Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #634069 > unrolled thread

4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 22:00 -0700
    Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 22:19 -0700
    Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-22 00:04 -0700
    Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 00:39 -0700
    Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-22 12:23 +0000
    Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-22 12:28 +0000
    4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 16:42 -0700
      Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-22 20:22 -0400
      Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 15:40 -0700
        Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-27 21:02 +0000
        also, the robots, Reber-Hanson, Porat, Starmaker Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-29 00:37 -0700
          Re: also, the robots, Reber-Hanson, Porat, Starmaker Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-29 14:49 +0000
          time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-30 22:31 -0700
            Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 23:19 -0700
              Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 12:57 -0700
                Porat stealing Re: Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 22:46 -0700
                  Re: Porat stealing Re: Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 22:44 -0400
                    Re: Porat stealing Re: Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-05 23:30 -0700
            Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-04 00:30 -0700
            time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 08:53 -0700
              Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-05 11:47 -0500
              Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-05 22:49 -0400
              Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-05 23:10 -0700
    the Porat Method of Stealing science ;; failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-06-06 00:39 -0700
      Re: the Porat Method of Stealing science ;; failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-06 03:16 -0700
      Re: the Porat Method of Stealing science ;; failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-06 14:41 +0000
        Re: the Porat Method of Stealing science ;; failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-06-06 17:40 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#634069 — 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn

Two of them are failures of physics who identify people to attack and then just say the opposite of whatever the author says. They stalk incessantly. They are depressed and their posts are depressing.

Moroney is just a decades long attack stalker, worthless posts.

Benj is a science hatemonger, believes in crap-- ghosts, ESP, black holes, gravity waves, spoon bending, and that Porat is full of science not full of sh(t.

McGinn is the worst of the three because he threatens the entire board with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpagesaturation. Mind you, the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics. The twit when asked to experiment with a IR thermometer to verify Greenhouse Effect shrugged that off, as if science is pontification, not experiment. McGinn is a huge huge menace to sci.physics.

I have found Google Abuse Reports a valuable tool and have often reported McGinn so as to never see those reported threads "hidden from view". It takes but 2 minutes per day to hide from view the McGinn front page saturation. And because of McGinn's persistent desire to flood the front page, I think he is insane.


From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
Lines: 33 
Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
(CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
(CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 

In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 
Moroney) writes. . . 
> I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> exist. 

Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 

-------- 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#634070

On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 10:00:06 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Two of them are failures of physics who identify people to attack and then just say the opposite of whatever the author says. They stalk incessantly. They are depressed and their posts are depressing.
> 
> Moroney is just a decades long attack stalker, worthless posts.
> 
> Benj is a science hatemonger, believes in crap-- ghosts, ESP, black holes, gravity waves, spoon bending, and that Porat is full of science not full of sh(t.
> 
> McGinn is the worst of the three because he threatens the entire board with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpagesaturation. Mind you, the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics. The twit when asked to experiment with a IR thermometer to verify Greenhouse Effect shrugged that off, as if science is pontification, not experiment. McGinn is a huge huge menace to sci.physics.
> 
> I have found Google Abuse Reports a valuable tool and have often reported McGinn so as to never see those reported threads "hidden from view". It takes but 2 minutes per day to hide from view the McGinn front page saturation. And because of McGinn's persistent desire to flood the front page, I think he is insane.
> 
> 
> From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
> Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
> Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
> Lines: 33 
> Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
> References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
> (CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
> (CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 
> 
> In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 
> Moroney) writes. . . 
> > I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> > exist. 
> 
> Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
> absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 
> 
> --------

Nothing is stopping you and the rest of you trolls from leaving and using some other forum for you chat group so that real scientists can post to a troll free forum and not a chat group for middle aged, male, retired engineers that think they are scientists because they have Discovery channel on cable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634086

