Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #598923 > unrolled thread

Re: Why are Aliens never black?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-29 23:38 -0700
    Re: Why are Aliens never black? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-09-30 03:25 -0400
    Re: Why are Aliens never black? Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-30 09:11 -0500
      Re: Why are Aliens never black? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:33 -0700
        Re: Why are Aliens never black? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:01 -0700
          Re: Why are Aliens never black? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-30 08:50 -0700
        Re: Why are Aliens never black? Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-30 11:40 -0500
      Re: Why are Aliens never black? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-09-30 16:39 -0400
        Re: Why are Aliens never black? Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-30 20:36 -0500
    Re: Why are Aliens never black? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:02 -0700
      Re: Why are Aliens never black? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-30 10:54 -0700
    Re: Why are Aliens never black? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-01 11:34 -0700
      Re: Why are Aliens never black? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 08:05 +0200
        Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 01:02 -0700
          Re: Why are Aliens never black? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 17:28 +0200
            Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 11:11 -0700
              Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 12:13 -0700
                Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 12:43 -0700
                  Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 13:18 -0700
                    Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-03 12:27 -0700
                      Re: Why are Aliens never black? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-05 05:09 +0200
                        Re: Why are Aliens never black? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:30 -0700
              Re: Why are Aliens never black? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-02 22:17 +0200
          Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-02 19:26 -0700
            not unlike the EsqimO noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 20:15 -0700
        Re: Why are Aliens never black? "Martin" <martinm@outlook.com> - 2016-10-04 01:37 +0200
          Re: Why are Aliens never black? Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 10:36 -0700
          Re: Why are Aliens never black? "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2016-10-04 12:49 -0500
            Re: Why are Aliens never black? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-10-06 08:02 -0400
              Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-06 12:10 -0700
                Re: Why are Aliens never black? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 02:12 +0000
                  Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-06 21:27 -0700
                    Re: Why are Aliens never black? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 05:44 +0000
                      Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-06 23:00 -0700
                        Re: Why are Aliens never black? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 09:19 +0000
                  Re: Why are Aliens never black? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 05:16 -0400
                    Re: Why are Aliens never black? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 09:30 +0000
                      Re: Why are Aliens never black? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 05:47 -0400
                        Re: Why are Aliens never black? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 12:15 +0000
                    Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-07 10:01 -0700
                      Re: Why are Aliens never black? Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 20:15 +0000
                        Re: Why are Aliens never black? "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2016-10-07 17:25 -0500
                          Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-08 12:32 -0700
                            Re: Why are Aliens never black? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-08 22:44 +0200
                              Re: Why are Aliens never black? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-10-08 14:42 -0700
                              Re: Why are Aliens never black? "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2016-10-08 22:42 -0500
                Re: Why are Aliens never black? "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> - 2016-10-07 12:28 -0500
    Re: Why are Aliens never black? Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-06 18:19 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#599493

Am 03.10.2016 21:27, schrieb The Starmaker:

>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...and how do you make Brown? You mix Red, Blue, and Yellow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You get a nice brown by mixing red and green.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But in 'order' to get Green you first need to mix Yellow with Blue, then
>>>>>>> add Red to get Brown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, you can chose a variety of method to create a brown colour.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it is not necessary to mix blue and yellow to get green.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are several green minerals (like Malachite) or the green of the
>>>>>> plants, which are not a mixture of blue and yellow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Green is the color between blue and yellow on the spectrum of visible
>>>>>> light. It is evoked by light with a predominant wavelength of roughly
>>>>>> 495–570 nm. "
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TH
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm talking about Art colors, paint...pigments. Not the colors of light.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not the primary colors of light...
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm talking about the primary colors of pigments/paint/Art. Red, Blue, and Yellow.
>>>>>
...
>
> i notice in the past, if information was from the Internet, it was considered not to be a good source for information...
> today, it's still not a good and realiable souurce but there are more of yous who have forgotten that.
>
>
> Take for example...
> you take 3 jars of paint
> a Red jar
> a Blue jar and
> a Yellow jar.
>
> Now mix the three colors together, what color do you get?


These paints stirred together give some kind of brown.

But that was not the point.

You wrote, that it takes yellow and blue paint, to create green.

But there are substance, that have a green colour, but neither blue or 
yellow in it.

Your error is, that you use features of the human eyes (three types of 
colour-receptors) and ascribe them to the objects seen.

This is wrong, since seeing and objects seen are different things.

So: colour is an impression of the human brain about the objects.

