Groups > sci.physics > #612234 > unrolled thread

How Many different Electrons?

Started by	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
First post	2017-01-09 10:25 -0800
Last post	2017-01-20 17:43 -0800
Articles	20 on this page of 24 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

  How Many different Electrons? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 10:25 -0800
    Re: How Many different Electrons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-09 11:13 -0800
      Re: How Many different Electrons? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 11:37 -0800
        Re: How Many different Electrons? Yuri Kretin <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2017-01-09 13:47 -0600
        Re: How Many different Electrons? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-09 20:00 +0000
          Re: How Many different Electrons? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 20:40 -0800
            Re: How Many different Electrons? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:27 -0600
              Re: How Many different Electrons? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 10:51 -0800
                Re: How Many different Electrons? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 08:07 -0600
    Re: How Many different Electrons? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-01-10 14:36 -0800
      Re: How Many different Electrons? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 09:49 -0800
        Re: How Many different Electrons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-11 10:00 -0800
        Re: How Many different Electrons? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-11 18:21 -0500
          Re: How Many different Electrons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-11 15:36 -0800
          Re: How Many different Electrons? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 07:55 +0100
        Re: How Many different Electrons? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-01-19 13:23 -0800
    Re: How Many different Electrons? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 16:06 -0800
      Re: How Many different Electrons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-12 16:33 -0800
      Re: How Many different Electrons? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-12 20:39 -0500
      Re: How Many different Electrons? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 17:43 -0800
        Re: How Many different Electrons? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-19 21:12 -0500
          Re: How Many different Electrons? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 13:35 -0800
            Re: How Many different Electrons? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-20 19:03 -0500
            Re: How Many different Electrons? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-01-20 17:43 -0800

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

#612234 — How Many different Electrons?

From	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-09 10:25 -0800
Subject	How Many different Electrons?
Message-ID	<e18082ce-41c5-4b9b-82d3-1d70e9c845d7@googlegroups.com>

I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#612254

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date	2017-01-09 11:13 -0800
Message-ID	<o50nah$s9t$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#612234

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
 I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and why it's
such a _Quixotic Mentality_ (QM).Because it fits with 
my _Quantitatively Exhibited Dementia_ (QED).
Its so No-belch type thinking. O ya Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612262

From	john <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-09 11:37 -0800
Message-ID	<d05a3cd4-9c06-467f-90fe-2c9c082cdfa3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612254

There are two: the up and the down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612265

From	Yuri Kretin <invlaid@invalid.com>
Date	2017-01-09 13:47 -0600
Message-ID	<o50pd9$epp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#612262

On 1/9/2017 1:37 PM, john wrote:
> There are two: the up and the down.
>

left and the right

rich and the deplorables


if you have two, Up and a Down electrons, that is OK

but what if you have two UPs  or two Downs ?  gay ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612269

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date	2017-01-09 20:00 +0000
Message-ID	<o50q5k$s35$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to	#612262

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>There are two: the up and the down.

That's kind of like saying there are two kinds of quarters: heads and tails.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612451

From	john <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-10 20:40 -0800
Message-ID	<c21e728b-bcfd-487d-a349-4ed1905cf297@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612269

Michael
"
That's kind of like saying there are two kinds of quarters: heads and tails. "
You actually said something smart.
Wave-particles 
Heads-tails

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612513

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-11 09:27 -0600
Message-ID	<o55itj$1sgc$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#612451

On 1/10/2017 10:40 PM, john wrote:
> Michael
> "
> That's kind of like saying there are two kinds of quarters: heads and tails. "
> You actually said something smart.
> Wave-particles
> Heads-tails
>

Exactly! This is the problem with asking whether an electron is a wave 
or a particle. It's like asking whether a quarter is an American 
president, or whether a quarter is a bird with spread wings. It is 
neither but it has the properties of both. And no, this does not mean 
that we've ever had a bird as a president, or that George Washington had 
tail feathers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612552

From	john <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-11 10:51 -0800
Message-ID	<f72314cd-2d09-4f35-9387-649b8b01e4e0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612513

Odd
"Exactly! This is the problem with asking whether an electron is a wave 
or a particle. It's like asking whether a quarter is an American 
president, or whether a quarter is a bird with spread wings. It is .."

It is a wave when referenced to OUR fractal
level- it is a vortex composed of an
arm of spinning bodies (50 billion as you said),
just like a galactic arm, when referenced to
the fractal level below ours.
I know that you cannot grasp multifaceted 
thoughts, Odd- just let it zip over

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612686

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-12 08:07 -0600
Message-ID	<o582jo$1nsr$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#612552

On 1/11/2017 12:51 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "Exactly! This is the problem with asking whether an electron is a wave
> or a particle. It's like asking whether a quarter is an American
> president, or whether a quarter is a bird with spread wings. It is .."
>
> It is a wave when referenced to OUR fractal
> level- it is a vortex composed of an
> arm of spinning bodies (50 billion as you said),

John, you smoki too much ganji. I've never said anything about 50 
billion spinning bodies.

