Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #609769 > unrolled thread

Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time

Started byDouble-A <double-a3@hush.com>
First post2016-12-20 13:56 -0800
Last post2016-12-23 14:04 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 128 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-12-20 13:56 -0800
    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-12-21 11:12 -0500
      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 08:42 -0800
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-21 13:11 -0800
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 09:36 -0600
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 08:04 -0800
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 10:19 -0600
              he c0uld d0 that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 10:11 -0800
              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 01:13 -0800
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 01:18 -0800
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 16:01 -0800
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-22 17:33 -0500
              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 15:55 -0800
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 16:37 -0800
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 10:27 -0600
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 18:49 +0000
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-22 17:31 -0500
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-12-26 14:53 -0800
      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time little brother <andronicus451@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 07:44 -0800
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 08:08 -0800
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 17:34 -0600
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-12 03:32 +0000
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 22:25 -0800
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 02:54 -0800
              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-12 16:07 +0000
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 10:11 -0600
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 09:21 -0800
                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-12 19:14 +0000
                    spectrum of wavingstuff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 11:40 -0800
                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 11:54 -0800
                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-13 02:47 +0000
                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-13 03:20 -0800
                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-13 19:44 +0000
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 10:29 -0800
                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 11:29 -0800
                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-12 17:45 -0500
                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-01-13 09:30 -0800
                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-13 20:02 +0000
                      magneto ... man thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-01-13 18:05 -0800
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 11:06 -0800
    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time little brother <andronicus451@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 05:32 -0800
      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-12-26 02:34 -0500
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 10:28 -0800
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-26 20:41 +0000
      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 10:22 -0800
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 14:30 -0800
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 16:18 -0800
    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-12-23 12:42 -0500
      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 10:21 -0800
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-23 11:19 -0800
      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-23 18:59 +0000
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 11:05 -0800
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-23 18:30 -0500
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 09:49 -0800
              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 13:22 -0800
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-28 16:04 -0800
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 16:22 +0000
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 16:24 -0800
              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 15:26 +0000
                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 11:13 -0800
                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-26 02:17 +0000
                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 19:45 -0800
                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-26 05:31 +0000
                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 10:40 -0600
                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 09:12 -0800
                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 13:04 -0600
                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 09:26 -0800
                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 13:07 -0600
                            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 12:33 -0800
                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 13:19 -0800
                                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 22:28 -0600
                                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 20:44 -0800
                                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 05:50 +0000
                                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 07:47 -0800
                                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 17:33 +0000
                                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 10:08 -0800
                                            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 22:10 +0000
                                              spectra from waves of emmission & absorption noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 15:31 -0800
                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:14 -0600
                                                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 11:09 -0800
                                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 13:36 -0600
                                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 16:52 -0800
                                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-02 20:10 -0500
                                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-03 15:30 +0000
                                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 15:00 -0600
                                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 17:02 -0800
                                            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 18:59 -0800
                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 08:02 -0800
                                                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 08:20 -0800
                                                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-01-04 08:47 -0800
                                                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 10:50 -0600
                                                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 09:17 -0800
                                                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 11:30 -0600
                                                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-01-05 06:34 -0800
                                                        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 07:16 -0800
                                                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 10:17 -0600
                                                            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 08:40 -0800
                                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 07:08 -0600
                                                                of Antimatter bserveD noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 14:24 -0800
                                                          sorry, Dad noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 12:29 -0800
                                                            sorry, Dad john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 14:15 -0800
                                                          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-01-07 19:03 -0800
                                                            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 19:14 -0800
                                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-08 06:59 +0000
                                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 10:19 -0800
                                                            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 11:27 -0800
                                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 13:50 -0600
                                                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-04 18:45 +0000
                                                    timewise noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 11:48 -0800
                                                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 13:14 -0800
                                                      tock noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 16:32 -0800
                                                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-05 04:10 +0000
                                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 10:28 -0600
                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-28 03:39 +0000
                                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 06:01 -0800
                                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 08:04 -0800
                                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-28 20:33 +0000
                                    Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 13:35 -0600
                                      Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:32 -0800
                                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-28 16:28 +0000
                              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 22:28 -0600
                                Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-12-29 00:36 -0500
                  Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 10:39 -0600
            Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 18:51 -0800
              Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 15:23 +0000
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-27 10:34 -0600
        Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 12:43 -0800
          Re: Spectrum Of Antimatter Observed For First Time john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 14:04 -0800

Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7  Next page →

#610376

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-12-26 02:17 +0000
Message-ID<o3puka$6qv$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#610359
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>"
>But they do exist.  How can the rare 3 armed galaxies have arms 
>alternating between matter and antimatter? "

>If two of the arms are the same,
>they will attract each other and coalesce.

And if a matter and antimatter arm decide to coalesce instead, and BOOM! ?

And I am still awaiting how you will try to explain those 3 other big
problems...

>This would seem to predict
>double electrons, if they then remain
>together. Presumably,  it would take some
>time for 2 to become 1.