And mixing blue particles with with yellow ones can look similar to 
green particles. But looking similar does not say, they are similar.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599540

there is only rhodopsin for nightvision;
the rods & cones are alike conformed as log-spiral antennae, and
that goes perfectly well with the studies of Edward lanD

> Your error is, that you use features of the human eyes (three types of 
> colour-receptors) and ascribe them to the objects seen.
> 
> This is wrong, since seeing and objects seen are different things.
> 
> So: colour is an impression of the human brain about the objects.
> 
> And mixing blue particles with with yellow ones can look similar to 
> green particles. But looking similar does not say, they are similar.
> 
> 
> TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599146

Am 02.10.2016 20:11, schrieb The Starmaker:

>>> But in 'order' to get Green you first need to mix Yellow with Blue, then
>>> add Red to get Brown.
>>
>> Well, you can chose a variety of method to create a brown colour.
>>
>> But it is not necessary to mix blue and yellow to get green.
>>
>> There are several green minerals (like Malachite) or the green of the
>> plants, which are not a mixture of blue and yellow.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green
>>
>> "Green is the color between blue and yellow on the spectrum of visible
>> light. It is evoked by light with a predominant wavelength of roughly
>> 495–570 nm. "
>>
>> TH
>
>
> I'm talking about Art colors, paint...pigments. Not the colors of light.
>
> Not the primary colors of light...
>
> I'm talking about the primary colors of pigments/paint/Art. Red, Blue, and Yellow.
>
>
> You people are gettin your primary colors mixed up.
>


Well, you address a difficult question: have green objects yellow and 
blue components in their colour?

I would say: possibly, but not necessarily.

If an object reflects pure green light, we would see this object as green.


Since the colour is pure green, we have no yellow or blue in it.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599184

Quadibloc wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 2:00:22 AM UTC-6, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> > But in 'order' to get Green you first need to mix Yellow with Blue, then
> > add Red to get Brown.
> 
> No; either you start with Green, or you get Green by mixing Yellow with Cyan,
> since *those* are the *subtractive* primaries.
> 
> Oh, well, I suppose if you're mixing _paint_, then Red, Yellow, and Blue rather
> than Magenta, Yellow, and Cyan, are indeed the primaries - just as the
> subtractive primaries (printing press, color film) are Magenta, Yellow, and
> Cyan and the additive primaries (color TV set) are Red, Green, and Blue.
> 
> But the point is that one can obtain absurd results if one conflates different
> sets of primaries.
> 
> John Savard



you're a hopeless case

did you get left back in kindergarten????

teacher did not let you paint the sun white?? that would get you left back..


Since you're posting from the 'science fiction community'...
i guess i need to use sf lingo..

Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote a Mars book which contained comments 
that 'on Mars there are two more primary colors than on Earth'


maybe that would help..


but i doubt it.


(since the glasses you wear have...rose colors.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599189 — not unlike the EsqimO

like Heinlein said about base_three; actually,
I suppose that base_three logarythms would be ideal in most respects, but
if you are talking about volors, you only have to study
"the apparent trichromacy of vision of Ed lanD, whence
you will see that some of the colors are not visible
as simple sine-waves.

hey, you could use a.p's semicircular waves, if
you have to restrict the form to the plae, since
a.p can do no math, what so ever

> > But the point is that one can obtain absurd results if one conflates different
> > sets of primaries.
> > 
> > John Savard
> 
> 

> Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote a Mars book which contained comments 
> that 'on Mars there are two more primary colors than on Earth'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599332

In article <e5bmebF7cbgU1@mid.individual.net>
Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
>
> Am 01.10.2016 20:34, schrieb Hägar:
>
> > Aliens are never Black because there are no Black people in the
> > Universe. All people on Earth are just different shades of Brown.
> > There are no White or Black people.
> >
> > All people on Earth are just different shades of Brown.
> >
> >
> >
> > ...and how do you make Brown? You mix Red, Blue, and Yellow.
> >
>
> You get a nice brown by mixing red and green.

You get a bad brown by allowing negroes to enter your country.

> The brown of the skin is actually Melanin.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin
>
> So the difference in colour stems from the amount and type of these
> pigments in the skin.

How does that explain the predisposition of brown "people of 
color" to rob liquor stores, rape white women and shoot police 
officers?

> Melanin makes also dark hair and brown eyes.
>
> Without melanin the eyes are blue.

Without negroes or hispanics, your country is free of crime.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599413

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, 
sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy, soc.culture.african.american

Is there some reason you are arguing with retarded, crossposting 
trolls? Is it because Little Tommy seems to have finally learned his 
lesson and gone away and you're bored?

-- 
Terry Austin

Vacation photos from Iceland: 
https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/QaXQkB

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
    -- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599414

"Martin"  wrote in message 
news:d81d74fdc1d049f6c5e4cc888c52f72a@dizum.com...
>
> How does that explain the predisposition of brown "people of color" to rob 
> liquor stores, rape white women and shoot police officers?
>
> Without negroes or hispanics, your country is free of crime.

