Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #603052 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 364 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700
The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 02:43 -0700
The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 07:22 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:13 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:28 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 17:01 +0100
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:08 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:25 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 03:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 03:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 04:49 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 11:36 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:10 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-02 12:25 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 14:29 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 10:21 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-03 12:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:32 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:36 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:48 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:09 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 15:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:32 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 16:05 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:45 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 15:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 20:00 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 02:11 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 15:30 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 10:10 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 10:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:46 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-03 11:24 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 08:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-08 17:24 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-09 00:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:05 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:29 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:50 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 00:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:39 -0800
The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:14 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:19 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-10-31 11:44 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:09 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 05:47 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-31 11:58 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 12:25 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 14:57 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 15:34 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:49 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 16:33 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 19:44 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:39 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:42 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:06 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:00 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 07:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:08 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-08 11:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 12:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:24 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-10 14:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-10 18:42 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 17:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 05:25 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 08:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:51 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:49 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 04:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 05:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 07:12 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:01 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:31 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 11:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 04:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 05:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 06:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:34 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:27 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:49 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:47 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:58 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:00 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 19:02 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast sdf <sdf@sdf.sdf> - 2016-11-17 20:48 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:45 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:05 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:37 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:32 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 18:22 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:34 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:52 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 01:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:58 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-19 07:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 19:10 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:56 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:17 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:55 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 17:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:39 -0500
trons go keplerian; that is hwat the four quantum numbers are noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:49 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 03:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 04:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-15 10:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:03 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:17 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:40 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:33 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:22 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:37 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 21:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 07:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:03 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:51 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:33 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 16:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-16 08:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:53 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:07 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:02 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:46 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 17:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-19 18:19 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "Amazing Distilled Wolverine" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 14:00 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:42 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:40 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 15:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 18:10 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 20:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 14:48 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 16:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:37 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:29 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 07:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:35 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 11:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 08:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:04 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 07:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:35 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:55 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 11:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-11 14:04 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 12:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-20 13:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 07:54 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:25 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-21 16:44 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:48 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:31 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:57 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 13:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:17 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:59 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:20 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 09:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:11 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:35 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 15:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 22:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 00:02 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 12:06 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-11-26 14:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 