Babble.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610380

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-25 19:45 -0800
Message-ID<465340ed-7ad7-472f-95ab-695ecb9ed4d0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610376
Michael
"
And if a matter and antimatter arm decide to coalesce instead, and BOOM! ? 
"
Wow.
Okay, remember the part 
before where the matter arm
attracted the third arm if
that third arm is matter? 
The part where matter and antimatter 
repel? Because they're opposites?

Ask benj.
Merry Christmas, Michael, always fun
talking to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610385

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-12-26 05:31 +0000
Message-ID<o3qa05$et6$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#610380
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>"
>And if a matter and antimatter arm decide to coalesce instead, and BOOM! ? 
>"
>Wow.
>Okay, remember the part 
>before where the matter arm
>attracted the third arm if
>that third arm is matter? 
>The part where matter and antimatter 
>repel? Because they're opposites?

No.  Because they don't repel.

>Ask benj.

No. Benj is also kooky.

>Merry Christmas, Michael, always fun
>talking to you. 

Merry Christmas to you as well, John.  Or at least Happy Boxing Day since 
it is after midnight here.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610496

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 10:40 -0600
Message-ID<o3u5ho$qal$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#610380
On 12/25/2016 9:45 PM, john wrote:
> The part where matter and antimatter
> repel? Because they're opposites?

The part where third graders learn that opposites attract, and where you 
say "Whatever" and then you repeat the statement that opposites repel?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610497

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 09:12 -0800
Message-ID<9d89ea33-7680-4a3b-b133-09c8461a0eb9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610496
Odd
"
The part where third graders learn that opposites attract, and where you 
say "Whatever" and then you repeat the statement that opposites repel? "

You constantly reference protons
"attracting" electrons, but all of the
electrons remain separate from
the protons. Why- if they attract- do
they not combine?
It looks like they repel, at a certain
distance. Any story?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610510

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 13:04 -0600
Message-ID<o3udvg$1ajo$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#610497
On 12/27/2016 11:12 AM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "
> The part where third graders learn that opposites attract, and where you
> say "Whatever" and then you repeat the statement that opposites repel? "
>
> You constantly reference protons
> "attracting" electrons, but all of the
> electrons remain separate from
> the protons. Why- if they attract- do
> they not combine?

Already answered, John, less than a week ago. How's your attention span?

> It looks like they repel, at a certain
> distance. Any story?

No, they do not repel. Pay attention.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610500

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 09:26 -0800
Message-ID<7e9d5478-db9d-4479-8f13-639c5322b309@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610496
Odd
"On 12/25/2016 9:45 PM, john wrote: 
> The part where matter and antimatter 
> repel? Because they're opposites? 

The part where third graders learn that opposites attract, and where you 
say "Whatever" and then you repeat the statement that opposites repel? 
- show quoted text -"

Odd, the topic is antimatter versus matter
and whether they repel because of
their opposite structural nature.

We are not, and were not, talking about
splitting either of those into two parts-
arbitrarily deemed "positive", and "negative"- 
and whether or not those two parts are
seriously influenced to come back together
(pushed, pulled, whatever).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610512

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 13:07 -0600
Message-ID<o3ue5d$1ajo$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#610500
On 12/27/2016 11:26 AM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "On 12/25/2016 9:45 PM, john wrote:
>> The part where matter and antimatter
>> repel? Because they're opposites?
>
> The part where third graders learn that opposites attract, and where you
> say "Whatever" and then you repeat the statement that opposites repel?
> - show quoted text -"
>
> Odd, the topic is antimatter versus matter
> and whether they repel because of
> their opposite structural nature.
>
> We are not, and were not, talking about
> splitting either of those into two parts-
> arbitrarily deemed "positive", and "negative"-
> and whether or not those two parts are
> seriously influenced to come back together
> (pushed, pulled, whatever).
>

John, just as a reminder to you, the antiparticle to a charged particle 
always has opposite sign. A positron is the antiparticle to an electron, 
and it is positively charged while the electron is negatively charged. 
The antiproton is negatively charged, opposite to the positive charge on 
a proton.

As other kids learned in the third grade, and which you missed in the 
tenth grade, opposite charges attract. Always.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610517

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 12:33 -0800
Message-ID<b09eb8f6-9017-4f3f-998e-9c8806157daa@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610512
Odd
"As other kids learned in the third grade, and which you missed in the 
tenth grade, opposite charges attract. Always. "

What are you talking about "charges" for?
I'm talking about ANTIMATTER versus MATTER.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610529

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-27 13:19 -0800
Message-ID<e4d0b774-daa8-42ee-a407-36689ff25d66@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610517
Odd
You always conflate things you big
conflater.
So- if matter-antimatter behaved
like charges, alike things would be
repelled by each other and the Earth
would fly apart.
You big joker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610643

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-28 22:28 -0600
Message-ID<o423e4$tvr$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#610529
On 12/27/2016 3:19 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> You always conflate things you big
> conflater.
> So- if matter-antimatter behaved
> like charges, alike things would be
> repelled by each other and the Earth
> would fly apart.

