Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #610090 > unrolled thread

Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O?

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2016-12-22 14:35 -0800
Last post2017-02-22 09:42 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 42 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 14:35 -0800
    Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 12:57 -0800
      Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-26 00:12 -0600
        Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 11:16 -0800
          Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-26 13:21 -0800
            Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 13:27 -0800
              Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-26 14:01 -0800
                Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-26 16:42 -0600
                  Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 15:55 -0800
                  Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:49 -0800
            Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 17:31 -0800
              Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-12-28 20:01 -0800
                Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:18 -0800
                  Do You Dispute Steam Tables? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 12:13 -0800
                    Re: Do You Dispute Steam Tables? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-31 06:56 -0800
                Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-01 20:53 -0800
                  Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 13:24 -0800
                  Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 13:30 -0800
                    Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 14:08 -0800
                    Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 10:05 -0800
                    Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 17:27 -0800
                      what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 00:02 -0800
                        Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 10:58 -0800
                          Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 09:12 -0800
                            Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 15:27 -0800
                              Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 21:47 -0800
                                Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 22:41 -0800
                                  Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes Yuri Kretin <invalaid@invalid.com> - 2017-02-03 07:51 -0600
                    Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 22:36 -0800
                Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 22:12 -0800
            Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-31 14:31 -0800
      Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 21:32 -0800
        Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 13:22 -0800
          Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 14:45 -0800
            Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? Yuri Kreton <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-05 18:57 -0600
              Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-05 22:19 -0800
                Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 14:06 -0800
                  Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? Yuri Kreton <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-06 16:29 -0600
                    Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 08:58 -0800
                      Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-08 08:26 -0600
                        Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-08 22:02 -0800
                      Re: So, uh, what is the boiling point of H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-02-22 09:42 -0800

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#614804

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-22 17:27 -0800
Message-ID<0bf07845-0c8b-4d4b-a94e-acbc2510861c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#613901
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 1:30:29 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 8:53:56 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 8:01:42 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > > At what temperature and pressure? Otherwise, the answer is worthless. I could assume that you mean at STP, in which case the answer is 100°C... but, of course, this has NOTHING to do with evaporation and/or sublimation.
> > 
> > Maybe someday your evidence will be located.  Also, maybe someday humanity will find a nation of bigfoot hiding in the woods.
> > 
> > Have faith
> 
> Maybe someday you will find the evidence that everyone else can find but which you so desperately seek.
> 
> The evidence to support your own position, will *never* be found because it does not exist. Perhaps a bigfoot ate it!

Even a bigfoot can read a steam table.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614865 — what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-23 00:02 -0800
Subjectwhat is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<7c5d9432-81a7-4ef4-9ce7-bdaa2990a60d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614804
ah, l00k -- tardnadoees got a hypothesis!

> Even a bigfoot can read a steam table.

rather, your attitude is just ...
I have got to stop replying to churners!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615315 — Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-25 10:58 -0800
SubjectRe: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<80c33cdb-ee97-4b22-8aa5-63795fa0f734@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614865
On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:02:55 AM UTC-8, noTthaTguY wrote:
> ah, l00k -- tardnadoees got a hypothesis!
> 
> > Even a bigfoot can read a steam table.
> 
> rather, your attitude is just ...
> I have got to stop replying to churners!

I bet even you can read a steam table.

Evidence of cold steam is on similar to that of ghosts.  

Some people feel the presence of ghosts wherever they go.

Some people can feel the existence of thousands and thousands of people that 
have empirically confirmed the existence of cold steam. And, it seems, this 
belief runs so deep and is so widespread that we can only assume that someday 
one or more of these people (all of whom, regrettably, were not in the habit of 
documenting their methods, procedures, or data) will turn up.

Keep the faith.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615626 — Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromClaudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-27 09:12 -0800
SubjectRe: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<11613aaa-cbca-4897-9e35-f008e4b87e86@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#615315
On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 10:58:43 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 12:02:55 AM UTC-8, noTthaTguY wrote:
> > ah, l00k -- tardnadoees got a hypothesis!
> > 
> > > Even a bigfoot can read a steam table.
> > 
> > rather, your attitude is just ...
> > I have got to stop replying to churners!
> 
> I bet even you can read a steam table.
> 
> Evidence of cold steam is on similar to that of ghosts.  
> 
> Some people feel the presence of ghosts wherever they go.
> 
> Some people can feel the existence of thousands and thousands of people that 
> have empirically confirmed the existence of cold steam. And, it seems, this 
> belief runs so deep and is so widespread that we can only assume that someday 
> one or more of these people (all of whom, regrettably, were not in the habit of 
> documenting their methods, procedures, or data) will turn up.
> 
> Keep the faith.

