Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #632210 > unrolled thread

Atom For John

Started byHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
First post2017-05-07 03:48 -0700
Last post2017-05-08 18:13 -0400
Articles 19 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Atom For John HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 03:48 -0700
    Atom For John HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 03:49 -0700
      Atom For John john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 05:04 -0700
        Re: Atom For John Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 12:22 +0000
          Re: Atom For John john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 05:41 -0700
            Re: Atom For John Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 16:21 -0500
          Re: Atom For John HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 09:21 -0700
            Re: Atom For John john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:49 -0700
              Re: Atom For John HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 10:58 -0700
                Re: Atom For John john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 11:22 -0700
                  Re: Atom For John moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-07 19:14 +0000
              Re: Atom For John moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-07 19:10 +0000
              Re: Atom For John Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 16:22 -0500
                Re: Atom For John benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-08 18:21 -0400
                  Re: Atom For John john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-05-08 20:04 -0700
          Re: Atom For John benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-08 18:14 -0400
        Re: Atom For John moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-07 13:37 +0000
          Re: Atom For John benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-08 18:15 -0400
      Re: Atom For John benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-08 18:13 -0400

#632210 — Atom For John

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 03:48 -0700
SubjectAtom For John
Message-ID<e4e8580c-47f4-4420-a305-500d18478f70@googlegroups.com>
https://www.google.com/search?q=animated+gif+of+an+atom&oq=animated+gif+of+an+atom&aqs=chrome..69i57.9903j0j4&client=tablet-android-alco&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=ozk1wQTaqrM5kM:

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#632211

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 03:49 -0700
Message-ID<82175561-5de7-4f19-a25e-4cb30b37f031@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632210
Please note that MY submission is not a cartoon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632214

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 05:04 -0700
Message-ID<091c97d6-7933-41fd-9a65-442faa45cf6f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632211
HVAC
Your submission shows electrons going in repeating 
circles.
How does, for instance, a Hydrogen atom then
become a sphere?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632216

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 12:22 +0000
Message-ID<oen3hl$7sp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#632214
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> HVAC
> Your submission shows electrons going in repeating 
> circles.
> How does, for instance, a Hydrogen atom then
> become a sphere?
> 

For the record, HVAC's GIFs are in no way scientifically accurate either. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632217

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 05:41 -0700
Message-ID<87dcc764-c78a-4858-8b7d-108739d9cb54@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632216
Odd
"uoted text -
For the record, HVAC's GIFs are in no way scientifically accurate either. "

For the record,
Odd says that the "scientifically accurate "
GIFs are not possible
because ATOMS CAN'T BE PICTURED

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632280

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 16:21 -0500
Message-ID<oeo34f$4g6$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#632217
On 5/7/17 7:41 AM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "uoted text -
> For the record, HVAC's GIFs are in no way scientifically accurate either. "
> 
> For the record,
> Odd says that the "scientifically accurate "
> GIFs are not possible
> because ATOMS CAN'T BE PICTURED
> 

I never said that. I showed you Atom in a Box. That's the picture of an 
atom. There are LOTS of places where atoms are pictured. Open up a 
chemistry book.

-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632225

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 09:21 -0700
Message-ID<ec2331c1-912b-4b53-83e5-2fac6450b275@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632216
Odd Bodkin
- show quoted text -
For the record, HVAC's GIFs are in no way scientifically accurate either
----------

For the record, I wasn't going for accuracy. I was going for sarcasm.

I think that gif pictured it perfectly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632242

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 10:49 -0700
Message-ID<19b4c6a9-1418-4e42-8d08-94ed6095ba50@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632225
HVAC
"
For the record, I wasn't going for accuracy. I was going for sarcasm. 

I think that gif pictured it perfectly "

You can't really do that, because current
theory has no picture.
Odd is sensitive about that.
Michael offers: "The Schrodinger Equation is
spherical in the ground state!"
Good, Michael!
Atoms are spheres, too!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632245

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 10:58 -0700
Message-ID<4a033242-1d52-4b1f-93f1-fd464c77d7bf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632242
Poor John says
Atoms are spheres, too!! 
--------

You think so?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632256

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 11:22 -0700
Message-ID<1b5610e9-7369-4129-af4c-4673804fdb35@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632245
HVAC
"John says 
Atoms are spheres, too!! 
-------- 

You think so? "

Why, don't you, little HVAC?
Over time, the points from the Schrodinger
in the ground state
make a sphere.
Over time, a turning/precessing disc does so
also.
Which is reality?

