Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #641507 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-20 00:23 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-07-25 12:57 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 269 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 00:23 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 01:29 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 01:33 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 05:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 05:46 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 06:07 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:02 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:53 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:37 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 05:52 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 07:07 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:23 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 08:27 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-21 12:36 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 09:40 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 16:38 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-20 21:01 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 23:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-21 00:32 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 01:34 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-21 07:02 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 18:06 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 22:03 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 00:04 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 01:11 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 03:45 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 06:14 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 09:36 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 06:36 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 10:20 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 17:31 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 09:33 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 15:09 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 16:13 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 16:33 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 09:57 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 16:38 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 18:02 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 20:50 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-26 05:16 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-26 01:14 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 17:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-26 21:19 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 19:34 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-26 17:35 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 14:17 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 04:40 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 00:25 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:13 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 09:03 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 11:53 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:04 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:17 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:21 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:54 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 11:05 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 16:17 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 09:50 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:04 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:05 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:48 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 07:08 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 20:17 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 20:07 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:05 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:22 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:00 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 08:40 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 02:47 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:09 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:42 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 17:11 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 18:55 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 04:32 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 03:25 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-26 18:46 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 10:04 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 18:34 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-29 21:08 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 19:04 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 04:38 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 05:10 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:27 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:38 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:22 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:58 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 02:27 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:43 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 01:21 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 08:04 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 08:14 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 08:24 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 08:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-01 17:18 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 16:33 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 17:36 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 14:23 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:10 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:08 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 10:02 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 17:43 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 01:55 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 19:45 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 09:57 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:56 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 03:57 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:00 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 22:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:37 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 02:12 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 12:30 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 12:42 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 07:23 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 16:42 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 17:40 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 17:50 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 18:04 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 18:08 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 18:16 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 18:59 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:07 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:00 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:13 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 19:08 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 22:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 08:03 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 17:04 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:28 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:29 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:37 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 17:07 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:17 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 15:54 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 02:34 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 22:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 03:44 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:44 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 10:53 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 23:41 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 13:04 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-06 17:15 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-06 21:22 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 00:08 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-07 08:52 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 07:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 16:18 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 15:28 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 16:29 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 08:43 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 15:39 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 17:02 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-10 20:18 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 17:41 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 20:43 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 19:34 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-11 06:58 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-11 22:14 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-12 16:14 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 00:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 12:37 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 15:26 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:10 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 21:30 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 22:37 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-14 07:05 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 07:29 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-15 03:18 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 11:03 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-15 11:25 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 13:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-07 08:23 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 03:53 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:09 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:10 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:50 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:54 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 11:13 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:43 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 11:59 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:18 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:35 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:25 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:21 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 14:28 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:33 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:20 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 11:37 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-27 17:54 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:10 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-27 18:38 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 17:36 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 07:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 08:17 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-27 17:37 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 16:05 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 09:16 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 11:49 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-28 11:56 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:13 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:51 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:05 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-28 12:29 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:40 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-26 21:54 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 02:41 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 16:30 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 16:50 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:23 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:35 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:43 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:48 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:48 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 20:29 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 14:17 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:30 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 14:34 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:55 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:09 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 03:52 +0000