Maybe we have to try harder to have faith that cold steam exists.  Maybe we should pray.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616708 — Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-02 15:27 -0800
SubjectRe: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<249f7b2e-77c2-4989-b710-48b41dd8fb1c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#615626
On Friday, January 27, 2017 at 9:12:40 AM UTC-8, Claudius Denk wrote:


> > Keep the faith.
> 
> Maybe we have to try harder to have faith that cold steam exists.  Maybe we should pray.

Believing is simple.  Science is hard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616736 — Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-02 21:47 -0800
SubjectRe: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<9ebaa5f7-490b-478f-ab42-7e88c238ed18@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#616708
DO NOT FOLD STEAMTABLE
unless it's a theorem about steamtable

> Believing is simple.  Science is hard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616749 — Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-02 22:41 -0800
SubjectRe: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<d62c6f61-a68c-4b27-a636-2aa855f86323@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#616736
DO NOT FOLD STEAMTABLE
thankyou&pleaseRECYCLEable  --we'reDisneycorP

Y wrote:
> DO NOT FOLD STEAMTABLE
> unless it's a theorem about steamtable
> 
> > Science is hard; believing about whaT

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616776 — Re: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes

FromYuri Kretin <invalaid@invalid.com>
Date2017-02-03 07:51 -0600
SubjectRe: what is your altitude ffor boiling potatoes
Message-ID<o721tg$c7v$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#616749
On 2/3/2017 12:41 AM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> DO NOT FOLD STEAMTABLE
> thankyou&pleaseRECYCLEable  --we'reDisneycorP
>
> Y wrote:
>> DO NOT FOLD STEAMTABLE
>> unless it's a theorem about steamtable
>>
>>> Science is hard; believing about whaT
>

there are pictures of Bigfoot, even movies...

so where are McGinn's Photos of his mystical "non-water vapor" ?

are their any photos at all anywhere ?  anything ??

              it exists only in JM's imagination.


there are accurate steam tables at the cafeteria.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615243

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-24 22:36 -0800
Message-ID<db6f92e8-2e3e-45f6-97c5-6ab19b4750fc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#613901
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 1:30:29 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 8:53:56 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 8:01:42 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > > At what temperature and pressure? Otherwise, the answer is worthless. I could assume that you mean at STP, in which case the answer is 100°C... but, of course, this has NOTHING to do with evaporation and/or sublimation.
> > 
> > Maybe someday your evidence will be located.  Also, maybe someday humanity will find a nation of bigfoot hiding in the woods.
> > 
> > Have faith
> 
> Maybe someday you will find the evidence that everyone else can find but which you so desperately seek.
> 
> The evidence to support your own position, will *never* be found because it does not exist. Perhaps a bigfoot ate it!

All the evidence anybody needs is in the steam tables.  But evidence is of little consequence to dingbats who equate truth to consensus.

The reason nobody ever will present evidence of cold steam is because ITS IMPOSSIBLE!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614519

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-20 22:12 -0800
Message-ID<e62d9de1-f0a0-4a32-bddc-c0364f24facb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610637
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 8:01:42 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 5:31:14 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 1:21:24 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 11:16:29 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Believers believe.  Scientist understand.
> > > 
> > > Exactly! 
> > > 
> > > Everyone here, EVERYONE, understands that you are a believer and definitely NOT a scientist, that is an impossibility!
> > 
> > Science isn't about what EVERYONE believes/understands. It's about what the evidence actually indicates, you frickin moron.  
> 
> Exactly! So, show us the evidence, you incredible dumbfuck. You are all bluster and zero evidence. YOU make outrageous statements but NEVER provide either observations or evidence to support your position. You act as though everyone else needs to prove you wrong, whereas the reality is that it is up to YOU to prove you are right. You will never see a lick of evidence from me, because I haven't made any claims... except to say that you are WRONG! Go ahead, prove yourself to be right.
> 
> You are clearly NOT a scientist.
> 
> > Now answer the question:
> > What is the boiling temperature of H2O?
> 
> At what temperature and pressure? Otherwise, the answer is worthless. I could assume that you mean at STP, in which case the answer is 100°C... but, of course, this has NOTHING to do with evaporation and/or sublimation.

