Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #631326 > unrolled thread

Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 22:16 -0700
    Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-30 06:23 +0000
    Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 23:31 -0700
      Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-01 15:31 +0000
      Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 15:15 -0700
        Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 01:27 -0700
          Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 00:36 -0700
        Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-04 01:34 +0000
          Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-03 21:19 -0500
        Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 22:39 -0700
          Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 20:54 -0700
            Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-06 20:59 -0700
            Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 15:04 -0700
              Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 16:31 -0700
                Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-07 23:14 -0700
                  Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-08 00:26 -0700
                    Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-08 00:57 -0700
                      Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 00:04 -0700
                        Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 14:48 -0700
                          truth to these pontificating twits-- something is true- once they say it is true//Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 21:08 -0700
                            Re: truth of the  pontificating twit ArchiePoo "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-09 21:46 -0700
                              Re: truth of the  pontificating twit ArchiePoo poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-10 01:19 -0700
                            Re: truth to these pontificating twits-- something is true- once they say it is true//Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn "Mr. Npbpdy" <nobody@nowhere.nohow> - 2017-05-09 22:56 -0400
                    Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 22:03 -0700
                      worthless jackass McGinn can't even afford a IR thermometer Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-09 22:36 -0700
                        Re: worthless jackass Failures of physics APe shit ArchiePoo cries "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-09 23:18 -0700
                        worthless jackass McGinn can't even afford a IR thermometer Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 03:08 -0700
                          Re: worthless jackass & Failures of physics, please do not talk to APe shit ArchiePoo "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-10 06:14 -0700
    Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-01 16:07 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#631326 — Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn

Sci.physics is a open forum, meaning, kooks can come and waste your time. Please do not talk, ever to these kooks, these failures of physics. We cannot kick them out, they have a privilege of being a kook of physics, but if you talk to them, they hang around longer and they attract other kooks.

Have to include the front-page-hog McGinn, who has been told time and time again that this is physics and take his weather crap over to sci.geo.geology.meteorology or wherever weather is discussed.

Have to include the loud mouth Benj, of course, he is a different failure than Moroney or Odd in that Benj hates physics and scientific method. At least Moroney and Odd like physics but are terrible in it. 

Please do not talk to any of these failures, for you never learn anything and waste your time, and they hang around longer.

Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:56:31 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: do not talk with the Failures of Physics-- Mike Moroney, Odd 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 21:56:31 +0000 


do not talk with the Failures of Physics-- Mike Moroney, Odd 

The list may increase, but for now, the two outstanding big failures are Moroney and Odd. 

They failed phsyics, so why are they here? Some people are so so very looney, that even though they failed a subject, they stick around in it. So psychologist may have answers. Normal people when they understand that they are not good at something, go and find whatever it is that they are good at. 

But then some failures just sink deeper and deeper into their failings. It is perverse, and maybe a psychologist should and could take Moroney and Odd as a case study, provided those two are willing. Find out what is loose in their minds, why they just cannot move elsewhere. 

They have little comprehension of how physics works. And their daily activities involve-- identify a poster to hate, then post a followup saying the exact opposite of the target author. These two failures waste the time of thousands of posters to sci.physics. 

This thread is going to be carried forward by me as long as I post to sci.physics, because these goofball failures never go away, and thus everyone needs this warning. 

Now the first time I realized Moroney was a worthless failure in physics is this post of 1993, and with Moroney, it only got worse and worse since 1993. We cannot kick him out of sci.physics, but what we can do is totally ignore and report every one of his posts to Google Abuse. 


From: sichase@csa5.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) 
Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Subject: Re: NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES, part 2 of 3 
Date: 1 Sep 1993 11:00 PST 
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA 
Lines: 33 
Message-ID: (1SEP199311004143@csa5.lbl.gov> 
References: (CCLD2F.ADE@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> 
(CCLyC0.HIK@world.std.com> 
(CCn6DD.G3E@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com> 

In article (CCnuqr.A1q@world.std.com>, moroney@world.std.com (Michael 
Moroney) writes. . . 
> I did look things up. That's how I found out that Pu-231 doesn't 
> exist. 

