Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #603052 > unrolled thread

The electron goes fast

Started byjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
First post2016-10-31 00:41 -0700
Last post2016-11-26 10:26 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 364 — 23 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700
    The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 02:43 -0700
      The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 07:22 -0700
        Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:07 -0500
          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:13 -0500
            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:28 -0700
              Re: The electron goes fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 17:01 +0100
              Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:08 -0500
                Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:18 -0800
                Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:25 -0800
                  Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 03:20 -0800
                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 03:33 -0800
                      Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 04:49 -0800
              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
              Re: The electron goes fast Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 11:36 -0700
                  Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:10 -0700
                    Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-02 12:25 -0700
                  Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 14:29 -0700
                    Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 10:21 -0700
                      Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-03 12:30 -0500
                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:32 -0700
                        Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:36 -0700
                          Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:48 -0700
                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:23 -0800
                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:32 -0800
                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:56 -0800
                                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:09 -0500
                                  Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 15:53 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:32 -0500
                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 16:05 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:28 -0500
                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:45 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:56 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:07 -0500
                                          Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 15:58 -0800
                                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 20:00 -0500
                              Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:47 -0800
                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:14 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:23 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 02:11 +0000
                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:36 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 15:30 +0000
                              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0600
                                Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 10:10 -0600
                                Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 10:30 -0800
                            Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:46 -0600
                      Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-03 11:24 -0700
              Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:13 -0800
                Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 08:57 -0800
                  Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-08 17:24 +0000
                  Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-09 00:39 -0800
        Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:05 -0700
          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:29 -0700
              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:50 -0600
            Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:50 -0700
              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:56 -0600
                Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:24 -0800
                  Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 00:32 -0800
                    Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:19 -0800
                      Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:28 -0800
                    Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0800
                Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:39 -0800
        The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:14 -0700
    Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:19 -0700
      Re: The electron goes fast pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-10-31 11:44 -0700
        Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:09 -0500
          Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 05:47 -0700
      Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-31 11:58 -0700
      Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 12:25 -0700
        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 14:57 -0700
          Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 15:34 -0700
          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:49 -0400
            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 16:33 -0700
              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 19:44 -0400
              Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:39 -0700
                Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:42 -0700
                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:06 -0400
          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:00 -0600
            Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 07:19 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:08 -0700
    Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:43 -0800
      Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:57 -0800
        Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-08 11:46 -0800
          Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 12:39 -0800
            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:24 -0500
              Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-10 14:21 -0800
                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-10 18:42 -0500
                  Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 17:52 -0800
                    Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 05:25 -0800
                      Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 08:20 -0800
                        Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:51 -0600
                          Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:06 -0800
                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:49 -0500
                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 04:54 -0800
                                Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 05:51 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 07:12 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:01 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:31 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 11:41 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 04:20 -0800
                                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 05:35 -0800
                                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 06:35 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:39 -0800
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:34 -0800
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:40 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:55 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:06 -0800
                                                          Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:27 +0000
                                                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:15 -0800
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:24 -0800
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:13 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:49 +0000
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:47 +0000
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:24 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:58 -0600
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:00 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:18 -0800
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:50 -0600
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:30 -0500
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 19:02 -0500
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast sdf <sdf@sdf.sdf> - 2016-11-17 20:48 +0000
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:45 +0000
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:05 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:15 -0800
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:19 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:37 -0600
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:32 -0500
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 18:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:30 -0500
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:28 -0500
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:34 -0600
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:51 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 -0600
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:47 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:52 -0600
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 01:09 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:58 -0600
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:41 -0800
                                                                          Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-19 07:58 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 19:10 -0500
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:56 -0500
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:17 +0000
                                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:55 -0500
                                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 17:39 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:14 -0500
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:47 -0800
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:39 -0500
                                              trons go keplerian; that is hwat the four quantum numbers are noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:41 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:49 -0500
                                        Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 03:42 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 04:06 -0800
                                            Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:56 -0800
                                              Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-15 10:54 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:03 -0800
                                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:17 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 13:46 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:40 -0500
                                              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:33 -0500
                                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:22 -0500
                                          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:37 -0500
                                            Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 21:52 -0800
                                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:42 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 07:54 -0800
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:39 -0800
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:24 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:03 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:33 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:51 -0500
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:33 -0500
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:52 -0500
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 16:58 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:36 -0500
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-16 08:52 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:36 -0500
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:09 -0800
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:53 -0500
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:07 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:20 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:52 -0500
                                              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:28 -0500
                                                Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:02 -0800
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:46 -0500
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 17:56 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-19 18:19 -0500