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:09 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:09 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 05:47 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 06:42 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 09:08 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-23 01:32 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 03:25 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 06:41 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 15:45 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 17:12 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 17:25 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 03:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 09:41 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 15:19 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 17:30 -0500
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-23 22:27 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 00:16 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-24 02:13 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 02:23 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-24 05:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 05:17 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-24 07:09 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 08:08 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-24 22:00 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-25 17:49 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 16:29 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-25 18:20 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 20:59 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. "Dave Osborne" <SupDavOs@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-23 07:24 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 08:01 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 03:36 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 17:29 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 17:49 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 21:18 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 18:37 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 06:52 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-25 17:25 -0400
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 03:34 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-07-23 12:09 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 17:02 -0700
Re: The attractive force that binds multi-molecules - how it has to relate to the atomic structure of positive charge concentration at the nucleus. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-07-25 12:57 -0700
Page 8 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 14 Next page →
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 22:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e90fcf2c-f99b-48db-ac76-a64f86f2e444@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644309 |
Still alive and well. What more do i want apart from the good of all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 03:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a7675f9-737b-40da-accb-95d17998f9d5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644322 |
See, Odd? Not everyone requires fame. Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. You can help by not promoting bullshit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 11:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <om4sfj$1tsg$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644345 |
On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > See, Odd? > Not everyone requires fame. I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. > You can help by not promoting bullshit > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <348f6a3f-2d9b-4fa0-9a9a-181e0d86b2a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644566 |
Odd " given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. " Yes, I noticed the 'racist' thing. I encountered the same thing in the hospital. Clearly incompetent non-Canadian norms could not be criticized. I raised a stink about med cups rolling on corridor floors and being put back on the stack (give her a break- she's from a different country- what? The country of stupid?) And I was immediately a racist. Highest infection rates ever in hospitals- I wonder why?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <668e144b-0379-4156-95f8-4871df6fae86@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644588 |
Should be 'nurses', not norms. Some of them did their whole thing on the patients, also.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 23:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1c241acc-617c-498c-bd8d-6432d4306648@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644566 |
On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > > See, Odd? > > Not everyone requires fame. > > I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. Or a reverse-racist. You are twisting my words. How dishonest. You were the one talking about Nobels. I don't want to build rockets. I want to build Internal Force Engines that will replace rockets and jet engines. I can only do so much, the rest is up to others. If those who notice ignore me or twist my words out of context and meaning, then what can be done! Who knows! Good people have always been persecuted by bad people. On the other hand, the good people have benefited from the works of good people in the past. Carrying on this trend, is the way to go for me. If going alone is the only way then that is the way to go. Giving in to the cunning liars and frauds is not on. Simple as that. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > > Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. > > You can help by not promoting bullshit > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-06 13:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <om7440$1q9j$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644753 |
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: >>> See, Odd? >>> Not everyone requires fame. >> >> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be >> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based >> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he >> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE >> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > > Or a reverse-racist. > > You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > You were the one talking about Nobels. Do you want your own words quoted back to you? It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your personality rejects that you could have said such things. > I don't want to build rockets. > I want to build Internal Force Engines that will replace rockets and jet > engines. > > I can only do so much, the rest is up to others. If those who notice ignore me > or twist my words out of context and meaning, then what can be done! > > Who knows! > > Good people have always been persecuted by bad people. On the other hand, the > good people have benefited from the works of good people in the past. > > Carrying on this trend, is the way to go for me. If going alone is the only way > then that is the way to go. > > Giving in to the cunning liars and frauds is not on. > > Simple as that. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee >> >>> Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. >>> You can help by not promoting bullshit >>> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-06 17:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <63f8255e-6082-4d99-b5ef-7577c0eaf9d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644789 |
On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > >>> See, Odd? > >>> Not everyone requires fame. > >> > >> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > >> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > >> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > >> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > >> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > > > > Or a reverse-racist. > > > > You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > > You were the one talking about Nobels. I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your > personality rejects that you could have said such things. You mad bad lot project your madness upon me, what a surprise! Apart from Mahipal, I am the only sane person here. > > I don't want to build rockets. > > I want to build Internal Force Engines that will replace rockets and jet > > engines. > > > > I can only do so much, the rest is up to others. If those who notice ignore me > > or twist my words out of context and meaning, then what can be done! > > > > Who knows! > > > > Good people have always been persecuted by bad people. On the other hand, the > > good people have benefited from the works of good people in the past. > > > > Carrying on this trend, is the way to go for me. If going alone is the only way > > then that is the way to go. > > > > Giving in to the cunning liars and frauds is not on. > > > > Simple as that. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > >> > >>> Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. > >>> You can help by not promoting bullshit > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-06 21:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <om8it0$2je$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644867 |
On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote:
>>>>> See, Odd?
>>>>> Not everyone requires fame.
>>>>
>>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be
>>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based
>>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he
>>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE
>>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist.
>>>
>>> Or a reverse-racist.
>>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest.
>>> You were the one talking about Nobels.
>
> I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread.
>
> I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by
> twisting my words. Go quote them by all means.
>
> I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is
> horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled.
>
>
>> It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your
>> personality rejects that you could have said such things.
>
> You mad bad lot project your madness upon me, what a surprise!
>
> Apart from Mahipal, I am the only sane person here.
SERGIO IS SANEST DUDE HERE, NSS!
Maypo is sane too.
there is one dude that is double crazy, which makes him a real hoot
and their are pairs of guys that stalk each other and their crazyness
cancles out (different polarities)
McFly lives in a Cracker Jack's Box.
most of the women here are sane posters.
[how can you tell if shes hot in txt only mode ?]
>
>>> I don't want to build rockets.
>>> I want to build Internal Force Engines that will replace rockets and jet
>>> engines.
>>>
>>> I can only do so much, the rest is up to others. If those who notice ignore me
>>> or twist my words out of context and meaning, then what can be done!
>>>
>>> Who knows!
>>>
>>> Good people have always been persecuted by bad people. On the other hand, the
>>> good people have benefited from the works of good people in the past.
>>>
>>> Carrying on this trend, is the way to go for me. If going alone is the only way
>>> then that is the way to go.
>>>
>>> Giving in to the cunning liars and frauds is not on.
>>>
>>> Simple as that.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>>
>>>>> Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known.
