Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #636764 > unrolled thread

7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 14:57 -0700
    Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-17 15:42 -0700
    Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-17 19:11 -0400
      Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-18 08:43 -0500
        Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 23:41 -0700
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 15:14 +0000
            Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-22 12:43 -0500
              Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-22 18:31 -0400
                Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-22 20:42 -0500
        Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 10:45 -0700
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor hanson <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-23 11:01 -0700
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 14:10 -0400
    7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 14:14 -0700
      Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-23 03:24 +0000
      7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 00:28 -0700
        7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-23 00:38 -0700
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-23 01:30 -0700
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 13:07 -0400
        Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-23 13:06 -0400
        Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-23 18:19 +0000
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 14:34 -0500
            Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 18:19 -0700
              Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:52 -0400
                Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-30 04:59 -0700
                  Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 14:15 -0400
        Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-27 09:19 -0700
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-27 19:15 +0000
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-27 17:25 -0400
            Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 18:22 -0700
              Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:49 -0400
          Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-28 20:30 -0700
            Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-28 22:19 -0700
            Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 21:56 -0400
              Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-29 19:27 -0700
                Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-29 21:22 -0700
                Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-30 14:35 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#636764 — 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn, Reber-Hanson, Porat stealing-accostor

All of them are failures of physics which begs the question, why so much time spent in sci.physics? A normal person failing physics or finding it too difficult moves onto something else in life. But no, some failures are crazy along with failing, and so they run to sci.physics to deposit their mind rot. 

Moroney and McGinn are the classical failures but lack the intelligence to move on, and with McGinn talk of weather, the goofball has not enough sense to realize he should be in sci.geo.meteorology, not sci.physics. 

Benj is a pernicious failure of physics for he hates science altogether-- a anti-science twerp. So pernicious that he issued a death threat on AP.

> Benj death threat 
> 

> From: benj <be...@nobody.net> 
> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:47:09 -0400 
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 
>  Thunderbird/45.8.0 
> MIME-Version: 1.0 
> In-Reply-To: <c2bf8da9-6a16-4fc4-a400-9a627d467663@googlegroups.com> 
> Lines: 41 
> Message-ID: <59309972$0$62649$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> 
> Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com 
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 2d028550.news.astraweb.com 
> 

> > 
> Overpopulation is such a horrible problem ArchiePoo. I suggest we start 
> by killing you. Think of the good you'd be doing for humanity. Think of 
> the way that would raise the level of science discussion in this 
> newsgroup. Get that Barrel Boat from Bert and sail into the sunset to 
> Hawaii. DRink your TAng Geezer. YOu are STILL an idiot. 

Moroney's et al mode of operation is stalking, who identify people to attack and then just say the opposite of whatever the author says. They stalk incessantly. They are depressed and their posts are depressing. Stalking relieves them-- but of what, for they no longer really have anything of science to give. 

Benj is a science hatemonger, believes in crap-- ghosts, ESP, black holes, gravity waves, spoon bending, denies Global Warming, and that Porat is full of science not full of sh(t. 

McGinn threatens the entire board with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpage-saturation klutz. Mind you, the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics. The twit when asked to experiment with a IR thermometer to verify Greenhouse Effect shrugged that off, as if science is pontification, not experiment. McGinn is a huge huge menace to sci.physics. McGinn is such a moron of science that he denies Global Warming. 

I have found Google Abuse Reports a valuable tool and have often reported McGinn so as to never see those repeating threads "hidden from view". It takes but 2 minutes per day to hide from view the McGinn front page saturation, along with several other nutters. And because of McGinn's persistent desire to flood the front page, I think he is insane. 

Porat is a huge huge menace in sci.physics. His game or robot game is to post baby-talk, sheer nonsense, baby talk, baby talk baby talk. Sprinkled with some words of physics like circle or mass, or motion, or electron. And if anyone uses the words of say mass, the raving lunatic accosts you with stealing his ideas, when, there never was an idea from Porat. Porat never in his life, ever yielded a decent idea in physics. The worthless fool cannot even do math, only rave on baby talk. So what Porat is, is like in the fairy tale of a Ogre on a bridge of sci.physics, and people want to get across the bridge and do physics, while this ogre of Porat is charging at you pestering you because you use a word that the fiend Porat uses. Porat should have been kicked out of sci.physics a decade ago. 