                                      Re: The electron goes fast "Amazing Distilled Wolverine" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 14:00 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:42 -0500
                                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:40 -0500
                        Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 15:36 -0800
                          Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 18:10 -0800
                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 20:29 -0800
                              Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 14:48 -0800
                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 16:21 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:37 -0600
                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:43 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:29 -0600
                                  Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 07:55 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:58 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:35 -0600
                                        Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 11:42 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:13 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:32 -0600
                                      Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:41 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:15 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 08:53 -0800
                            Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:04 -0600
                              Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 07:18 -0800
                                Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:32 -0600
                                  Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:40 -0800
                                    Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:35 -0600
                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:55 -0500
            Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 11:13 -0800
              Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-11 14:04 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:14 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:23 -0800
      Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 12:09 -0800
        Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-20 13:55 -0800
        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:32 -0800
          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 07:54 -0600
            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:06 -0800
              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:25 -0600
                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:28 -0800
                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:49 -0600
                  Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-21 16:44 +0000
                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:33 -0800
                      Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:41 -0800
                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:48 -0600
                        Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:54 -0800
                          Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:36 -0800
                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:57 -0800
                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:31 -0800
                              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:57 -0600
                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 13:13 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:17 -0600
                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:59 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:20 +0000
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 09:43 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:50 -0600
                                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:52 -0500
                                              Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:06 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:11 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:14 -0800
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:35 -0500
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 15:43 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 22:30 -0800
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 00:02 -0800
                                                          Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 12:06 +0000
                                                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:56 -0800
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-11-26 14:13 -0800
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 14:49 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-26 15:37 -0800
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:42 -0800
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 16:15 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:28 -0800
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 13:42 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-06 13:51 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 04:23 -0800
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 07:42 -0800
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 09:57 -0800
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 11:01 -0800
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 17:17 -0600
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 23:23 +0000
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 14:53 -0800
                                                          Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 13:57 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:43 -0600
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:15 +0000
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:50 -0500
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:23 +0000
                                                          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:07 -0500
                                                            Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:03 +0000
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:26 -0500
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:35 +0000
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:35 -0500
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:35 +0000
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:14 -0500
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:22 +0000
                                                                          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
                                                                            Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:54 +0000
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:08 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:54 -0500
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:25 +0000
                                                          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:11 -0500
                                                            Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:05 +0000
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:27 -0500
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:36 +0000
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:36 +0000
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:23 +0000
                                                                          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
                                                                            Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:55 +0000
                                                        Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:29 -0800
                                                          Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:44 -0500
                                                            Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:38 +0000
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
                                                                Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:38 +0000
                                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
                                                                    Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:25 +0000
                                                                      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
                                                                        Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:56 +0000
                                                            Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800
                                                              Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:44 -0500
                                                Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0600
                                          Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:23 +0000
                                          Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:08 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 10:19 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:26 +0000
                              Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 22:18 -0800
                            Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:32 -0800
                          Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:19 -0800
                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:20 -0800
                          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:02 -0600
                            Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:46 -0800
                              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:22 -0600
                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:28 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:49 -0600
                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:32 -0600
                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:41 -0800
                                      Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:00 -0600
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:14 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0800
                                            Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:56 -0600
                                              Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:06 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:52 -0600
                                          Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:13 +0000
                                      Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 11:06 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:20 -0800
                                        Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:26 -0800
                                          Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:36 -0800
                                            Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 19:10 -0500
                                              Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:47 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0600
                                              Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 -0800
                                                Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:17 -0800
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 08:40 -0800
                                                    Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 09:06 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 15:40 -0800
                                                      Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-25 03:17 +0000
                                                  Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:58 -0500
                                                Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:57 -0500
                                          Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:39 -0600
                                            Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:53 -0800
                                              Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-24 06:29 +0000
                                              Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:41 -0600
                                Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 22:55 -0800
                                  Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:49 -0600
                      Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:30 -0800
                        Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:41 -0800
        Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 09:54 -0800
          Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 10:32 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:41 -0800
      Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:56 -0500
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:43 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 15:53 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:24 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:26 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:29 -0800
    Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:30 -0800
      Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 20:35 -0800
        Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600