>>>>> You can help by not promoting bullshit
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 00:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e9aa4fa5-d841-4db9-bd5b-e0d68f33657e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644885 |
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > >>>>> See, Odd? > >>>>> Not everyone requires fame. > >>>> > >>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > >>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > >>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > >>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > >>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > >>> > >>> Or a reverse-racist. > > >>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > >>> You were the one talking about Nobels. > > > > I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. > > > > I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > > twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > > > > I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > > horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > > > > > >> It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your > >> personality rejects that you could have said such things. > > > > You mad bad lot project your madness upon me, what a surprise! > > > > Apart from Mahipal, I am the only sane person here. > > SERGIO IS SANEST DUDE HERE, NSS! I do not confuse sanity with your pigheaded unscientific attitude. The scientific mind is not closed as yours is. To a scientist all knowledge is provisional. Only Mahipal and I are on the same wavelength, this way. > Maypo is sane too. > there is one dude that is double crazy, which makes him a real hoot > and their are pairs of guys that stalk each other and their crazyness > cancles out (different polarities) > McFly lives in a Cracker Jack's Box. > most of the women here are sane posters. They are about as sane as you, that is to say, dogmatic and dull. > > [how can you tell if shes hot in txt only mode ?] > > > > > > >>> I don't want to build rockets. > >>> I want to build Internal Force Engines that will replace rockets and jet > >>> engines. > >>> > >>> I can only do so much, the rest is up to others. If those who notice ignore me > >>> or twist my words out of context and meaning, then what can be done! > >>> > >>> Who knows! > >>> > >>> Good people have always been persecuted by bad people. On the other hand, the > >>> good people have benefited from the works of good people in the past. > >>> > >>> Carrying on this trend, is the way to go for me. If going alone is the only way > >>> then that is the way to go. > >>> > >>> Giving in to the cunning liars and frauds is not on. > >>> > >>> Simple as that. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Arindam Banerjee > >>>> > >>>>> Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. > >>>>> You can help by not promoting bullshit > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 08:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <om9raq$5dl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644915 |
On 8/7/2017 2:08 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: >> On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: >>>>>>> See, Odd? >>>>>>> Not everyone requires fame. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be >>>>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based >>>>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he >>>>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE >>>>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. >>>>> >>>>> Or a reverse-racist. >> >>>>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. >>>>> You were the one talking about Nobels. >>> >>> I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. >>> >>> I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by >>> twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. >>> >>> I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is >>> horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. >>> >>> >>>> It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your >>>> personality rejects that you could have said such things. >>> >>> You mad bad lot project your madness upon me, what a surprise! >>> >>> Apart from Mahipal, I am the only sane person here. >> >> SERGIO IS SANEST DUDE HERE, NSS! > > I do not confuse sanity with your pigheaded unscientific attitude. you are the one that is 'pigheaded unscientific attitude', because you have NO MATH. > The scientific mind is not closed as yours is. now you are projecting again, put down that blunt! > To a scientist all knowledge is provisional. wrong. once disproven by a repeatable experiment, always disproven, like aether. > Only Mahipal and I are on the same wavelength, this way. ....but with different slopes, as your aether is infesting you, itchy stuff isnt it ? > >> Maypo is sane too. >> there is one dude that is double crazy, which makes him a real hoot >> and their are pairs of guys that stalk each other and their crazyness >> cancles out (different polarities) >> McFly lives in a Cracker Jack's Box. >> most of the women here are sane posters. > > They are about as sane as you, that is to say, dogmatic and dull. what is it with this doggie thing of yours ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 07:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <68169e56-34fe-44c9-b615-1ad6d27a3a08@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644943 |
Sergio "> They are about as sane as you, that is to say, dogmatic and dull. what is it with this doggie thing of yours ? " Haha. Typical. Hasn't read more than two actual books in his life, but instantly interested in anything remotely 'rainbow' sexual.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 16:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <36f5f3e7-0cf9-42b4-ae81-414a61d1a1be@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644943 |