What like-charged things on earth would you think would repel each 
other? Go ahead, list the examples.

As I said, John, the DEFINITION of antimatter includes having a charge 
opposite to its matter counterpart. And as you know, opposites attract.

You're acting as though third grade science is a big, unbelievable 
surprise to you.

> You big joker.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610648

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-28 20:44 -0800
Message-ID<c67c2dc7-9ebc-45ac-ad30-e26b2761dc59@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610643
Odd are you deliberately stupid?
We're talking about neutral ANTIMATTER 
versus neutral matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610661

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-12-29 05:50 +0000
Message-ID<o4286q$lvr$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#610648
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Odd are you deliberately stupid?
>We're talking about neutral ANTIMATTER 
>versus neutral matter.

Except for all that plasma out there, of course.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610668

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-29 07:47 -0800
Message-ID<520f5e8e-6800-442b-b7b0-11dd73e1c78c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610661
Michael chirped
.."..plasma...."
'A plasma is a hot ionized gas consisting of approximately equal numbers of positively charged ions and negatively charged electrons. The characteristics of plasmas are significantly different from those of ordinary neutral gases so that plasmas are considered a distinct "fourth state of matter."'

What has plasma to do with
whether neutral antimatter attracts
or repels neutral matter, Michael?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610732

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-12-29 17:33 +0000
Message-ID<o43hd2$2fs$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#610668
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael chirped
>.."..plasma...."
>'A plasma is a hot ionized gas consisting of approximately equal numbers of=
> positively charged ions and negatively charged electrons. The characterist=
>ics of plasmas are significantly different from those of ordinary neutral g=
>ases so that plasmas are considered a distinct "fourth state of matter."'

>What has plasma to do with
>whether neutral antimatter attracts
>or repels neutral matter, Michael?

Because in a real galaxy, the not-neutral matter plasma would attract any
not-neutral antimatter plasma (if it existed) and BOOM!

"Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom!"
-Marvin the Martian

Now consider neutral matter/antimatter, to make you happy.  Matter has
electron clounds making up most of the space of atoms.  When these
electron clouds from two chunks of matter encounter each other, they repel
(like charges repel) and we see this as matter acting solid, or at least
not allowing matter to pass through matter.  Antimatter-antimatter would
be similar.  However, consider what would happen if a piece of matter
encountered antimatter. The electron cloud of the matter would ATTRACT the
positron cloud of antimatter and KABOOM! they'd annihilate.  Now you have
ions/bare nuclei of opposite charges, which also attract and KABOOM!!!

This, of course, ignores gravity, which always attracts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610738

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-29 10:08 -0800
Message-ID<afa10f66-bd3d-4c22-adc4-46bc9913ed25@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610732
Michael
Everything goes "kaboom",
in your scenario.
Why hasn't it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610782

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-12-29 22:10 +0000
Message-ID<o441ki$gil$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#610738
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>Everything goes "kaboom",
>in your scenario.
>Why hasn't it?

Because there is (practically) no antimatter out there.

Why?

One of the big unsolved mysteries of physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610800 — spectra from waves of emmission & absorption

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-29 15:31 -0800
Subjectspectra from waves of emmission & absorption
Message-ID<158562fb-1352-4287-b794-321395d87ae6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#610782
according to Alfven's laboratory-tested plasma physic,
half of Universe is antimatter, but
there are no waves of antimatter, since
waves pass through antimatter, just as they pass
through matter.

unfortunately, almost all physicists,
that I have ever read, are glued to the idea that
photons (or any wave-form at all) are bosons, and that
bosons are 0-dimensionalites

> Because there is (practically) no antimatter out there.
> 
> Why?
> 
> One of the big unsolved mysteries of physics.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611496

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-03 12:14 -0600
Message-ID<o4gple$t0n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#610782
On 12/29/2016 4:10 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Michael
>> Everything goes "kaboom",
>> in your scenario.
>> Why hasn't it?
>
> Because there is (practically) no antimatter out there.
>
> Why?
>
> One of the big unsolved mysteries of physics.
>

I think I've read that the matter-antimatter imbalance is due to 
CP-violating terms in the KM matrix. Now, why there are CP-violating 
terms in the KM matrix, I agree that no good answer has emerged for that.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611502

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-03 11:09 -0800
Message-ID<3240823d-1c30-4bf2-9ef5-2bba803cc344@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#611496
Everything that 'pops' onto our fractal
plane are these 'spin structures'
(okay?better than vortices?)
where there is enough energy for
creation of an electron/positron pair.
They split into-basically-half matter
and half antimatter.
This occurs at every level.

If you make entire galaxies out of
one or the other, then, what? All
their atoms and their atoms' atoms
are one or the other? No more
"popping"?

Oh, right, you deny any organization
smaller than some limit, or other,
right? Just before "points"? Or baby
blocks. Or whatever.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web