Page 8 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 19  Next page →


#605440

From"F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com>
Date2016-11-19 07:58 -0800
Message-ID<5a4bbd12-ec54-4269-9597-10f78d830b97@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#605426
On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 12:41:52 AM UTC-8, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:58:33 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > On 11/17/2016 3:09 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> > > =========
> > > don't you see it on any corner of
> > > physics ''discussion !!??
> > >
> > > the understanding that
> > > there is no relativistic mass at all
> > > is my  unprecedented copyright quite long ago
> > > unless you prove otherwise
> > > ====================================
> > > where did you see the brand new   basic rule of physics
> > > ===============================================
> > > 'NO MASS' - THE ***ONLY **(again ONLY!!! MASS) -
> > > - NO REAL PHYSICS !!
> > > ===============================================
> > > in other words
> > > **all kinds of  mass
> > >  no matter if in gas or solid
> > > or in chemistry or in nuclear power and radiation
> > > of any** mixture of them **!!!
> > > ie in a ''***closed system**
> > >
> > > that is the bottom  line of all energies  !!
> > >
> > > did anyone coined it before me ??
> > > if not  in   my brand new
> > > above assertion :???
> > > if I was precedented  by     the above
> > > by anyone else
> > > please quote/show   it !!
> > > =====================================
> > > does envy drives you crazy or out of your
> > >  stable decent way ??!!!
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ===================================
> > 
> > Not envy, Porat. Historical fact.
> > I replied to you a while ago with a quotation from Einstein, written 
> > before you were born, where he states that relativistic mass is not a 
> > good concept and should not be used. Nor have physicists used it for 
> > decades, long before you ever came up with the realization yourself.
> > 
> > You spend every day lusting for recognition for ideas you want to claim 
> > as your own, but have been common knowledge for your whole life. You 
> > also put reference to "laws" like "conservation of mass" which do not 
> > hold in nature and which physicists say are false.
> 
> ====================
> anonymous !!...
> criminal against mankind!!
> shameless lire   blockhead and thief !!
> 
> go f yourself with   your ''physicists' 
>  I  showed you nasty pig blockhead 
> even long ago 
> 
> that
> not
> E=mc^2
> nor E = h f 
> contain  mass = the only mass
> NOTHING RELATIVISTC 
> NO ZERO MULTIPLYER THERE !!
> BNO INE BEFORE ME DI DTHAT
> DYMENSSION ANALYSYS 
> NOT THE CONCLUTIONS
> just mass 
> THE ONLY!!!!! MASS !!
> --
> no one before me coined  those  most basic rules of physics 
> ===========================================
> NO NASS - THE ONLY MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !!
> ===============================================
> 2
> ===============================================
> MASS IS THEMOTHER OF ALL FORCES - INCLUDING GRAVITY !!
> ==========================================
> shameless Pig
> IS IT (both!!!OF THEM ( above rules( TOGETHWER!!! )
> --
> is it 
> COMMON KNOWLWDGE NOW ???!!
> OR IN PAST 
> ===============
> 
> just bring quotes AND PROVES 
> and exactly as I did
>  as short  and unequivocal   
> 
> ie not walking around the bush 
> 
> calming   that those are most  basic rules 
>  = the most basic rules  of  physics 
> that will 
> will bring a new revolution in physics 
> because they are ***contradictory** to  existing 
> dominant rules of current time !!!
>   
> 
> proved that I was
>  precedent !!
> as short and clear unequivocal simple is I did it 
> ===========================
> if not
> go f yourself with 
> Josef''....
> you spiritual teacher  
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> =============================    
> 
> not Josef... but he is simply
f.art.ingatu 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  If you want to claim 
> > copyright for your errors of fact and of history, you are welcome to own 
> > them.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604790

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
Message-ID<b4fade76-8429-4f68-b584-b571587ba419@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604739
john
HVAC 
"So now you're trying to sell the fact that a dream about an alien...A drug induced dream... Has given you good health? 