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 11:52:32 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > On 8/7/2017 2:08 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > >> On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > >>>>>>> See, Odd? > >>>>>>> Not everyone requires fame. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > >>>>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > >>>>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > >>>>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > >>>>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > >>>>> > >>>>> Or a reverse-racist. > >> > >>>>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > >>>>> You were the one talking about Nobels. > >>> > >>> I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. > >>> > >>> I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > >>> twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > >>> > >>> I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > >>> horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > >>> > >>> > >>>> It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your > >>>> personality rejects that you could have said such things. > >>> > >>> You mad bad lot project your madness upon me, what a surprise! > >>> > >>> Apart from Mahipal, I am the only sane person here. > >> > >> SERGIO IS SANEST DUDE HERE, NSS! > > > > I do not confuse sanity with your pigheaded unscientific attitude. > > you are the one that is 'pigheaded unscientific attitude', because you > have NO MATH. What a lie! My whole professional career has to do with maths. Maths comes after logic. To put maths before logic is to be a typical pseudo-scientific fraud. These are the kinds who spout e=mcc dogma misusing maths as a mask. For the genuine scientist: 1. Observation of nature 2. Understanding of natural processes 3. Modeling of natural processes, with suitable explanation 4. Mathematical construction of the model 5. If possible, physical construction of the model 6, Experiments - with rigour about aim/goal, question to ask, method, execution, data extraction, analysis of data, conclusion from analysis of data, projection from the conclusion to technology and then the handover to the engineer who will 7. Prototype the design using above inputs 8. Test and improve the design, iteratively For my work in the Internal Force Engine, I have completed processes 1-6. From now on, I will be on 7-8 till I die. And while doing that, I will clean up the wrong e=mcc=hv physics that has made the world mad. Chaps around, will come in useful as mops. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > > The scientific mind is not closed as yours is. > > now you are projecting again, put down that blunt! > > > To a scientist all knowledge is provisional. > > wrong. once disproven by a repeatable experiment, always disproven, > like aether. > > > Only Mahipal and I are on the same wavelength, this way. > > ....but with different slopes, as your aether is infesting you, itchy > stuff isnt it ? > > > > >> Maypo is sane too. > >> there is one dude that is double crazy, which makes him a real hoot > >> and their are pairs of guys that stalk each other and their crazyness > >> cancles out (different polarities) > >> McFly lives in a Cracker Jack's Box. > >> most of the women here are sane posters. > > > > They are about as sane as you, that is to say, dogmatic and dull. > > what is it with this doggie thing of yours ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 15:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e07ad5ff-847f-4d15-8ceb-bd2284e2d84c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644915 |
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 3:08:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > > On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > > >>>>> See, Odd? > > >>>>> Not everyone requires fame. > > >>>> > > >>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > > >>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > > >>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > > >>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > > >>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > > >>> > > >>> Or a reverse-racist. > > > > >>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > > >>> You were the one talking about Nobels. > > > > > > I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. Odd is a poor reader of Written English. Example? Odd doesn't know Physicists from Physics. > > > I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > > > twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > > > > > > I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > > > horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. Has anybody in history ever been de-Nobeled? I don't think so. Al Gore? Obomba? > > >> It's a sign of mental illness, Arindam, when you say things and later your > > >> personality rejects that you could have said such things. > > > > > > You mad bad lot project your madness upon me, what a surprise! > > > > > > Apart from Mahipal, I am the only sane person here. > > > > SERGIO IS SANEST DUDE HERE, NSS! Wait... what? Does that make you two more sane than me or less? Got math? > I do not confuse sanity with your pigheaded unscientific attitude. > The scientific mind is not closed as yours is. > To a scientist all knowledge is provisional. > Only Mahipal and I are on the same wavelength, this way. > > > Maypo is sane too. Maypo/Mahipal. He he... How dare you call me sane Sane SANE?! What the Hell?! Whatever did I do to deserve this horrible taint upon me m(y) reputation, BozosJi? > > there is one dude that is double crazy, which makes him a real hoot > > and their are pairs of guys that stalk each other and their crazyness > > cancles out (different polarities) > > McFly lives in a Cracker Jack's Box. > > most of the women here are sane posters. > > They are about as sane as you, that is to say, dogmatic and dull. > > > > [how can you tell if shes hot in txt only mode ?] Women love text messaging. Show me a girl on Earth not texting. I dare you. > > >>> I don't want to build rockets. > > >>> I want to build Internal Force Engines that will replace rockets and jet > > >>> engines. > > >>> > > >>> I can only do so much, the rest is up to others. If those who notice ignore me > > >>> or twist my words out of context and meaning, then what can be done! > > >>> > > >>> Who knows! > > >>> > > >>> Good people have always been persecuted by bad people. On the other hand, the > > >>> good people have benefited from the works of good people in the past. > > >>> > > >>> Carrying on this trend, is the way to go for me. If going alone is the only way > > >>> then that is the way to go. > > >>> > > >>> Giving in to the cunning liars and frauds is not on. > > >>> > > >>> Simple as that. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Arindam Banerjee > > >>>> > > >>>>> Some people just want the bullsjit to stop so the truth can be known. > > >>>>> You can help by not promoting bullshit > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Odd's the finest toy tool of them all! Keeps asking: Show me The Math! Any good Engineer/Scientist/Physicist/... can do any math for one's self. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 16:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <951c980b-2bb7-42b1-bfdc-f01bf4d808d2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #645033 |