On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 8:00:06 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Two of them are failures of physics who identify people to attack and then just say the opposite of whatever the author says. They stalk incessantly. They are depressed and their posts are depressing.
> 
> Moroney is just a decades long attack stalker, worthless posts.
> 
> Benj is a science hatemonger, believes in crap-- ghosts, ESP, black holes, gravity waves, spoon bending, and that Porat is full of science not full of sh(t.
> 
> McGinn is the worst of the three because he threatens the entire board with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpagesaturation. Mind you, the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics. The twit when asked to experiment with a IR thermometer to verify Greenhouse Effect shrugged that off, as if science is pontification, not experiment. McGinn is a huge huge menace to sci.physics.
> 
> I have found Google Abuse Reports a valuable tool and have often reported McGinn so as to never see those reported threads "hidden from view". It takes but 2 minutes per day to hide from view the McGinn front page saturation. And because of McGinn's persistent desire to flood the front page, I think he is insane.
> 
> 
> From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
> Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
> Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
> Lines: 33 
> Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
> References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
> (CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
> (CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 
> 
> In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 
> Moroney) writes. . . 
> > I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> > exist. 
> 
> Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
> absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 
> 
> --------
Hey!!!

Archimedes Uranium forgot me
in his kill   file !!!

and there fore I feel myself deeply insulted !!
even a robot will feel itself in such case= insulted !!

CAN YOU IMMAGINE SOMWEONE **NOT INCLUDED**!!! IN 
KILLFILE OF AARCHIMEDES(YESS THE BIG ARCIMEDES  uranium ??

(ALL OUR NAVIGATION IS DUE TO HIM AND HIS MOMETOUS FINDINGS !!!! more!! than 2 thousand years ago !!!

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634087

On Sunday, May 21, 2017 at 10:00:06 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Two of them are failures of physics who identify people to attack and then just say the opposite of whatever the author says. They stalk incessantly. They are depressed and their posts are depressing.
> 
> Moroney is just a decades long attack stalker, worthless posts.
> 
> Benj is a science hatemonger, believes in crap-- ghosts, ESP, black holes, gravity waves, spoon bending, and that Porat is full of science not full of sh(t.
> 
> McGinn is the worst of the three because he threatens the entire board with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpagesaturation. Mind you, the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics. The twit when asked to experiment with a IR thermometer to verify Greenhouse Effect shrugged that off, as if science is pontification, not experiment. McGinn is a huge huge menace to sci.physics.
> 
> I have found Google Abuse Reports a valuable tool and have often reported McGinn so as to never see those reported threads "hidden from view". It takes but 2 minutes per day to hide from view the McGinn front page saturation. And because of McGinn's persistent desire to flood the front page, I think he is insane.
> 
> 
> From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
> Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
> Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
> Lines: 33 
> Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
> References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
> (CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
> (CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 
> 
> In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 
> Moroney) writes. . . 
> > I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> > exist. 
> 
> Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
> absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 
> 
> --------

I hope the troll lobby on this NG takes your advice.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634094 — Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
>Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST

WOW!  Are you *still* so embarrassed when I made the Plutonium Stupidity
Theory the laughingstock of sci.physics some 24 years ago by pointing out
that Pu-231 was likely unstable and may not exist, that you *still* feel
the need to repost a 24 year old post that states it may exist? Are you
once again attempting to project your own failure at physics onto me, as
if that post is somehow embarrassing to me (it's not)?

Oh, to catch up for 24 years, Pu-231 is now listed in the Table of 
Nuclides, but is extremely unstable, just as I predicted 24 years ago.
It wasn't even listed in the CRC back then.

Now it's time for you to reply to this and project your own failure at
physics onto me (and others). It's just a matter of how you project your
failure, which is amusing to me.

p.s. Go clean your yard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634095

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>McGinn is the worst of the three because he threatens the entire board
>with his spam pollution. He is a veritable frontpagesaturation. Mind you,
>the twit talks endlessly about weather yet this is sci.physics.

