Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #532233 > unrolled thread

It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 18:16 -0600
    Re: It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-11 18:18 -0600
    Re: It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-12 00:36 +0000
    Re: It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it? Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2015-11-11 20:30 -0800
    Re: It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 12:47 -0800

#532233 — It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has before. Or is it?

It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have 
been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has 
before. Or is it?
> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-global-fast-today.html

> Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg have
> shown in the latest edition of the journal Nature Communications that
> the temperature changes millions of years ago probably happened no
> more slowly than they are happening today.
>
> In order to predict how today's ecosystems will react to increasing
> temperatures over the course of global warming, palaeobiologists
> study how climate change happened in the earth's history and what the
> consequences were. In order to compare the events of the past with
> current changes researchers need data on the scope of the changes.
> What was the speed with which temperatures increased or decreased?
> What was the magnitude of the change in temperatures? Until now, the
> general consensus has been that current climate change is happening
> more quickly than any previous temperature fluctuations.
>
> Climate change in the earth's past faster than previously thought
>
> Together with a British colleagues, palaeobiologist Prof. Dr.
> Wolfgang Kießling and geosciences student Kilian Eichenseer, both
> from FAU, have published a pioneering study in Nature Communications
> explaining that the idea that environmental changes in the earth's
> past happened slowly in comparison to current, rapid climate change
> is wrong. The reason for this incorrect assumption is the different
> time periods that are examined in climate research. 'Today we can
> measure the smallest fluctuations in climate whenever they occur,'
> Kilian Eichenseer explains. 'Yet when we look at geological history
> we're lucky if we can determine a change in climate over a period of
> ten thousand years.'


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#532234

On 11/11/2015 6:16 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
















                                                            <snip crap>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#532244

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have 
> been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has 
> before. Or is it?
>> http://phys.org/news/2015-11-global-fast-today.html
> 
>> Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universit?t Erlangen-N?rnberg have
>> shown in the latest edition of the journal Nature Communications that
>> the temperature changes millions of years ago probably happened no
>> more slowly than they are happening today.
>>
>> In order to predict how today's ecosystems will react to increasing
>> temperatures over the course of global warming, palaeobiologists
>> study how climate change happened in the earth's history and what the
>> consequences were. In order to compare the events of the past with
>> current changes researchers need data on the scope of the changes.
>> What was the speed with which temperatures increased or decreased?
>> What was the magnitude of the change in temperatures? Until now, the
>> general consensus has been that current climate change is happening
>> more quickly than any previous temperature fluctuations.
>>
>> Climate change in the earth's past faster than previously thought
>>
>> Together with a British colleagues, palaeobiologist Prof. Dr.
>> Wolfgang Kie?ling and geosciences student Kilian Eichenseer, both
>> from FAU, have published a pioneering study in Nature Communications
>> explaining that the idea that environmental changes in the earth's
>> past happened slowly in comparison to current, rapid climate change
>> is wrong. The reason for this incorrect assumption is the different
>> time periods that are examined in climate research. 'Today we can
>> measure the smallest fluctuations in climate whenever they occur,'
>> Kilian Eichenseer explains. 'Yet when we look at geological history
>> we're lucky if we can determine a change in climate over a period of
>> ten thousand years.'
 
No shit?

Seems to me people have been telling you that for many years now, spammer. 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#532277

> > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-global-fast-today.html
> 
> > Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg have
> > shown in the latest edition of the journal Nature Communications that
> > the temperature changes millions of years ago probably happened no
> > more slowly than they are happening today.

Were a billion inhabitants claiming property rights in tidal areas back then?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#532446

On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 4:16:23 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> It is not the first time in our planet's history that temperatures have 
> been rising, but it is happening much faster now than it ever has 
> before. Or is it?
> > http://phys.org/news/2015-11-global-fast-today.html
> 
> > Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg have
> > shown in the latest edition of the journal Nature Communications that
> > the temperature changes millions of years ago probably happened no
> > more slowly than they are happening today.
> >
> > In order to predict how today's ecosystems will react to increasing
> > temperatures over the course of global warming, palaeobiologists
> > study how climate change happened in the earth's history and what the
> > consequences were. In order to compare the events of the past with
> > current changes researchers need data on the scope of the changes.
> > What was the speed with which temperatures increased or decreased?
> > What was the magnitude of the change in temperatures? Until now, the
> > general consensus has been that current climate change is happening
> > more quickly than any previous temperature fluctuations.
> >
> > Climate change in the earth's past faster than previously thought
> >
> > Together with a British colleagues, palaeobiologist Prof. Dr.
> > Wolfgang Kießling and geosciences student Kilian Eichenseer, both
> > from FAU, have published a pioneering study in Nature Communications
> > explaining that the idea that environmental changes in the earth's
> > past happened slowly in comparison to current, rapid climate change
> > is wrong. The reason for this incorrect assumption is the different
> > time periods that are examined in climate research. 'Today we can
> > measure the smallest fluctuations in climate whenever they occur,'
> > Kilian Eichenseer explains. 'Yet when we look at geological history
> > we're lucky if we can determine a change in climate over a period of
> > ten thousand years.'
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Reality is its the first time my "Heavy Air Theory" is showing air pressure at sea level is rising.I like that in regards to good science thinking that can be Nobel all the way to Sweden OY I am clever  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web