Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #642948 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-27 17:26 -0500 |
| Last post | 2017-08-02 13:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 68 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-27 17:26 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:31 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 17:35 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 18:20 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 18:32 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 01:55 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:37 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 02:56 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:07 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 12:24 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 20:21 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:44 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 20:37 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 12:19 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 10:23 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 15:17 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 12:53 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 20:04 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 20:08 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:42 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 20:01 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 12:47 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 14:23 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-02 12:53 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:00 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 18:48 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 17:17 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 01:22 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Mushnik <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-03 20:30 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:48 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 15:15 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:03 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-08-02 11:19 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:42 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:52 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-08-02 12:09 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-02 13:53 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 12:01 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-08-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-02 14:45 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 15:19 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-08-02 15:37 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:07 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-08-03 09:48 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:56 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 14:14 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Mushnik <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-03 12:33 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 12:12 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-03 12:25 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 19:02 +0000
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 14:10 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 17:21 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-08-03 18:27 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 13:39 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 15:29 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 19:48 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 05:39 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 08:50 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:23 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 08:52 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 20:06 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-27 20:11 -0500
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 22:46 -0700
Re: Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:46 -0700
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99d2666b-b57c-4404-a34d-322c8328ca43@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644028 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 11:19:57 AM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 11:03:17 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > > > >> Yes. I know. I'm an expert in thermodynamics. That what the focus of my Master's thesis. > > No Jim, that's a lie. You have no degree, at least not in any science. > > You have already been proven to be a liar, you know, the whole "most-viewed usenet post ever" bullshit, so there is zero reason why anyone would believe you about this. So, let me get this straight, Google is a liar, Princeton University is a liar, and the people that make H2O phase diagrams are all liars. So, everbody in the world except you and your fellow trolls are liars? Did I get this right? Or am I lying about this too? LOL James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes The 'Missing Link' of Meteorology's Theory of Storms http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 12:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d4e0a58a-a21c-468f-9c69-ca057e122b71@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644039 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:01:27 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > So, let me get this straight, Google is a liar, Princeton University is a liar, and the people that make H2O phase diagrams are all liars. I never made such a claim, and you know it. I said *YOU* are the liar... and you ARE! > So, everbody in the world except you and your fellow trolls are liars? Everbody? Spell checker is your friend... and mine, too... > > Did I get this right? Or am I lying about this too? LOL I don't know... once proven to be a liar, there's no telling what else you might lie about, hard to say...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 14:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olta5j$hhd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644042 |
On 8/2/2017 2:13 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:01:27 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > >> So, let me get this straight, Google is a liar, Princeton University is a liar, and the people that make H2O phase diagrams are all liars. > > I never made such a claim, and you know it. I said *YOU* are the liar... and you ARE! > >> So, everbody in the world except you and your fellow trolls are liars? > > Everbody? Spell checker is your friend... and mine, too... >> >> Did I get this right? Or am I lying about this too? LOL > > I don't know... once proven to be a liar, there's no telling what else you might lie about, hard to say... > McGinn is trying to defend his ego, which is squirrelly, and vastly over self inflated on heroic non-sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 15:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2bed3a7f-71bb-48bd-ac72-ed4c7bf30b25@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644042 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:13:41 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > I never made such a claim, State of denial.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 15:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1356b683-ce3b-4079-802b-c03e22caf3a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644070 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 3:19:29 PM UTC-7, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:13:41 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I never made such a claim, > > State of denial. Google never forgets. Show me the post where I made the claim, or accept the fact that you are a proven liar. Your call.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olvfcs$1s4v$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644042 |