And I told you how to deal with the likes of McGinn.  But you're too thick
to follow my directions.  Even though you (should) know about regular news
readers, since you've been k00king here since long before there ever was a
Google Groups.  McGinn? Who is he? I never see his posts. Front Page hog?
What's that?

p.s. You could also killfile me and everyone else who points out all your
lack of physics, so you can babble to yourself in peace without criticism.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634151

Hey Mike, Mike Moroney, you failure of science, there are no atoms of gold in the Sun because noone in print media says so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634157

On 5/22/2017 7:42 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Hey Mike, Mike Moroney, you failure of science, there are no atoms of gold in the Sun because noone in print media says so.
>
Rule: Media and Democrats NEVER lie. GOPers and Trump Always lie.
You need to kill off maybe 5 or 6 more brain cells and you'll right at 
the IQ of Glazier.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634470

Report the failures to Google abuse, that spares your cardiac

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634541 — Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>Report the failures to Google abuse, that spares your cardiac

You want everyone to report you to Google Abuse?  How does that help 
anyone's heart, since your failure can be so amusing sometimes?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634653 — also, the robots, Reber-Hanson, Porat, Starmaker Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Mike Moroney, Benj, McGinn

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 5:40:31 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Report the failures to Google abuse, that spares your cardiac

I need to consolidate the failures with the robots in sci.physics, as to leave more room for productive science, such as geothermal energy thread that I have had a long lull in.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634666 — Re: also, the robots, Reber-Hanson, Porat, Starmaker Re: 4please do not talk to the failures of physics-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 5:40:31 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Report the failures to Google abuse, that spares your cardiac

>I need to consolidate the failures with the robots in sci.physics, as to 
>leave more room for productive science, such as geothermal energy thread 
>that I have had a long lull in.

Help me to understand. Are you saying that since failures of physics 
shouldn't be posting here, in order to leave more room for productive 
science, that you'll be leaving us?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634832 — time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc

I am not the only one in sci.physics sick and tired of the asinine creep Porat who writes robot snippets. And worst of all, dare anyone use a word that Porat uses, like circle or helix, the fool attacks you for stealing.

Porat never writes anything that makes any sense.

And he attacks those that use a word he uses.

It is time to kick this jerk out of sci.physics.


AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#634957 — Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc

Porat needs kicking out of sci.physics. 

Bad enough you have so many failures here in sci.physics, but that is to be anticipated for every one that is good at physics, you have a 100,000 failures and so you would expect many of those failures to appear here on sci.physics, not accepting the fact they are failures of the subject. Mike Moroney, Porat, Reber-Hanson, Benj.

But Porat, robot or human, Porat needs kicking out because his game is evil.

He/it types in some nonsense paragraphs. Many misspellings.

But the evil is that whatever words he uses, he attacks others for stealing physics because he uses the word circle or helix.

So, this creep types in circle and if you mention circle in your own work-- the creep pops up and claims you stole his ideas.

So the Porat creep is a forerunner of how stealing other peoples ideas are going to work in the future. You type in a word and then look for someone else to use the same word and claim he stole from you.

So kick this jerk Porat out of sci.physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635221 — Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:51:00 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Benj death threat, suggest he be kicked out of sci.physics// never
 any physics but only anti-science remarks
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 08:51:00 +0000


Benj death threat, suggest he be kicked out of sci.physics// never any physics but only anti-science remarks

Benj death threat 

Subject: Re: Geothermal making coal, oil, gas obsolete//Iceland, the best 
 country and hope of the world for 2016; while other countries are going 
 backwards 
Newsgroups: sci.physics 
References: <c2bf8da9-6a16-4fc4-a400-9a627d467663@googlegroups.com> 
From: benj <be...@nobody.net> 
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:47:09 -0400 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 
 Thunderbird/45.8.0 
MIME-Version: 1.0 
In-Reply-To: <c2bf8da9-6a16-4fc4-a400-9a627d467663@googlegroups.com> 
Lines: 41 
Message-ID: <59309972$0$62649$b1db1813$79461190@news.astraweb.com> 
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com 
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2d028550.news.astraweb.com 

