Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #603052 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 364 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700
The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 02:43 -0700
The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 07:22 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:13 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:28 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 17:01 +0100
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:08 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:25 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 03:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 03:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 04:49 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 11:36 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:10 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-02 12:25 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 14:29 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 10:21 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-03 12:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:32 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:36 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:48 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:09 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 15:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:32 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 16:05 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:45 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 15:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 20:00 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 02:11 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 15:30 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 10:10 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 10:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:46 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-03 11:24 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 08:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-08 17:24 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-09 00:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:05 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:29 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:50 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 00:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:39 -0800
The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:14 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:19 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-10-31 11:44 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:09 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 05:47 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-31 11:58 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 12:25 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 14:57 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 15:34 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:49 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 16:33 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 19:44 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:39 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:42 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:06 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:00 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 07:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:08 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-08 11:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 12:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:24 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-10 14:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-10 18:42 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 17:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 05:25 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 08:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:51 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:49 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 04:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 05:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 07:12 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:01 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:31 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 11:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 04:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 05:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 06:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:34 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:27 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:49 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:47 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:58 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:00 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 19:02 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast sdf <sdf@sdf.sdf> - 2016-11-17 20:48 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:45 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:05 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:37 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:32 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 18:22 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:34 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:52 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 01:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:58 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-19 07:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 19:10 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:56 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:17 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:55 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 17:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:39 -0500