Well, to be fair we should say that we've never seen it, not that it 
absolutely doesn't exist. If you look at a chart of the nuclides, you ..... 

--------
AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#631329 — Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>Sci.physics is a open forum, meaning, kooks can come and waste your time.

Which I tried to tell you when you were whining why doesn't Google kick
Hanson off when he was so obsessed with you.  Did you thank me when I gave
you suggestions?  No, you insulted me and blew me off.

Kooks can come and waste your time alright.  You have been here, failing
at physics right here for 25 years now!  Now you are projecting your
failures onto others right and left.  Maybe it is really bugging you deep
down inside that you've wasted a quarter century of your life?  Or your
unfortunate encounter with cancer made it sink in that your time on earth
is finite and one day you'll post here no more, and you'll soon be
forgotten?  Except occasionally by old-timers who might say things like
"Remember that nut who thought the universe was a giant atom and who
thought he could rewrite the laws of physics whenever he felt like it?"

>Please do not talk, ever to these kooks, these failures of physics.

You don't want anyone to talk to you?

>We

We? You have a mouse in your pocket? Or is that the royal we?

>We cannot kick them out, they have a privilege of being a kook of physics,
>but if you talk to them, they hang around longer and they attract other kooks.

Yup, you've been kooking here for some 25 years and look at all the other 
kooks you've attracted!

>Please do not talk to any of these failures, for you never learn anything
>and waste your time, and they hang around longer.

I sometimes get thanked for my explanations, last time a couple of days
ago for explaning how Ford's and Rubin's galaxy observations don't show
solid body rotation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631529

Yea, divorced, lonely, and even though a failure at physics, it is their desire cover up their failings by posting. Weak in mind, that they cannot find a constructive outlet.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631563 — Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>Yea, divorced, lonely, and even though a failure at physics, it is their desire 
>cover up their failings by posting. Weak in mind, that they cannot find a 
>constructive outlet.

Your continued projection of your own failures onto others isn't exactly
making you look good here.  25 years chasing after a cheap graphic in a book
and a bad dream.  And I see that even people who knew you in person commented
that you're "not bolted down too tight"...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631757

Failures of physics usually stop in school by realizing they are failures in math, and cannot proceed further. Example of this is Moroney so dumb in math that given definition of sine with unit circle thinks the graph of sine is sinusoidal when it is a semicircle. Dumb klutzes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631815

:Eric Francis Dartmouth Murders (St.Martin's Press) writes page 99 "Geology Department 
:might be close enough for someone (Archimedes Plutonium) they thought wasn't bolted down too tight :in the first place." 

Why Eric Francis and George Witte, speaking about heads, what about your own, is it Clams & mussels?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631923

The FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with volta dancing by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS PRESSURE 

                                                                   __ 
                                                             .-'         `-.              ,dP""Yb, 
                                                           .'               `.          ,d"        "b, 
                                                          /                   \        d'    _      `Y, 
                                             _           ;                     ;      8     8        `b 
                              __        ,'"    "`.      |                      |     `b,_,aP       P 
               __         ,'     `.    /           \     ;                     ;        """"        d' 
             .'    `.      /        |   |             |     \                    /                 ,P" 
         _  |       |     |        /    \           /      `.                .'       a,.__,aP" 
  . o ( _ ) `.__.'      `.__.'        `.___ .'           `-._____.-'           `"""'' 

  


Eric Francis Dartmouth Murders (St.Martin's Press) writes page 99 "Geology Department might be close enough for someone (Archimedes Plutonium) they thought wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place." 

Melania Trump has an easy time defending her dignity from gutter press, in one month with millions. 

Annie Oakley struggled with the gutter press 

Archimedes Plutonium like Annie Oakley has to battle the evil, but alas time away from doing science. 