On 6/1/2017 2:29 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> 
> 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 22:23:22 -0800 (PST) 
> 
> Subject: Iceland, the best country and hope of the world for 2016; while other 
>  countries are going backwards; GEOTHERMAL 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:23:22 +0000 
> 
> 
> Iceland, the best country and hope of the world for 2016; while other countries are going backwards; GEOTHERMAL 
> 
> The year 2016 is going down as a very very miserable year worldwide. Especially for animals of the world, since all are going extinct, save for very small animals like mice and rats. 
> 
> Many wars, many killings, many bad elections, many horrible leaders in the world. 
> 
> Worst of all is human overpopulation-- approaching 10 billion and certainly the extinction of many animals. 
> 
> But in all the mess and morass, there was a beacon of great light and news and hope, which this 25th of December can find joy and comfort. 
> 
> A small European country is leading the entire world into our new energy future. No, not fusion, which many silly stupid physicists think is possible, but rather,-- geothermal. 
> 
> Many people on Earth never realized that the planet they stand on is a "second star, a second Sun in terms of energy" and all we need to do is drill to volcanoes. We harness volcanoes. 
> 
> In the USA, Yellowstone and Hawaii can supply all the energy that all of north america wants or needs. We can use Alaska geothermals for even excess energy. 
> 
> So, Iceland is drilling into a Volcano and harnessing that energy. 
> 
> Whilst idiot nations like USA is going more coal. Idiot Russia more petrol, and idiot India is going more coal. Idiot China is going more coal. Idiot Canada is going more tar sands. 
> 
> Thank God, there is a country that is smart and not idiots,, of Iceland. Give an Xmas cheer to Iceland, so that every gloomy and dismal year can be topped off by great news and hope such as what Iceland has given the world in 2016. 
> 
> AP 
> 
Overpopulation is such a horrible problem ArchiePoo. I suggest we start 
by killing you. Think of the good you'd be doing for humanity. Think of 
the way that would raise the level of science discussion in this 
newsgroup. Get that Barrel Boat from Bert and sail into the sunset to 
Hawaii. DRink your TAng Geezer. YOu are STILL an idiot. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635354 — Porat stealing Re: Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics

When you do not clean out abuse in a newsgroup, the abuse just keeps getting worse.

Benj with death-threats, is totally unacceptable in sci.physics

Porat with the constant Accosting attacks of stealing. Back in the 1990s there was a group of kooks who thought it wise to post words and then place some copyright over the random words. Another kook group would register all these various names so that the day would come when someone wanted their name but had to pay a fee to this group that had netted thousands of names already registered. So Porat reminds one of those twerps stealing. The Porat Game is post words and then if anyone else uses that word-- like circle or helix, the twerp Porat accosts you for using that word. Porat is digging into how to steal the ideas of others.

Both should be removed from sci.physics-- at least a year removed and see if they can gain some better sense before allowed back.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635478 — Re: Porat stealing Re: Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics

On 6/5/2017 1:46 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> When you do not clean out abuse in a newsgroup, the abuse just keeps getting worse.
> 
> Benj with death-threats, is totally unacceptable in sci.physics
> 
> Porat with the constant Accosting attacks of stealing. Back in the 1990s there was a group of kooks who thought it wise to post words and then place some copyright over the random words. Another kook group would register all these various names so that the day would come when someone wanted their name but had to pay a fee to this group that had netted thousands of names already registered. So Porat reminds one of those twerps stealing. The Porat Game is post words and then if anyone else uses that word-- like circle or helix, the twerp Porat accosts you for using that word. Porat is digging into how to steal the ideas of others.
> 
> Both should be removed from sci.physics-- at least a year removed and see if they can gain some better sense before allowed back.
> 
> AP
> 
Hey Senile Archipoo? Have you done the right thing yet? Bert will give 
you his theories on Barrel boats! Do the right thing and sail for Hawaii 
before you hurt yourself or others. The planet is depending on you!