Well, galaxies prove the turning disc part,
so far as reality precedent. 
Any Scroedinger machines in Nature?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632270

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2017-05-07 19:14 +0000
Message-ID<oenrlq$9jd$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#632256
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>HVAC
>"John says 
>Atoms are spheres, too!! 
>-------- 

>You think so? "

>Why, don't you, little HVAC?
>Over time, the points from the Schrodinger
>in the ground state
>make a sphere.

Only in an "s" orbital or if the shell is full or half full.
>Over time, a turning/precessing disc does so
>also.

No, it does not.

>Which is reality?

Certainly not retarded precessing spinny disks.

>Well, galaxies prove the turning disc part,

No, they do not.

You really should quit making up crap like that.

>Any Scroedinger machines 
in Nature?

Atoms.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632268

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2017-05-07 19:10 +0000
Message-ID<oenrfl$9jd$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#632242
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Atoms are spheres, too!!

No, they are not, unless the outer shell is filled or half-full.

You really should quit making up crap like that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632281

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-07 16:22 -0500
Message-ID<oeo35s$4g6$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#632242
On 5/7/17 12:49 PM, john wrote:
> HVAC
> "
> For the record, I wasn't going for accuracy. I was going for sarcasm.
> 
> I think that gif pictured it perfectly "
> 
> You can't really do that, because current
> theory has no picture.

That's just bullshit, John.
Chemistry books have pictures of the structure of atoms.

> Odd is sensitive about that.
> Michael offers: "The Schrodinger Equation is
> spherical in the ground state!"
> Good, Michael!
> Atoms are spheres, too!!
> 


-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632469

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-08 18:21 -0400
Message-ID<5910ef80$0$53176$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#632281
On 5/7/2017 5:22 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 5/7/17 12:49 PM, john wrote:
>> HVAC
>> "
>> For the record, I wasn't going for accuracy. I was going for sarcasm.
>>
>> I think that gif pictured it perfectly "
>>
>> You can't really do that, because current
>> theory has no picture.
>
> That's just bullshit, John.
> Chemistry books have pictures of the structure of atoms.

No they don't, Boinker. You are STILL and idiot.

(Question, just WHAT are those pictures in textbooks of? Answer slowly 
and carefully, Boinker)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632513

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-05-08 20:04 -0700
Message-ID<752de1f7-25b2-41ed-acb1-158444c3cf66@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#632469
benj
"No they don't, Boinker. You are STILL and idiot. "

Always was

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632463

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-08 18:14 -0400
Message-ID<5910edc5$0$53176$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#632216
On 5/7/2017 8:22 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>> HVAC
>> Your submission shows electrons going in repeating
>> circles.
>> How does, for instance, a Hydrogen atom then
>> become a sphere?
>>
>
> For the record, HVAC's GIFs are in no way scientifically accurate either.
>
Thank you Odd, I had already referred HVAC to you for this fact!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632220

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2017-05-07 13:37 +0000
Message-ID<oen7v8$77s$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#632214
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>HVAC
>Your submission shows electrons going in repeating 
>circles.
>How does, for instance, a Hydrogen atom then
>become a sphere?

Forget about Bohr-type models with the electron orbiting the nucleus like
a planet around the sun.

I already gave you pointers to the Schrodinger wave equation. The simplest
solution (hydrogen in the ground state, l=0) is spherically symmetrical.
If you need a picture, see Figure 4.6 on 
https://online.science.psu.edu/chem101_sp1/node/11147.
Kind of boring, but there it is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632464

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-08 18:15 -0400
Message-ID<5910edfe$0$53176$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#632220
On 5/7/2017 9:37 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> HVAC
>> Your submission shows electrons going in repeating
>> circles.
>> How does, for instance, a Hydrogen atom then
>> become a sphere?
>
> Forget about Bohr-type models with the electron orbiting the nucleus like
> a planet around the sun.
>
> I already gave you pointers to the Schrodinger wave equation. The simplest
> solution (hydrogen in the ground state, l=0) is spherically symmetrical.
> If you need a picture, see Figure 4.6 on
> https://online.science.psu.edu/chem101_sp1/node/11147.
> Kind of boring, but there it is.
>
HVAC says it's a gay cartoon!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#632462

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2017-05-08 18:13 -0400
Message-ID<5910ed97$0$53176$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#632211
On 5/7/2017 6:49 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Please note that MY submission is not a cartoon
>
All those images in addition to being wrong (see Odd for more details) 
are all cartoons! You can't even pick out one image as the one you 
believe in! This is the kind of computer illiteracy that I'd expect from 
Bert. You must be a former Web TV poster too!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web