Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726594 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 66 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 23:49 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 14:26 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-10 20:02 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 15:09 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-10 14:23 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 19:45 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 12:53 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 23:35 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 16:50 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:17 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:38 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:25 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 05:59 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 20:11 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 06:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 21:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 21:51 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 01:49 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 18:56 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 03:36 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-12 06:46 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 06:08 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-12 14:59 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 22:37 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:48 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 23:13 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:26 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:08 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 22:00 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:06 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:03 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:08 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:18 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:11 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:26 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:02 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 07:02 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-16 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:00 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-16 08:18 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:41 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 23:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-12 09:14 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:17 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:27 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-12 19:49 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 01:11 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 18:22 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:08 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:31 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:14 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:48 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 18:19 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:04 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 21:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3sp8r$1ku$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726721 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >> >> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after an >> hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. > > Blow it out your ass child. kensi 1 - 0 jimp Try again? :) -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 21:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ob79jf-8f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726781 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>> >>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after an >>> hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >> >> Blow it out your ass child. > > kensi 1 - 0 jimp > > Try again? :) Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an adolescent twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of clever put down when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about climate change? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 01:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3t8n2$1ku$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726789 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>>> >>>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after >>>> an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >>> >>> Blow it out your ass child. >> >> kensi 1 - 0 jimp >> >> Try again? :) > > Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an adolescent > twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of clever put down > when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about > climate change? You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvpulf.34u.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726821 |
On 2019-02-11 6:49 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>>>> >>>>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after >>>>> an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >>>> >>>> Blow it out your ass child. >>> >>> kensi 1 - 0 jimp >>> >>> Try again? :) >> >> Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an adolescent >> twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of clever put down >> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >> climate change? > > You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some > would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out > of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that > pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. > i did a test and turned up the heat in my bedroom , the water didn't get any deeper , no hurricanes appeared , there wear no examples of warming at all other than it was warmer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 20:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cbea1981f88acd1352@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #726822 |
In article <bvpulf.34u.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > >On 2019-02-11 6:49 p.m., Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>>>>> >>>>>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after >>>>>> an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >>>>> >>>>> Blow it out your ass child. >>>> >>>> kensi 1 - 0 jimp >>>> >>>> Try again? :) >>> >>> Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an adolescent >>> twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of clever put down >>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>> climate change? >> >> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some >> would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out >> of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that >> pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. >> >i did a test and turned up the heat in my bedroom , >the water didn't get any deeper , no hurricanes appeared , >there wear no examples of warming at all other than it was warmer that makes propane go away faster
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 03:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <0ir9jf-md2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726821 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:03:13 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. >>>>> >>>>> An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after >>>>> an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. >>>> >>>> Blow it out your ass child. >>> >>> kensi 1 - 0 jimp >>> >>> Try again? :) >> >> Try what, attempt to have an intelligent conversation with an adolescent >> twit that thinks "climate change denier" is some sort of clever put down >> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >> climate change? > > You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some > would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out > of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that > pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 06:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q3tj2e$1tf0$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726834 |
