Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600952 > unrolled thread
| Started by | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-15 00:34 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-17 04:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 00:34 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:22 -0700
b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 21:44 -0700
Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:46 -0700
Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:52 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:37 -0700
poseurs ominous noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 10:16 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 21:12 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous "King Knutsacco" <b.krazy@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-17 21:54 -0700
Re: poseurs ominous poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 03:40 -0700
c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 11:01 -0700
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 02:49 -0700
there, so noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 10:03 -0700
Re: there, so poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:05 -0700
why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 11:22 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 11:40 -0700
stop it -- mystreating your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 12:39 -0700
Re: stop it -- mystreating your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 19:18 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:17 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 11:14 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 13:23 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 22:11 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 06:04 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 08:53 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 07:55 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard "Brian McConnel" <ballunatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-22 10:02 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 10:50 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 13:58 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-22 21:18 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 08:55 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 07:38 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 10:11 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 09:54 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 07:47 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-25 08:49 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-25 07:34 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 03:55 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 22:09 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 00:20 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 05:29 -0700
1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 18:10 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 22:21 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 13:19 -0700
Re: 1/37,20,00 seconds per mile (the period of the sphere, or diameter, or reciprocal of curvature poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 20:01 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:09 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-01 01:08 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2016-11-02 03:28 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 17:27 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-03 02:22 -0700
your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 14:02 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-03 23:54 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 11:56 -0700
Re: your keyboard could sue, you, though, iff poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-04 23:29 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:00 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:06 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 16:12 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 01:27 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:13 -0500
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 06:46 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 12:36 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:15 -0600
be causal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 21:08 -0800
Re: be causal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 22:17 -0800
Re: be causal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-09 12:18 -0800
Re: be causal poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 02:34 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 23:13 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:55 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 13:03 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 13:13 -0700
"plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 16:13 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 21:04 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 22:14 -0700
Re: "plonk" -- we know, you are just going to rattle your keyboard; this is my last reply to you poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 22:11 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 14:13 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 01:03 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:11 -0500
a while hath been noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 12:26 -0700
Re: a while hath been poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-31 12:41 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 10:22 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 14:17 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 05:26 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:00 -0600
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 08:58 -0800
why don't you just think, awhile ... we have plenty of ellipses noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 11:25 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile ... we have plenty of ellipses poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:55 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 11:11 -0800
before mystreatying your keyboard, gAf about permittivity & permeability noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 15:29 -0800
Re: before mystreatying your keyboard, gAf about permittivity & permeability poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-20 00:25 -0800
Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 13:39 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 00:37 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 02:54 -0800
bad typist? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:04 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? "Alberto Meltdown Jones" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 19:37 -0800
Re: Bodkin knows about permittivity & permeability; po rat is just a typist -- a very bad typist? poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 01:13 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:47 -0600
"HELP," your keyboard screamed, but only Po raT could hear it noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:58 -0800
think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:58 -0700
Re: think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 21:06 -0700
Re: think, awhile, before mystreatying my dumbterinal -- thakyou noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 11:40 -0700
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 09:12 -0800
Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:36 -0600
because he just doen't think -- he just l00ks and types at teh same momentbieng noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:00 -0800
go read a goddam b00k, you m0r0n noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 11:32 -0700
Re: go read a goddam b00k, you m0r0n poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 22:17 -0700
vmv is t.h.a.t noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 11:59 -0700
Re: vmv is t.h.a.t poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-24 01:29 -0700
vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 11:55 -0700
Re: vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:57 -0800
Re: vmv/2 (Liebniz's *vis viva* a.k.a kinetic energy or k.e poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 22:59 -0800
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum "Eduardo Grudin" <raving_lunatic@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-19 21:00 -0700
Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:00 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' "Eduardo Space Helmut" <b.karzeddin@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-16 16:49 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:38 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 22:40 -0700
Re: EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-17 04:00 -0700
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-15 00:34 -0700 |
| Subject | EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' |
| Message-ID | <1a24010b-3706-4fe8-be9b-14c20226edde@googlegroups.com> |
EVERY MUMBLER THAT WANTS TO POSE BIGGER THAN HIMSELF -USES THE 'WORD'' RELATIVISTIC ' NO MATTER IF JUSTIFYED OR NOT !! =================================================== ''NO MASS'' - THE ONLY** MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS !! ==================================================== JUST MASS - NOT RELATIVISTIC AND NOT 'SCHMELATIVISTIC' !! just as simple as that !! the 'gamma factor'' IF AT ALL **!!!- - belongs really - to the other side of the equations ie the side of -force or energy side !!! --***AS A DENOMINATOR** !!! ---------------------------------------- old historic revolutionary innovation by Eng Yehiel Porat =====================================]
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 16:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0635451d-a33c-4ea6-b971-2361759a6c7a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600952 |
ah, almost akin to a hypothesis. anyway, from now, on, my policy will be to ne'er reply to you, more than once per ... what ever it is, this is, that I'm typing about > the 'gamma factor'' IF AT ALL **!!!- > - belongs really - > to the other side of the equations > ie > the side of -force or energy side !!! > --***AS A DENOMINATOR** !!! > ---------------------------------------- > old historic revolutionary innovation > by Beasxeaux synonymouS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 21:44 -0700 |
| Subject | b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s |
| Message-ID | <355b5454-c190-48c5-957f-1d24fee01e23@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601169 |
wOw, talk about elementary ignorance; it's just dividing both sides by gamma -- what ever that is supposed to be > > the 'gamma factor'' IF AT ALL **!!!- > > - belongs really - > > to the other side of the equations > > ie > > the side of -force or energy side !!! > > --***AS A DENOMINATOR** !!! > > ---------------------------------------- > > old historic revolutionary innovation > > by Beauxeaux synonymouS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 22:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s |
| Message-ID | <e2be1dfe-e07d-41b7-b87c-d33289855fb0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601217 |
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 7:45:03 AM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > wOw, talk about elementary ignorance; > it's just dividing both sides by gamma -- what ever that is supposed to be > > > > the 'gamma factor'' IF AT ALL **!!!- > > > - belongs really - > > > to the other side of the equations > > > ie > > > the side of -force or energy side !!! > > > --***AS A DENOMINATOR** !!! > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > old historic revolutionary innovation > > > by Beauxeaux synonymous ================= imbecile dreck halfwit it is E/gamma ==m a and not for instance E - gamma a not both sides learn elementary school algebra can a sub human hired gangster pig learn something new in his f en life ================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 22:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: b*Z*Z S*N*N*M**s |
| Message-ID | <ff010063-49fb-4c66-b0d6-1fa4087bcd2a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601225 |
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 8:46:10 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 7:45:03 AM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > > wOw, talk about elementary ignorance; > > it's just dividing both sides by gamma -- what ever that is supposed to be > > > > > > the 'gamma factor'' IF AT ALL **!!!- > > > > - belongs really - > > > > to the other side of the equations > > > > ie > > > > the side of -force or energy side !!! > > > > --***AS A DENOMINATOR** !!! > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > old historic revolutionary innovation > > > > by Beauxeaux synonymous > ================= > imbecile dreck halfwit > it is > > E/gamma ==m a > and not for instance > E - gamma a ===== sorry typo it is E /Gamma = m a or E photon = h f and nothing relativistic multiplier in it not in left side not I right side got it little dreck human being ?? === Y ============================= > not both sides > learn elementary school algebra > > can a sub human hired gangster pig > learn something new in his f en life > > ================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-16 22:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <498bc678-c05f-4bdd-b5c7-3f92fc824fe1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601169 |