Curiouser and Curiouser " 

Yes. He told me to be vegan. 

Look up: 
Dr Esselstyn 
Hippocrates Institute 
China Study 

You should do that, HVAC. 
Metastasis is serious 
----------

John it was just your imagination. But no matter. It spears that my cancer is gone. I won't know for sure until they a PET scan in a month or so. You can live any way you like as long as you don't interfere with my right to do the same. That's my life philosophy. And I didn't learn it from an alien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604837

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-14 19:10 -0500
Message-ID<582a5267$0$34619$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#604790
On 11/14/2016 3:40 PM, HVAC wrote:
> john HVAC "So now you're trying to sell the fact that a dream about
> an alien...A drug induced dream... Has given you good health?
>
> Curiouser and Curiouser "
>
> Yes. He told me to be vegan.
>
> Look up: Dr Esselstyn Hippocrates Institute China Study
>
> You should do that, HVAC. Metastasis is serious ----------
>
> John it was just your imagination. But no matter. It spears that my
> cancer is gone. I won't know for sure until they a PET scan in a
> month or so. You can live any way you like as long as you don't
> interfere with my right to do the same. That's my life philosophy.
> And I didn't learn it from an alien
>
Believe it or not John isn't trying to "interfere" with your "right" to 
live the way you desire, he's just trying to save your worthless ass.

So you should figure that your previous ways supposedly ended up with 
disease, so an intelligent person would be trying to figure out what 
they need to change so they don't do it again. Needless to day that sort 
of leaves you out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604832

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-14 18:56 -0500
Message-ID<582a4f49$0$10307$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#604723
On 11/14/2016 10:39 AM, john wrote:
> HVAC
> "Your (cough) experience was nothing more than a bad dream "
>
> Yet, this experience has given me
> perfect health, again.
> I think you're the one still having a bad dream.
> Wanna play frisbee?
>
That's it John. Ask him about his "perfect health".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604849

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-11-15 02:17 +0000
Message-ID<o0dr8i$osl$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#604723
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Yet, this experience has given me
>perfect health, again.

Perfect mental health?  Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604831

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-14 18:55 -0500
Message-ID<582a4eea$0$10307$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#604701
On 11/14/2016 7:20 AM, HVAC wrote:
> john HVAC Boyd Bushmann said aliens use esp. I experienced an esp
> contact with a human that sure didn't look homegrown. Oh my God
> (sorry HVAC) who to believe?? ----------
>
> Well Loyd Bushbaby is a proven liar and fraud. You are drug addled.
> You should believe me... Obviously
>

John, the government remote viewing experiments proved ESP real. 
Hardblow is the only proven liar and fraud here. You can take that to 
the bank. It is a given.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604845

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-14 17:39 -0800
Message-ID<f38729ba-8256-4e2c-9343-5beb4d988cfe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604831
BJ quacked
John, the government remote viewing experiments proved ESP real. 
----------

Lol! And BJ calls poor John a kook!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604997

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-15 17:14 -0500
Message-ID<582b88c0$0$34625$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#604845
On 11/14/2016 8:39 PM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
> John, the government remote viewing experiments proved ESP real.
> ----------
>
> Lol! And BJ calls poor John a kook!
>
Hardblow has a religious belief that remote viewing experiments never 
happened. He is such a man of faith!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#605048

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-16 04:47 -0800
Message-ID<1ad986d6-aca8-47b8-91bb-bcc01f3fec78@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604997
BJ quacked
> Lol! And BJ calls poor John a kook! 
> 
Hardblow has a religious belief that remote viewing experiments never 
happened. He is such a man of faith! 
-------------

Of course those experiments took place. Our government had to do it's due diligence. When those experiments produced zero actionable intelligence the program was closed.