On 8/2/17 2:13 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > McGinn wrote: > the people that make H2O phase diagrams are all liars. It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the first place. He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in the form of a gas, because he is under the impression that the only time two phases can ever coexist is at melting point or boiling point, which is his interpretation of a phase diagram. This would then apply to ethanol as well as water. (The simple test of this is to see if ethanol can combust in the region ABOVE an air-liq.ethanol interface.) In other words, the phase diagram tells him something that is NOT special to water. But then he says that water is unique in this aspect because of the special attributes of water and its unusual behaviors, such as its high polarity. And therefore ONLY water lives as microdroplets and not as a gas below the boiling point. In which case the phase diagram argument means nothing because it is not the phase diagram that enforces that state but the special features of water. But then again, maybe only one of McGinn's personalities is making the argument based on what phase diagrams and boiling point mean to him. A wholly different personality is making the argument based on the unique attributes of water. And yet another personality isn't making any argument at all, but is simply flinging spittle and muttering "you got nothin!" -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 09:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b23af757-5a9f-4b75-b600-013b156e5c15@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644190 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:27:30 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the > first place. > > He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in > the form of a gas, Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . But you can believe whatever you want, as do many non-physicists. > because he is under the impression that the only time > two phases can ever coexist is at melting point or boiling point, which > is his interpretation of a phase diagram. Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > This would then apply to > ethanol as well as water. Of course. > (The simple test of this is to see if ethanol > can combust in the region ABOVE an air-liq.ethanol interface.) Ethanol combusts as a vapor (liquid) you fucking mental retard. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > In other > words, the phase diagram tells him something that is NOT special to water. > > But then he says that water is unique in this aspect because of the > special attributes of water and its unusual behaviors, such as its high > polarity. Wow. You are ignorant. H bonds are prevalent in all of chemistry that contains hydrogen, including hydrocarbons, you simpleton. Have you ever thought about getting an education? In the meantime, maybe you should leave science to scientists. Fair enough? Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ec7af209-def7-437b-a0a7-33d86ecd624b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644196 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:07:17 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:27:30 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the > > first place. > > > > He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in > > the form of a gas, > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . But you can believe whatever you want, as do many non-physicists. > > > because he is under the impression that the only time > > two phases can ever coexist is at melting point or boiling point, which > > is his interpretation of a phase diagram. > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > > > This would then apply to > > ethanol as well as water. > > Of course. > > > > (The simple test of this is to see if ethanol > > can combust in the region ABOVE an air-liq.ethanol interface.) > > Ethanol combusts as a vapor (liquid) you fucking mental retard. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > > > In other > > words, the phase diagram tells him something that is NOT special to water. > > > > But then he says that water is unique in this aspect because of the > > special attributes of water and its unusual behaviors, such as its high > > polarity. > > Wow. You are ignorant. H bonds are prevalent in all of chemistry that contains hydrogen, including hydrocarbons, you simpleton. > > Have you ever thought about getting an education? > > In the meantime, maybe you should leave science to scientists. Fair enough? > > Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist? No, Jim, you are definitely not a physicist, and not a scientist of any kind... and since you re a proven liar, there is no reason that anyone should believe you, is there?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 09:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ce1c4ed-b666-4bd2-a4cf-2317d4d96a89@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644202 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:48:52 AM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:07:17 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:27:30 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > > It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the > > > first place. > > > > > > He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in > > > the form of a gas, > > > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . But you can believe whatever you want, as do many non-physicists. > > > > > because he is under the impression that the only time > > > two phases can ever coexist is at melting point or boiling point, which > > > is his interpretation of a phase diagram. > > > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > > > > > This would then apply to > > > ethanol as well as water. > > > > Of course. > > > > > > > (The simple test of this is to see if ethanol > > > can combust in the region ABOVE an air-liq.ethanol interface.) > > > > Ethanol combusts as a vapor (liquid) you fucking mental retard. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > > > > > In other > > > words, the phase diagram tells him something that is NOT special to water. > > > > > > But then he says that water is unique in this aspect because of the > > > special attributes of water and its unusual behaviors, such as its high > > > polarity. > > > > Wow. You are ignorant. H bonds are prevalent in all of chemistry that contains hydrogen, including hydrocarbons, you simpleton. > > > > Have you ever thought about getting an education? > > > > In the meantime, maybe you should leave science to scientists. Fair enough? > > > > Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist? > > No, Jim, you are definitely not a physicist, and not a scientist of any kind... and since you re a proven liar, there is no reason that anyone should believe you, is there? So, Google is a liar. Princeton University are all liars. And I am a liar. Well, at least I'm in good company.