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 2:22:55 AM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > ah, almost akin to a hypothesis. anyway, > from now, on, > my policy will be to ne'er reply to you, more than once per ... > what ever it is, this is, that I'm typing about > > > the 'gamma factor'' IF AT ALL **!!!- > > - belongs really - > > to the other side of the equations > > ie > > the side of -force or energy side !!! > > --***AS A DENOMINATOR** !!! > > ---------------------------------------- > > old historic revolutionary innovation > > by Beasxeaux synonymous ================== ?????? Y.P ====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 10:16 -0700 |
| Subject | poseurs ominous |
| Message-ID | <e196bb31-a71a-4868-80fe-b634b580c988@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601222 |
00ps, should be: Baeuxaex synonymouS, or\and Bozos anonymouS ... because it is almost impossible to see, wTf you are trying to say .. but, gamma is just a number that is commutative in multiplication or/and division. thething is that, division is not always so simply commutative, nor is r00ting & so on > > > by Beasxeaux synonymous > ================== > ?????? > Y.P > ====================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 21:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: poseurs ominous |
| Message-ID | <d8319ae2-f66c-485d-92bd-f35949a6e98e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601280 |
On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 8:16:06 PM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > 00ps, should be: > Baeuxaex synonymouS, or\and > Bozos anonymouS ... because > it is almost impossible to see, > wTf you are trying to say .. but, > gamma is just a number that is commutative > in multiplication or/and division. > > thething is that, > division is not always so simply commutative, > nor is r00ting & so on > > > > > by Beasxeaux synonymous > > ================== > > ?????? > > Y.P > > ==================== next !!!!! to serious responsible human beings Y.P =========================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "King Knutsacco" <b.krazy@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-17 21:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: poseurs ominous |
| Message-ID | <nu4a7b$lt2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601438 |
next!!! you incomprehensible jizztrumpet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 03:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: poseurs ominous |
| Message-ID | <25b256af-3d4c-4fb8-b970-86481aa5a4bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601440 |
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 7:59:27 AM UTC+3, King Knutsacco wrote: > next!!! you incomprehensible jizztrumpet. ======================== what s your real name coward piggy ?? -------- Y.P ========
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-18 11:01 -0700 |
| Subject | c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum |
| Message-ID | <a0d1942a-26cd-4ca3-8892-38797c949768@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601438 |
l00k it up, f00l; commutativity is just arithmetic property that almost all highsch00l grads can do, although it's harder for division, of course > > gamma is just a number that is commutative > > in multiplication or/and division. > > > > thething is that, > > division is not always so simply commutative, > > nor is r00ting & so on > > > > > > > by Beasxeaux synonymous > > > ================== > > > ?????? > > > Y.P > > > ==================== > next !!!!! > to serious responsible human beings > Y.P > =========================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-19 02:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: c.o.m.m.u.t.a.t.i.n.g operators (+, x; maybe -, / etc. ad finitum |
| Message-ID | <1e6afa42-bfe0-46a9-9de9-98934c129dd7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601506 |
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 9:01:36 PM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > l00k it up, f00l; > commutativity is just arithmetic property that > almost all highsch00l grads can do, although > it's harder for division, of course > > > > gamma is just a number that is commutative > > > in multiplication or/and division. > > > > > > thething is that, > > > division is not always so simply commutative, > =============== so ??? mumble gamble just be more specific Next so serious responsible people Y.P ==============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-19 10:03 -0700 |
| Subject | there, so |
| Message-ID | <298fbf9a-82f9-47c1-8880-ec0d8f73d654@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601630 |
a+b = b+a, ab = ba, ab/a = b, ab/b = a; a-b =\= b-a, a/b =/= b/a etc. ad vom. > > commutativity is just arithmetic property that > > almost all highsch00l grads can do, although > > it's harder for division, of course > > > > > > gamma is just a number that is commutative > > > > in multiplication or/and division. > > > > > > > > the thing is that, > > > > division is not always so simply commutative, > > =============== > so ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 00:05 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: there, so |
| Message-ID | <ebcf1803-c353-4432-9f11-a7b8c4ae7162@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601663 |
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 8:03:48 PM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > a+b = b+a, ab = ba, ab/a = b, ab/b = a; > a-b =\= b-a, a/b =/= b/a etc. ad vom. > > > > commutativity is just arithmetic property that > > > almost all highsch00l grads can do, although > > > it's harder for division, of course > > > > > > > > gamma is just a number that is commutative > > > > > in multiplication or/and division. > > > > > > > > > > the thing is that, > > > > > division is not always so simply commutative, > > > =============== > > so ??? physics IS NOT JST F EN MATHEMATICS !!! IT IS FOR RESONSIBLE PHYSICS ***TEHINKERS** we are not playing here retarded disturbed children s bump parasites game == next !! Y.P =====================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 11:22 -0700 |