That's just the truth that you will not admit. Why? Because you're a kook. No offense of course

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#605126

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-16 18:39 -0500
Message-ID<582cee2f$0$34532$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#605048
On 11/16/2016 7:47 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
>> Lol! And BJ calls poor John a kook!
>>
> Hardblow has a religious belief that remote viewing experiments never
>  happened. He is such a man of faith! -------------
>
> Of course those experiments took place. Our government had to do it's
> due diligence. When those experiments produced zero actionable
> intelligence the program was closed.
>
> That's just the truth that you will not admit. Why? Because you're a
> kook. No offense of course
>
He means the programs were a success and the follow-ons are now
classified. He's paid to cover that kind of thing up.

If you doubt that HJVAC is lying just go read all the books by the
persons who did the experiments. Either all of them are lying or HVAC is 
lying. You pick.

HVAC is just a paid pathological liar. No offense of course.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604857 — trons go keplerian; that is hwat the four quantum numbers are

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-14 19:41 -0800
Subjecttrons go keplerian; that is hwat the four quantum numbers are
Message-ID<61dba36a-8627-4f45-b23f-e05cc26d2e62@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604831
those guys are nutty fabricatirs,
like that freak on hte Art belL show, what;s-his-name-o;
the only time that I got through,
Art cut me off, because I was not a believer
in the u.f.o o'er Phoenix ... possibly only,
because I was born in Phoenix

> John, the government remote viewing experiments proved ESP real. 
> Hardblow is the only proven liar and fraud here. You can take that to 
> the bank. It is a given.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604830

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-14 18:49 -0500
Message-ID<582a4d7f$0$11892$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#604591
On 11/13/2016 1:31 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Maple loops says
> Can I safely conclude that you HVAC did not attend all schools, whilst whenever?
> If yes and so, then what was your favorite subject at your unnameable alma mater?
> -----------
>
> What you conclude is of no concern to me.
>
>> Note that in the world of the physical universe there is no place
>> for the insane things BJ believes in like ghosts and esp. He is a
>> kook
>
> You HVACtypes do realize that ghosts, ESP, aliens, ... as ideas and
> thoughts have existed -- beliefs or no -- thousands and thousands of
> years before either you HVACtypes' plus BenjJi's ages combined?!
> --------
>
> And of course that means absolute nothing in the real world of the physical sciences.
>
> Even you have to admit that anyone such as BJ who believes in ghosts, aliens, esp, etc is a kook.
>
>
Ignore HardBlow. He's gay. He's depressed since Hillary lost the election.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604902

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-15 03:42 -0800
Message-ID<8f308bbc-3b08-4ecb-b91c-82863fd5a3de@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604591
A good Tuesday morning to one and all... me m(y) days be numbered...

On Sunday, November 13, 2016 at 1:31:31 PM UTC-5, HVAC wrote:
> Maple loops says
> Can I safely conclude that you HVAC did not attend all schools, whilst whenever? 
> If yes and so, then what was your favorite subject at your unnameable alma mater? 
> -----------
> 
> What you conclude is of no concern to me.

That's not very nice, HVAC. Do accept this, I was/am mocking you.

So, did you have a favorite subject... anywhere, anytime, anyTeacher?

> > Note that in the world of the physical universe there is no place 
> >for the insane things BJ believes in like ghosts and esp. He is a 
> >kook 
> 
> You HVACtypes do realize that ghosts, ESP, aliens, ... as ideas and 
> thoughts have existed -- beliefs or no -- thousands and thousands of 
> years before either you HVACtypes' plus BenjJi's ages combined?! 
> --------
> 
> And of course that means absolute nothing in the real world of the
> physical sciences.

It means, and let me spell this out for you HVAC, you singling out one BJ
regards your silly topics is impolite, rude, and entirely non-scientific.
It also proves only one thing, that you HVAC are obsessed with BenjJi. Stop it.