It is hard to believe but you are actually more drooling senile than 
Bert! At least he has the theory of "heavy air". What have you got? 
Nothing but lies and ignorance like HVAC. At least HVAC is funny 
sometimes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635516 — Re: Porat stealing Re: Benj death threat, time he is kicked out of sci.physics

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 5:44:48 AM UTC+3, benj wrote:
> On 6/5/2017 1:46 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > When you do not clean out abuse in a newsgroup, the abuse just keeps getting worse.
> > 
> > Benj with death-threats, is totally unacceptable in sci.physics
> > 
> > Porat with the constant Accosting attacks of stealing. Back in the 1990s there was a group of kooks who thought it wise to post words and then place some copyright over the random words. Another kook group would register all these various names so that the day would come when someone wanted their name but had to pay a fee to this group that had netted thousands of names already registered. So Porat reminds one of those twerps stealing. The Porat Game is post words and then if anyone else uses that word-- like circle or helix, the twerp Porat accosts you for using that word. Porat is digging into how to steal the ideas of others.
> > 
> > Both should be removed from sci.physics-- at least a year removed and see if they can gain some better sense before allowed back.
> > 
> > AP
> > 
> Hey Senile Archipoo? Have you done the right thing yet? Bert will give 
> you his theories on Barrel boats! Do the right thing and sail for Hawaii 
> before you hurt yourself or others. The planet is depending on you!
> 
> It is hard to believe but you are actually more drooling senile than 
> Bert! At least he has the theory of "heavy air". What have you got? 
> Nothing but lies and ignorance like HVAC. At least HVAC is funny 
> sometimes.
====================

I am stealing from that psychopath Archimedes Uranium  ??
!!!!

I have here my findings more than 25 years along !

the  abstract of my model is here 
from 1993
not to speak about hundreds(if not thousands  of threads 
that  all  are recorded in Google archive 
who is the one who proved that the photon has mass  the only mass  
who found that
mass is the mother of all forces ?

who climes that ''no mass no real physics'' ??!!!

and if So 
no need for that HIGGS GOD PARTICLES
TO GIVE MASS TO  PARTICLES ?

etc etc etc 
and that is only the 'tip of iceberg ''
of my contributions here in this n g

and what are your contributions here  
little pig  dreck shit   HAVAC 
 hired   gangster ??!!
-------

Y.P
==================
  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635277 — Re: time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 8:32:00 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I am not the only one in sci.physics sick and tired of the asinine creep Porat who writes robot snippets. And worst of all, dare anyone use a word that Porat uses, like circle or helix, the fool attacks you for stealing.
> 
> Porat never writes anything that makes any sense.
> 
> And he attacks those that use a word he uses.
> 
> It is time to kick this jerk out of sci.physics.
> 
> 
> AP

=====================
psychopath Archimedes   
Uranium !!
it is enough to see how you sit say and   night 
and done stop to shit the ng with your 
sick garbage  empty  childish  worthless physics 
to realize that you are a 
pain in the neck PSYCHOPATH gangster  disaster 
for this that could be 
--an important ng without psychopaths like you 
we all should appeal do GOOGLE
TO THROUH YOU OUT OF HERE 
TO YOUR SENATOTIUM  HOSPITAL !!

from which you ran away 

and should be banned in this ng !!

I wonder how is it that you still are here
and not at the right place yo belong to !!
it seems that you  are not a just a poor psychopath
BUT A  ***THIEF*** AS WELL !!!!
---
next !! to  sane  human  beings !!
----------
=
Y.Porat   
(the ''automat'' according to the psychopath Uranium  )   (-:) 
======
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#635394 — time to kick out Porat from sci.physics-- his constant pestering of authors and accusations of stealing dare you use a word like circle or helix etc

May 31Archimedes Plutonium
I am not the only one in sci.physics sick and tired of the asinine creep Porat who writes robot snippets. And worst of all, dare anyone use a word that Porat uses, like circle or helix, the fool attacks you for stealing. 

Porat never writes anything that makes any sense. 

And he attacks those that use a word he uses. 

It is time to kick this jerk out of sci.physics. 
-------------

Request denied

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web