Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #621579 > unrolled thread

Atoms and magnetism

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 04:11 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-05 13:50 -0800
      get him! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-05 15:52 -0800
      Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 04:49 -0800
        Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-07 11:15 -0800
          Re: Atoms and magnetism noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 11:27 -0800
          Re: Atoms and magnetism S Ergio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-07 14:46 -0600
            Re: Atoms and magnetism Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 22:08 +0100
              Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 06:19 -0800
                Re: Atoms and magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-08 17:11 +0000
                  focality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 07:14 -0800
                    focality john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 07:35 -0800
                      Re: focality noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 23:30 -0800
                Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-09 14:22 -0800
                  Re: Atoms and magnetism HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 05:19 -0800
                    Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:26 -0800
                      Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:32 -0800
                  Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:44 -0800
                    Re: Atoms and magnetism Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-03-10 13:56 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism Se Rgio <invlid@invalid.com> - 2017-03-05 18:31 -0600
      Re: Atoms and magnetism moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-06 05:17 +0000
      Re: Atoms and magnetism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 04:54 -0800
        Re: Atoms and magnetism edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 09:26 -0800
          and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 16:55 -0800
            Re: and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-07 11:29 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-05 16:48 -0800
    Re: Atoms and magnetism poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-06 01:22 -0800
      thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 01:45 -0800
        thrEEdots.co john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 04:52 -0800
          Re: thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-06 09:04 -0800
        Re: thrEEdots.co poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-03-09 10:33 -0800
          Re: thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 00:19 -0800
            Re: thrEEdots.co noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:21 -0800
              nothing, exactly (_0.0_) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 11:58 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#621700

Se Rgio <invlid@invalid.com> writes:

>On 3/5/2017 6:11 AM, john wrote:

<snip>

>what do you call your new theory ?

I call it "word salad".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621761

Se rGio 
"
what do you call your new theory ? "

The Galaxy Model for the Atom

The Universe is a Fractal. Galaxies are
made from SELF SIMILAR units called atoms.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621792

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 7:54:52 AM UTC-5, john wrote:
> Se rGio 
> "
> what do you call your new theory ? "
> 
> The Galaxy Model for the Atom
> 
> The Universe is a Fractal. Galaxies are
> made from SELF SIMILAR units called atoms.

With zero evidence to support it.
Yours is not the first fractal theory.
It seems like an interesting idea until
you try to match it with reality.

ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621884 — and

the mini-M-sets are artifacts of i.e.e.e-758;
never seen -858, or what ever, what datum

> With zero evidence to support it.
> Yours is not the first fractal theory.
> It seems like an interesting idea until
> you try to match it with reality.
> 
> ed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622009 — Re: and

so, did they really cahnge it?

> never seen -858, or what ever, what datum
> > With zero evidence to support it.
> > Yours is not the first fractal theory.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621673

All atoms creates magnetism. 
The electrons and protons arrange themselves 
as a disc, with protons at the center. 
If there are an unequal number of electrons 
and protons, the rotation of the disc 
will create a magnetic pole at right-angles 
to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing 
10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole 
gets turned end over end very quickly, 
resulting in a polar electric field. 

_______________________________

"All atoms creates magnetism." 

A stone that is composed of atom is not magnetic.

-----------------------------------------------------


"The electrons and protons arrange themselves 
as a disc, with protons at the center." 

_______________________________


Like a Frisbee or an egg shiny side up?  But what about a potato chip that does not produce magnetism, I get it the curve space of the potato chip does not allow for the magnetism to occur?

_____________________________________


Since the disc is also precessing 
10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole 
gets turned end over end very quickly, 
resulting in a polar electric field.

-----------------------------------------------


You mean like a judo flip. Did you know that a judo flip is a defensive move. If you do not flip. Do you know what happens. You have to go to the emergency room and get this heavy white thing put on your arm and you also get a large tub a ice cream with potato chips.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621732

On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 2:11:52 PM UTC+2, john wrote:
> All atoms creates magnetism.
> The electrons and protons arrange themselves
> as a disc, with protons at the center.
> If there are an unequal number of electrons 
> and protons, the rotation of the disc
> will create a magnetic pole at right-angles
==============================
rather 
the Y circlon mechanism !!!
is the mother of all forces 
Y.Porat
=====================================


> to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
> 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
> gets turned end over end very quickly,
> resulting in a polar electric field.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621741 — thrEEdots.co

g00d question about ions, but
you really should try the old m00n model;
no flat-rrth disky thing (Aximander?...  no,
some other A. greek d00d

Bob m00n was on the Manhattan project, and
he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical!

> > The electrons and protons arrange themselves
> > as a disc, with protons at the center.
> > If there are an unequal number of electrons 
> > and protons, the rotation of the disc
> > will create a magnetic pole at right-angles

po rat wasn't really here!

> > to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
> > 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
> > gets turned end over end very quickly,
> > resulting in a polar electric field.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621760 — thrEEdots.co

Not

"Bob m00n was on the Manhattan project, and 
he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical!"

 First the line.
Then the circle (or many circles= disc).
Finally the sphere.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#621778 — Re: thrEEdots.co

certainly, as the orbits are perfectly keplerian --
one might say, transcendentally, because of pi & all; however,
I don;t know that the theory goes to elliptical orbits,
as of this momentbeing ... and
it also has got to include hyperbolic ones --
which is a nice problemma, three

> "Bob m00n was on the Manhattan project, and 
> he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical!"
> 
>  First the line.
> Then the circle (or many circles= disc).
> Finally the sphere.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622307 — Re: thrEEdots.co

On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 11:45:55 AM UTC+2, noTthaTguY wrote:
> g00d question about ions, but
> you really should try the old m00n model;
> no flat-rrth disky thing (Aximander?...  no,
> some other A. greek d00d
> 
> Bob m00n was on the Manhattan project, and
> he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical!
> 
> > > The electrons and protons arrange themselves
> > > as a disc, with protons at the center.
> > > If there are an unequal number of electrons 
> > > and protons, the rotation of the disc
> > > will create a magnetic pole at right-angles
> 
> po rat wasn't really here!
==========================
pig
G B F Y M 
Y.Porat
==========================
> 
> > > to its centre. Since the disc is also precessing
> > > 10^16 times per second, this magnetic pole
> > > gets turned end over end very quickly,
> > > resulting in a polar electric field.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622404 — Re: thrEEdots.co

see larouchepub.com

> > Bob m00n was on the Manhattan project, and
> > he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical
> > 
> > po rat wasn't here, niether;
appears to be a bad typing bot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622421 — Re: thrEEdots.co

this is the natural model to elaborate;
see _SynergeticS e.g ... he almost had the correct idea!

> see larouchepub.com
> > > Bob m00n was on the Manhattan project, and
> > > he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#622449 — nothing, exactly (_0.0_)

what would abU, say

> this is the natural model to elaborate;
> > > > he's got a gorgeous atomic model -- stunningly spherical

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web