Lesson? Science/Physics is independent of the beliefs of those practicing it.

HVAC, why not you directly write about what is comical/goofy and/or
non-scientific about your three {ghosts, esp, aliens}? Ghooo...oats?

I used to believe in having dreams, then reality knocked me out with a bat!

> Even you have to admit that anyone such as BJ who believes in
> ghosts, aliens, esp, etc is a kook.

I admit I am respectful of, and indifferent to, what individuals believe.

I suspect, when and if I call people names, they will be called kookHVACs.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604903

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-15 04:06 -0800
Message-ID<66db53fe-9c9b-42cf-9be7-3f0271089595@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604902
Maple loops says
It means, and let me spell this out for you HVAC, you singling out one BJ 
regards your silly topics is impolite, rude, and entirely non-scientific. 
It also proves only one thing, that you HVAC are obsessed with BenjJi. Stop it. 
--------------

Request denied.

I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook view of the world. BJ gets no free pass.



Lesson? Science/Physics is independent of the beliefs of those practicing it. 
-------------

Kooks like BJ and John no NOT practice science. They practice western versions of witchcraft, voodoo and juju. They are closer to the cave man rubbing mud on his belly and howling at the moon than they are too science.


"Little old lady got mutilated late last night. Werewolves in London again... AWOOOOO!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604943

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-15 09:56 -0800
Message-ID<2bea1790-32d3-4a2e-b6b6-4cecadbaa8c5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604903
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 7:06:52 AM UTC-5, HVAC wrote:
> Maple loops says
> It means, and let me spell this out for you HVAC, you singling out one BJ 
> regards your silly topics is impolite, rude, and entirely non-scientific. 
> It also proves only one thing, that you HVAC are obsessed with BenjJi. Stop it. 
> --------------
> 
> Request denied.

I am not surprised.

> I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook view
> of the world. BJ gets no free pass.

Insult the truth? Pray tell, what be this so-called truth you reference?
Where are books or hyperlinks that have stated this truth which can be insulted?

Show sincere respect and understanding for the existence of other peeps.
Afterall, they will have to attend your funeral service. Want your date?

Would it kill you HVAC to contemplate the discussion's contents before
reacting/responding in less seconds than there are characters in any tweet?

> Lesson? Science/Physics is independent of the beliefs of those practicing it. 
> -------------
>
> Kooks like BJ and John no NOT practice science. They practice
> western versions of witchcraft, voodoo and juju. They are closer to
> the cave man rubbing mud on his belly and howling at the moon than
> they are too science.

Sure, then what is it that they practice? Do tell. I'll make popcorn.

In TwitterSpeak >> TrumpSpeak, the shorter the sentence, the better it sounds@#. 
Luckily, that does not apply to short human hands forcefull(y) groping for ...youKnow.

In me m(y) Chinese impersonation: I kid the Plesident-Erect... O... wait. Run myPal!

myPal: Which way to Fifth Avenue? I lost my @#smartestphone at the protest.

> "Little old lady got mutilated late last night. Werewolves in London again... AWOOOOO!"

I've always enjoyed hearing that song... Werewolves of London...
The song is a little bit like "Grandma got run over by a reindeer"...

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604947

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-11-15 10:54 -0800
Message-ID<o0flka$2ko$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#604943
"Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
Harlow Campbell, Mr.HVAC aka Moderator General wrote:
> Maple loops says
> It means, and let me spell this out for you HVAC, you singling out one BJ
> regards your silly topics is impolite, rude, and entirely non-scientific.
> It also proves only one thing, that you HVAC are obsessed with BenjJi. 
> Stop it.
> --------------
>
Harlow wrote:
> Request denied.
>
VirdyJi wrote:
I am not surprised.
>
Harlow wrote:
> I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook view
> of the world. BJ gets no free pass.
>
VirdyJi wrote:
Insult the truth? Pray tell, what be this so-called truth you reference?
Where are books or hyperlinks that have stated this truth which can be 
insulted?