trons go keplerian; that is hwat the four quantum numbers are noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:49 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 03:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 04:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-15 10:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:03 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:17 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:40 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:33 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:22 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:37 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 21:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 07:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:03 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:51 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:33 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 16:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-16 08:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:53 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:07 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:02 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:46 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 17:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-19 18:19 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "Amazing Distilled Wolverine" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 14:00 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:42 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:40 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 15:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 18:10 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 20:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 14:48 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 16:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:37 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:29 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 07:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:35 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 11:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 08:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:04 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 07:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:35 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:55 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 11:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-11 14:04 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 12:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-20 13:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 07:54 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:25 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-21 16:44 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:48 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:31 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:57 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 13:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:17 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:59 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:20 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 09:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:11 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:35 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 15:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 22:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 00:02 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 12:06 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-11-26 14:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 14:49 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-26 15:37 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 16:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 13:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-06 13:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 04:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 07:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 09:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 11:01 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 17:17 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 23:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 14:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 13:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:43 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:15 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:50 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:03 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:26 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:35 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:35 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:35 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:22 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:54 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:08 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:54 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:25 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:11 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:05 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:27 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:36 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:36 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:55 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:44 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:38 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:38 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:25 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:56 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:44 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:08 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 10:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:26 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 22:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:02 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:22 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:00 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:52 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:13 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 11:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:26 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 19:10 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:17 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 08:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 09:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 15:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-25 03:17 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:58 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:57 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:39 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-24 06:29 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:41 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 22:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 09:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 10:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:56 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 15:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:26 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 20:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600
Page 7 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 19 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-18 17:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <582f8115$0$51785$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #605121 |
