Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #638483 > unrolled thread

Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 01:43 -0700
    Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-07-02 01:49 -0700
      Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-02 15:30 +0000
      Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-03 15:01 -0400

#638483 — Re: Is geothermal 4 to 1 or 5000 to 1 superior to Solar, and is hydroelectric 4 to 1 superior to geothermal?

Mind you, get that of the science failure calling geothermal as fossil solar

On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >Learned a lot about the loop under ground and the 51 degree temperature.
> 
> Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and
> winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending
> on how deep they go.
> 
> Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it
> is much better than simply using that energy to make heat.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#638485

Classic idiot of science with a big mouth

On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 3:43:09 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Mind you, get that of the science failure calling geothermal as fossil solar
> 
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > >Learned a lot about the loop under ground and the 51 degree temperature.
> > 
> > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and
> > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending
> > on how deep they go.
> > 
> > Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it
> > is much better than simply using that energy to make heat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638510

Failure of Physics, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:


>Classic idiot of science with a big mouth

Why yes, you are!  That phrase describes you perfectly!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#638648

On 7/2/2017 4:49 AM, Archimedes Plutonium drooled:
> 
> Classic idiot of science with a big mouth

Oh look Muffy, Classic senile troll AP says others have a big mouth!

> On Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 3:43:09 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Mind you, get that of the science failure calling geothermal as fossil solar
>>
>> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Learned a lot about the loop under ground and the 51 degree temperature.
>>>
>>> Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and
>>> winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending
>>> on how deep they go.
>>>
>>> Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it
>>> is much better than simply using that energy to make heat.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web