Show sincere respect and understanding for the existence of other peeps.
Afterall, they will have to attend your funeral service. Want your date?

Would it kill you HVAC to contemplate the discussion's contents before
reacting/responding in less seconds than there are characters in any tweet?
>
Harlow wrote:
> Lesson? Science/Physics is independent of the beliefs of those practicing 
> it.
> -------------
>
> Kooks like BJ and John no NOT practice science. They practice
> western versions of witchcraft, voodoo and juju. They are closer to
> the cave man rubbing mud on his belly and howling at the moon than
> they are too science.

VirdyJi wrote:
Sure, then what is it that they practice? Do tell. I'll make popcorn.

In TwitterSpeak >> TrumpSpeak, the shorter the sentence, the better it 
sounds@#.
Luckily, that does not apply to short human hands forcefull(y) groping for 
...youKnow.

In me m(y) Chinese impersonation: I kid the Plesident-Erect... O... wait. 
Run myPal!

myPal: Which way to Fifth Avenue? I lost my @#smartestphone at the protest.
>
Harlow wrote:
> "Little old lady got mutilated late last night. Werewolves in London 
> again... AWOOOOO!"
>
VirdyJi wrote:
I've always enjoyed hearing that song... Werewolves of London...
The song is a little bit like "Grandma got run over by a reindeer"...

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
>
hanson wrote:
VirdyJi, excellent exchange!... & when extrapolated in & along
the same vein then the issue arises that a lot of current s.p.
denizens who honestly BELIEVE that what they advocate is
supposed to be science, did NOT even get what Cohen meant
when he said "repent... rePENT... REPENT!!....
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkRqQQWu_mA>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604965

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-15 12:03 -0800
Message-ID<7b21092e-4d79-4901-9f55-d2bf9199be2f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604947
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 1:54:38 PM UTC-5, hanson wrote:
> "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote:
> Harlow Campbell, Mr.HVAC aka Moderator General wrote:
> > Maple loops says
> > It means, and let me spell this out for you HVAC, you singling out one BJ
> > regards your silly topics is impolite, rude, and entirely non-scientific.
> > It also proves only one thing, that you HVAC are obsessed with BenjJi. 
> > Stop it.
> > --------------
> >
> Harlow wrote:
> > Request denied.
> >
> VirdyJi wrote:
> I am not surprised.
> >
> Harlow wrote:
> > I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook view
> > of the world. BJ gets no free pass.
> >
> VirdyJi wrote:
> Insult the truth? Pray tell, what be this so-called truth you reference?
> Where are books or hyperlinks that have stated this truth which can be 
> insulted?
> 
> Show sincere respect and understanding for the existence of other peeps.
> Afterall, they will have to attend your funeral service. Want your date?
> 
> Would it kill you HVAC to contemplate the discussion's contents before
> reacting/responding in less seconds than there are characters in any tweet?
> >
> Harlow wrote:
> > Lesson? Science/Physics is independent of the beliefs of those practicing 
> > it.
> > -------------
> >
> > Kooks like BJ and John no NOT practice science. They practice
> > western versions of witchcraft, voodoo and juju. They are closer to
> > the cave man rubbing mud on his belly and howling at the moon than
> > they are too science.
> 
> VirdyJi wrote:
> Sure, then what is it that they practice? Do tell. I'll make popcorn.
> 
> In TwitterSpeak >> TrumpSpeak, the shorter the sentence, the better it 
> sounds@#.
> Luckily, that does not apply to short human hands forcefull(y) groping for 
> ...youKnow.
> 
> In me m(y) Chinese impersonation: I kid the Plesident-Erect... O... wait. 
> Run myPal!
> 
> myPal: Which way to Fifth Avenue? I lost my @#smartestphone at the protest.
> >
> Harlow wrote:
> > "Little old lady got mutilated late last night. Werewolves in London 
> > again... AWOOOOO!"
> >
> VirdyJi wrote:
> I've always enjoyed hearing that song... Werewolves of London...
> The song is a little bit like "Grandma got run over by a reindeer"...
> 
> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”
> >
> hanson wrote:
> VirdyJi, excellent exchange!... & when extrapolated in & along
> the same vein then the issue arises that a lot of current s.p.
> denizens who honestly BELIEVE that what they advocate is
> supposed to be science, did NOT even get what Cohen meant
> when he said "repent... rePENT... REPENT!!....
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkRqQQWu_mA>

Thanks! You brother Sir hansonJi are both kind and wise! Fare thee well.