| Subject | why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard |
| Message-ID | <8731cbfb-e632-4b59-8a5b-05db18e1fca1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601766 |
your tantrum is always to be expected; should we, not? *mathematica* is a minimum of four subjects, but it does not include arithmetic, any more (although numbertheory used to be called, teh higher arithmetic > > a-b =\= b-a, a/b =/= b/a etc. ad vom. > > > > almost all highsch00l grads can do, although > > > > it's harder for division, of course > > > > > > gamma is just a number that is commutative > IS NOT JST F EN MATHEMATICS !!! > IT IS FOR RESONSIBLE PHYSICS ***TEHINKERS** > > we are not playing here > retarded disturbed children s bump parasites game > == > next !! > > Y.P > =====================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 11:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard |
| Message-ID | <49c4625a-061a-42d3-a19b-d1e3ed741226@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601807 |
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 9:22:51 PM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote: > your tantrum is always to be expected; should we, not? > > *mathematica* is a minimum of four subjects, but > it does not include arithmetic, any more (although > numbertheory used to be called, > teh higher arithmetic ================================ 1 )F =gamma m a in physics it is not as 2 F/gamma= m a because in that last case m *remains constant !! got it ass hole blockhead ?? --- that is just one example ===================== Y.P ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 12:39 -0700 |
| Subject | stop it -- mystreating your keyboard |
| Message-ID | <94f72d22-e7d2-4d0e-aa35-72d7ccba866c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601811 |
I'm not sure -- you flaming & recalcitrant idiot -- what, it is that you're trying to convey. But, this is just the simple commutativity of multiplication or\and division, taking care not to drop the pencil on your blankey-blank of course, m and a are both variables, for which explicit values can be substituted, whence "calculated to show a Force stop being a jack-ass, ***-jack > 1 )F =gamma m a > > in physics > it is not as > 2 > F/gamma= m a > because in that last case > > m *remains constant !! > > got it ass hole blockhead ?? > --- > that is just one example
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 19:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: stop it -- mystreating your keyboard |
| Message-ID | <0a4aadef-8ef9-4fd9-b204-58ffd8dbac04@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601818 |
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 10:40:04 PM UTC+3, noTthaTguY wrote:
> I'm not sure -- you flaming & recalcitrant idiot -- what,
> it is that you're trying to convey. But,
> this is just the simple commutativity of multiplication
> or\and division, taking care not to drop the pencil
> on your blankey-blank
>
> of course, m and a are both variables,
> for which explicit values can be substituted,
> whence "calculated to show a Force
>
> stop being a jack-ass, ***-jack
>
> > 1 )F =gamma m a
> >
> > in physics
> > it is not as
> > 2
> > F/gamma= m a
> > because in that last case
> >
> > m *remains constant !!
> >
> > got it ass hole blockhead ??
> > ---
> > that is just one example
=======================================
=============================================================
are you able to understand such a ''peculiar''' phenomenon ??
at the first case
the gamma factor multiplies the **mass**
-at the second case
it multiplies the **Force** factor !!!
so
the physical meaning is
completely revolutionary (''upside down ''' )
have you ever
pushed a car !!!
-in order to ignite it ??
had you done it
you would understand it in your mussels
and your bones ....
ie
the **energy you need** becomes bigger while adding velocity
****IT IS NOT THE MASS OF THE CAR
THAT IS BECOMMING BIGGER !!**
==
I am from the generations that had to make things
by their ''hands'' ...as well
not only by their mouth !! (or keyboard)- as the young generation does ..
===============
GREATINGS TO P D !!!! (-:)
Y.Porat
======================
===================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 09:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard |
| Message-ID | <nud81l$sak$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #601811 |
On 10/20/2016 1:40 PM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > 1 )F =gamma m a > > in physics > it is not as > 2 > F/gamma= m a > because in that last case > > m *remains constant !! > > got it ass hole blockhead ?? > --- > that is just one example > ===================== > Y.P > ============================ > Good grief, what an idiot. Even in F = gamma*m*a, m is constant. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty350@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-21 11:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: why don't you just think, awhile, before mystreatying your keyboard |
| Message-ID | <b73779ba-70ce-4a63-97ef-ee75775efc07@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601888 |
On Friday, October 21, 2016 at 5:17:31 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 10/20/2016 1:40 PM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote: > > 1 )F =gamma m a > > > > in physics > > it is not as > > 2 > > F/gamma= m a > > because in that last case > > > > m *remains constant !! > > > > got it ass hole blockhead ?? > > --- > > that is just one example > > ===================== > > Y.P > > ============================ > > > > Good grief, what an idiot. > Even in F = gamma*m*a, m is constant. > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables ====================== so ??? nasty pig professional thief !!! where do you have on earth RELATIVISTIC MASS ??!! didn't I say/prove it again and again: along years !!: ========================================= NO MASS - THE ONLY!!!! MASS -NO REAL PHYSICS !! ========================================== 2 MASS IS THE MOTHER OF ALL!!! FORCES *INCLUDING GRAVITY** ===================================== IS IT MY INNOVAVTION -OR ANYONE LELSE s?? or may be yours ?? can you bring (fabricated) precedent quotes ?? I detected you as Paul Draper so if you will start fabricating I will recruit Google from years ago in which you said different things than now TIA Y.Porat ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web