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0b05645c-5eca-427e-99ca-c41686b07d73@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644205 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 12:56:10 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:48:52 AM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:07:17 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: [] > > > Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist? > > > > No, Jim, you are definitely not a physicist, and not a scientist > > of any kind... and since you re a proven liar, there is no reason > > that anyone should believe you, is there? > > So, Google is a liar. Princeton University are all liars. And I am a liar. There's more than one Princeton university? Who knew! And the Liar's paradox thrown in for good measure. > > Well, at least I'm in good company. No, you are a loon of all your own. ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mushnik <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 12:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olvmpt$ahi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644202 |
On 8/3/2017 11:48 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:07:17 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > No, Jim, you are definitely not a physicist, and not a scientist of any kind... and since you re a proven liar, there is no reason that anyone should believe you, is there? > McGinn Quote of the hour; "H bonds are prevalent in all of chemistry that contains hydrogen, including hydrocarbons" James, remember the title of this thread ? "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own,Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments as demonstrated by James McGinn"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58f1adf2-b369-481a-b494-c2e65eaf2ab8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644202 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:48:52 AM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:07:17 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:27:30 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > > It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the > > > first place. > > > > > > He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in > > > the form of a gas, > > > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . But you can believe whatever you want, as do many non-physicists. > > > > > because he is under the impression that the only time > > > two phases can ever coexist is at melting point or boiling point, which > > > is his interpretation of a phase diagram. > > > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > > > > > This would then apply to > > > ethanol as well as water. > > > > Of course. > > > > > > > (The simple test of this is to see if ethanol > > > can combust in the region ABOVE an air-liq.ethanol interface.) > > > > Ethanol combusts as a vapor (liquid) you fucking mental retard. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > > > > > In other > > > words, the phase diagram tells him something that is NOT special to water. > > > > > > But then he says that water is unique in this aspect because of the > > > special attributes of water and its unusual behaviors, such as its high > > > polarity. > > > > Wow. You are ignorant. H bonds are prevalent in all of chemistry that contains hydrogen, including hydrocarbons, you simpleton. > > > > Have you ever thought about getting an education? > > > > In the meantime, maybe you should leave science to scientists. Fair enough? > > > > Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist? > > No, Jim, you are definitely not a physicist, and not a scientist of any kind... and since you re a proven liar, there is no reason that anyone should believe you, is there? Water is a liquid,solid,and gas.When turning into a solid it expands.That feature of expanding gave Earth a chance for higher life(us) TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 12:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <olvt3c$8le$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #644228 |
Devious "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> aka Glazier, <http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> alias <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>, you are a sanctimonious Pig. Whatever you post belongs into the <http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017> in which you try to cover up that you are a Face Shitter & a Hatemonger, whose Glazierola you designed to get a response from "Paul Analsinger" <pnalsing@gmail.com> who Glazier hopes to be another new filthy misfits who'll join your existing crowd of 8 pigs who laid themselves under your sphincter, to get this: <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>. from you, ___ Glazier, the Turd-man of Anaheim___, who for the sake of **sheer spite**, perversion & bigotry refuses to accept <http://tinyurl.com/Herbert-Glazier-s-Reprieve>, as he waits for <http://tinyurl.com/Swine-Glazier-s-Undertaker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 19:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <olvs09$k4a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #644196 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:27:30 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the >> first place. >> >> He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in >> the form of a gas, > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, No, Jim, you're not. And there are not three separate people, McGinn, Desk, and Tornadoes. And you do not have a Master's thesis on the internet. And you are not living under your own recognizance. And you never learned what a phase diagram shows. And you never learned what boiling point means. There are lots of things you believe that to you are as real as trees, but they aren't reality, Jim. You have a mental illness, Jim, and those delusions are just as damaging to you as hearing voices to burn down the bedroom, even if they don't feel damaging. I know all this posturing feels better than getting the help you need, but you really should get that help first. It will not rob you of your ideas. It will just help you see them for what they are. Nobody is going to lobotomize you. There is no reason to be afraid of treatment. > so . . . But you can believe whatever you want, as do many non-physicists. > >> because he is under the impression that the only time >> two phases can ever coexist is at melting point or boiling point, which >> is his interpretation of a phase diagram. > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . > >> This would then apply to >> ethanol as well as water. > > Of course. > > >> (The simple test of this is to see if ethanol >> can combust in the region ABOVE an air-liq.ethanol interface.) > > Ethanol combusts as a vapor (liquid) you fucking mental retard. But then > I'm a physicist, so . . . > >> In other >> words, the phase diagram tells him something that is NOT special to water. >> >> But then he says that water is unique in this aspect because