Then of course, there is the comedy routine of Reber and his partner Hanson, the Ha Ha scatology feces thrower of olympic proportion. Reber is a insipid robot, pelting out insipid comments, along with Starmaker. Never is there any physics to this nonsense, so please, never talk to them, because you only increase this robot nonsense traffic that only tends to downgrade sci.physics. 


From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
Lines: 33 
Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
(CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
(CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 

In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 

Moroney) writes. . . 
> I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> exist. 

Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 

--------

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#636770

On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 12:57:54 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> All of them are failures of physics which begs the question, why so much time spent in sci.physics? A normal person failing physics or finding it too difficult moves onto something else in life. But no, some failures are crazy along with failing, and so they run to sci.physics to deposit their mind rot. 
> 
> Moroney and McGinn are the classical failures but lack the intelligence to move on, and with McGinn talk of weather, the goofball has not enough sense to realize he should be in sci.geo.meteorology, not sci.physics. 
> 
> Benj is a pernicious failure of physics for he hates science altogether-- a anti-science twerp. So pernicious that he issued a death threat on AP.
> 
> > Benj death threat 
> > 
> 
> > From: benj <be...@nobody.net> 
> > Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:47:09 -0400 
> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 
> >  Thunderbird/45.8.0 
> > MIME-Version: 1.0 
> > In-Reply-To: <c2bf8da9-6a16-4fc4-a400-9a627d467663@googlegroups.com> 
> > Lines: 41 
> > Message-ID: <59309972$0$62649$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> 
> > Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com 
> > NNTP-Posting-Host: 2d028550.news.astraweb.com 
> > 
> 
> > > 
> > Overpopulation is such a horrible problem ArchiePoo. I suggest we start 
> > by killing you. Think of the good you'd be doing for humanity. Think of 
> > the way that would raise the level of science discussion in this 
> > newsgroup. Get that Barrel Boat from Bert and sail into the sunset to 
> > Hawaii. DRink your TAng Geezer. YOu are STILL an idiot. 
> 
> Moroney's et al mode of operation is stalking, who identify people to attack and then just say the opposite of whatever the author says. They stalk incessantly. They are depressed and their posts are depressing. Stalking relieves them-- but of what, for they no longer really have anything of science to give. 
> 
> Benj is a science hatemonger, believes in crap-- ghosts, ESP, black holes, gravity waves, spoon bending, denies Global Warming, and that Porat is full of science not full of sh(t. 
> 
> McGinn threatens the entire board with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpage-saturation klutz. Mind you, the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics. The twit when asked to experiment with a IR thermometer to verify Greenhouse Effect shrugged that off, as if science is pontification, not experiment. McGinn is a huge huge menace to sci.physics. McGinn is such a moron of science that he denies Global Warming. 
> 
> I have found Google Abuse Reports a valuable tool and have often reported McGinn so as to never see those repeating threads "hidden from view". It takes but 2 minutes per day to hide from view the McGinn front page saturation, along with several other nutters. And because of McGinn's persistent desire to flood the front page, I think he is insane. 
> 
> Porat is a huge huge menace in sci.physics. His game or robot game is to post baby-talk, sheer nonsense, baby talk, baby talk baby talk. Sprinkled with some words of physics like circle or mass, or motion, or electron. And if anyone uses the words of say mass, the raving lunatic accosts you with stealing his ideas, when, there never was an idea from Porat. Porat never in his life, ever yielded a decent idea in physics. The worthless fool cannot even do math, only rave on baby talk. So what Porat is, is like in the fairy tale of a Ogre on a bridge of sci.physics, and people want to get across the bridge and do physics, while this ogre of Porat is charging at you pestering you because you use a word that the fiend Porat uses. Porat should have been kicked out of sci.physics a decade ago. 
> 
> Then of course, there is the comedy routine of Reber and his partner Hanson, the Ha Ha scatology feces thrower of olympic proportion. Reber is a insipid robot, pelting out insipid comments, along with Starmaker. Never is there any physics to this nonsense, so please, never talk to them, because you only increase this robot nonsense traffic that only tends to downgrade sci.physics. 
> 
> 
> From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
> Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
> Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
> Lines: 33 
> Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
> References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
> (CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
> (CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 
> 
> In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 
> 
> Moroney) writes. . . 
> > I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> > exist. 
> 
> Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
> absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 
> 
> --------
======================
the fact the  psychopath pig Archi Pu 
IS SO AFRAIEDOF ME
IS THE BIGGEST COMPLELENT FOR ME !!.....
--
Y.Porat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636781

