Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #640637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-15 13:43 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-07-30 21:22 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 259 — 29 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-07-15 18:39 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 18:31 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 19:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:34 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:49 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-07-16 12:24 +1000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:18 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 12:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:24 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:35 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 11:48 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:54 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 10:20 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 11:30 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-07-18 20:03 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 18:03 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 09:59 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 12:04 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 16:34 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:41 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:34 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:27 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:47 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:43 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:06 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:15 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 03:42 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:29 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 17:27 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 00:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 21:20 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 01:41 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 09:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 21:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 12:08 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-22 18:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-22 21:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 20:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-24 05:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-24 08:39 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 20:15 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-25 11:56 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 20:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-26 20:28 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-29 21:18 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-29 23:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-31 17:05 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-24 20:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-15 20:09 +0100
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:44 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:24 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:42 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-21 13:46 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:07 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:31 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 19:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-22 00:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 18:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. krw@notreal.com - 2017-07-15 22:38 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 03:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-16 09:20 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2017-07-17 22:29 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 04:18 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:29 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-07-15 12:51 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-15 23:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:58 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-16 09:22 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:46 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 10:13 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 06:26 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 11:09 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-21 21:44 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 22:17 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-22 02:16 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-23 10:33 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-23 16:34 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 12:10 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-24 05:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 12:32 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-24 08:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 16:56 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-24 12:02 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 23:51 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-24 17:16 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-25 01:12 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-24 18:25 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-25 11:54 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 17:19 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 17:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-24 23:33 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-24 21:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:12 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-21 18:53 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-22 00:23 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 06:00 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-07-21 09:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:30 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-21 17:30 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:34 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2017-07-21 13:08 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-15 19:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-21 06:05 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-21 19:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2017-07-22 10:39 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 12:47 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-26 18:18 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-26 18:27 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 11:40 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-07-23 14:32 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 10:03 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:33 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-30 21:19 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 09:33 -0700
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-07-30 21:22 -0700
Page 5 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 13 Next page →
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okijjl$11hn$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640934 |
Serg io wrote: > On 7/16/2017 1:49 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >> >> Alloy, or plated with something else, idiot. > > Na, motherboards chipped and tested in box at a store with a price of > $50. assuming they make 50% profit, the gold contant is less than $ 0.50 Since you are stupid, then yes, you only get that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimi2$1854$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641028 |
On 7/17/2017 10:03 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >> On 7/16/2017 1:49 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> jimp wrote: >>> >>>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >>> >>> Alloy, or plated with something else, idiot. >> >> Na, motherboards chipped and tested in box at a store with a price of >> $50. assuming they make 50% profit, the gold contant is less than $ 0.50 > > Since you are stupid, then yes, you only get that. > I feel sorry for you, I add +20 points to your IQ. Feel Better ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgcnh$1ksj$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640838 |
jimp wrote: > Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is > actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are new-beginners in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech and how those things are put together.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgnen$9qh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640844 |
On 7/16/2017 1:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is >> actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. > > And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are new-beginners > in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech and how those > things are put together. > wrong again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c43b9$0$57965$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #640844 |
On 07/16/2017 02:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is >> actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. > > And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are new-beginners > in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech and how those > things are put together. > Gold or aluminum you dumb shit. The only nano-technology is the brain inside your miniature skull. IC are NOT "all gold" inside. Just certain areas coated. A big loud mouth does not equal intelligence, all Libs have proved that theorem beyond any doubt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okik3i$11ho$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640976 |
benj wrote: > On 07/16/2017 02:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >> >> And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are >> new-beginners in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech >> and how those things are put together. >> > Gold or aluminum you dumb shit. The only nano-technology is the brain > inside your miniature skull. IC are NOT "all gold" inside. Just certain > areas coated. A big loud mouth does not equal intelligence, all Libs > have proved that theorem beyond any doubt. A dumb shit is your mother. You however, an Imbecile. Let's hope mister Tom will not help you out, since there is an obvious reason, on why GOLD is prefered and used in nono-tech, here IC /MCUs. 14nm fab and less is not even possible without gold. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14_nanometer Take a look at that picture, idiot, all gold inside. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:4-fach-NAND-C10.JPG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimlp$1854$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641029 |