    _ _/| 
   \'o.0' 
   =(___)= 
      U 



Poem-- seeking the poet George Witte to publish 

___________________________________________ 

STUPIDITY of Inflamming Innocence Abroad 
___________________________________________ 

Francis Come Witte, Witte Come Francis it was a dance to do 
It was a dance for you 

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid is Francis Come Witte 
I mean rock-hard stupid.   
Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid, Witte Come Francis 

Surface of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide 
And sulfuric acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.   
Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know 
Into a whole different sensorium of stupid.   
It was the dance to do. 

Witte Come Francis is trans-stupid stupid. 
Meta-stupid.   
Stupid so collapsed upon itself 
That it is within its
 own Fusion Barrier Principle radius stupid.   
Lightning bolt stupid.   
It was the dance for two, Francis Come Witte, Witte Come Francis. 

Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect can escape.   
Maxwell Dirac Equations stupid. 
Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations Stupid. 
Francis & Witte emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise 
emits stupid/year.   
Quasar stupid.   
And do the twist, round and around. 

Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid.   
Witte Come Francis is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment 
From the original Antimatter of Stupid 
A pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else 
As to be beyond the laws of physics that define maximally 
Extrapolated hyperbolic geometrical
 Dimensional background radiation stupid 
As we can imagine it.   
Cha cha cha 

And do the twist! 
Witte Come Francis 
is Planck stupid 
A quantum foam of stupid 
A vacuum decay of stupid 
A grand unified theory of stupid 
It was the dance for two 

(UncleAl/AP) 


       \\\ 
       (0 0) 
_ooO_(_)_Ooo____   


       o-:^>___? 
       `~~c--^c' 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631902 — Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>Failures of physics usually stop in school by realizing they are failures 
>in math, and cannot proceed further. Example of this is Moroney so dumb 
>in math that given definition of sine with unit circle thinks the graph 
>of sine is sinusoidal when it is a semicircle. Dumb klutzes

Failure in math in school? I got a 100% on the NYS Regents Math exam in
high school, which I took a year early due to being in an accelerated
mathematics program.  In college I got to skip the full year of required 
freshman math because I got college credit for the 12th grade math I had
(again, because I was in an advanced math program).  And I have a degree
in electrical engineering, with all the math that entails. Especially
math related to sines/cosines, you can't get anywhere in EE without AC
circuit analysis and all the trig functions embedded therein.

Not only are you wrong about all the sine/cosine crap you've posted
recently, you are *spectacularly* wrong!

Silly Archie Pu.. your projection of your own failure onto me just won't 
work...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#631903 — Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Archimedes Plutonium

On 5/3/2017 8:34 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Failures of physics usually stop in school by realizing they are failures
>> in math, and cannot proceed further. Example of this is Moroney so dumb
>> in math that given definition of sine with unit circle thinks the graph
>> of sine is sinusoidal when it is a semicircle. Dumb klutzes
>
> Failure in math in school? I got a 100% on the NYS Regents Math exam in
> high school, which I took a year early due to being in an accelerated
> mathematics program.  In college I got to skip the full year of required
> freshman math because I got college credit for the 12th grade math I had
> (again, because I was in an advanced math program).  And I have a degree
> in electrical engineering, with all the math that entails.

Excellent!  EE is about 85% math    (got one of them too)

> Especially
> math related to sines/cosines, you can't get anywhere in EE without AC
> circuit analysis and all the trig functions embedded therein.

AND it all works, the math works, and its computerized, SPICE, and lots 
of other programs.  (some areas require a little fudging as some things 
are unknown like in some areas of RF design, strays are unknown or change)

>
> Not only are you wrong about all the sine/cosine crap you've posted
> recently, you are *spectacularly* wrong!
>
> Silly Archie Pu.. your projection of your own failure onto me just won't
> work...
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632086

Not only is Benj a Science failure, but a hater of science.