On 6/17/2017 5:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> All of them are failures of physics which begs the question, why so much time spent in sci.physics? A normal person failing physics or finding it too difficult moves onto something else in life. But no, some failures are crazy along with failing, and so they run to sci.physics to deposit their mind rot.
> 
> Moroney and McGinn are the classical failures but lack the intelligence to move on, and with McGinn talk of weather, the goofball has not enough sense to realize he should be in sci.geo.meteorology, not sci.physics.
> 
> Benj is a pernicious failure of physics for he hates science altogether-- a anti-science twerp. So pernicious that he issued a death threat on AP.
> 
>> Benj death threat

ARchiePoo is a liar and senile coot. His "death threat" was my 
suggestion that he could do something about his rant on overpopulation 
(he issued a death threat to all of iceland) by committing suicide. I"m 
all for Archie saving the planet by killing himself. As for me saving 
the planet, I have no plans for suicide nor plans to kill ARchie (he one 
foot in the grave already) except perhaps only after a fair trial.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#636830

On 6/17/2017 6:11 PM, benj wrote:
> On 6/17/2017 5:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> All of them are failures of physics which begs the question, why so 
>> much time spent in sci.physics? A normal person failing physics or 
>> finding it too difficult moves onto something else in life. But no, 
>> some failures are crazy along with failing, and so they run to 
>> sci.physics to deposit their mind rot.

>> Moroney and McGinn are the classical failures but lack the 
>> intelligence to move on, and with McGinn talk of weather, the goofball 
>> has not enough sense to realize he should be in sci.geo.meteorology, 
>> not sci.physics.
>>
>> Benj is a pernicious failure of physics for he hates science 
>> altogether-- a anti-science twerp. So pernicious that he issued a 
>> death threat on AP.
>>
>>> Benj death threat
> 
> ARchiePoo is a liar and senile coot. His "death threat" was my 
> suggestion that he could do something about his rant on overpopulation 
> (he issued a death threat to all of iceland) by committing suicide. I"m 
> all for Archie saving the planet by killing himself. As for me saving 
> the planet, I have no plans for suicide nor plans to kill ARchie (he one 
> foot in the grave already) except perhaps only after a fair trial.


Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via 
Amazon as an eBook.

Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.

I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637275

On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:43:36 AM UTC-5, Sегgi о wrote:

> 
> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via 
> Amazon as an eBook.
> 
> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
> 
> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.

I am more concerned about getting it logically done.

There is no money angle in it for me

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637302 — Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> failed logic by writing:

>On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:43:36 AM UTC-5, Sегgi о wrote:

>> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via
>> Amazon as an eBook.
>>
>> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
>>
>> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.

>I am more concerned about getting it logically done.

"Writing a book" by babbling in sci.physics isn't logical.
Writing a book" by actually writing a book is logical.

>There is no money angle in it for me

Nothing wrong for offering it for free or selling it for cost.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637328 — Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

On 6/22/2017 10:14 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> failed logic by writing:
> 
>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:43:36 AM UTC-5, Sегgi о wrote:
> 
>>> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via
>>> Amazon as an eBook.
>>>
>>> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
>>>
>>> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.
> 
>> I am more concerned about getting it logically done.
> 
> "Writing a book" by babbling in sci.physics isn't logical.
> Writing a book" by actually writing a book is logical.
> 
>> There is no money angle in it for me
> 
> Nothing wrong for offering it for free or selling it for cost.
> 

if you want, you could publish it here in parts,

then someone here could put it together and put it on Amazon for you, 
and give you full credit of course, and all the sales $ to you.
Your photo would look good on the back cover too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637379 — Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