On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:28:17 AM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 3:08:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > > > On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > >>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > > > >>>>> See, Odd? > > > >>>>> Not everyone requires fame. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > > > >>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > > > >>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > > > >>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > > > >>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > > > >>> > > > >>> Or a reverse-racist. > > > > > > >>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > > > >>> You were the one talking about Nobels. > > > > > > > > I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. > > Odd is a poor reader of Written English. > Example? Odd doesn't know Physicists from Physics.\ A typical racist really, like practically all of them. John is the only one who stands out with his open-mindedness about aether. He goes into fractals which may well be right but that will be another story. > > > > > I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > > > > twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > > > > > > > > I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > > > > horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > > Has anybody in history ever been de-Nobeled? I don't think so. Al Gore? Obomba? I think if the Nobel Prize should have any credibility they MUST de-Nobel people whose work was undeserving of the honour. That way, many of them will be de-Nobelled. Like, sportsmen are deprived of their medals when found cheating. Why should Einstein and Feynman be honoured for promoting lies and killing physics? The way things are, the Nobel is an Eurocentric racist-bigoted tool to subdue the non-whites or make them lickers. It promotes the white bigoted interests, but when exposed as such will become irrelevant at best to independent-minded non-whites. Another point, it is dangled as a bribe and a seal of authenticity by the Eurocentric devils. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-09 08:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <011d0140-d71f-4a80-b53f-a45754655da2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #645042 |
On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 7:29:39 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:28:17 AM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 3:08:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > > > > On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > >>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > > > > >>>>> See, Odd? > > > > >>>>> Not everyone requires fame. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > > > > >>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > > > > >>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > > > > >>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > > > > >>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Or a reverse-racist. > > > > > > > > >>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > > > > >>> You were the one talking about Nobels. > > > > > > > > > > I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. > > > > Odd is a poor reader of Written English. > > Example? Odd doesn't know Physicists from Physics. > > A typical racist really, like practically all of them. Unnamed Odd's too chicken shit even to reveal its name. Odd/He/She/It/AI/... just Blah BLAH blahs. On and on and ON... Only Odd understands Physics and nobody else ever could. Blah BLAH blah... > John is the only one who stands out with his open-mindedness about aether. > He goes into fractals which may well be right but that will be another story. I love the idea of a Fractal Universe! JohnJi is a little obsessed by fractals though. We're all, well most, friends here... JohnJi how is your son's music progressing? There's only one Race, the HumanRace. We must survive TheDivideAndConquerMentality. Within that Race, there do exist StupidRacists. It takes TrumpET Stupidity to be racist. Based on past USA trends, the next president could be either Beyonce or Kim Kardashian. > > > > > I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > > > > > twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > > > > > > > > > > I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > > > > > horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > > > > Has anybody in history ever been de-Nobeled? I don't think so. Al Gore? Obomba? > > I think if the Nobel Prize should have any credibility they MUST de-Nobel > people whose work was undeserving of the honour. The Nobel Prize has become a political advertisement vehicle. Wish I had just one! > That way, many of them will be de-Nobelled. > > Like, sportsmen are deprived of their medals when found cheating. Or, why not just equally dope all the athletes? By some weight to drug ratio? > Why should Einstein and Feynman be honoured for promoting lies and killing > physics? I love FeynmanJi! Love his books/works! RPF==Feynman deserves billions of Nobels. > The way things are, the Nobel is an Eurocentric racist-bigoted tool to subdue > the non-whites or make them lickers. It promotes the white bigoted interests, > but when exposed as such will become irrelevant at best to independent-minded > non-whites. Of course it's Eurocentric. Do you know why there's no Nobel Prize in Maths? Sex. > Another point, it is dangled as a bribe and a seal of authenticity by the > Eurocentric devils. Relax relax RELAX... devils are people too. As always, these be dangerous times. Again... Jag Choro Ka Hai Dera (Bhagavad Gita==Song). Chors==Liars are better off... When studying physics at Princeton University, I attended a lot of seminars. Just amazing how many Nobel Laureates gave their lectures there! > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-09 15:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e5e0281d-0de8-4156-aa00-941c4863f5a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #645293 |