of the >> special attributes of water and its unusual behaviors, such as its high >> polarity. > > Wow. You are ignorant. H bonds are prevalent in all of chemistry that > contains hydrogen, including hydrocarbons, you simpleton. > > Have you ever thought about getting an education? > > In the meantime, maybe you should leave science to scientists. Fair enough? > > Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist? > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 14:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c15e5975-8a92-4509-92f4-c32f7bfecae3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644196 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 12:07:17 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:27:30 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > It's worth pointing out that McGinn can't get his story right in the > > first place. > > > > He says first of all that NO substance below its boiling point can be in > > the form of a gas, > > Right. But then I'm a physicist, so . . . Attempting to argue from Authority only works if you actually have some authority. Without any degree in science, let alone in Physics, you "got nothing". [] > Oh, by the way, did I mention that I am a physicist? BTW, no, you are not a physicist. Not now, not ever. Of course you could present some evidence otherwise. But we've played this game before, and you never produced even the name of a university for your degree or even just attending classes. Does your current employer know you pad your resume? What a loon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 17:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <154e0c7a-c674-409f-8409-1815556632fb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644264 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:10:10 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > Attempting to argue from Authority In science the only authority is reproducible experimental evidence. And I have no dispute with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 18:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f223a61c-8279-4f18-8bd6-f7ca2b654d4f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644292 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 5:21:44 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:10:10 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > Attempting to argue from Authority > > In science the only authority is reproducible experimental evidence. And I have no dispute with it. So, where is your reproducible experimental evidence that humid air is heavier than dry air? where is your reproducible experimental evidence that water cannot be a gas in the atmosphere at a temperature less than its boiling point? You've got nothing!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-04 13:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <edee35d2-c26f-4b86-bf93-f72b0cd6ee29@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644292 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 8:21:44 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:10:10 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > > Attempting to argue from Authority > > In science the only authority is reproducible experimental evidence. > And I have no dispute with it. And you have no experimental evidence. Strike two (hundred). ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 15:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd9f7079-f5d9-41c0-986f-264239f8ed1c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644027 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 2:03:17 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 10:54:16 AM UTC-7, Serg io wrote: > > On 8/2/2017 9:23 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: [] > > >> Yes. I know. I'm an expert in thermodynamics. > > >> That what the focus of my Master's thesis. > > > > > > From what school? > > > > by his own admission, James McGinn does not have a degree, therefore > > does not have a Master's thesis. > > > > James, if you do have a Master's Thesis, post it here. > > It's been replicated thousands of thousands of times. > Its all over the internet. Anybody can find it. Just do a search. Sure Jimboo. We are here to serve you. 8^) Search string - "James McGinn" Master's thesis First result with your name (third result overall BTW) is a Comment on an article about graduate school. http://nautil.us/issue/43/heroes/what-does-any-of-this-have-to-do-with-physics Your first name isn't Leo is is? https://archive.org/stream/annualcommenceme1949nort/annualcommenceme1949nort_djvu.txt If this is you, you have a BS Mechanical Eng. and you are very old! (class of '49) OH, BA in ENGLISH 2003? (still no Master's thesis) https://www.york.ac.uk/media/studenthome/graduation/graduands/Graduands%20-%20July%202003.pdf Another Comment on a weather article: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/11/04/more-ipcc-inadequacies-and-failures-precipitation/ Still no thesis. O wait, Maybe your real name is Timothy? http://www.goucher.edu/learn/graduate-programs/ma-in-historic-preservation/thesis-abstracts Well no a thesis on thermodynamics. Oh Jimboo, show us how to find your thesis.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 19:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0dc15324-3d78-455c-9466-64b7a2ef4031@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #644077 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 3:30:01 PM UTC-7, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 2:03:17 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 10:54:16 AM UTC-7, Serg io wrote: > > > On 8/2/2017 9:23 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > [] > > > >> Yes. I know. I'm an expert in thermodynamics. > > > >> That what the focus of my Master's thesis. > > > > > > > > From what school? > > > > > > by his own admission, James McGinn does not have a degree, therefore > > > does not have a Master's thesis. > > > > > > James, if you do have a Master's Thesis, post it here. > > > > It's been replicated thousands of thousands of times. > > Its all over the internet. Anybody can find it. Just do a search. > > Sure Jimboo. We are here to serve you. 8^) > Search string - "James McGinn" Master's thesis > > First result with your name (third result overall BTW) > is a Comment on an article about graduate school. > > http://nautil.us/issue/43/heroes/what-does-any-of-this-have-to-do-with-physics > > > Your first name isn't Leo is is? > https://archive.org/stream/annualcommenceme1949nort/annualcommenceme1949nort_djvu.txt > If this is you, you have a BS Mechanical Eng. and you are very old! > (class of '49) > > OH, BA in ENGLISH 2003? (still no Master's thesis) > https://www.york.ac.uk/media/studenthome/graduation/graduands/Graduands%20-%20July%202003.pdf > > Another Comment on a weather article: > https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/11/04/more-ipcc-inadequacies-and-failures-precipitation/ > > Still no thesis. > > O wait, Maybe your real name is Timothy? > http://www.goucher.edu/learn/graduate-programs/ma-in-historic-preservation/thesis-abstracts > Well no a thesis on thermodynamics. > > Oh Jimboo, show us how to find your thesis. Thousands and thousands of professors have had no trouble finding it. It's all over the internet. I'm not going to spoon feed you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web