Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #624786 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-23 18:28 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:28 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-23 20:56 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 18:57 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 19:35 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 19:49 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 20:14 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:52 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-23 22:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 02:14 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 04:59 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:18 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 17:07 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 05:46 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:53 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:15 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:15 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 09:24 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 09:29 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-24 18:03 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 07:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-25 11:26 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 10:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:06 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 12:52 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:09 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 17:15 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:20 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 14:28 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-25 23:12 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 19:54 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-03-26 01:15 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:51 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 03:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:50 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 22:49 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 07:37 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-26 23:52 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 17:31 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 17:40 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:38 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 19:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-26 20:54 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 19:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:03 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:07 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 04:56 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 01:10 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:16 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 23:00 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:52 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 05:59 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:26 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 13:19 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:48 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:02 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 17:06 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 17:32 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 21:14 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:09 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 05:19 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 13:26 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:21 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:08 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-28 11:40 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 20:23 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:43 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 16:06 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-28 20:28 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 15:55 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-28 15:54 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:09 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 09:42 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 11:52 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 12:09 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:37 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-27 17:41 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 14:38 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:31 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:29 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:25 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-27 17:04 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 05:23 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:48 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 16:18 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-25 23:06 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-03-25 19:48 -0400
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:17 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-24 14:59 +0000
Re: Breakthroughs Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:03 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 08:13 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-24 14:29 -0500
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 22:40 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-24 11:05 -0800
Re: Breakthroughs john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 12:10 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs gmbr3359@gmail.com - 2017-03-25 23:18 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-26 03:36 -0700
Re: Breakthroughs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 09:27 -0700
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 05:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <86b3249b-1484-4346-9a38-7e212fa63149@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625323 |
On Monday, March 27, 2017 at 4:03:42 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 3/27/2017 7:59 AM, john wrote: > > Odd > > " > > Cosmic rays don't travel straight because they are electrically charged > > and they're present in the magnetic field of the earth. The neutral > > components of cosmic rays DO travel in straight lines. " > > > > So what? If one component within your "vacuum " > > can find purchase to curve, your argument is shot. > > > > "The super-fine emr or neutrinos you propose do not have electric charge. " > > > > Oh, now a pronouncement on what these subphotons > > that you don't believe in can and cannot have? > > > > If you're going to say they are charged, John, then don't call them > sub-photons or sub-neutrinos. Both photons and neutrinos are uncharged. > > Now, if you are supposing that electrons radiate charged thingies that > bend around in circles to hit from behind, then you're going to have to > worry about the law of conservation of charge. > > You haven't yet explained why replacing the ping pong ball with a > charged glass ball results in observing the glass ball now moving AWAY > from the glass rod. > > Nor have you explained why the piece of paper has no effect. > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables ==================== have you ever hear about they circlon mechanism ???! Y.Porat ===========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 13:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <obb3hs$ree$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #625322 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Odd >" >Cosmic rays don't travel straight because they are electrically charged >and they're present in the magnetic field of the earth. The neutral >components of cosmic rays DO travel in straight lines. " >So what? If one component within your "vacuum " >can find purchase to curve, your argument is shot. >"The super-fine emr or neutrinos you propose do not have electric charge. " >Oh, now a pronouncement on what these subphotons >that you don't believe in can and cannot have? So if they DO have charge, then there's yet another law of physics (conservation of charge) your magical subphotons violate, and therefore yet another reason to reject the whole idea of those retarded subphotons completely.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 07:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ca96414e-6ec7-4ae7-bf44-d05799f8d2bf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625325 |