On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:43:25 AM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 7:29:39 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:28:17 AM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 3:08:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 12:22:33 PM UTC+10, Serg io wrote: > > > > > On 8/6/2017 7:15 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:04:07 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > > >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 2:41:28 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > > >>>> On 8/4/17 5:44 AM, john wrote: > > > > > >>>>> See, Odd? > > > > > >>>>> Not everyone requires fame. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I think you should read again what Arindam says. He says he should be > > > > > >>>> given multiple Nobels for his work, and the funds to build rockets based > > > > > >>>> on his ideas so that we can escape obliteration by asteroids. He says he > > > > > >>>> has been deprived of deserved fame by racism, and he says that ANYONE > > > > > >>>> who dismisses his work is therefore a racist. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Or a reverse-racist. > > > > > > > > > > >>> You are twisting my words. How dishonest. > > > > > >>> You were the one talking about Nobels. > > > > > > > > > > > > I said I *deserved* multiple Nobels in some other thread. > > > > > > Odd is a poor reader of Written English. > > > Example? Odd doesn't know Physicists from Physics. > > > > A typical racist really, like practically all of them. > > Unnamed Odd's too chicken shit even to reveal its name. > Odd/He/She/It/AI/... just Blah BLAH blahs. On and on and ON... > Only Odd understands Physics and nobody else ever could. Blah BLAH blah... A coward, twister and liar. Normally a waste of time, but as a mop to clean up the corrupted physics I find him useful. His negative reactions are provocative for my creative explanatory aphorisms. > > > John is the only one who stands out with his open-mindedness about aether. > > He goes into fractals which may well be right but that will be another story. > > I love the idea of a Fractal Universe! JohnJi is a little obsessed by fractals though. > We're all, well most, friends here... JohnJi how is your son's music progressing? > > There's only one Race, the HumanRace. We must survive TheDivideAndConquerMentality. > Within that Race, there do exist StupidRacists. It takes TrumpET Stupidity to be racist. > Based on past USA trends, the next president could be either Beyonce or Kim Kardashian. > > > > > > > I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > > > > > > twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > > > > > > > > > > > > I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > > > > > > horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > > > > > > Has anybody in history ever been de-Nobeled? I don't think so. Al Gore? Obomba? > > > > I think if the Nobel Prize should have any credibility they MUST de-Nobel > > people whose work was undeserving of the honour. > > The Nobel Prize has become a political advertisement vehicle. Wish I had just one! I got disgusted by them long ago. One Nobel-giver who came to India was asked why Indians could not get the Nobel Prize in Literature at least. His comment was illuminating. As far as I can remember it was to the effect that the entire Indian ethos was inferior and so Indians were not worthy for their Nobelic consideration. As I can see, the racist+bigot benj is a reflection of that sort of radiance. In other words, you have to be an assiduous licker of western boots to be considered for the Nobel Prize. Such licking not being a part of my nature, I bid goodbye to the idea of ever getting a Nobel Prize. It is for the whites and their non-white lickers who are thus honoured to destroy the non-white cultures, as subversive elements. Now, I am not a BJP type. Nor am I a CPM type. I am an old fashioned Nehru and Indira type supporting an advanced socialism of the Star Trek scenario. In such a scheme the thought structure that existed in India 2000+ years ago fits in nicely. While I am alone in such appreciation, it is immensely pleasing to me and I can manage without any prizes thanks. So when the touch of 2000+ years of India moves me, I get more satisfaction than anything that bunch of liars, robbers, frauds, racists, bigots, hypocrites etc. can offer. Note my recent translation of the lyrics of "lag ja gale..." in my facebook page. > > > That way, many of them will be de-Nobelled. > > > > Like, sportsmen are deprived of their medals when found cheating. > > Or, why not just equally dope all the athletes? By some weight to drug ratio? Why not just give up professional sports? Make it all amateur instead. No money in sports is a great idea. People will do sports for the fun of it. Life will be a lot better for all including sportsmen/women. > > > Why should Einstein and Feynman be honoured for promoting lies and killing > > physics? > > I love FeynmanJi! Love his books/works! RPF==Feynman deserves billions of Nobels. He probably does from a certain point of view. On the other hand if physics is to be rid of relativistic quantum mechanics it is necessary to deprive him of any institutionalisation. > > > The way things are, the Nobel is an Eurocentric racist-bigoted tool to subdue > > the non-whites or make them lickers. It promotes the white bigoted interests, > > but when exposed as such will become irrelevant at best to independent-minded > > non-whites. > > Of course it's Eurocentric. Do you know why there's no Nobel Prize in Maths? Sex. > > > Another point, it is dangled as a bribe and a seal of authenticity by the > > Eurocentric devils. > > Relax relax RELAX... devils are people too. As always, these be dangerous times. > Again... Jag Choro Ka Hai Dera (Bhagavad Gita==Song). Chors==Liars are better off... That they are, especially in the USA. > > When studying physics at Princeton University, I attended a lot of seminars. > Just amazing how many Nobel Laureates gave their lectures there! Ugh. > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” > Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-10 17:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0a30dd2e-cc21-4c11-8bd4-6ad2d82229ba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #645334 |