On 11/16/2016 6:18 PM, john wrote: > HVAC > " > ----------- > > I lump BJ in with John in that regard. BJ is just better at dodging tough questions than is John " > > I lump HVAC Odd Mickey and now ed > in with each other: not one idea > among the four of them. Zeros not heros > > They make me feel good to not be them, > anyway. > Love you guys!! John when if comes to science you are a GENIUS compared to HVAC. He has no science education, he knows no science, he believes in ghosts, and refuses to even READ (maybe he can't read) any science literature. You are very LUCKY not to be him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 19:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <582cf389$0$51753$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #605118 |
On 11/16/2016 6:00 PM, HVAC wrote: > Odd Bodkin > - show quoted text - > John has certain fixed ideas, though he doesn't have any real basis for > believing them. He just says, "These things are true." Then anything > that scientists propose that are in conflict with those fixed ideas are > crap, as far as he's concerned, end of story. No possibility is > entertained that he might be wrong in believing what he does. > > John either doesn't know how to scrap his fixed ideas, or he thinks it > is of paramount importance that he be allowed to choose his fixed ideas. > ----------- > > I lump BJ in with John in that regard. BJ is just better at dodging tough questions than is John > HVAC just means that I can counter his lies better than John who seems to believe anyone who says they are a scientist and have seen aliens. I'm guessing HVAC has seen lots of UFOs (but no aliens) but as usual he just lies about it. Ask me the tough questions HVAC! Is "climate change" a fraud? Answer: Yes it is. Trump is right on the money. That is a given.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sdf <sdf@sdf.sdf> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 20:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o0l537$1usm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #605136 |
benj wrote: > I'm guessing HVAC has seen lots of UFOs (but no aliens) but as usual he > just lies about it. YOu have to define first, what you mean with Identify.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 16:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o0fe2k$n96$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #604910 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Mickey >"- show quoted text - >Like Steve Jobs? " >Jobs didn't do the Hippocrates Institute, >I'm betting. Yup. Just like I said before. If it works, it's because the belief is true. If it doesn't work, it is because they did it wrong, not because the belief (in this case veganism cures cancer) is false. Jobs' cancer didn't get better, it got worse, so it must because he did it wrong. "I'm betting." Plenty of cults operate exactly like that. Because the cult belief always gets the credit but never the blame, the cult belief is true and always works (as long as done correctly, "correctly" being undefined)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 09:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5ee52229-3259-40c8-8ba6-bdd2c822af70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #604918 |
Michael Moroney Jobs' cancer didn't get better, it got worse, so it must because he did it wrong. "I'm betting." Plenty of cults operate exactly like that. Because the cult belief always gets the credit but never the blame, the cult belief is true and always works (as long as done correctly, "correctly" being undefined) ---------- That holds true even in modern day cults like religion. A plane crashes and 1 child is left alive. "Miracle baby". When asked why god killed the other 10 kids the answers are typically "god works in mysterious ways". It's a heads I win, tails you lose proposition. And in other religions the same holds true. Take the religion of john and BJ... The religion of UFOs. If you ask for evidence, suddenly you are a part of the conspiracy. Heads I win, tails you lose
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 09:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1393ab59-87ed-4c57-81b9-49842c1c73f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #604927 |
HVAC Odd and Michael have some issues with "black and white-ism". If one UFO is shown to be a fake, they're ALL fake. Which is handy for disinformation elements who put out fake material in order to confuse. You guys need to learn what "lethal dose" means. Everything is a poison. Even water must be taken in moderation. If one vegan can kill himself drinking too much high-fructose crap, and then for Michael that's an indictment against being vegan? Get a grip.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 09:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f82ea974-f33c-421f-a815-0e4e88c242c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #604929 |
HVAC Odd and Michael (and the ghosts of PD, Absolutely Vertical, Big Dog, The Wiz) Get a grip.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 11:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0fh4v$1el6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #604931 |
On 11/15/2016 11:19 AM, john wrote: > HVAC Odd and Michael > (and the ghosts of PD, Absolutely > Vertical, Big Dog, The Wiz) > > Get a grip. > You're the one replying to ghosts, John. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 19:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <582ba91d$0$11960$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #604937 |
On 11/15/2016 12:37 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 11/15/2016 11:19 AM, john wrote: >> HVAC Odd and Michael >> (and the ghosts of PD, Absolutely >> Vertical, Big Dog, The Wiz) >> >> Get a grip. >> > > You're the one replying to ghosts, John. > HVAC believes in ghosts. Do you, Boinker?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 18:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o0fjpg$8n4$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #604929 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >You guys need to learn what "lethal dose" >means. Everything is a poison. >Even water must be taken in moderation. >If one vegan can kill himself drinking >too much high-fructose crap, >and then for Michael that's >an indictment against being vegan? Nope, I object to what HVAC called "heads I win, tails you lose" mentality that you and assorted cultists use to push their causes. First it was just veganism needed, but once confronted with Jobs, now it's a specific type of veganism along with a made-up excuse that Jobs must have gotten too much fructose (which can be perfectly vegan). Question: If you told a cancer sufferer to follow that strict vegan method you mentioned, without fructose or whatever, and that person followed that strictly and gave up traditional chemo etc., and the cancer got worse and the person died a miserable death, would you have any remorse for telling them that strict veganism cures cancer?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 19:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <582ba8c7$0$11960$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #604944 |