On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>> climate change? >> >> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some >> would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out >> of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that >> pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. > > Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 06:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf4ajf-n73.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726837 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>> climate change? >>> >>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what some >>> would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think she's out >>> of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on the basis of that >>> pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier in *this very thread*. >> >> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. > > Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take your nap. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 21:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3ve11$8bs$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726842 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>> climate change? >>>> >>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >>>> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >>>> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on >>>> the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier >>>> in *this very thread*. >>> >>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >> >> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. > > Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take > your nap. kensi 2 - 0 jimp Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 14:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ccefafbaf2bb7f1388@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #726928 |
In article <q3ve11$8bs$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>>> climate change? >>>>> >>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >>>>> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >>>>> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on >>>>> the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier >>>>> in *this very thread*. >>>> >>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>> >>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >> >> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take >> your nap. > >kensi 2 - 0 jimp > >Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? Because you say so does not make it true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 22:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7eubjf-r69.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726928 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>>> climate change? >>>>> >>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >>>>> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >>>>> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on >>>>> the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier >>>>> in *this very thread*. >>>> >>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>> >>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >> >> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take >> your nap. > > kensi 2 - 0 jimp > > Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of contest? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 15:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvs81i.g2l.19.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726943 |
On 2019-02-12 3:37 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>>>> climate change? >>>>>> >>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >>>>>> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >>>>>> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on >>>>>> the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier >>>>>> in *this very thread*. >>>>> >>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>>> >>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >>> >>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take >>> your nap. >> >> kensi 2 - 0 jimp >> >> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? > > Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of contest? > > what's a jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 23:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oh0cjf-ud9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726944 |
In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-02-12 3:37 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think about >>>>>>>> climate change? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with what >>>>>>> some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I don't think >>>>>>> she's out of line in classifying you as a climate change denier on >>>>>>> the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one instance was earlier >>>>>>> in *this very thread*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>>>> >>>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >>>> >>>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and take >>>> your nap. >>> >>> kensi 2 - 0 jimp >>> >>> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of 5? >> >> Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of contest? >> >> > what's a jimp Do you drool a lot? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 00:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3vo7d$b4k$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726948 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:13:28 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-02-12 3:37 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think >>>>>>>>> about climate change? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with >>>>>>>> what some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I >>>>>>>> don't think she's out of line in classifying you as a climate >>>>>>>> change denier on the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one >>>>>>>> instance was earlier in *this very thread*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. >>>>> >>>>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and >>>>> take your nap. >>>> >>>> kensi 2 - 0 jimp >>>> >>>> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of >>>> 5? >>> >>> Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of >>> contest? >>> >>> >> what's a jimp > > Do you drool a lot? And it's bye-bye irony meter #65,536. :P -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-12 22:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cd54348a0676e996489@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #726958 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q3vo7d$b4k$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... ¤ ¤ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:13:28 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ ¤ > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: ¤ >> On 2019-02-12 3:37 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, ¤ >>>> melt! ¤ >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: ¤ >>>>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ >>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, ¤ >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ >>>>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I think ¤ >>>>>>>>> about climate change? ¤ >>>>>>>> ¤ >>>>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles with ¤ >>>>>>>> what some would generously call "climate change skepticism". I ¤ >>>>>>>> don't think she's out of line in classifying you as a climate ¤ >>>>>>>> change denier on the basis of that pattern of behavior. Hell, one ¤ >>>>>>>> instance was earlier in *this very thread*. ¤ >>>>>>> ¤ >>>>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. ¤ >>>>>> ¤ >>>>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. ¤ >>>>> ¤ >>>>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and ¤ >>>>> take your nap. ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> kensi 2 - 0 jimp ¤ >>>> ¤ >>>> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out of ¤ >>>> 5? ¤ >>> ¤ >>> Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of ¤ >>> contest? ¤ >>> ¤ >>> ¤ >> what's a jimp ¤ > ¤ > Do you drool a lot? ¤ ¤ And it's bye-bye irony meter #65,536. :P Do you punce? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 22:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4242k$b4k$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726990 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:08:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q3vo7d$b4k$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > ¤ > ¤ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:13:28 +0000, jimp wrote: > ¤ > ¤ > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > ¤ >> On 2019-02-12 3:37 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > ¤ >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > ¤ >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > snowflakes, ¤ >>>> melt! > ¤ >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > ¤ >>>>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > ¤ >>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > ¤ >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, > ¤ >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp > wrote: > ¤ >>>>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I > think ¤ >>>>>>>>> about climate change? > ¤ >>>>>>>> > ¤ >>>>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles > with ¤ >>>>>>>> what some would generously call "climate change > skepticism". I ¤ >>>>>>>> don't think she's out of line in classifying > you as a climate ¤ >>>>>>>> change denier on the basis of that pattern > of behavior. Hell, one ¤ >>>>>>>> instance was earlier in *this very > thread*. > ¤ >>>>>>> > ¤ >>>>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. > ¤ >>>>>> > ¤ >>>>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. > ¤ >>>>> > ¤ >>>>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and > ¤ >>>>> take your nap. > ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> kensi 2 - 0 jimp ¤ >>>> > ¤ >>>> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out > of ¤ >>>> 5? > ¤ >>> > ¤ >>> Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of > ¤ >>> contest? > ¤ >>> > ¤ >>> > ¤ >> what's a jimp ¤ > > ¤ > Do you drool a lot? > ¤ > ¤ And it's bye-bye irony meter #65,536. :P > > Do you punce? Do I what? And: In what way is your question relevant? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 16:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ce50d15a931b009964a8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #727155 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q4242k$b4k$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... ¤ ¤ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:08:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote: ¤ ¤ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ¤ > Checkmate! In article <q3vo7d$b4k$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 ¤ > @gmail.invalid says... ¤ > ¤ > ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, ¤ > melt! ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:13:28 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: ¤ > ¤ >> On 2019-02-12 3:37 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, ¤ > snowflakes, ¤ >>>> melt! ¤ > ¤ >>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:08:23 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>>>>> On 2/11/2019 10:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:51:20 +0000, jimp ¤ > wrote: ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>>>> when the babbling child hasn't the slightest clue what I ¤ > think ¤ >>>>>>>>> about climate change? ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>>> You have replied to many of kensi's climate change articles ¤ > with ¤ >>>>>>>> what some would generously call "climate change ¤ > skepticism". I ¤ >>>>>>>> don't think she's out of line in classifying ¤ > you as a climate ¤ >>>>>>>> change denier on the basis of that pattern ¤ > of behavior. Hell, one ¤ >>>>>>>> instance was earlier in *this very ¤ > thread*. ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>>>>> Then you are both ignorant, adolescent, twits. ¤ > ¤ >>>>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>>>> Note: Not a refutation of what Nadegda wrote. ¤ > ¤ >>>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>>> Your mommy is calling you; time to turn off daddy's computer and ¤ > ¤ >>>>> take your nap. ¤ > ¤ >>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>> kensi 2 - 0 jimp ¤ >>>> ¤ > ¤ >>>> Ready to give up now? Or will you insist on making it best 3 out ¤ > of ¤ >>>> 5? ¤ > ¤ >>> ¤ > ¤ >>> Give up what? Do you puerile twits believe you are in some sort of ¤ > ¤ >>> contest? ¤ > ¤ >>> ¤ > ¤ >>> ¤ > ¤ >> what's a jimp ¤ > ¤ > ¤ > Do you drool a lot? ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ And it's bye-bye irony meter #65,536. :P ¤ > ¤ > Do you punce? ¤ ¤ Do I what? ¤ ¤ And: In what way is your question relevant? It was a rhetorical question that only you can answer. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 06:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #727187 |
On 2/13/2019 7:06 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q4242k$b4k$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:08:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > ¤ > Do you punce? > ¤ > ¤ Do I what? > ¤ > ¤ And: In what way is your question relevant? > > It was a rhetorical question that only you can answer. Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-13 21:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvvf4q.muh.19.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #727252 |
On 2019-02-13 9:03 p.m., kensi wrote: > On 2/13/2019 7:06 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q4242k$b4k$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:08:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> ¤ > Do you punce? >> ¤ >> ¤ Do I what? >> ¤ >> ¤ And: In what way is your question relevant? >> >> It was a rhetorical question that only you can answer. > > Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. > > *snicker* > how did he get drunk with no water to make beer and , why do you tell everyone to snicker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-14 00:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36cec44a65a6230f9964b7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #727252 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q42pa6$1ont$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 2/13/2019 7:06 PM, Checkmate wrote: ¤ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ¤ > Checkmate! In article <q4242k$b4k$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 ¤ > @gmail.invalid says... ¤ > ¤ On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:08:28 -0800, Checkmate wrote: ¤ > ¤ > Do you punce? ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ Do I what? ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ And: In what way is your question relevant? ¤ > ¤ > It was a rhetorical question that only you can answer. ¤ ¤ Translation: it's nonsense and Checkmate was drunk when he wrote that post. ¤ ¤ *snicker* Not very likely, since I don't drink, you Ko0ok. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web