Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #644498 > unrolled thread

12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 02:39 -0700
    Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 04:08 -0700
      Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 06:12 -0700
        Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 21:59 -0700
          Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 17:13 -0700
            Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 22:41 -0700
              Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 23:45 -0700
              Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 10:37 -0700
                Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-07 23:06 -0700
            Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-07 00:36 -0700
          Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-07 00:40 +0000
        Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 00:01 -0700
    Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-06 00:00 +0000
    Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 11:43 -0700
      Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 12:39 -0700
        Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 15:07 -0700
          Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 16:46 -0700
            Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 17:11 -0700
              Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 01:29 -0700
                Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-08 02:53 -0700
                  Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-08 09:51 -0700
                Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 04:52 -0700
                  Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-08 09:57 -0700
                    Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 23:02 -0700
                      Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-08 23:19 -0700
                        Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 22:23 -0700
                          Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 21:21 -0700
                          Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-11 03:18 -0700
                Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-08 13:18 +0000
          Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-07 18:40 -0700
        Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-08 04:13 +0000
      Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- McGinn, Arindam, Moroney, Benj, Relf/Carroll, robots Porat, Reber/Hanson, Starmaker "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-07 18:48 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#645148

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 12:53:22 PM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 11:29:17 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > So, when is Reber going to explain his G= emc^2
> > 
> > When Moroney begins to understand what geothermal is, not his backsides
> =================================================================
> ======================
> AND WHEN PORT IS GOING TO PROVE  HIS
> HISTORIC  ASSERTION :
> 
> =======================================================
> MASS -  THE  ONLY MASS - IS THE ''MOTHER '' OF ALL FORCES
> -INCLUDING GRAVITY !!
> ======================================================= 
> ATB
> Y porat
> ======================
> ==================================
 I am explaining it here 
a few decades 
and you idiot psycho 
just  follow it is recorded along decades 
2
I dont give a damn if a psycho like you 
don't understand it 
Y.P
=============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645126

So Porat, let me help you out here, buddy, for you are lagging far behind the advanced physics con artists of Reber with his fake formula of G = emc^2 and Arindam fakery of e = .5mVVN(N-k)

Porat, you need your own fake formula to fuel you through the winter months in sci.physics and fly high as a kite kook like Arindam.

Maybe if I get time, Porat, I should write the Definitive History of Phyaics crank formulas, and you would be absent unless you straighten up and get your own fake formula.

Whether it is your lousy education, thwarting and stunting your fake formula growth, or, whether your poor intuition and feel for physics has blinded you to never dream up a fake con artist formula.

So let me help you here, so next Sunday and around the water tank, you can brag that you one upmanshiped Arindam and Reber.

The ideal gas law of PV = nRT is a great start for your con artist fake physics formula, even Technion University will invite you to speak to undergraduates on this.

So now you need to doctor it up so you can claim "newness"

What say you Porat, that we add a constant to it like PV = nRT +C, where C can be your chosing, say Smcherzspace.

Or, better yet, throw a Logarithm in the C, like this PV = nRT + Ln(C), for that really outbests Arindam's juvenile N(N-k), and also you can say your the greatest chemist of all time, whereas Arindam is trying to  become a second Newton.

Don't take too long to think about this, for some other lurking kooks in sci.physics will snatch up this lucrative fake formula.

So, get with the con artistry of others, here, Porat, or you will be left out

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645149

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 2:53:05 PM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> So Porat, let me help you out here, buddy, for you are lagging far behind the advanced physics con artists of Reber with his fake formula of G = emc^2 and Arindam fakery of e = .5mVVN(N-k)
> 
> Porat, you need your own fake formula to fuel you through the winter months in sci.physics and fly high as a kite kook like Arindam.
> 
> Maybe if I get time, Porat, I should write the Definitive History of Phyaics crank formulas, and you would be absent unless you straighten up and get your own fake formula.
> 
> Whether it is your lousy education, thwarting and stunting your fake formula growth, or, whether your poor intuition and feel for physics has blinded you to never dream up a fake con artist formula.
> 
> So let me help you here, so next Sunday and around the water tank, you can brag that you one upmanshiped Arindam and Reber.
> 
> The ideal gas law of PV = nRT is a great start for your con artist fake physics formula, even Technion University will invite you to speak to undergraduates on this.
> 
> So now you need to doctor it up so you can claim "newness"
> 
> What say you Porat, that we add a constant to it like PV = nRT +C, where C can be your chosing, say Smcherzspace.
> 
> Or, better yet, throw a Logarithm in the C, like this PV = nRT + Ln(C), for that really outbests Arindam's juvenile N(N-k), and also you can say your the greatest chemist of all time, whereas Arindam is trying to  become a second Newton.
> 
> Don't take too long to think about this, for some other lurking kooks in sci.physics will snatch up this lucrative fake formula.
> 
> So, get with the con artistry of others, here, Porat, or you 

