Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #621579 > unrolled thread

Atoms and magnetism

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 04:11 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-05 13:50 -0800
      get him! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 15:52 -0800
      Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 04:49 -0800
        Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 11:15 -0800
          Re: Atoms and magnetism noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 11:27 -0800
          Re: Atoms and magnetism S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 14:46 -0600
            Re: Atoms and magnetism Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 22:08 +0100
              Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 06:19 -0800
                Re: Atoms and magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-08 17:11 +0000
                  focality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 07:14 -0800
                    focality john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 07:35 -0800
                      Re: focality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 23:30 -0800
                Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-09 14:22 -0800
                  Re: Atoms and magnetism HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 05:19 -0800
                    Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:26 -0800
                      Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:32 -0800
                  Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:44 -0800
                    Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-10 13:56 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism Se Rgio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-05 18:31 -0600
      Re: Atoms and magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-06 05:17 +0000
      Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 04:54 -0800
        Re: Atoms and magnetism edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 09:26 -0800
          and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 16:55 -0800
            Re: and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 11:29 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 16:48 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 01:22 -0800
      thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 01:45 -0800
        thrEEdots.co john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 04:52 -0800
          Re: thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 09:04 -0800
        Re: thrEEdots.co poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-09 10:33 -0800
          Re: thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 00:19 -0800
            Re: thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:21 -0800
              nothing, exactly (_0.0_) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 11:58 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#621579 — Atoms and magnetism

All atoms creates magnetism.
The electrons and protons arrange themselves
as a disc, with protons at the center.
If there are an unequal number of electrons 
and protons, the rotation of the disc
will create a magnetic pole at right-angles
to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
gets turned end over end very quickly,
resulting in a polar electric field. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#621634

On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 4:11:52 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> All atoms creates magnetism.
> The electrons and protons arrange themselves
> as a disc, with protons at the center.
> If there are an unequal number of electrons 
> and protons, the rotation of the disc
> will create a magnetic pole at right-angles
> to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
> 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
> gets turned end over end very quickly,
> resulting in a polar electric field.


Is this like the Bohr atom?  Or more of a pancake model?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621663 — get him!

got'im!

> > to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
> > 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
> > gets turned end over end very quickly,
> > resulting in a polar electric field.
> 
> 
> Is this like the Bohr atom?  Or more of a pancake model?
> 
> Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621952

- hide quoted text -
On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 4:11:52 AM UTC-8, john wrote: 
> All atoms creates magnetism. 
> The electrons and protons arrange themselves 
> as a disc, with protons at the center. 
> If there are an unequal number of electrons 
> and protons, the rotation of the disc 
> will create a magnetic pole at right-angles 
> to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing 
> 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole 
> gets turned end over end very quickly, 
> resulting in a polar electric field. 


"Is this like the Bohr atom?  Or more of a pancake model? 

Double-A "

This is the Galaxy Model for the Atom; the
Universe is a Fractal based on Atom/Galaxy-
galaxies are made from self-similar units
called atoms. Likewise, atoms are made 
from self-similar units IN THE SAME WAY.

Atoms are laid out like spiral galaxies- a
nucleus with varying numbers of arms.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622004

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:30 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> - hide quoted text -
> On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 4:11:52 AM UTC-8, john wrote: 
> > All atoms creates magnetism. 
> > The electrons and protons arrange themselves 
> > as a disc, with protons at the center. 
> > If there are an unequal number of electrons 
> > and protons, the rotation of the disc 
> > will create a magnetic pole at right-angles 
> > to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing 
> > 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole 
> > gets turned end over end very quickly, 
> > resulting in a polar electric field. 
> 
> 
> "Is this like the Bohr atom?  Or more of a pancake model? 
> 
> Double-A "
> 
> This is the Galaxy Model for the Atom; the
> Universe is a Fractal based on Atom/Galaxy-
> galaxies are made from self-similar units
> called atoms. Likewise, atoms are made 
> from self-similar units IN THE SAME WAY.
> 
> Atoms are laid out like spiral galaxies- a
> nucleus with varying numbers of arms.


And so, continuing with that line of thought, do you think out universe's galaxies are actually the atoms of something super big?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622007

that is the question, we shalkl not ask of ... d00ds

> And so, continuing with that line of thought, do you think out universe's galaxies are actually the atoms of something super big?
> 
> Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622027

On 3/7/2017 1:15 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:30 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
>> - hide quoted text - On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 4:11:52 AM UTC-8,
>> john wrote:
   >>

>> "Is this like the Bohr atom?  Or more of a pancake model?
>>
>> Double-A "
>>
>> This is the Galaxy Model for the Atom; the Universe is a Fractal
>> based on Atom/Galaxy- galaxies are made from self-similar units
>> called atoms. Likewise, atoms are made from self-similar units IN
>> THE SAME WAY.