On 11/15/2016 1:22 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > >> You guys need to learn what "lethal dose" >> means. Everything is a poison. >> Even water must be taken in moderation. >> If one vegan can kill himself drinking >> too much high-fructose crap, >> and then for Michael that's >> an indictment against being vegan? > > Nope, I object to what HVAC called "heads I win, tails you lose" mentality > that you and assorted cultists use to push their causes. First it was just > veganism needed, but once confronted with Jobs, now it's a specific type > of veganism along with a made-up excuse that Jobs must have gotten too much > fructose (which can be perfectly vegan). > > Question: If you told a cancer sufferer to follow that strict vegan method > you mentioned, without fructose or whatever, and that person followed that > strictly and gave up traditional chemo etc., and the cancer got worse and > the person died a miserable death, would you have any remorse for telling > them that strict veganism cures cancer? > If you told a desperate cancer patient that if yo filled them full of poisonous chemicals and blasted their body with deadly radiation that it MIGHT cure their cancer and they then died a horrible painful death FAR worse than if they'd done nothing, would you have and remorse?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 17:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <582b8c2c$0$12028$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #604927 |
On 11/15/2016 12:05 PM, HVAC wrote: > Michael Moroney Jobs' cancer didn't get better, it got worse, so it > must because he did it wrong. "I'm betting." > > Plenty of cults operate exactly like that. Because the cult belief > always gets the credit but never the blame, the cult belief is true > and always works (as long as done correctly, "correctly" being > undefined) ---------- > > That holds true even in modern day cults like religion. A plane > crashes and 1 child is left alive. "Miracle baby". When asked why god > killed the other 10 kids the answers are typically "god works in > mysterious ways". Nonsense. The baby lived because God noticed he was the only on not acting like a jerk on the Internet. No mystery! > It's a heads I win, tails you lose proposition. That is the game you always try to play, right? right. > And in other religions the same holds true. Take the religion of john > and BJ... The religion of UFOs. If you ask for evidence, suddenly you > are a part of the conspiracy. John maybe. He believes all sorts of crap just like Hardblow. AS for me I gave HVAC a number of irrefutable references based on FOID access to government's OWN PAPERS! Hardblow just calmly says he can't read. And then he says if he never read it then it does not exist. He's as big a kook as REber. > Heads I win, tails you lose You hardblowji are a BORN LOSER! Anyone here can see that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 11:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0fguq$1el6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #604910 |
On 11/15/2016 8:15 AM, john wrote: > Mickey > "- show quoted text - > Like Steve Jobs? " > > Jobs didn't do the Hippocrates Institute, > I'm betting. > Did you do the Hippocrates Institute, John? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 09:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <824cba5a-26d8-475d-80c8-3b70af3c1a89@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #604934 |
Odd " Did you do the Hippocrates Institute, John? -- " Haha. You remind me of Andy Roddick on that game show: Moderator "What member of the sheep family sounds like a letter?" Andy "Baaa?" Moderator "No, Ewe." Andy "Me?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-15 12:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0flpf$1mte$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #604941 |
On 11/15/2016 11:51 AM, john wrote: > Odd > " > Did you do the Hippocrates Institute, John? > Well, you can surely understand the basis of my question. You say you've been healed by vegan diet. You've also said that the Hippocrates Institute documents healing with a vegan diet. You've also said that Steve Jobs did not get healed because he did not follow the Hippocrates Institute plan. So if you are also not following the Hippocrates Institute plan, then you're in the same position as Steve Jobs. In which case, your success is just as accidental as Steve Jobs's failure. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 09:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1c71a524-49f3-4dde-a2f5-26cbdb1adad1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #604934 |
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 7:34:22 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 11/15/2016 8:15 AM, john wrote: > > Mickey > > "- show quoted text - > > Like Steve Jobs? " > > > > Jobs didn't do the Hippocrates Institute, > > I'm betting. > > > > Did you do the Hippocrates Institute, John? > ======================= did ***you ** did it anonymous Paul Draper PD ? ===================================== Y.Porat ==========================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-16 11:52 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0i6cd$1eh7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #605069 |
On 11/16/2016 11:47 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 7:34:22 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 11/15/2016 8:15 AM, john wrote: >>> Mickey >>> "- show quoted text - >>> Like Steve Jobs? " >>> >>> Jobs didn't do the Hippocrates Institute, >>> I'm betting. >>> >> >> Did you do the Hippocrates Institute, John? >> > ======================= > did ***you ** did it anonymous Paul Draper PD ? > ===================================== > Y.Porat > ========================== > Why do you chase ghosts of past posters? Why do you believe conservation of mass is an accepted law of physics? Why do you believe that conservation of energy applies to each form of energy separately? Why do you believe that physicists still use relativistic mass as a concept? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 01:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f7106970-369e-470a-9779-858c3f454998@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605070 |