Answer the question you evasive jackass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611098

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-31 14:31 -0800
Message-ID<6c14de17-a8da-456a-9f4c-8d1cb0c932f7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610404
On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 1:21:24 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 11:16:29 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> 
> > Believers believe.  Scientist understand.
> 
> Exactly! 
> 
> Everyone here, EVERYONE, understands that you are a believer and definitely NOT a scientist, that is an impossibility!

Well then, why not ask EVERYONE to help you develop a substantive argument?  

Good luck with that.

James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615055

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-23 21:32 -0800
Message-ID<fb184e15-945d-4c43-bf6e-f3598d555ea0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610184
photocopy, next time

> so, give us three consecutive lines of your all-wonderful steamtable,
> even if you didn't steal from DisnewrolD\lanD, iff

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615334

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-25 13:22 -0800
Message-ID<b441176a-a5c2-43df-be7b-e93f924e0b2f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#615055
come on, at least three lines from this allegorical table of steamvaluation,
and maybe the DisneY tradEMark will not have to be quoted in full

> > so, give us three consecutive lines of your all-wonderful steamtable,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617146

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-05 14:45 -0800
Message-ID<07f75b45-c8c8-45c9-89cf-148617005916@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#615334
did you eat your steamtable -- again?

> > > so, give us three consecutive lines of your all-wonderful steamtable,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617168

FromYuri Kreton <invliad@invalid.com>
Date2017-02-05 18:57 -0600
Message-ID<o78hm1$1rj3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#617146
On 2/5/2017 4:45 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> did you eat your steamtable -- again?
>
>>>> so, give us three consecutive lines of your all-wonderful steamtable,
>


  ofcourse, steamvegietables, I getitnow

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617180

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-05 22:19 -0800
Message-ID<a1bdb0d0-0f74-4056-964d-deed7d8df264@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#617168
On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 4:57:43 PM UTC-8, Yuri Kreton wrote:
> On 2/5/2017 4:45 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> > did you eat your steamtable -- again?
> >
> >>>> so, give us three consecutive lines of your all-wonderful steamtable,
> >
> 
> 
>   ofcourse, steamvegietables, I getitnow

Remember.  H2O will not boil at ambient temperatures.  It is vapor.

Don't allow yourself to be conned.

James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617257

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-06 14:06 -0800
Message-ID<9339d16d-9e35-4d28-a112-50f0026b5f2b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#617180
Quoth the nevaR

> Remember.  H2O will not boil at ambient temperatures.  It is vapor.
> 
> Don't allow yourself to be conned.
> 
> James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes

get your steamtable ... some where else!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617266

FromYuri Kreton <invliad@invalid.com>
Date2017-02-06 16:29 -0600
Message-ID<o7atc6$1f7o$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#617257
On 2/6/2017 4:06 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> Quoth the nevaR
>
>> Remember.  H2O will not boil at ambient temperatures.  It is vapor.
>>
>> Don't allow yourself to be conned.
>>
>> James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
>
> get your steamtable ... some where else!
>


"H2O will not boil at ambient temperatures.  It is vapor."

if its vapor, it already boiled.  Or evaporated.

does JM deny evaporation ?   YES.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617382

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-07 08:58 -0800
Message-ID<c961599d-4df4-46a3-a12f-1f6ab9d6c823@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#617266
the steamtable is totally shredded, like,
it is almost evaporate ... there will be no Mickey officeR to get him!

> "H2O will not boil at ambient temperatures.  It is vapor."
> 
> if its vapor, it already boiled.  Or evaporated.
> 
> does JM deny evaporation ?   YES.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#617560

FromSerg Io <invliad@invalid.com>
Date2017-02-08 08:26 -0600
Message-ID<o7f9pk$10j0$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#617382
On 2/7/2017 10:58 AM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> the steamtable is totally shredded, like,
> it is almost evaporate ... there will be no Mickey officeR to get him!
>
>> "H2O will not boil at ambient temperatures.  It is vapor."
>>
>> if its vapor, it already boiled.  Or evaporated.
>>
>> does JM deny evaporation ?   YES.
>

Rehydration of steamvegatable evaporate using hydrogen hydroxide,
    no steam tables needed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web