Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 175 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 11:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 16:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 12:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 09:04 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:57 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-17 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-17 19:45 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 09:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-19 13:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 12:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 12:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 20:33 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 21:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 08:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 10:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 17:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 07:56 +0200
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 01:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-19 20:32 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-20 15:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-21 13:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:24 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 18:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 22:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 06:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 14:05 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 14:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 00:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 14:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 22:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 14:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 23:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 02:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( the Ediot forgets a link I gave him earlier ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 01:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c6utcc-2o8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521799 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The >>>>>>> Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, >>>>>>> Michael, Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E >>>>>>> Coyote or the Roadrunner because those two are the only two with >>>>>>> the credentials that they believe as proven by they still think >>>>>>> the CGIs were real. <G> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos >>>>>>> only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks question >>>>>> that you can't answer? >>>>>> >>>>>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the >>>>>> plane hitting the tower? >>>>>> >>>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were they >>>>>> all mistaken? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Absolutely not. >>>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their >>>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings >>>>> disolving into dust. >>>>> >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>> towers. >>>>> >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>>> it fell just the same. >>>> >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>> hitting WTC 7 >> >> You didn't hear about the collapse of the North Tower dropping heavy >> debris and starting fires, kook? >> >> That sort of figures as you are in your own little kook world. > > > > > > Nope, but not only did I not see it. > No one with a camera that day did either Why do you lie about this, kook? <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mti0nu$vua$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521819 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>>>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , >>>>>>>> The Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, >>>>>>>> Michael, Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E >>>>>>>> Coyote or the Roadrunner because those two are the only two with >>>>>>>> the credentials that they believe as proven by they still think >>>>>>>> the CGIs were real. <G> >>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of >>>>>>>> videos only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. >>>>>>>> See: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks >>>>>>> question that you can't answer? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the >>>>>>> plane hitting the tower? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were >>>>>>> they all mistaken? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Absolutely not. >>>>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their >>>>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings >>>>>> disolving into dust. >>>>>> >>>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>>> towers. >>>>>> >>>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, >>>>>> and it fell just the same. >>>>> >>>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>>> hitting WTC 7 >>> >>> You didn't hear about the collapse of the North Tower dropping heavy >>> debris and starting fires, kook? >>> >>> That sort of figures as you are in your own little kook world. >> >> >> >> >> >> Nope, but not only did I not see it. >> No one with a camera that day did either > > Why do you lie about this, kook? > > <snip remaining kook babble> I didn't lie. The 9/11 commission did, because they never dared to say or write that WTC 7 was brought down becuase it was hit by dust. You better write them a long letter and give them shit for not backing you up. And while your at it, write obama and tell him to make them fix it in the history books, or you will come down there personally and cal HIM a liar Now what else do you think THE 9/!! FAIRYTALE COMMISSION, LIED ABOUT ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oofucc-bja.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521883 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tony Dragon wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17/09/2015 16:03, Rocky wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , >>>>>>>>> The Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, >>>>>>>>> Michael, Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E >>>>>>>>> Coyote or the Roadrunner because those two are the only two with >>>>>>>>> the credentials that they believe as proven by they still think >>>>>>>>> the CGIs were real. <G> >>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of >>>>>>>>> videos only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. >>>>>>>>> See: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 >>>>>>>>> ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rocky >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wow, I'm a heckler, is that a new name for someone who asks >>>>>>>> question that you can't answer? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As to the video, do we know who filmed the first sequence of the >>>>>>>> plane hitting the tower? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now how about all the people who saw the event happening, were >>>>>>>> they all mistaken? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Absolutely not. >>>>>>> I'm sure they really saw something hit out of the corner of their >>>>>>> eye, and then an explosion and fireball, and later buildings >>>>>>> disolving into dust. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>>>> towers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, >>>>>>> and it fell just the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>>>> hitting WTC 7 >>>> >>>> You didn't hear about the collapse of the North Tower dropping heavy >>>> debris and starting fires, kook? >>>> >>>> That sort of figures as you are in your own little kook world. >>> >>> >>> Nope, but not only did I not see it. >>> No one with a camera that day did either >> >> Why do you lie about this, kook? >> >> <snip remaining kook babble> > > > I didn't lie. Yes, you quite obviously did, kook. > The 9/11 commission did, because they never dared to say or write that WTC > 7 was brought down becuase it was hit by dust. Why would the 9/11 Commission say such an insane, delusional thing, kook? Yes, in your delusional mind they lied so that is justification for your lie, is that it, kook? <snip remaining insane kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <q0amvat8ne26fgrf2b6lg4b4d2qe3nmcu4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521691 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the towers. >>> >>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>> it fell just the same. >> >> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? > >Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other hitting >WTC 7 >...But you can try Dragons or Goziila You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. You like video's. Here's one. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtfbg1$nhc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521706 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>> towers. >>>> >>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>> it fell just the same. >>> >>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >> >> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >> hitting WTC 7 >> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila > > You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. > > You like video's. Here's one. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it to fall ? Because that is all the video shows,....no damage beyond some smoke stains. Perhaps you can explain how throwing dust against the concrete wall of WTC 7 caused fires to start inside. Better yet, don't tell me because I won;t be here looking at any more of your posts. I have new threads to start.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <52prcc-ph1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521718 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>> towers. >>>>> >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>>> it fell just the same. >>>> >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>> >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>> hitting WTC 7 >>> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila >> >> You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. >> >> You like video's. Here's one. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo > > > > > > > > > Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it > to fall ? No, you are supposed to go get help for your mental problems, lunatic. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3065e23a73bb01f998c2b6@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521731 |
In article <52prcc-ph1.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, > >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the > >>>>> towers. > >>>>> > >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and > >>>>> it fell just the same. > >>>> > >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? > >>> > >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other > >>> hitting WTC 7 > >>> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila > >> > >> You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. > >> > >> You like video's. Here's one. > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it > > to fall ? > > No, you are supposed to go get help for your mental problems, lunatic. She knows/thinks she's "special", so she will do anything to keep the Troofer religion alive. Even though it's been a rotting corpse for over 14 years now. If/when Troofery dies out, she won't be special anymore. She'll just be another mental patient. Her anger amuses me no end. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <urlmvalgrfepr969fn0d7c8jagbqtpv9tt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521718 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:34:56 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>>>> And they may even have later claimed that they saw planes. dragons, >>>>> UFO's, zepplins, godziila, and hundreds of other things hit the >>>>> towers. >>>>> >>>>> BUT NOT ONE PERSON,....ever claimed they saw anything hit WTC 7, and >>>>> it fell just the same. >>>> >>>> You mean other than the big chunks of the other buildings, lunatic? >>> >>> Noooo, I don't recall any reports of a lunatic building or any other >>> hitting WTC 7 >>> ...But you can try Dragons or Goziila >> >> You must have passed out before you saw the live coverage. >> >> You like video's. Here's one. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqS1jaK2fvo > >Am I supposed to believe that smoke and dust drifting into WTC 7 caused it >to fall ? > >Because that is all the video shows,... The video clearly shows the damage to the building. And it shows the damage from different angles. .no damage beyond some smoke stains. >Perhaps you can explain how throwing dust against the concrete wall of WTC 7 >caused fires to start inside. When part of the structure comes down due to falling debris, the fires start. >Better yet, don't tell me because I won;t be here looking at any more of >your posts. >I have new threads to start. > Run away .....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3JydnXo2detggmHInZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521691 |
"Arc Michael" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4b19214a-b3a7-487b-8237-20dcc1cfa3e6@googlegroups.com... > On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 1:01:53 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > watch the videos faggot, building 7 is cut in half by the falling tower, > you freak of nature as all saw and reported, turdo. What matters is that when WTC7 fell it fell at free fall speed for over 2 seconds and that does not just happen unless if cartoon physics is applied. And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed they always have to show cartoons? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mthd76$24b$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #521811 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed >they always have to show cartoons? <G> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, they used it to model what happens in response to certain events. (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kmutcc-2o8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521815 |