Odd and MM I really don't get what makes you think that whatever happens with glass rods etc is all one mechanism? A flag flaps like it does because of many factors. One thing I've noticed about you two is a dog-like concentration on every subject that excludes everything else. You focus in way too tight, and lose all the peripheral immediately. Are glass rods effects Gravity? Are they magnetism? Are they charge? Wtf are you arguing, Odd?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 08:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e5313a24-d5d9-4366-b0e9-38c509997027@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625331 |
Poor John says One thing I've noticed about you two is a dog-like concentration on every subject that excludes everything else. You focus in way too tight, and lose all the peripheral immediately. Are glass rods effects Gravity? Are they magnetism? Are they charge? Wtf are you arguing, Odd? ------------ One thing I've noticed about you John, is that you never put forth answers to physics questions that are posed to you in support of your 'ideas'. Instead you just ask another question to divert attention away from answering the questions or to you. Just my two cents.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 17:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d97ee0$0$17455$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625332 |
On 3/27/2017 11:02 AM, HVAC wrote: > Poor John says > One thing I've noticed about you two > is a dog-like concentration on every > subject that excludes everything else. > You focus in way too tight, and lose all > the peripheral immediately. > Are glass rods effects Gravity? Are they > magnetism? Are they charge? > Wtf are you arguing, Odd? > ------------ > > One thing I've noticed about you John, is that you never put forth answers to physics questions that are posed to you in support of your 'ideas'. Instead you just ask another question to divert attention away from answering the questions or to you. > > Just my two cents. > At least John diverts to other science. You always divert to sex, bodily functions and name-calling insults. We already proved beyond any doubt here that John knows FAR more science than you do. You can no longer fool anyone with your claims of omniscience.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 17:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f1273191-96a1-44ff-98e7-ab86b30664f4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625408 |
BJ quacked > > One thing I've noticed about you John, is that you never put forth answers to physics questions that are posed to you in support of your 'ideas'. Instead you just ask another question to divert attention away from answering the questions or to you. > > Just my two cents. > At least John diverts to other science. ----------- What *you* consider science. Kook science is what it is. You are a disgrace to science. You are fucking clown shoes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 21:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58d9b8fa$0$57922$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625458 |
On 3/27/2017 8:32 PM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked >> >> One thing I've noticed about you John, is that you never put forth answers to physics questions that are posed to you in support of your 'ideas'. Instead you just ask another question to divert attention away from answering the questions or to you. >> >> Just my two cents. >> > At least John diverts to other science. > ----------- > > What *you* consider science. Kook science is what it is. > > You are a disgrace to science. You are fucking clown shoes > Still waiting for you to say anything "scientific". What school did you "attend" (they always say that when they flunked out) again?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 05:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a7f0bd8-3773-4f5a-93e0-02796d7679ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625470 |
BJ quacked Still waiting for you to say anything "scientific". ------------- Ditto
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 05:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b82f6bfa-78d1-4a57-899c-2a2d1290c1e2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625514 |
HVAC "Ditto " What the heck, HVAC! Why don't you go first?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 13:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <obdob2$jhr$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #625519 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >HVAC >> BJ quacked >> Still waiting for you to say anything "scientific". >"Ditto " >What the heck, HVAC! >Why don't you go first? Why don't YOU go first? Or last? Or at all? You NEVER give an explanation of why you believe what you believe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 07:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <74198036-44d1-48f3-97c8-0a949bcb73f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625534 |
MM " You NEVER give an explanation of why you believe what you believe. " I believe the Universe is a Fractal, is everywhere and everything. I believe this because, as I've said, lots, "There is no smallest because smaller is smaller." The Universe has always Been. There is No such Thing as Nothing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 11:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obe1qp$2g5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #625544 |
On 3/28/2017 9:21 AM, john wrote: > MM > " > You NEVER give an explanation of why you believe what you believe. " > I believe the Universe is a Fractal, is everywhere > and everything. > I believe this because, as I've said, lots, ======= > "There is no smallest because smaller is smaller." > The Universe has always Been. > There is No such Thing as Nothing. > Let's look at these three statements in reverse order. 1. "There is No such Thing as Nothing." This may be trivially true, in the sense that the word "nothing" means "no thing present". However, I'm not aware of any physical theory that describes ANYTHING that would be classed as "nothing" in this sense. Everything in physical theories is a Thing. Spacetime is a Thing, Electrons are Things. Now, there may be other unjustified statements underneath this one, like "Only material things are Things, so that spacetime is not a Thing" (which is an unjustified statement) or "Only things that have volume are Things, so that an electron cannot be a Thing" (which is another unjustified statement). So the statement "There is No such Thing as Nothing" may be trivially true but irrelevant. 2. The Universe has always Been. This is a completely unjustified belief. 3. "There is no smallest because smaller is smaller." This may be an argument that the word "smallest" has no semantic meaning. The word "smallest" itself has a DEFINITION which means "the descriptor of a thing for which there is no smaller instance." Now, you John wish to believe that there MUST ALWAYS be a smaller instance. Why you would choose to believe that, nobody knows. Unjustified beliefs, expressed only in sound bites, every one. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 11:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obe3mg$65e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #625544 |