Btw, you have always been nice to me hansonJi, what the hell did I ever do?!

That Cohen song is really cool. Today Tuesday is the first time I heard it.
Look, sometimes I have to work and/or listen to Hindi lyrics. Time's short.

Too deep/weird these Cohen's lyrics... the order of the soul... too good!
I bet there exists no mathematical formulas to capture such true sentiment.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604973

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-15 12:17 -0800
Message-ID<395c53d9-c99c-430d-8848-840f93bb9f5d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604943
Maple loops says
> Request denied. 

I am not surprised. 

> I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook view 
> of the world. BJ gets no free pass. 

Insult the truth? Pray tell, what be this so-called truth you reference? 
Where are books or hyperlinks that have stated this truth which can be insulted? 
-----------

BJ and John insult the truth and the scientific method with almost every post they make. They talk of god, ghosts, aliens, esp, etc as if they were as real as the study of atomic theory. When pressed for evidence they point to anecdotes and other unsupported bullshit.

This is a de facto insult to truth.

You should be ashamed of yourself for defending them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#604994

FromMahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-15 13:46 -0800
Message-ID<ac4de5f4-d54a-4a2e-a208-3313a8519496@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#604973
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 3:17:52 PM UTC-5, HVAC wrote:
> Maple loops says
> > Request denied. 
> 
> I am not surprised. 
> 
> > I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook view 
> > of the world. BJ gets no free pass. 
> 
> Insult the truth? Pray tell, what be this so-called truth you reference? 
> Where are books or hyperlinks that have stated this truth which can be insulted? 
> -----------
> 
> BJ and John insult the truth and the scientific method with almost
> every post they make. They talk of god, ghosts, aliens, esp, etc as
> if they were as real as the study of atomic theory. When pressed for
> evidence they point to anecdotes and other unsupported bullshit.

There's nothing unscientific about discussing atomic theory or god(s).

> This is a de facto insult to truth.

HVAC, don't make me SHOUT, what truth are they or I, insulting? Today!
 
> You should be ashamed of yourself for defending them.

Trust me, I've got a lot more minor issues I waste my time being
ashamed of and on. Want a list? All I have to do is cut and paste.

HVAC, what truth are they or I, insulting/hiding? Tell me/us today! It's not
something you have to research or invent. Is it? Wake the fuck up, HVAC.

-- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: d(me) != 0 ... me alwa(y)s changes...”

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#605008

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-15 17:40 -0500
Message-ID<582b8efa$0$10318$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#604973
On 11/15/2016 3:17 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Maple loops says
>> Request denied.
>
> I am not surprised.
>
>> I will always insult those who insult the truth with their kook
>> view of the world. BJ gets no free pass.
>
> Insult the truth? Pray tell, what be this so-called truth you
> reference? Where are books or hyperlinks that have stated this truth
> which can be insulted? -----------
>
> BJ and John insult the truth and the scientific method with almost
> every post they make. They talk of god, ghosts, aliens, esp, etc as
> if they were as real as the study of atomic theory. When pressed for
> evidence they point to anecdotes and other unsupported bullshit.

Actually I wrote a book on the subject but Hardblow can't read. He's too 
ignorant to do anything but call names and make up lies. He acts like 
words such as god, aliens, ghosts etc. aren't in the English language 
and if you ever happen to use them in any context, then you must 
"believe" in them.

Do you know what "context" means, Hardblow? You don't believe in 
context, do you.

> This is a de facto insult to truth.
>
> You should be ashamed of yourself for defending them.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 8 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 19  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web