Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #617384 > unrolled thread

What we DON'T know about tornadoes

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2017-02-07 09:00 -0800
Last post2017-02-11 10:55 -0800
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  What we DON'T know about tornadoes James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 09:00 -0800
    Re: What we DON'T know about tornadoes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 22:15 -0800
      Re: What we DON'T know about tornadoes Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-09 07:04 -0600
        Re: What we DON'T know about tornadoes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-09 09:54 -0800
    Re: What we DON'T know about tornadoes "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 10:55 -0800

#617384 — What we DON'T know about tornadoes

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-07 09:00 -0800
SubjectWhat we DON'T know about tornadoes
Message-ID<f7e28786-740a-49a6-a57a-ec589957ee10@googlegroups.com>
What we DON'T know about tornadoes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KOTFV8d-t0

Published on Jun 17, 2016
After a half century of investigation with radar, the fundamental mechanism of how tornadoes form eludes meteorology.
A complete theory must describe the sources of rotation along with how and why it is positioned and concentrated.
What we still don't know about tornado formation as explained by NSSL meteorologists using data from the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX).
Maybe it is time to examine alternate theories.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#617714

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-08 22:15 -0800
Message-ID<65e1a32b-6745-4d4d-9276-27e670b97253@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#617384
heads up

> NSSL meteorologists using data from the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX).
> Maybe it is time to examine alternate theories.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#617741

FromSerg Io <invliad@invalid.com>
Date2017-02-09 07:04 -0600
Message-ID<o7hpbo$v74$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#617714
On 2/9/2017 12:15 AM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> heads up
>
>> NSSL meteorologists using data from the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX).
>> Maybe it is time to examine alternate theories.
>

....someone is reading the literature (!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#617762

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-09 09:54 -0800
Message-ID<6502c23f-25a6-4ac7-bf80-5134aea0f35e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#617741
we don't know, what mCg doesn't know, unless it is a)
any thing

> ....someone is reading the literature (!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#618119

From"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-11 10:55 -0800
Message-ID<f1585540-0a7a-461e-9e50-e2ec70509f9f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#617384
On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 9:00:30 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> What we DON'T know about tornadoes
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KOTFV8d-t0
> 
> Published on Jun 17, 2016
> After a half century of investigation with radar, the fundamental mechanism of how tornadoes form eludes meteorology.
> A complete theory must describe the sources of rotation along with how and why it is positioned and concentrated.
> What we still don't know about tornado formation as explained by NSSL meteorologists using data from the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX).
> Maybe it is time to examine alternate theories.

One word for tornado is "Vacuum" My house in Florida was hit twice.Also a money maker.I got $35,000 for the last one. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web