On 3/28/2017 9:21 AM, john wrote: > MM > " > You NEVER give an explanation of why you believe what you believe. " > I believe the Universe is a Fractal, is everywhere > and everything. fractals were invented in 1975
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 20:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <obegni$o2t$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #625544 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >" >You NEVER give an explanation of why you believe what you believe. " >I believe the Universe is a Fractal, is everywhere >and everything. >I believe this because, as I've said, lots, >"There is no smallest because smaller is smaller." >The Universe has always Been. >There is No such Thing as Nothing. You have never explained why you believe any of these. Ever. "There is no smallest because smaller is smaller." That's like saying "there's no oldest person because older is older." But somewhere on earth, there is a person who is the oldest person on earth. Of course that always is changing since the oldest person eventually dies and gets replaced by the next oldest person as the new oldest. Similarly, there is a set of smallest particles, with no evidence of anything smaller. "The Universe has always Been." Why do you believe this to be true? "There is No such Thing as Nothing." Do you believe in/understand the concept of zero? Like "there are zero dragons in the room with me now." There are many more unanswered questions, such as why does dark matter get your panties in a twist (other than 6 year olds who could explain it just run away), what's wrong with structureless zero size particles, etc. And one thing glaringly missing is why you believe in retarded precessing spinny things? Why do you believe retarded precessing spinny things are somehow the answer to everything? "Explain benzene." "Precessing spinny things." "Explain neon." "Precessing spinny things." "Why is the sky blue?" "Precessing spinny things." "Why is water wet?" "Precessing spinny things." (Of course I know the real answer)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 07:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3e06af2d-67f0-47ba-aa89-f4ef0851d341@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #625519 |
Poor John says HVAC "Ditto " What the heck, HVAC! Why don't you go first? ---------------- To what end John? I've seen Mr. Bodkin and Mr. Moroney attempt to impart rational science into this group and as hard as they try, it doesn't sink in. You and BJ have your kook science and NOTHING will ever bring you into the light. I realized this over 20 years ago on these groups. Now it's strictly entertainment for me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 16:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58dac244$0$41974$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625550 |
On 3/28/2017 10:43 AM, HVAC wrote: > Poor John says > HVAC > "Ditto " > What the heck, HVAC! > Why don't you go first? > ---------------- > > To what end John? I've seen Mr. Bodkin and Mr. Moroney attempt > to impart rational science into this group and as hard as they > try, it doesn't sink in. You and BJ have your kook science and > NOTHING will ever bring you into the light. > > I realized this over 20 years ago on these groups. > > Now it's strictly entertainment for me. > What he means is Odd and HVAC try to impart their establishment propaganda nonsense to the group, and when they get called out for being illogical and ignorant, they immediately say that everyone ELSE are the stupid ones. At least Odd COULD think even though he refuses to do so. HVAC simply does not have the equipment needed to think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 20:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <obeh25$o2t$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #625550 |
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> writes: >Poor John says >HVAC >"Ditto " >What the heck, HVAC! >Why don't you go first? >---------------- >To what end John? I've seen Mr. Bodkin and Mr. Moroney attempt >to impart rational science into this group and as hard as they >try, it doesn't sink in. You and BJ have your kook science and >NOTHING will ever bring you into the light. >I realized this over 20 years ago on these groups. >Now it's strictly entertainment for me. Same here. I really know the likes of John are ineducatable and incurable. I'm actually here because I like to watch all the kooks kook in here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 15:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58dabf9a$0$57930$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625519 |
On 3/28/2017 8:19 AM, john wrote: > HVAC > "Ditto " > What the heck, HVAC! > Why don't you go first? > He can't John, because as usualy he has nothing upstairs. All he can do is plagiarize what others have said first. He's a nutjob.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 15:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58dabf5c$0$57930$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #625514 |
On 3/28/2017 8:09 AM, HVAC drooled: > BJ quacked > Still waiting for you to say anything "scientific". > ------------- > > Ditto > There you go folks. This remark is what looner HVAC calls "discussing science".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 10:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <obb9vf$1clp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #625331 |
On 3/27/2017 9:48 AM, john wrote: > Odd and MM > I really don't get what > makes you think that whatever happens with > glass rods etc > is all one mechanism? OK, so what you are saying is that when a charged glass rod makes a charged ping pong ball approach, this is due to one mechanism: subphotons emitted from the glass rod circling around to hit the ping pong ball from the backside to push it inward. But when the charged ping pong ball is replaced with a charged glass ball, now the subphotons emitted from the glass rod NO LONGER circle around to hit the glass ball from the backside, and instead they go in straight lines to hit the glass ball from the frontside, to make the glass ball recede from the rod? Is this what you're saying, John? What the hell makes the subphotons do THAT? > > A flag flaps like it does because of many > factors. > > One thing I've noticed about you two > is a dog-like concentration on every > subject that excludes everything else. You have made the statement that ALL attractive forces are illogical. > You focus in way too tight, and lose all > the peripheral immediately. > Are glass rods effects Gravity? Are they > magnetism? Are they charge? > Wtf are you arguing, Odd? > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web