14:49 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-26 15:37 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 16:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 13:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-06 13:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 04:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 07:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 09:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 11:01 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 17:17 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 23:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 14:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 13:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:43 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:15 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:50 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:03 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:26 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:35 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:35 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:35 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:22 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:54 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:08 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:54 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:25 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:11 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:05 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:27 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:36 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:36 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:55 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:44 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:38 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:38 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:25 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:56 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:44 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:08 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 10:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:26 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 22:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:02 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:22 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:00 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:52 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:13 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 11:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:26 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 19:10 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:17 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 08:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 09:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 15:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-25 03:17 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:58 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:57 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:39 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-24 06:29 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:41 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 22:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 09:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 10:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:56 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 15:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:26 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 20:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600
Page 16 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 01:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rdm1hd-s9f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607139 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2016 8:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>> ------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lol. I love being me >>>>>> >>>>> Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. >>>>> >>>>> All can easily see (except maybe nutjob >>>>> Chimp) what you are. >>>> >>>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >>>> phenomena kook? >>>> >>>> >>> Google is your friend, lazyass. >> >> Funny Google has no results for such and there is no university in the >> world with a department of psychic phenomena kook. >> >> If there were positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >> phenomena one would expect there would be lots of universities around >> the world studying it kook. > > Denier. Waste of time. You are the one claiming there are positive results from peer reviewed studies of psychic phenomena yet you can't produce any kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e3c79$0$10193$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607158 |
On 11/29/2016 8:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2016 8:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lol. I love being me >>>>>>> >>>>>> Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. >>>>>> >>>>>> All can easily see (except maybe nutjob >>>>>> Chimp) what you are. >>>>> >>>>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >>>>> phenomena kook? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Google is your friend, lazyass. >>> >>> Funny Google has no results for such and there is no university in the >>> world with a department of psychic phenomena kook. >>> >>> If there were positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >>> phenomena one would expect there would be lots of universities around >>> the world studying it kook. >> >> Denier. Waste of time. > > You are the one claiming there are positive results from peer reviewed > studies of psychic phenomena yet you can't produce any kook. > > Stalker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 05:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8962hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607184 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 8:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/29/2016 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lol. I love being me >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All can easily see (except maybe nutjob >>>>>>> Chimp) what you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >>>>>> phenomena kook? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Google is your friend, lazyass. >>>> >>>> Funny Google has no results for such and there is no university in the >>>> world with a department of psychic phenomena kook. >>>> >>>> If there were positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >>>> phenomena one would expect there would be lots of universities around >>>> the world studying it kook. >>> >>> Denier. Waste of time. >> >> You are the one claiming there are positive results from peer reviewed >> studies of psychic phenomena yet you can't produce any kook. >> >> > Stalker Where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic phenomena kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <43b66f0b-40cc-42f4-94d2-be103734deeb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606906 |
BJ quacked > Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. > ------------ > > Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. > > This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. > > Lol. I love being me > Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. ------------ Aww! You mad bro?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 16:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <584099cf$0$7309$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607417 |
On 12/1/2016 3:55 PM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked >> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >> ------------ >> >> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >> >> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >> >> Lol. I love being me >> > Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. > ------------ > > Aww! You mad bro? > We Have Hardblow joy! HVAC cranks himself over this imagined success. wank wank wank!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 09:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o14c4r$e7d$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #606053 |
On 11/22/2016 8:06 PM, john wrote: > benj > " >> > John is right. You ARE a zombie. " > :) > These guys can't decide what structure > means. > Mickey now says if it comes apart > it HAS structure! > Like clouds, Mickey? > John on November 21: Please TRY to think, Odd. If the STRUCTURE that is a railroad tie breaks down, what happens? If the STRUCTURE that is a body breaks down, what happens? John on November 22: If something doesn't come apart readily, there is an underlying support. This is called "structure". John on November 23: These guys can't decide what structure means. Do you listen to yourself? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-22 20:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o129gp$6l4$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #605938 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Michael >"john <johnse...@gmail.com> writes: >>-So when you said that electrons sure seem to act like -"units", where >>-units means a having a structure, >Since when? " >Everything above was written by Odd. Odd said units have a structure? I don't think so. >He also said that electrons "don't >become structurally unsound", >meaning you can't split them. >If something doesn't come apart >readily, there is an underlying support. >This is called "structure". Umm, no, the exact opposite. If something has no structure, you can't split it because there is nothing (no structure) to split. It is meaningless to describe splitting with no structure. And if something *does* come apart, then there is some structure that actually can come apart. So the fact that electrons can't be split supports (but doesn't prove) they have no structure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-22 20:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <53554451-956f-492c-8c89-cbc398d86e66@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605938 |