In sci.physics Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed >>they always have to show cartoons? <G> > > Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used > nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, they > used it to model what happens in response to certain events. Delusional lunatics with marginal thinking ability like Rocky will never understand that. > (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a > plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) If you did and gathered the lunatics to watch first hand, they would just say it was rigged because it didn't match their delusions. Once a delusional nut case becomes convinced of something, no matter how bizarre, improbable, or even impossible, there is no changing their minds without intensive therapy and probably medication for their damaged brain chemistry. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 13:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PM00052019BFECFFC0@aca425d0.ipt.aol.com> |
| In reply to | #521820 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 collapsed >>>they always have to show cartoons? <G> >> >> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used >> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, they >> used it to model what happens in response to certain events. > > Delusional lunatics with marginal thinking ability like Rocky will > never understand that. > >> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a >> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) > > If you did and gathered the lunatics to watch first hand, they would > just say it was rigged because it didn't match their delusions. > > Once a delusional nut case becomes convinced of something, no matter > how bizarre, improbable, or even impossible, there is no changing > their minds without intensive therapy and probably medication for > their damaged brain chemistry. Also note that Coast-to-Coast has been replaying the old Art Bell radio shows which were promoting this conspiracy hypothesis. /BAH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 10:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pfWdnWT9MsDgGWDInZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521993 |
"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message news:PM00052019BFECFFC0@aca425d0.ipt.aol.com... > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>collapsed >>>>they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>> >>> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used >>> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case, >>> they >>> used it to model what happens in response to certain events. >> >> Delusional lunatics with marginal thinking ability like Rocky will >> never understand that. >> >>> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a >>> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?) >> >> If you did and gathered the lunatics to watch first hand, they would >> just say it was rigged because it didn't match their delusions. >> >> Once a delusional nut case becomes convinced of something, no matter >> how bizarre, improbable, or even impossible, there is no changing >> their minds without intensive therapy and probably medication for >> their damaged brain chemistry. > > Also note that Coast-to-Coast has been replaying the old Art Bell > radio shows which were promoting this conspiracy hypothesis. Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. DUH Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 12:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sm2rva5ef08rhv489sis15pq89hvl0jctc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522015 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:54:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more >than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. DUH > >Rocky Roger the conspiracy Troofer expects people to believe that 9/11 was "pulled off " by one person.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 11:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4r3rvalnkmcgsp4fb9qjbimkm42jhvmnla@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522015 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 10:54:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:PM00052019BFECFFC0@aca425d0.ipt.aol.com...
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7
>>>>>collapsed
>>>>>they always have to show cartoons? <G>
>>>>
>>>> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is used
>>>> nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this case,
>>>> they
>>>> used it to model what happens in response to certain events.
>>>
>>> Delusional lunatics with marginal thinking ability like Rocky will
>>> never understand that.
>>>
>>>> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly a
>>>> plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt WTC7?)
>>>
>>> If you did and gathered the lunatics to watch first hand, they would
>>> just say it was rigged because it didn't match their delusions.
>>>
>>> Once a delusional nut case becomes convinced of something, no matter
>>> how bizarre, improbable, or even impossible, there is no changing
>>> their minds without intensive therapy and probably medication for
>>> their damaged brain chemistry.
>>
>> Also note that Coast-to-Coast has been replaying the old Art Bell
>> radio shows which were promoting this conspiracy hypothesis.
>
>Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more
>than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. DUH
Um, he's not claiming Art was behind it, stupid. DUH.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 12:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtk3po$qqq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #522015 |
Rocky wrote: > "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message > news:PM00052019BFECFFC0@aca425d0.ipt.aol.com... >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> >>> wrote: >>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>> collapsed >>>>> they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>>> >>>> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is >>>> used nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this >>>> case, they >>>> used it to model what happens in response to certain events. >>> >>> Delusional lunatics with marginal thinking ability like Rocky will >>> never understand that. >>> >>>> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly >>>> a plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt >>>> WTC7?) >>> >>> If you did and gathered the lunatics to watch first hand, they would >>> just say it was rigged because it didn't match their delusions. >>> >>> Once a delusional nut case becomes convinced of something, no matter >>> how bizarre, improbable, or even impossible, there is no changing >>> their minds without intensive therapy and probably medication for >>> their damaged brain chemistry. >> >> Also note that Coast-to-Coast has been replaying the old Art Bell >> radio shows which were promoting this conspiracy hypothesis. > > Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more > than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. DUH > Rocky The 9/11 official fairytalers aren't stupid. They are simply going with the flow,....as lemmings. No different from the bible thumpers who rally against gay marriage, even though their bible has no mention of gay marriage being forbidden. ....but they FEEL it does, they are TOLD it does, so they never check for themselves, but comfortably accept it with blind faith. And of course pointing out to them that the guy they worship,...never married a woman, and hung around with 12 other guys all the time. <raises eyebrow> Hmmmmmmm. ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 12:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <-OednUBHO5R-C2DInZ2dnUU7-YvOydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522036 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mtk3po$qqq$1@dont-email.me... > > > Rocky wrote: >> "jmfbahciv" <See.above@aol.com> wrote in message >> news:PM00052019BFECFFC0@aca425d0.ipt.aol.com... >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> And talking about cartoons why is it when NIST explains why WTC7 >>>>>> collapsed >>>>>> they always have to show cartoons? <G> >>>>> >>>>> Those "cartoons" are the product of CAD software. CAD software is >>>>> used nowadays all the time in the design of new buildings. In this >>>>> case, they >>>>> used it to model what happens in response to certain events. >>>> >>>> Delusional lunatics with marginal thinking ability like Rocky will >>>> never understand that. >>>> >>>>> (Do you really expect them to build copies of WTC7 and WTC1, and fly >>>>> a plane into the rebuilt WTC1 to see what happens to the rebuilt >>>>> WTC7?) >>>> >>>> If you did and gathered the lunatics to watch first hand, they would >>>> just say it was rigged because it didn't match their delusions. >>>> >>>> Once a delusional nut case becomes convinced of something, no matter >>>> how bizarre, improbable, or even impossible, there is no changing >>>> their minds without intensive therapy and probably medication for >>>> their damaged brain chemistry. >>> >>> Also note that Coast-to-Coast has been replaying the old Art Bell >>> radio shows which were promoting this conspiracy hypothesis. >> >> Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more >> than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. >> DUH >> Rocky > > > > > > The 9/11 official fairytalers aren't stupid. > They are simply going with the flow,....as lemmings. > > No different from the bible thumpers who rally against gay marriage, even > though their bible has no mention of gay marriage being forbidden. > ....but they FEEL it does, they are TOLD it does, so they never check for > themselves, but comfortably accept it with blind faith. > > And of course pointing out to them that the guy they worship,...never > married a woman, and hung around with 12 other guys all the time. <raises > eyebrow> Hmmmmmmm. ??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=en9NMvwR2gU Oh boy. I try to stay away from religion but what of Jesus never died on the cross? Then he never came back from the dead either right? And the old test of checking to see how thick someone's blood was to see if they were dead or not didn't work very well in the rain. <G> And who says there are never back doors in tombs? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 18:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mtkav5$hr$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #522036 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: >Rocky wrote: >> Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more >> than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. DUH >> Rocky It was a conspiracy, k00k. Osama bin Laden, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, 19 hijackers and who knows how many others conspired to fly 4 hijacked planes into 4 targets. >The 9/11 official fairytalers aren't stupid. >They are simply going with the flow,....as lemmings. The 9/11 kooktard fairytalers are stupid. They are simply going with the flow,....as sheeple. >No different from the bible thumpers who rally against gay marriage, even >though their bible has no mention of gay marriage being forbidden. >....but they FEEL it does, they are TOLD it does, so they never check for >themselves, but comfortably accept it with blind faith. No different from the other kooktards who rally against hijackers, even though their alternative conspiracies have no possibility of working. ....but they FEEL it does, they are TOLD it does, so they never check for themselves, but comfortably accept it with blind faith.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 20:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <AJSdnf1HM8vwlGPInZ2dnUU7-S2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522066 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:mtkav5$hr$2@pcls7.std.com... > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> writes: > >>Rocky wrote: > >>> Boy are you stupid because if you think that 9/11 was pulled off by more >>> than one person than your version of 9/11 has to be a conspiracy also. >>> DUH >>> Rocky > > It was a conspiracy, k00k. Osama bin Laden, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, 19 > hijackers and who knows how many others conspired to fly 4 hijacked planes > into 4 targets. > >>The 9/11 official fairytalers aren't stupid. >>They are simply going with the flow,....as lemmings. > > The 9/11 kooktard fairytalers are stupid. > They are simply going with the flow,....as sheeple. > >>No different from the bible thumpers who rally against gay marriage, even >>though their bible has no mention of gay marriage being forbidden. >>....but they FEEL it does, they are TOLD it does, so they never check for >>themselves, but comfortably accept it with blind faith. > > No different from the other kooktards who rally against hijackers, even > though their alternative conspiracies have no possibility of working. > ....but they FEEL it does, they are TOLD it does, so they never check for > themselves, but comfortably accept it with blind faith. Too bad you have yet to explain why the remains of the Twin Towers look like the remains of a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg With walls still standing strong and people living below the vaporization range of a nuke. <G> And do not forget, NIST lied about the test results at Underwriters Laboratory so why not have others falsify other data too? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 01:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p5g1dc-bck.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #522134 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Too bad you have yet to explain why the remains of the Twin Towers look like > the remains of a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. No they don't, raving kook. > With walls still standing strong and people living below the vaporization > range of a nuke. A nuclear device explodes from where the device is outward, therefor it is impossible for a nuclear device under a building to vaporize the top part but not the bottom part, raving kook. > And do not forget, NIST lied about the test results at Underwriters > Laboratory so why not have others falsify other data too? What test results would those be, raving kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web