On 6/22/2017 1:43 PM, Sегgi о wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 10:14 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> failed logic by 
>> writing:
>>
>>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:43:36 AM UTC-5, Sегgi о wrote:
>>
>>>> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via
>>>> Amazon as an eBook.
>>>>
>>>> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
>>>>
>>>> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.
>>
>>> I am more concerned about getting it logically done.
>>
>> "Writing a book" by babbling in sci.physics isn't logical.
>> Writing a book" by actually writing a book is logical.
>>
>>> There is no money angle in it for me
>>
>> Nothing wrong for offering it for free or selling it for cost.
>>
> 
> if you want, you could publish it here in parts,
> 
> then someone here could put it together and put it on Amazon for you, 
> and give you full credit of course, and all the sales $ to you.
> Your photo would look good on the back cover too.
> 
> 
Only if he wears his toupee!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637396 — Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

On 6/22/2017 5:31 PM, benj wrote:
> On 6/22/2017 1:43 PM, Sегgi о wrote:
>> On 6/22/2017 10:14 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> failed logic by 
>>> writing:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:43:36 AM UTC-5, Sегgi о wrote:

>>>>> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via
>>>>> Amazon as an eBook.
>>>>>
>>>>> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.
>>>
>>>> I am more concerned about getting it logically done.

>>> "Writing a book" by babbling in sci.physics isn't logical.
>>> Writing a book" by actually writing a book is logical.
>>>
>>>> There is no money angle in it for me
>>>
>>> Nothing wrong for offering it for free or selling it for cost.
>>>

>> if you want, you could publish it here in parts,
>>
>> then someone here could put it together and put it on Amazon for you, 
>> and give you full credit of course, and all the sales $ to you.
>> Your photo would look good on the back cover too.
>>
>>
> Only if he wears his toupee!

could get a Labyrinth Wig offa amazon cheap.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637455

On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 6:43:36 AM UTC-7, Sегgi о wrote:
> On 6/17/2017 6:11 PM, benj wrote:
> > On 6/17/2017 5:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> All of them are failures of physics which begs the question, why so 
> >> much time spent in sci.physics? A normal person failing physics or 
> >> finding it too difficult moves onto something else in life. But no, 
> >> some failures are crazy along with failing, and so they run to 
> >> sci.physics to deposit their mind rot.
> 
> >> Moroney and McGinn are the classical failures but lack the 
> >> intelligence to move on, and with McGinn talk of weather, the goofball 
> >> has not enough sense to realize he should be in sci.geo.meteorology, 
> >> not sci.physics.
> >>
> >> Benj is a pernicious failure of physics for he hates science 
> >> altogether-- a anti-science twerp. So pernicious that he issued a 
> >> death threat on AP.
> >>
> >>> Benj death threat
> > 
> > ARchiePoo is a liar and senile coot. His "death threat" was my 
> > suggestion that he could do something about his rant on overpopulation 
> > (he issued a death threat to all of iceland) by committing suicide. I"m 
> > all for Archie saving the planet by killing himself. As for me saving 
> > the planet, I have no plans for suicide nor plans to kill ARchie (he one 
> > foot in the grave already) except perhaps only after a fair trial.
> 
> 
> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via 
> Amazon as an eBook.
> 
> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
> 
> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.
Had to get a book published I wrote two novels and know that's reality.Takes money in advertising etc. Trebert.Hot and sunny here at the beach.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637461

On 06/23/2017 10:45 AM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 6:43:36 AM UTC-7, Sегgi о wrote:
>> On 6/17/2017 6:11 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 6/17/2017 5:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
 >
All 3 of the above posters, Serge, Benj & Archie
  told you, SwineBert, already, over and over that you
are <http://tinyurl.com/Loudmouth-Glazier-8Feb2017>
who is a cretin, is wrong, lies and is drunk @ 10AM,
as they know that you are a stinky Face Shitter and a
Criminal Graveyard vandal who does not tell why he
insists and brags to be such a pig.....  "it's a pity"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637465