will be left out
===========================
imbecile psycho 

you say 
p v ??
do you psycho know the dimensions  of P ??
=======================
no more questions 
===============
Y.Porat
==================================

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645256 — Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ?

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 11:57:09 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:

> ===========================
> imbecile psycho 
> 
> you say 
> p v ??
> do you psycho know the dimensions  of P ??
> =======================
> no more questions 
> ===============
> Y.Porat
> ==================================

Thank you Porat, for giving the world the Porat crackpot formula of just plain P.

I suggested some tinkering with PV = nRT.

For the crackpot Reber just included G in G = emc^2

Then the crackpot Arindam tacked on N(N-k) in kinetic energy e=.5mVVN(N-k)

Finally, Porat shows what genius he is in crackpot physics by just P.

Porat, no equal sign? No equal sign in your famous formula, just P?

Does P stand for Mass, your Mother Mass?

Or does P stand for Universe, so that you can write it P = U where U is universe.

Porat, can we add something to your groundbreaking math physics formula, like a addition sign, or is that covered in advanced classes, where the Technion Univ has a entrance screening of 97% denied and only 3% accepted. Where they learn the famous Porat physics formula P.

Porat, can I take the derivative of P, or do I need permission?

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645258 — Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ?

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:02:20 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 11:57:09 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > ===========================
> > imbecile psycho 
> > 
> > you say 
> > p v ??
> > do you psycho know the dimensions  of P ??
> > =======================
> > no more questions 
> > ===============
> > Y.Porat
> > ==================================
> 
> Thank you Porat, for giving the world the Porat crackpot formula of just plain P.
> 
> I suggested some tinkering with PV = nRT.
> 
> For the crackpot Reber just included G in G = emc^2
> 
> Then the crackpot Arindam tacked on N(N-k) in kinetic energy e=.5mVVN(N-k)
> 
> Finally, Porat shows what genius he is in crackpot physics by just P.
> 
> Porat, no equal sign? No equal sign in your famous formula, just P?
> 
> Does P stand for Mass, your Mother Mass?
> 
> Or does P stand for Universe, so that you can write it P = U where U is universe.
> 
> Porat, can we add something to your groundbreaking math physics formula, like a addition sign, or is that covered in advanced classes, where the Technion Univ has a entrance screening of 97% denied and only 3% accepted. Where they learn the famous Porat physics formula P.
> 
> Porat, can I take the derivative of P, or do  ARCHI PLUTONIUM P
=====================
DEAR ARCHI PLUTONIUM URANIUM  **RECTOM* PSYCHOPATH PARRPT 
================
IT WHANT HELP YOU 
====================================================
MASS  the only mass !! -IS THE MOTHER OF ALL FORCES - INCLUDING GRAVITY !!
==========================================================
IF IT IS Bigger THAN YOU 
take it or leave it 
========
Y.Porat
==============================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645389 — Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ?

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 1:19:18 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:02:20 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 11:57:09 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > > ===========================
> > > imbecile psycho 
> > > 
> > > you say 
> > > p v ??
> > > do you psycho know the dimensions  of P ??
> > > =======================
> > > no more questions 
> > > ===============
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ==================================
> > 

Porat, meet Pentcho, Pentcho meet Porat.


Pentcho Valev	
5:24 PM (6 hours ago)

Then the reasonable question will be raised: 

If time speeds up for the traveler, how can he remain younger? 