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 12:43:19 PM UTC-5, john wrote: [] > > If something doesn't come apart > readily, there is an underlying support. > This is called "structure". That logic is so off base, I really do not know what to tell you. You say this on purpose to get attention like JM, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o120i1$ukg$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #605891 |
On 11/22/2016 7:59 AM, john wrote: > Odd > "-Electrons do not become structurally unsound. Electrons -do not decay. > -Electrons do not disintegrate. > > -So when you said that electrons sure seem to act like -"units", where > -units means a having a structure, what observed ------------behaviour are you > -thinking of that reminds you of being units? " > > Pretty much what you just said. > > For something to be structurally unsound, they have to have internal structure in the first place, no? Or are you thinking that things that DON'T disintegrate are the things that DO have structure, and things that DO disintegrate are the things that DON'T have structure? So uranium disintegrates. Does it have structure or not? A neutron disintegrates. Does it have structure or not? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-22 10:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <228171e8-fb2e-4488-8f33-6cd30c217404@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605945 |
Odd "Electrons do not become structurally unsound. Electrons do not decay. Electrons do not disintegrate. " YOU said that, Odd. How is that compatible with "no structure "? (btw- what "fine tools" do you make?)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-22 20:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o129lj$6l4$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #605956 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Odd >"Electrons do not become structurally unsound. Electrons do not decay. >Electrons do not disintegrate. >" >YOU said that, Odd. >How is that compatible with "no structure "? Obvious! If electrons have no structure, they *can't* disintegrate. There's nothing for them to disintegrate into! >(btw- what "fine tools" do you make?) How come you demand answers to your questions from Odd yet you refuse to answer his questions why you believe what you believe?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-21 22:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8c590ac7-63c9-45cf-aa4d-74a5dd737aba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605749 |
On Monday, November 21, 2016 at 2:57:58 PM UTC-5, john wrote: > Space has no structure? Stars are nothing? > Electrons have no structure? Funny, > they act like units. And in your ramblings you finally said something close to right. Electrons act like indivisible units. They have, as far as we can tell today, NO INTERNAL STRUCTURE. If you can find an experiment that shows an internal structure for an electron, I would gladly like to hear about it. Until then, your actions are just misguided. There is some much more to physics. try to learn some of it, rather than pontificating that you have the answers. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-21 12:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o0vll3$61b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #605740 |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> Glazier the Cretin is like a dog that barks into the night at a distant noise it knows nothing about, as seen when he wrote a concatenation of BUZZWORDS:."buckyball"... "gluons" ... "quarks" ... "protons,and neutrons" about which loudmouth Glazier knows nothing... except for the "BB" which is "Glazier's "Beer Belly" and "QM" which is Glazier's "Quixotic Mentality"..... Pity but LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-21 12:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <o0vl25$3km$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #605716 |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > Glazier's Quixotic Mentalitry (QM) alway has >something to show reality of Cretin Glazier, which. > is Nothing but far out stinking of TreBert who is the <http://tinyurl.com/Recalcitrant-Swine-Glazier>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-21 11:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <aa88a6da-0ab9-425a-a12c-966a20109b65@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605714 |
Odd " WHY do you believe that everything that exists MUST have structure? " Please TRY to think, Odd. If the STRUCTURE that is a railroad tie breaks down, what happens? If the STRUCTURE that is a body breaks down, what happens? My God, are you really this stupid? Please answer at least this last question
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-21 14:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0vjsh$16m7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #605729 |
On 11/21/2016 1:20 PM, john wrote: > Odd > " WHY > do you believe that everything that exists MUST have structure? " > > Please TRY to think, Odd. > If the STRUCTURE that is a railroad > tie breaks down, what happens? It depends. It can crumble into smaller pieces. > If the STRUCTURE that is a body > breaks down, what happens? It can break down into smaller parts, like an atom can break into an electron and a nucleus, and a nucleus can break down into protons and neutrons. An electron doesn't break down into anything. Neither does a photon. Neither does a gluon. > > My God, are you really this stupid? Why do you think I'm stupid, John? What from the above discussion gives you the impression that a photon has structure? > Please answer at least this last question I've answered your question. Now try answering one of mine. WHY do you believe that everything has structure. No more evasions. No more questions to me before you answer me. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-22 22:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dda4a52a-7053-4c93-b925-53834272ea44@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605753 |
On Monday, November 21, 2016 at 10:02:31 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 11/21/2016 1:20 PM, john wrote: > > Odd > > " WHY > > do you believe that everything that exists MUST have structure? " > > > > Please TRY to think, Odd. > > If the STRUCTURE that is a railroad > > tie breaks down, what happens? > > It depends. It can crumble into smaller pieces. > > > If the STRUCTURE that is a body > > breaks down, what happens? > > It can break down into smaller parts, like an atom can break into an > electron and a nucleus, and a nucleus can break down into protons and > neutrons. An electron doesn't break down into anything. Neither does a > photon. Neither does a gluon. > > > > > My God, are you really this stupid? > > Why do you think I'm stupid, John? What from the above discussion gives > you the impression that a photon has structure? > > > Please answer at least this last question > > I've answered your question. Now try answering one of mine. > > WHY do you believe that everything has structure. > > No more evasions. No more questions to me before you answer me. > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables ============================ I can agree with some of your above assertions it seem that yo have learned something from me more accurate *stole something from my assertions !! 2 the photon has a structure !! ie it is a HELLIX !! 3 see Google 'The Y Porat model - an abstract ' Y.Porat ========================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 09:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o14c7r$e7d$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #606075 |
On 11/23/2016 12:46 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > I can agree with some of your above assertions > it seem that yo have learned something from me > more accurate > *stole something from my assertions !! You are so hungry for attention that you flatter yourself. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 07:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bede9b2d-28b9-4132-bce7-5108cd65d6dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606114 |
Odd Which is it? Does the observation that the electron can't be divided mean it has no structure? (The atom was indivisible up until recently) Or does it mean that it HAS structure? (As opposed to clouds, for example) Which, Odd?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-23 09:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o14dqh$haa$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #606117 |
On 11/23/2016 9:28 AM, john wrote: > Odd > Which is it? > Does the observation that the electron > can't be divided mean it has no structure? > (The atom was indivisible up until recently) > Or does it mean that it HAS structure? > (As opposed to clouds, for example) > > Which, Odd? > Things that have structure can be broken down into smaller parts that are inherently different than the original thing, or break down spontaneously. Figure it out. When you say the atom was indivisible until "recently", how recently are you thinking? The stripping of electrons off an atom to make an ion was discovered in 1834. That's 18 years short of two centuries ago. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web