On 6/23/2017 1:45 PM, reber G=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 6:43:36 AM UTC-7, Sегgi о wrote:
>> On 6/17/2017 6:11 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 6/17/2017 5:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>> All of them are failures of physics which begs the question, why so
>>>> much time spent in sci.physics? A normal person failing physics or
>>>> finding it too difficult moves onto something else in life. But no,
>>>> some failures are crazy along with failing, and so they run to
>>>> sci.physics to deposit their mind rot.
>>
>>>> Moroney and McGinn are the classical failures but lack the
>>>> intelligence to move on, and with McGinn talk of weather, the goofball
>>>> has not enough sense to realize he should be in sci.geo.meteorology,
>>>> not sci.physics.
>>>>
>>>> Benj is a pernicious failure of physics for he hates science
>>>> altogether-- a anti-science twerp. So pernicious that he issued a
>>>> death threat on AP.
>>>>
>>>>> Benj death threat
>>>
>>> ARchiePoo is a liar and senile coot. His "death threat" was my
>>> suggestion that he could do something about his rant on overpopulation
>>> (he issued a death threat to all of iceland) by committing suicide. I"m
>>> all for Archie saving the planet by killing himself. As for me saving
>>> the planet, I have no plans for suicide nor plans to kill ARchie (he one
>>> foot in the grave already) except perhaps only after a fair trial.
>>
>>
>> Hey AP - instead of going down this route, *publish your book* via
>> Amazon as an eBook.
>>
>> Think of a good title, intro and ending and do it now while you can.
>>
>> I think it is free, and amazon takes their cut when they sell.
> Had to get a book published I wrote two novels and know that's reality.Takes money in advertising etc. Trebert.Hot and sunny here at the beach.
> 
Sure, Bert. HVAC and I tried to buy copies of those supposed novels you 
wrote and got absolutely nothing. You can't even spell the simplest 
words so how can someone who didn't finish the 8th grade write a novel? 
Obviously they are as imaginary as M&M filters. HVAC got his filter yet?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637358

Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics?

On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 3:39:39 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and 
> > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending 
> > on how deep they go. 
> > 
> 
>    Born a day late and like that ever since. 
> 
>      Born during low tide in the gene pool. 
> 
>      Both oars in the water, but on the same side of the boat. 
> 
>      Brain permanently in power saving mode. 
> 
> How dumb and stupid is Moroney, the physics failure in geothermal? So stupid he cannot tell the difference between geothermal and fossil fuel and solar. So stupid we give Moroney his own idiocy joke. 
> 

Why would he get stuck on that? 

Well, to real scientists, they have a instinct that tells them the value of something. What I mean is that a real scientist and other real scientists have a pattern of mind that they do the scientific method in their thinking and experimentation, but a nonscientist has to always resort to " what he read, is the truth". They cannot figure things out independent of what they saw in print. 

A nonscientist needs to be surrounded by literature and journals telling him what he is to believe in, at all times. And does not have a independent scientific mind to sort things out. 

So that some things, never written about come up, then the nonscientist like Moroney is easily caught as a failure. 

So when Moroney hears of geothermal fossil solar, he cannot go to some literature or journal to support that idiotic idea because it is so far wacko that no scientist dare write about it, thinking that if you fall for such nonsense you do not deserve to be in science. 

A real scientist would by instinct know that geothermal fossil solar is sheer idiotic and needs no checking. 

So, here is another Moroney joke: 

M. Moroney thinks geothermal is fossil solar energy and he says it is 51 degrees. Moroney, are you missing nuclear?? you idiot. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637409 — Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> failed at physics once again by writing:

>Re: How dumb and stupid is Moroney in physics?

Nowhere as dumb as Archimedes Plutonium!

Archimedes Plutonium actually thinks 51 Fahrenheit is geothermal energy!  
Can you believe that? What a failure!  Real Geothermal energy is when
ground or water is heated by magma or otherwise by the HOT interior of
earth, producing HOT water or steam.  Guess what Carnot's Law has to say
about the amount of useful energy from a 51 Fahrenheit heat source! And
then only in winter! Oh yeah, you can operate it BACKWARDS on a hot summer
day -- but now you are actually dumping heat into the ground! There are
lots of earth source heat pump systems sold as "geothermal" to dazzle the
gullible (like Archimedes Plutonium). These are great, they're useful for
building heat and A/C since powering a heat pump with a source of heat
gives more building heat than if used as resistance heat. And then in the
summer it's a great sink for the hot end of an A/C system, but once again
you're now dumping heat INTO the ground!

