Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #520749 > unrolled thread

Ping KID: WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding this question too.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Ping KID:  WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding this question too. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:20 -0500
    Re: Rocky raves yet again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:34 +0000
    Re: Ping KID:  WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding this question too. burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-13 16:02 -0400
      Re: Ping KID:  WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding this question too. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:08 -0700

#520749 — Ping KID: WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding this question too.

You keep trying to say that nukes didn't leave the following but you can't 
say what did leave the following so maybe you are lying about the radiation 
they found at GZ instead.  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


That would be par for your course because I've caught you lying about the 
missing jet in the wide shot by Chopper 5 too.  <G>

A while back we were talking about a jet missing in the wide shot from
Chopper 5.  See:

>07 - The Key
>( indexed to start at 4:04 )
> https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=4m4s

and you replied with a complete evasion of:

"Do you have any idea how much area a plane traveling between 300 and 500
MPH covers?"

Also see:

9/11 and Media Fakery
 http://fakemedia911.blogspot.com/2013/04/911-plane-speed.html

Why don't we just do the math and I'll even go on the worst case scenario.

Let us say that the jet was only 15 pixels wide in the narrow shot but it
was clearly much bigger than that.

Now lets say that they used a 30x zoom but they clearly didn't zoom in that
far.

That doesn't make the jet disappear it would mean the jet would only show up
in every other frame and again that is using the worse case scenario and not
real life.  <G>

To me the fact there were so many videos of a disappearing wing is evidence
of a CGI and the fact you have to lie about the missing jet in the wide shot
is also evidence that the media used CGIs in their 9/11 bullshit.

BTW it does not matter who started the initial lies only that lies are
needed to keep the lies going and going and going.  <G>

Same with the crime scene photos of Ground Zero.  Until someone can come up
with a valid reason that the alleged falling debris from the North Tower did
not crush the Survivors or end up in the basement then Dimitri Khalezov
still has the best explanation for what happened to the Twin Towers.  See:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#520766 — Re: Rocky raves yet again

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> You keep trying to say that nukes didn't leave the following but you can't 
> say what did leave the following so maybe you are lying about the radiation 
> they found at GZ instead.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Everything else is kook babble.

<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520776

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:20:55 -0500
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
> Subject: Ping KID:  WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding
> this question too. Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:20:55 -0500
> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931

Hey Ichabod Why do you not have a job?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520779

On Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 4:02:44 PM UTC-4, burfordtjustice wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:20:55 -0500
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> > From: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
> > Subject: Ping KID:  WHAT LEFT THE FOLLOWING and you keep avoiding
> > this question too. Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:20:55 -0500
> > Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.physics
> > X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> 
> Hey Ichabod Why do you not have a job?

It's 2015. Obombma's USofAmerica. 50+. Next question.

-- Mahipal "Even President Obama is getting unemployed soon!"

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web