>> Atoms are laid out like spiral galaxies- a nucleus with varying
>> numbers of arms.
>
>
> And so, continuing with that line of thought, do you think out
> universe's galaxies are actually the atoms of something super big?
>
> Double-A
>


yes,  large pancakes, very very large  flatish  type  pancakes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622033

Dne 07/03/2017 v 21:46 S Ergio napsal(a):
> On 3/7/2017 1:15 PM, Double-A wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 4:49:30 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
>>> - hide quoted text - On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 4:11:52 AM UTC-8,
>>> john wrote:
>   >>
> 
>>> "Is this like the Bohr atom?  Or more of a pancake model?
>>>
>>> Double-A "
>>>
>>> This is the Galaxy Model for the Atom; the Universe is a Fractal
>>> based on Atom/Galaxy- galaxies are made from self-similar units
>>> called atoms. Likewise, atoms are made from self-similar units IN
>>> THE SAME WAY.
> 
>>> Atoms are laid out like spiral galaxies- a nucleus with varying
>>> numbers of arms.
>>
>>
>> And so, continuing with that line of thought, do you think out
>> universe's galaxies are actually the atoms of something super big?
>>

> yes,  large pancakes, very very large  flatish  type  pancakes
> 
And different atoms have different filing.
I like copper atoms with raspberries.

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622135

It's just bigger and bigger discs,
With symmetry occurring at 2, 10, etc.
I did 10:
 http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/NeonAnimation.GIF

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622156

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>It's just bigger and bigger discs,
>With symmetry occurring at 2, 10, etc.
>I did 10:
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/NeonAnimation.GIF

Animations with no connections to reality are worthless, John.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622284 — focality

of course, the antifocus is confocal with the focus,
when it's not going really, really faster

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622286 — focality

Buckyballs aren't symmetrical?
Diamonds aren't symmetrical?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622396 — Re: focality

the usual representation is soccerbalene,
with vertices as atoms; jut make the dual, and
the atoms are isoceles

> Buckyballs aren't symmetrical?
> Diamonds aren't symmetrical?

diamond lattice is tough

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622335

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 6:19:43 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> It's just bigger and bigger discs,
> With symmetry occurring at 2, 10, etc.
> I did 10:
>  http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/NeonAnimation.GIF


Nice animation.

A pretty picture.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622411

Double-A
- show quoted text -
Nice animation. 

A pretty picture. 
--------------

It's a cartoon

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622423

HVAC
"It's a cartoon"
And you are a joke.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622440

The problem is that you cannot
align two vortices tail to tail.
And an electron is a vortex- it is
defined by its spin.

So there are two kinds of electrons,
'spin up' and 'spin down', which
align opposite each other on the disc.

They are not called that because of
their position, but because they CAN
TAKE that position by virtue of having
the opposite spin- when they line up
tail to tail they are spinning the same 
way. Similarly, two vortices with the same
spin that are neighbours will interfere with 
each other, so neighbors as well as opposites
must be of opposite spin. 

This can be done with Carbon as well as Neon,
symmetrically.This actually gives me an idea
for another attempt at orbital-based
tetrahedral structures for Carbon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622442

AA
"..pretty.."
It is a ring where all neighbours  are opposites,
and all opposites are opposite.
And the ring turns once every time it
precesses twice, so all opposites follow
the same path, constantly changing the
path's colour.
This can actually also be done with Carbon-
I think I'll do it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622461

On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 10:44:20 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> AA
> "..pretty.."
> It is a ring where all neighbours  are opposites,
> and all opposites are opposite.
> And the ring turns once every time it
> precesses twice, so all opposites follow
> the same path, constantly changing the
> path's colour.
> This can actually also be done with Carbon-
> I think I'll do it.


If you can,
Do it!
If you can't,
Screw it!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621672

On 3/5/2017 6:11 AM, john wrote:
> All atoms creates magnetism.
> The electrons and protons arrange themselves
> as a disc, with protons at the center.
> If there are an unequal number of electrons
> and protons, the rotation of the disc
> will create a magnetic pole at right-angles
> to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
> 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
> gets turned end over end very quickly,
> resulting in a polar electric field.
>

what do you call your new theory ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web