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 7:52:18 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 11/16/2016 11:47 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 7:34:22 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 11/15/2016 8:15 AM, john wrote: > >>> Mickey > >>> "- show quoted text - > >>> Like Steve Jobs? " > >>> > >>> Jobs didn't do the Hippocrates Institute, > >>> I'm betting. > >>> > >> > >> Did you do the Hippocrates Institute, John? > >> > > ======================= > > did ***you ** did it anonymous Paul Draper PD ? > > ===================================== > > Y.Porat > > ========================== > > > > Why do you chase ghosts of past posters? ======================= in necessary bubbling !! ==== > > Why do you believe conservation of mass is an accepted law of physics? ======================== if not accepted now I will do it accepted quite easy may be by more clarification --------- > > Why do you believe that conservation of energy applies to each form of > energy separately? ================== in general bottom line it is cock right not in all mixture of energy it is obvious as should be it needs to work on it to make it obvious to every body as it is right about E - m c ^2 ------ !! > > Why do you believe that physicists still use relativistic mass as a concept? ========= don't you see it on any corner of physics ''discussion !!?? the understanding that there is no relativistic mass at all is my unprecedented copyright quite long ago unless you prove otherwise ==================================== where did you see the brand new basic rule of physics =============================================== 'NO MASS' - THE ***ONLY **(again ONLY!!! MASS) - - NO REAL PHYSICS !! =============================================== in other words **all kinds of mass no matter if in gas or solid or in chemistry or in nuclear power and radiation of any** mixture of them **!!! ie in a ''***closed system** that is the bottom line of all energies !! did anyone coined it before me ?? if not in my brand new above assertion :??? if I was precedented by the above by anyone else please quote/show it !! ===================================== does envy drives you crazy or out of your stable decent way ??!!! TIA Y.Porat ===================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-17 09:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0kk35$11h3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #605181 |
On 11/17/2016 3:09 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > ========= > don't you see it on any corner of > physics ''discussion !!?? > > the understanding that > there is no relativistic mass at all > is my unprecedented copyright quite long ago > unless you prove otherwise > ==================================== > where did you see the brand new basic rule of physics > =============================================== > 'NO MASS' - THE ***ONLY **(again ONLY!!! MASS) - > - NO REAL PHYSICS !! > =============================================== > in other words > **all kinds of mass > no matter if in gas or solid > or in chemistry or in nuclear power and radiation > of any** mixture of them **!!! > ie in a ''***closed system** > > that is the bottom line of all energies !! > > did anyone coined it before me ?? > if not in my brand new > above assertion :??? > if I was precedented by the above > by anyone else > please quote/show it !! > ===================================== > does envy drives you crazy or out of your > stable decent way ??!!! > > TIA > Y.Porat > =================================== Not envy, Porat. Historical fact. I replied to you a while ago with a quotation from Einstein, written before you were born, where he states that relativistic mass is not a good concept and should not be used. Nor have physicists used it for decades, long before you ever came up with the realization yourself. You spend every day lusting for recognition for ideas you want to claim as your own, but have been common knowledge for your whole life. You also put reference to "laws" like "conservation of mass" which do not hold in nature and which physicists say are false. If you want to claim copyright for your errors of fact and of history, you are welcome to own them. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-19 00:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <686c0933-690a-45a3-8940-f3ba084a59bb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #605194 |
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:58:33 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 11/17/2016 3:09 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > > ========= > > don't you see it on any corner of > > physics ''discussion !!?? > > > > the understanding that > > there is no relativistic mass at all > > is my unprecedented copyright quite long ago > > unless you prove otherwise > > ==================================== > > where did you see the brand new basic rule of physics > > =============================================== > > 'NO MASS' - THE ***ONLY **(again ONLY!!! MASS) - > > - NO REAL PHYSICS !! > > =============================================== > > in other words > > **all kinds of mass > > no matter if in gas or solid > > or in chemistry or in nuclear power and radiation > > of any** mixture of them **!!! > > ie in a ''***closed system** > > > > that is the bottom line of all energies !! > > > > did anyone coined it before me ?? > > if not in my brand new > > above assertion :??? > > if I was precedented by the above > > by anyone else > > please quote/show it !! > > ===================================== > > does envy drives you crazy or out of your > > stable decent way ??!!! > > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > =================================== > > Not envy, Porat. Historical fact. > I replied to you a while ago with a quotation from Einstein, written > before you were born, where he states that relativistic mass is not a > good concept and should not be used. Nor have physicists used it for > decades, long before you ever came up with the realization yourself. > > You spend every day lusting for recognition for ideas you want to claim > as your own, but have been common knowledge for your whole life. You > also put reference to "laws" like "conservation of mass" which do not > hold in nature and which physicists say are false. ==================== anonymous !!... criminal against mankind!! shameless lire blockhead and thief !! go f yourself with your ''physicists' I showed you nasty pig blockhead even long ago that not E=mc^2 nor E = h f contain mass = the only mass NOTHING RELATIVISTC NO ZERO MULTIPLYER THERE !! BNO INE BEFORE ME DI DTHAT DYMENSSION ANALYSYS NOT THE CONCLUTIONS just mass THE ONLY!!!!! MASS !! -- no one before me coined those most basic rules of physics =========================================== NO NASS - THE ONLY MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !! =============================================== 2 =============================================== MASS IS THEMOTHER OF ALL FORCES - INCLUDING GRAVITY !! ========================================== shameless Pig IS IT (both!!!OF THEM ( above rules( TOGETHWER!!! ) -- is it COMMON KNOWLWDGE NOW ???!! OR IN PAST =============== just bring quotes AND PROVES and exactly as I did as short and unequivocal ie not walking around the bush calming that those are most basic rules = the most basic rules of physics that will will bring a new revolution in physics because they are ***contradictory** to existing dominant rules of current time !!! proved that I was precedent !! as short and clear unequivocal simple is I did it =========================== if not go f yourself with Josef''.... you spiritual teacher TIA Y.Porat ============================= If you want to claim > copyright for your errors of fact and of history, you are welcome to own > them. > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web