> just like a galactic arm, when referenced to
> the fractal level below ours.
> I know that you cannot grasp multifaceted
> thoughts, Odd- just let it zip over

Multifaceted thoughts? Is that what you call your dope-infused babbling?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612406

From	Double-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date	2017-01-10 14:36 -0800
Message-ID	<980fd6ed-37e8-4c60-952b-31853520843b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612234

On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:25:25 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert


Electrons, muons, and tau particles, plus their respective anti-particles, and each can have one of two spins.    

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612536

From	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-11 09:49 -0800
Message-ID	<6f640bf8-6ae2-4b0e-8716-69ebe97d8263@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612406

On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 2:36:13 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:25:25 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert
> 
> 
> Electrons, muons, and tau particles, plus their respective anti-particles, and each can have one of two spins.    
> 
> Double-A

AA Does their increase of speed make for a heavy electron? Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612541

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date	2017-01-11 10:00 -0800
Message-ID	<o55rpe$ege$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#612536

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip stupid Glazierola>. Glazier, did you sign your 
Minnie Mouse Van now over to AA Abner Afterduft?
Bert, don't be an "Indian Giver". Just paint one, 3D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612611

From	benj <benj@nobody.net>
Date	2017-01-11 18:21 -0500
Message-ID	<5876be17$0$43752$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to	#612536

On 1/11/2017 12:49 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 2:36:13 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
>> On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:25:25 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert
>>
>>
>> Electrons, muons, and tau particles, plus their respective anti-particles, and each can have one of two spins.
>>
>> Double-A
>
> AA Does their increase of speed make for a heavy electron? Trebert
>
Electrons do not get heavier as they go faster. That is truth.

Electrons are not only nothing. They are LESS THAN NOTHING!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612616

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date	2017-01-11 15:36 -0800
Message-ID	<o56fga$p02$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#612611

"benj" <benj@nobody.net> wrote:..
> 
Face Shitter Glazier reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> Does their increase of speed make for a heavy electron? Trebert
>>
"benj" who is the victim of Swine Glazier's FS perversions, wrote: 
Electrons do not get heavier as they go faster. That is truth.
> Electrons are not only nothing. They are LESS THAN NOTHING!
>
and then Cretin Glazier did his No-belch thinking & said: O ya Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612674

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-12 07:55 +0100
Message-ID	<o5795m$iba$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#612611

Dne 12/01/2017 v 00:21 benj napsal(a):
> On 1/11/2017 12:49 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:

>> AA Does their increase of speed make for a heavy electron? Trebert
>>
> Electrons do not get heavier as they go faster. That is truth.
> 
> Electrons are not only nothing. They are LESS THAN NOTHING!

...but you still wants to be taken seriously.

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )

A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614166

From	Double-A <double-a3@hush.com>
Date	2017-01-19 13:23 -0800
Message-ID	<4d5449d3-d724-4a93-8770-1b69623e938c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612536

On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 9:49:58 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 2:36:13 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
> > On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:25:25 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> > > I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert
> > 
> > 
> > Electrons, muons, and tau particles, plus their respective anti-particles, and each can have one of two spins.    
> > 
> > Double-A
> 
> AA Does their increase of speed make for a heavy electron? Trebert


Only relatively.

Each lepton also has an associated neutrino.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612819

From	"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-12 16:06 -0800
Message-ID	<0f1d9371-74fe-4ec2-9b21-4b105b2b155d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612234

On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:25:25 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert

Lots of ways electron structure can change.Thus a different type.Still best to keep in mind Magnetic field and electric flow are two sides to same coin.Magnets came fist. Trebert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612828

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date	2017-01-12 16:33 -0800
Message-ID	<o5975s$9d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#612819

"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
Still best to keep in mind that "g=emc^2" means: 
_"Glazier Exhibits Micro Cephalic Cretinism"_, "O ya"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#612844

From	benj <benj@nobody.net>
Date	2017-01-12 20:39 -0500
Message-ID	<58782fb4$0$42655$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to	#612819

On 1/12/2017 7:06 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 10:25:25 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> I'll let you come up with them.After I'll tell you why they have a different structure,and what created it. Feynman would go with it.Its so QM.Because it fits with QED.Its so Nobel type thinking. O ya Trebert
>
> Lots of ways electron structure can change.Thus a different type.Still best to keep in mind Magnetic field and electric flow are two sides to same coin.Magnets came fist. Trebert
>
Treebert is right. I had this coin and one side attracted iron filings 
and the other side attracted tiny bits of paper.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614207

From	HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date	2017-01-19 17:43 -0800
Message-ID	<329f6706-6e66-42df-922f-b23bb1a78ac2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#612819

SmellBert says
Lots of ways electron structure can change.Thus a different type.Still best to keep in mind Magnetic field and electric flow are two sides to same coin.Magnets came fist. Trebert 
-----------

There are times that one must truly step back in awe of Bert's profound level of stupidity. Bert's stupidity is many layers. Like the Russian nesting dolls of stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →

csiph-web

How Many different Electrons?

Contents

#612234 — How Many different Electrons?

#612254

#612262

#612265

#612269

#612451

#612513

#612552

#612686

#612406

#612536

#612541

#612611

#612616

#612674

#614166

#612819

#612828

#612844

#614207