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 6:39:38 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:43:25 AM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: > > On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 7:29:39 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: <trim> > > > John is the only one who stands out with his open-mindedness about aether. > > > He goes into fractals which may well be right but that will be another story. > > > > I love the idea of a Fractal Universe! JohnJi is a little obsessed by fractals though. > > We're all, well most, friends here... JohnJi how is your son's music progressing? > > > > There's only one Race, the HumanRace. We must survive TheDivideAndConquerMentality. > > Within that Race, there do exist StupidRacists. It takes TrumpET Stupidity to be racist. > > Based on past USA trends, the next president could be either Beyonce or Kim Kardashian. > > > > > > > > > I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by > > > > > > > twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is > > > > > > > horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. > > > > > > > > Has anybody in history ever been de-Nobeled? I don't think so. Al Gore? Obomba? > > > > > > I think if the Nobel Prize should have any credibility they MUST de-Nobel > > > people whose work was undeserving of the honour. > > > > The Nobel Prize has become a political advertisement vehicle. Wish I had just one! > > I got disgusted by them long ago. One Nobel-giver who came to India was asked > why Indians could not get the Nobel Prize in Literature at least. His comment > was illuminating. As far as I can remember it was to the effect that the entire > Indian ethos was inferior and so Indians were not worthy for their Nobelic > consideration. As I can see, the racist+bigot benj is a reflection of that > sort of radiance. Sir BenjJi is no racist! Period. BenjJi's just playing you, BanerjeeJi. Banjo? > In other words, you have to be an assiduous licker of western boots to be > considered for the Nobel Prize. Count, in a 100 years only about a 100 people get any Nobel Prize. BFD. > Such licking not being a part of my nature, I bid goodbye to the idea of ever > getting a Nobel Prize. It is for the whites and their non-white lickers who > are thus honoured to destroy the non-white cultures, as subversive elements. Hey... deal with it... Whites are better people. Life goes on On ON... > Now, I am not a BJP type. Nor am I a CPM type. I am an old fashioned Nehru and > Indira type supporting an advanced socialism of the Star Trek scenario. In such > a scheme the thought structure that existed in India 2000+ years ago fits > in nicely. While I am alone in such appreciation, it is immensely pleasing to > me and I can manage without any prizes thanks. Do the Math, SW IT bozos waste a Nobel Prize's worth on like a yacht trip. Yawn. > So when the touch of 2000+ years of India moves me, I get more satisfaction than > anything that bunch of liars, robbers, frauds, racists, bigots, hypocrites > etc. can offer. Note my > recent translation of the lyrics of "lag ja gale..." in my facebook page. Wow lag ja gale... such a great song/poem! I love you, BanerjeeJi! > > > That way, many of them will be de-Nobelled. > > > > > > Like, sportsmen are deprived of their medals when found cheating. > > > > Or, why not just equally dope all the athletes? By some weight to drug ratio? > > Why not just give up professional sports? > Make it all amateur instead. > No money in sports is a great idea. > People will do sports for the fun of it. > Life will be a lot better for all including sportsmen/women. Does GodJi Roger Federer play for mere money? Never at all. Tennis is his call to life. > > > Why should Einstein and Feynman be honoured for promoting lies and killing > > > physics? > > > > I love FeynmanJi! Love his books/works! RPF==Feynman deserves billions of Nobels. > > He probably does from a certain point of view. On the other hand if physics is > to be rid of relativistic quantum mechanics it is necessary to deprive him of > any institutionalisation. RPF could care less what others thought of him! Clever Genius RPF! I love him. > > > The way things are, the Nobel is an Eurocentric racist-bigoted tool to subdue > > > the non-whites or make them lickers. It promotes the white bigoted interests, > > > but when exposed as such will become irrelevant at best to independent-minded > > > non-whites. > > > > Of course it's Eurocentric. Do you know why there's no Nobel Prize in Maths? Sex. > > > > > Another point, it is dangled as a bribe and a seal of authenticity by the > > > Eurocentric devils. > > > > Relax relax RELAX... devils are people too. As always, these be dangerous times. > > Again... Jag Choro Ka Hai Dera (Bhagavad Gita==Song). Chors==Liars are better off... > > That they are, especially in the USA. Come on, is India free of them Chors? No, not at all. Slumdog Zillionaires$$... Now, I'm just desperately attempting to master being a good, great, Chor. I am! IIRC, every movie has rich smugglers/thugs. May be it's just crass formulaic writing. If only I could discuss with someone the music from film Roti Kapda Aur Makaan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWm-D8_BetA Mehngai Mar Gayi Just so deep. Kase waqt main... then that Punjabi dude with his song/verse... just too great! Kho baitha hai apni jaan Jo sach sach sach bola to sachchaai maar gayi Sachchaai maar gayi That is just one of the best songs/poems ever written/sung/putToMusic/...! I once met music directors Laxmikant–Pyarelal's and got autographs once at John F. Kennedy Center. You know-it-all-physicists, you all well know where you can go. Fly there safe! Q/A: What's the rarest element on Earth? A Physicist fl(y)ing in First Class! Read more: http://www.lyricsoff.com/songs/mehangai-maar-gayi.html#ixzz4pJSBlSb3 The Opening Stanza/Mood... Usne kaha tu kaun hai Maine kaha ulfat teri Usne kaha tu kaun hai Maine kaha ulfat teri Usne kaha takta hai kya Maine kaha soorat teri Usne kaha chahta hai kya Usne kaha chahta hai kya Maine kaha chahat teri Maine kaha samjha nahin Usne kaha kismat teri Just too fucking absolutely great Great GREAT! I melt when I hear it. I cr(y)! Them four genius lines... Usne kaha chahta hai kya Maine kaha chahat teri Maine kaha samjha nahin Usne kaha kismat teri Brilliant^3! Better than any physics/math equation could ever be! EOS. Read more: http://www.lyricsoff.com/songs/mehangai-maar-gayi.html#ixzz4pOeOp76e True experience follows. I had this short boss once. Like 5'2''. He's sitting in an airplane in his