Now which is worse hater of science Benj or Trump-- a tough tough pick.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632204

Anyone that says Global Warming is not real is a failure of science and does not belong here.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632205

On Saturday, May 6, 2017 at 8:54:15 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Anyone that says Global Warming is not real is a failure of science and does not belong here.
> 
> AP

Only morons believe in global warming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632289

On Saturday, May 6, 2017 at 10:54:15 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Anyone that says Global Warming is not real is a failure of science and does not belong here.
> 
> AP

Now Benj and McGinn two of the hugest failures in physics, and ravenously posting their heads off, do not accept Global Warming.

So what I have proffered is that Colleges and Universities, and perhaps we have to go down into High Schools to get at Benj and McGinn, is that they have the powers to award degrees, so shall they have the power to annul degrees.

So annul any education degree of Benj and McGinn. If you deny Global Warming, then you have not even reached a education of High School.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632313

On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Saturday, May 6, 2017 at 10:54:15 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Anyone that says Global Warming is not real is a failure of science and does not belong here.
> > 
> > AP
> 
> Now Benj and McGinn two of the hugest failures in physics, and ravenously posting their heads off, do not accept Global Warming.
> 
> So what I have proffered is that Colleges and Universities, and perhaps we have to go down into High Schools to get at Benj and McGinn, is that they have the powers to award degrees, so shall they have the power to annul degrees.
> 
> So annul any education degree of Benj and McGinn. If you deny Global Warming, then you have not even reached a education of High School.

Can you explain how CO2 purportedly traps heat.  Go ahead, you fucking goof, answer the question.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632361

On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 6:31:04 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, May 7, 2017 at 3:04:57 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 6, 2017 at 10:54:15 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Anyone that says Global Warming is not real is a failure of science and does not belong here.
> > > 
> > > AP
> > 
> > Now Benj and McGinn two of the hugest failures in physics, and ravenously posting their heads off, do not accept Global Warming.
> > 
> > So what I have proffered is that Colleges and Universities, and perhaps we have to go down into High Schools to get at Benj and McGinn, is that they have the powers to award degrees, so shall they have the power to annul degrees.
> > 
> > So annul any education degree of Benj and McGinn. If you deny Global Warming, then you have not even reached a education of High School.
> 
> Can you explain how CO2 purportedly traps heat.  Go ahead, you fucking goof, answer the question.

Like a greenhouse, reflects the rays back down. And you fail being British in using the "f word"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632370

There you go Jim, set up an experiment showing CO2 does or does not have a Greenhouse Effect trapping in heat energy.

That is all you need to do-- but no-- you are only going to be an incessant yapping fool after your hero Benj.

Prove CO2 is or is not a Greenhouse gas

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632373

Wikipedia has a good synopsis of the Greenhouse Effect

Even gives a history of some of the experimenters

So if you want to prove them wrong, prove Global Warming is fake-- prove that CO2 does not behave like a Greenhouse.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632530

Now I do see that water vapor is a greater greenhouse effect than does CO2.

Now that raises an interesting question about the Great Extinction, the Permian extinction. Could there have been a time in which the atmosphere was constantly full of water vapor.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632679

McGinn is a total science failure, because, he pontificates what to him is true, rather than do the experiment that verifies what is true. 

In other words, those that mouth off and those that are in science-- do the experiments

McGinn you idiot, repeat the Greenhouse Effect Experiments, you total idiot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#632749 — truth to these pontificating twits-- something is true- once they say it is true//Re: Failures of physics, please do not talk to them-- Moroney, Odd, Benj, McGinn

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 4:48:05 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> McGinn is a total science failure, because, he pontificates what to him is true, rather than do the experiment that verifies what is true. 
> 
> In other words, those that mouth off and those that are in science-- do the experiments
> 
> McGinn you idiot, repeat the Greenhouse Effect Experiments, you total idiot

McGinn is an extremely obnoxious pontificating twit. Over in sci.math we have the pontificating twit of John Gabriel.

So what goes heywire in the minds of pontificating twits. Something is loose, for sure, that these twits think that -- If they say it, then it is true. Did they fall out of the baby crib when young and blow in fuse in their brains.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web