Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #617867 > unrolled thread

Re: What Causes the Hubble Redshift (in a Static Universe)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: What Causes the Hubble Redshift (in a Static Universe) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-09 22:54 -0800
    blueshift is hard to find! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 01:03 -0800
      Re: blueshift is hard to find! Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-10 10:27 -0600
        Re: blueshift is hard to find! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 09:25 -0800
          Re: blueshift is hard to find! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 09:38 -0800
    Re: What Causes the Hubble Redshift (in a Static Universe) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-10 11:01 -0800
      Re: What Causes the Hubble Redshift (in a Static Universe) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 12:10 -0800

#617867 — Re: What Causes the Hubble Redshift (in a Static Universe)

David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 6:32:09 PM UTC-6, al...@interia.pl wrote:
> > W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 01:14:53 UTC+1 użytkownik David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller napisał:
> > > If LIGO detected Gravity Waves & (2GM)/c^2 = Entropy then redshift is the universe gaining Entropy
> >
> > Entropy is a mathematical entity of a system,
> > which is fully preserved for any closed system!
> >
> > Stop improvising, stupid babes - you should learn something first!
> 
> I Predict You will be eventually be Proven Incorrect
> 
> red shift is the universe gaining Entropy


I think it's about time yous people learn the truth about Hubble redshift...


you would have a better understanding if you understood Colors.

There is no relation between the color red and the ...shift.


Mars is red, is it a shift?

Pluto is red, is it a shift?


there are other planets/bodies in our solar system that is red...no shift.


Red is a Color.


If you understands Colors, there is no need to understand shift.


Now, the test, ...What is Red?


What is the relation between Mars Red and Hubble Redshift?


Only if you understand Colors can you answer the question.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#617889 — blueshift is hard to find!

I ne'er thought that I would see p.v,
actually having written some thing -- what ever it is.

redshift is just longer waving, of course,
since most of it is shifting to microwave, radio etc.,
and there is no known end to reshifting.

it just gets fuzzzzzzier & fuzzzzier & redder & redder;
and that means harder & harder to see, of course,
because longer waves have less energy -- but
they are still waving at you

> What is the relation between Mars Red and Hubble Redshift?
> 
> 
> Only if you understand Colors can you answer the question.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617906 — Re: blueshift is hard to find!

On 2/10/2017 3:03 AM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> I ne'er thought that I would see p.v,
> actually having written some thing -- what ever it is.
>
> redshift is just longer waving, of course,
> since most of it is shifting to microwave, radio etc.,
> and there is no known end to reshifting.
>
> it just gets fuzzzzzzier & fuzzzzier & redder & redder;
> and that means harder & harder to see, of course,
> because longer waves have less energy -- but
> they are still waving at you
>
>> What is the relation between Mars Red and Hubble Redshift?
>>
>>
>> Only if you understand Colors can you answer the question.
>

blueshift is when a cop pulls you over, you been blueshifted

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617914 — Re: blueshift is hard to find!

certainly, but isn't it in With Halton arP and them?

> blueshift is when a cop pulls you over, you been blueshifted

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617917 — Re: blueshift is hard to find!

noT
"certainly, but isn't it in With Halton arP and them? "
and them:
Royal Raymond Rife
Wilhelm Reich
Pons
Fleishmann
Stan Meyer
Victor Schauberger

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617940

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 6:32:09 PM UTC-6, al...@interia.pl wrote:
> > > W dniu czwartek, 9 lutego 2017 01:14:53 UTC+1 użytkownik David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller napisał:
> > > > If LIGO detected Gravity Waves & (2GM)/c^2 = Entropy then redshift is the universe gaining Entropy
> > >
> > > Entropy is a mathematical entity of a system,
> > > which is fully preserved for any closed system!
> > >
> > > Stop improvising, stupid babes - you should learn something first!
> >
> > I Predict You will be eventually be Proven Incorrect
> >
> > red shift is the universe gaining Entropy
> 
> I think it's about time yous people learn the truth about Hubble redshift...
> 
> you would have a better understanding if you understood Colors.
> 
> There is no relation between the color red and the ...shift.
> 
> Mars is red, is it a shift?
> 
> Pluto is red, is it a shift?
> 
> there are other planets/bodies in our solar system that is red...no shift.
> 
> Red is a Color.
> 
> If you understands Colors, there is no need to understand shift.
> 
> Now, the test, ...What is Red?
> 
> What is the relation between Mars Red and Hubble Redshift?
> 
> Only if you understand Colors can you answer the question.


The Big Bang was a Giant Red Shift.


if you observe what caused the big bang, you will find lurking in the
shadows the blue and the green.


and the blue green sez, "What was all that noise?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617942

Purple green

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web