first class seat. I walk by through that finest class because the Emirates hostess directed me to do so. Short Idiot sees me. He stands up. His head barely able to see above his fancy classy seat. Literally, I mean loudly, he shouts: What are you (Mahipal) doing in First Class?! I did get fired a few months later from that job. Corporate Class Ua$$ofAmerica... > > When studying physics at Princeton University, I attended a lot of seminars. > > Just amazing how many Nobel Laureates gave their lectures there! > > Ugh. There are a few lectures/seminars I do relish/remember... Ugh? Very likely! But I got to hear them Nobel Laureates in person. Work! The one I loved/adored, me sitting next to him, was the silent Freeman John Dyson. I wish I had nerve enough to just shake FJD's hand. I didn't. Too awestruck, I. SirJi FJD attended more of them seminars than I even ever dreamt of attending. > > > Cheers, > > > Arindam Banerjee -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes... Enjo(y)!” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-10 20:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <598cf7f0$0$18142$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #645461 |
On 8/10/2017 8:02 PM, Mahipal wrote: > On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 6:39:38 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:43:25 AM UTC+10, Mahipal wrote: >>> On Monday, August 7, 2017 at 7:29:39 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > <trim> >>>> John is the only one who stands out with his open-mindedness about aether. >>>> He goes into fractals which may well be right but that will be another story. >>> >>> I love the idea of a Fractal Universe! JohnJi is a little obsessed by fractals though. >>> We're all, well most, friends here... JohnJi how is your son's music progressing? >>> >>> There's only one Race, the HumanRace. We must survive TheDivideAndConquerMentality. >>> Within that Race, there do exist StupidRacists. It takes TrumpET Stupidity to be racist. >>> Based on past USA trends, the next president could be either Beyonce or Kim Kardashian. >>> >>>>>>>> I never said that I *should be given* Nobels. That is what you say, by >>>>>>>> twisting my words. Go quote them by all means. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also said that Eisntein, Feynman were wrongly honoured for their work is >>>>>>>> horrible, and that they should be de-Nobeled. >>>>> >>>>> Has anybody in history ever been de-Nobeled? I don't think so. Al Gore? Obomba? >>>> >>>> I think if the Nobel Prize should have any credibility they MUST de-Nobel >>>> people whose work was undeserving of the honour. >>> >>> The Nobel Prize has become a political advertisement vehicle. Wish I had just one! >> >> I got disgusted by them long ago. One Nobel-giver who came to India was asked >> why Indians could not get the Nobel Prize in Literature at least. His comment >> was illuminating. As far as I can remember it was to the effect that the entire >> Indian ethos was inferior and so Indians were not worthy for their Nobelic >> consideration. As I can see, the racist+bigot benj is a reflection of that >> sort of radiance. > > Sir BenjJi is no racist! Period. BenjJi's just playing you, BanerjeeJi. Banjo? > >> In other words, you have to be an assiduous licker of western boots to be >> considered for the Nobel Prize. > > Count, in a 100 years only about a 100 people get any Nobel Prize. BFD. > >> Such licking not being a part of my nature, I bid goodbye to the idea of ever >> getting a Nobel Prize. It is for the whites and their non-white lickers who >> are thus honoured to destroy the non-white cultures, as subversive elements. > > Hey... deal with it... Whites are better people. Life goes on On ON... > >> Now, I am not a BJP type. Nor am I a CPM type. I am an old fashioned Nehru and >> Indira type supporting an advanced socialism of the Star Trek scenario. In such >> a scheme the thought structure that existed in India 2000+ years ago fits >> in nicely. While I am alone in such appreciation, it is immensely pleasing to >> me and I can manage without any prizes thanks. > > Do the Math, SW IT bozos waste a Nobel Prize's worth on like a yacht trip. Yawn. > >> So when the touch of 2000+ years of India moves me, I get more satisfaction than >> anything that bunch of liars, robbers, frauds, racists, bigots, hypocrites >> etc. can offer. Note my >> recent translation of the lyrics of "lag ja gale..." in my facebook page. > > Wow lag ja gale... such a great song/poem! I love you, BanerjeeJi! You LOVE Banjo? That does it Looper. WE ARE THROUGH! No more "MyPalji" for you! Here's your ring back! <throws it at him> Little wonder no woman ever gives you a second look. Enjoy your new relationship with Banjo. You deserve each other! With pig thief Banjo's "science" and Indian lyrics! Oh my! You third worlders do stick together, don't you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-10 17:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e8b15f3d-90be-47de-a98a-fc7f0b1ae477@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #645465 |
On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 8:19:01 PM UTC-4, benj wrote: > On 8/10/2017 8:02 PM, Mahipal wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 6:39:38 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: <trim> > >> So when the touch of 2000+ years of India moves me, I get more satisfaction than > >> anything that bunch of liars, robbers, frauds, racists, bigots, hypocrites > >> etc. can offer. Note my > >> recent translation of the lyrics of "lag ja gale..." in my facebook page. > > > > Wow lag ja gale... such a great song/poem! I love you, BanerjeeJi! > > You LOVE Banjo? That does it Looper. WE ARE THROUGH! No more "MyPalji" > for you! Here's your ring back! <throws it at him> Little wonder no > woman ever gives you a second look. Enjoy your new relationship with > Banjo. You deserve each other! With pig thief Banjo's "science" and > Indian lyrics! Oh my! You third worlders do stick together, don't you? My word strings regards BanjoJi's ideas matter neither here or there. He he... you BenjJi made me m(y) day! I've said it before, I'll say it again, WTF? I love you too Sir BenjJi! Smile! Not me m(y) problem others can't just get along. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Poet Pla(y)ing Tennis! Grasshopper Mode...” Enjo(y)... Salute… Cheers... Open your M I N D… Time it is Is IS 3PM somePlace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web