On 7/17/2017 10:11 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > benj wrote: > >> On 07/16/2017 02:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> jimp wrote: >>> >>>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >>> >>> And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are >>> new-beginners in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech >>> and how those things are put together. >>> >> Gold or aluminum you dumb shit. The only nano-technology is the brain >> inside your miniature skull. IC are NOT "all gold" inside. Just certain >> areas coated. A big loud mouth does not equal intelligence, all Libs >> have proved that theorem beyond any doubt. > > A dumb shit is your mother. You however, an Imbecile. Let's hope mister > > Take a look at that picture, idiot, all gold inside. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:4-fach-NAND-C10.JPG > wrong, that is ancient Mexican Indian Azteck Symbol
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 12:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7e058a6c-0899-4e2e-9d5c-bfef6049bff0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #640819 |
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 11:08:59 AM UTC-7, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Michael Moroney wrote: > > > Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used > > only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. > > Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, silver nowhere. And copper is > less corrosive than silver. Pure silver let alone corrodes in a matter of > hours, then its electrical characteristics degrades rapidly jeopardising > all circuitry, especially HF. You and your friend Sylvia are uneducated > cretins. Dr. Garfield is consistent in his treatise. Moroney is a moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <okgbm8$tea$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #640778 |
Den 16.07.2017 14.35, skrev Michael Moroney: > The nymshifting troll, posting as Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> writes: > >> Silver is strict avoided in electronics also because the capacitance and >> induction induced in circuitry by that corrosion. Use your brain before >> you post, lady mam. > > Admit it, nymshifter, you got caught in a mistake. Copper corrodes even > worse than silver, yet it is used all over the place. The reason for that > is because silver is simply too expensive compared to copper. Gold is an > even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used only where its > superior corrosion resistance is necessary. > Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver plated copper wire. And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver plated on the inside. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgbve$1ksj$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640830 |
Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver > plated copper wire. > And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver > plated on the inside. You forgot a lay of protection over, and is not pure silver, but whatever concentration alloy. I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <okge77$o6h$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #640834 |
Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: > I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load-coil/rf-coil-silver.html -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgesj$1ksj$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640850 |
Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >> > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html > http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types > https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html > https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm > http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php > http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm > https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html > http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ > http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- coil/rf-coil-silver.html Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and water kills silver in no time. Basic things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgnke$9qh$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640854 |
On 7/16/2017 2:30 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>> >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- > coil/rf-coil-silver.html > > Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to > look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, tolerance > etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and water kills > silver in no time. Basic things. > it is silver, probably 90%, some hardener, and corrosion does not hurt performance like you think it does. I know one factory that produces silver commutators from pure silver stock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okik8m$11ho$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640895 |
Serg io wrote: >> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to >> look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, >> tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and >> water kills silver in no time. Basic things. > > it is silver, probably 90%, some hardener, and corrosion does not hurt You have to look into the datasheet for the specs etc. These morons are incapable to read datasheets and believe all taken from the frontpage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimno$1854$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641030 |
On 7/17/2017 10:14 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to >>> look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, >>> tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and >>> water kills silver in no time. Basic things. >> >> it is silver, probably 90%, some hardener, and corrosion does not hurt > > You have to look into the datasheet for the specs etc. These morons are > incapable to read datasheets and believe all taken from the frontpage. > plating content never mentioned on datasheets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 16:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8d7b5995-9875-4c49-9a50-a1cb34e0dcb5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #640854 |
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 12:30:34 PM UTC-7, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > > Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: > >> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. > >> > > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html > > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html > > http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types > > https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html > > https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm > > http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php > > http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm > > https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html > > http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ > > http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- > coil/rf-coil-silver.html > > Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to > look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, tolerance > etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and water kills > silver in no time. Basic things. I agree.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okh5r6$a9a$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #640854 |
The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: >Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>> >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- >coil/rf-coil-silver.html >Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) explicitly states pure silver for some of the listed items. While silver does tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. Old wire wrap circuits sometimes used silver wire wrap wire. I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with some of the silver still in the machinery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c52db$0$60308$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #640943 |
On 07/16/2017 10:02 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: > >> Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >>> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>>> >>> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >>> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >>> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >>> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >>> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >>> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >>> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >>> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >>> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >>> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- >> coil/rf-coil-silver.html > >> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. > > Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned > (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) explicitly > states pure silver for some of the listed items. While silver does > tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. > > Old wire wrap circuits sometimes used silver wire wrap wire. > > I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch > factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts > and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with some > of the silver still in the machinery. > Silver is still today one of the choices a buyer can make for the material in switch contacts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okikkv$11ho$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #640992 |
benj wrote: > On 07/16/2017 10:02 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >> I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch >> factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts >> and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with >> some of the silver still in the machinery. >> > Silver is still today one of the choices a buyer can make for the > material in switch contacts. Among you two stupid, benj and morony, plus jimp, serg is the smartest of you four. lol, so true indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimtt$19g1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #641032 |
On 7/17/2017 10:21 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > benj wrote: > >> On 07/16/2017 10:02 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >>> I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch >>> factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts >>> and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with >>> some of the silver still in the machinery. >>> >> Silver is still today one of the choices a buyer can make for the >> material in switch contacts. > > Among you two stupid, benj and morony, plus jimp, serg is the smartest of > you four. lol, so true indeed. > we cannot win the race to the bottom, Hillary and Trump already morons been there, the stupider you are, the more electable you are, watch "Being There" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEb6fxpbcDo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web