Pentcho Valev 

--

Hey Porat, Pentcho,

Porat's famous formula of Physics is P

Arindam's is e=.5mVVN(N-k)

Reber's is G=emc^2

Pentcho's is PV

Benj's is I'm = du/mb

Moroney's is  fossil solar energy=  51 degrees

Hey, Moroney, you failure of physics, talk to Arindam for that nice toasty heat of N(N-k) for your dank Boston dump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645490 — Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ?

Hey Benj, yes you Benj, get your latest book published yet?

"Fairy fly through on,,,, Physics"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645497 — Re: Should AP write the Definitive History of Crackpot Physics Formulas ?

On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 8:23:55 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 1:19:18 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:02:20 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 11:57:09 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > > ===========================
> > > > imbecile psycho 
> > > > 
> > > > you say 
> > > > p v ??
> > > > do you psycho know the dimensions  of P ??
> > > > =======================
> > > > no more questions 
> > > > ===============
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > ==================================
> > > 
> 
> Porat, meet Pentcho, Pentcho meet Porat.
> 
> 
> Pentcho Valev	
> 5:24 PM (6 hours ago)
> 
> Then the reasonable question will be raised: 
> 
> If time speeds up for the traveler, how can he remain younger? 
> 
> Pentcho Valev 
> 
> --
> 
> Hey Porat, Pentcho,
> 
> Porat's famous formula of Physics is P
> 
> Arindam's is e=.5mVVN(N-k)
> 
> Reber's is G=emc^2
> 
> Pentcho's is PV
> 
> Benj's is I'm = du/mb
> 
> Moroney's is  fossil solar energy=  51 degrees
> 
> Hey, Moroney, you failure of physics, talk to Arindam for that nice toasty heat of N(N-k) for your dank Boston dump
=====================
psychopath   !!
=====================
Y.P
===========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645133 — Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- Archimedes Plutonium

Physics failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>So, when is Reber going to explain his G= emc^2

>When Moroney begins to understand what geothermal is, not his backsides

So Archie, you physics failure, when are you going to explain permafrost
to us?

FLUNK!

P.S. You still haven't told me what size wrench you need!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645068

Bert, <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
is <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017> who
waits for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>
who has a gruesome end in store for Glazier, who is 
>
____ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim_____, aka
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> who wrote:
"My email is kind" ... like when SwineBert, Face-Shitter
and Hatemonger Glazier said on 03Aug2017 to 
"benj" <nobody@gmail.com>:
"benj, you eat shit and your shitty brain is coming out your ears"
.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645095 — Re: 12Please do not talk to the sci.physics failures/spammers-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 1:43:25 PM UTC-5, reber G=3Demc^2 wrote:
>> Never be so low witted that you can tell people who to talk with.
>> Hitler did that.Its not the American way.Think free thinking and free 
>> speech.Most of all think>   TreBert

>You mistake free speech with free abuse.

>This is sci.physics, and if you don't want to do physics you need reminding
> of spam

OK, Archie, here is your reminder.  You are just spamming here. Especially
with attack posts like this one.  You are even counting how many times
you have spammed this particular attack post in the title, you've spammed
it 12 times so far.  No physics, just attack spam. So if all you want to
do is spam and attack, and not do physics, why are you even here?

In about 24 years of posting here, you never do any physics. You pretend
to do physics, but you fail completely, since all you seem to do is babble
about a topic you know little about, and then you come along and Proclaim
a New Law of Physics that is true because You Said So!  Examples are too
numerous to mention, but Google has kept track of them. Do you really 
think saying "Here's a New Law of Physics (which I named after myself!)
which is True because I Said So!" is physics?  Do you even understand
the scientific method and how it works?  And you accuse others of not 
doing science?  FAIL.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645074

<http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>,
said that he left his hi-value collection of vintage cars,
AND his fully paid for & owned lot of homers on the
 East Coast. Glazier hi-tailed in such a hurry that
he even forgot and left his dentures there... only to
become __ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim___, &
>
<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal>
and a Face-shitter & a homeless Vagrant who lives
in a old Van, with a bucket that he shits into... when
Bert could have been the big shot in a plush Jewish
Retirement Resort on the East Coast... BUT now waits
for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>
who has a gruesome end in store for Glazier. "It's a pity"

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web