How dumb and stupid is Plutonium, the physics failure in geothermal? So
stupid he cannot tell the difference between geothermal and fossil fuel
and solar. So stupid we give Plutonium his own idiocy joke.

So, here is another Plutonium joke:

A. Plutonium thinks fossil solar energy is geothermal and he says 51
degrees is geothermal. Plutonium, are you missing nuclear?? you idiot.
You probably aren't bolted down too tight as well.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637415

On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling 
> but even these are solar power in disguise.  They pump water from wells 
> from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat 
> from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the 
> water back into the ground.  The water is about 55F out of the ground. 

If this knucklehead is in education, what is he doing in education since almost all of his posts in my threads contain science flaws-- geothermal is solar in disguise. 

Moroney does not belong in science. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637416

Moroney thinks geothermal is disguised solar, only because he is a failure of science.

Moroney is a New England pumpkin, disguised as a scientist.

Porat-- what is your opinion? We value the opinion of the clinicly insane.

Reber approved post

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637417

On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 10:38:34 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Moroney thinks geothermal is disguised solar, only because he is a failure of science.
> 
> Moroney is a New England pumpkin, disguised as a scientist.
> 
> Porat-- what is your opinion? We value the opinion of the clinicly insane.

=========================
I didn't quite understand your question
2
 I am not a learned  psychiatrist 
but anyway
 I lived long enough with different many  kinds of  people 
so
if someone is a bit  cu cu   behavior 
it is   not difficult to detect  it

a san  man  
is not underestimating  himself
nor over- estimating       himself !!!
we are all  moral human  beings 
sometimes wrong
sometime right !!

'hominum errata est (spelling in roman ??!)

was said 2 thousand years ago !!
---------
2
may be for a change 
may be  
physics questions ??

how about ??
=======
TIA
Y.Porat
============================== 
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637448

On 6/23/2017 3:38 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Moroney thinks geothermal is disguised solar, only because he is a failure of science.
> 
> Moroney is a New England pumpkin, disguised as a scientist.
> 
> Porat-- what is your opinion? We value the opinion of the clinicly insane.
> 
> Reber approved post
> 

I think they are all pig thieves.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637446

On 6/23/2017 3:28 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
>>
>> There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling
>> but even these are solar power in disguise.  They pump water from wells
>> from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat
>> from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the
>> water back into the ground.  The water is about 55F out of the ground.
> 
> If this knucklehead is in education, what is he doing in education since almost all of his posts in my threads contain science flaws-- geothermal is solar in disguise.
> 
> Moroney does not belong in science.
> 
Moroney you MORON! GET OUT OF SCIENCE NOW! Obviously geothermal heat got 
in the earth from the sun. Archie was there back when it happened!

Archie is ahead in the Alzheimer's contest!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#637471 — Re: 7please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

Once again, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at physics by writing:

>Moroney thinks geothermal is disguised solar, only because he is a failure of science.

No, fool.  I'm just not dumb enough to think 55° Fahrenheit is "geothermal"
just because salesmen selling ground source heat pump heating/cooling
systems call them "geothermal".  But I guess you are dumb enough.
Watch "This Old House", they install several of those ground source heat pump
"geothermal" heating/cooling systems, extracting heat from 55° Fahrenheit
ground water.  But let's see anyone build a geothermal power plant using 55°
Fahrenheit ground source temperature...Carnot says "nope!"

On the other hand, places where underground temperatures are hundreds of
degrees are genuine geothermal.  I know the difference between geothermal
and stored solar.

>If this knucklehead is in education, what is he doing in education since

You'll be happy to know that there are and were many college professors and
teachers in my family over the years.

At least I know that babbling in sci.physics isn't "writing a book".
Even McFly knows how to write a book.

Anyone who sees a cheaply printed diagram in a book and then has a dream
(hallucination?) about some giant atom and babbles about it for 25 years
just might not be bolted down too tight in the first place.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web