Why there are no black aliens: http://i.imgur.com/ZezwgQJ.png 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599665

In article <Zq6dnR53daIudm7KnZ2dnUU7-WfNnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> said:

> "Martin"  wrote in message 
>
>> How does that explain the predisposition of brown "people of color" to rob 
>> liquor stores, rape white women and shoot police officers?
>>
>> Without negroes or hispanics, your country is free of crime.
>
> Why there are no black aliens: http://i.imgur.com/ZezwgQJ.png 

Seriously, what diseased rocks _do_ all these five-year-olds crawl
out from under?

-- wds

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599737

William December Starr wrote:
> 
> In article <Zq6dnR53daIudm7KnZ2dnUU7-WfNnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> said:
> 
> > "Martin"  wrote in message
> >
> >> How does that explain the predisposition of brown "people of color" to rob
> >> liquor stores, rape white women and shoot police officers?
> >>
> >> Without negroes or hispanics, your country is free of crime.
> >
> > Why there are no black aliens: http://i.imgur.com/ZezwgQJ.png
> 
> Seriously, what diseased rocks _do_ all these five-year-olds crawl
> out from under?
> 
> -- wds


Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".


does that answer your question???? 


Get rid of all the white people...and you're free of racism.


maybe build an atomic bomb that kills only white people...


not japaneese people, white people...the white devils..

the lighter than blue people..

not the dark people...the light people.


Racism is A Disease of White People. --Albert Einstein 


The smartest guy in the world knows what the fuck he's talking about, don't he?


He built the bomb to kill German people, what color were they??? Blond hair, blue eyes...sounds like White people to me.


http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_The-Man-Who-Built-The-Atomic-Bomb.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599796

The Starmaker wrote:

----snip----

> Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".

It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
then he was a racist.

----snip----

Ned

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599803

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> ----snip----
> 
> > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> 
> It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> then he was a racist.

I don't get what you're saying, ...why does that make Einstein a racist????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599810

The Starmaker wrote:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > ----snip----
> >
> > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> >
> > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > then he was a racist.
>
> I don't get what you're saying, ...why does that make Einstein
> a racist????

Read it again: "It's a racist statement". How could you miss that?

Ned

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599812

Ned Latham wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > ----snip----
> > >
> > > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> > >
> > > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > > then he was a racist.
> >
> > I don't get what you're saying, ...why does that make Einstein
> > a racist????
> 
> Read it again: "It's a racist statement". How could you miss that?
> 
> Ned


I'm not that smart...I don't get it..why does that make Einstein
a racist???? Can you elaborate? Can you expand on it? Can you explain in detail
why Albert Einstein making that statement... makes Einstein a racist?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599827

The Starmaker wrote:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ----snip----
> > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> > > >
> > > > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > > > then he was a racist.
> > >
> > > I don't get what you're saying, ...why does that make Einstein
> > > a racist????
> >
> > Read it again: "It's a racist statement". How could you miss that?
>
> I'm not that smart...

Seems you're smart enough to recognise that you're not smart.
That's a start.

Just keep thinking: you'll  get there. Maybe.

----snip----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599826

In article <slrnnve13s.sds.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>, 
nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz says...
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> ----snip----
> 
> > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> 
> It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> then he was a racist.

Making disparaging remarks about your own ethnicity is generally not 
considered to be "racist".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599828

J. Clarke wrote:
> Ned Latham wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > 
> > ----snip----
> > 
> > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> > 
> > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > then he was a racist.
>
> Making disparaging remarks about your own ethnicity is generally
> not considered to be "racist".

And that's just Political Correctness bullshit, aimed at obfuscating
the hypocrisy of accepting Afro-American racism.

Ned

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599830

In article <slrnnveqou.bv5.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>, 
nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz says...
> 
> J. Clarke wrote:
> > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > 
> > > ----snip----
> > > 
> > > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> > > 
> > > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > > then he was a racist.
> >
> > Making disparaging remarks about your own ethnicity is generally
> > not considered to be "racist".
> 
> And that's just Political Correctness bullshit, aimed at obfuscating
> the hypocrisy of accepting Afro-American racism.

The real "political correctness" is seeing racism under every rock.  IMO 
people who do that are loons and I am bored with dealing with loons, so 
<plonk>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599838

J. Clarke wrote:
> Med Latham wrote:
> > J. Clarke wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ----snip----
> > > >
> > > > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> > > >
> > > > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > > > then he was a racist.
> > >
> > > Making disparaging remarks about your own ethnicity is generally
> > > not considered to be "racist".
> >
> > And that's just Political Correctness bullshit, aimed at obfuscating
> > the hypocrisy of accepting Afro-American racism.
>
> The real "political correctness" is seeing racism under every rock.

Wrong. That's *a* real Political Correctness. Another is the one I
pointed out to you. People who recognise the one and posture over
the other are hypocrites, not worth shitting on.

----prejudicial bullshit snipped----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#599871

J. Clarke wrote:
> 
> In article <slrnnve13s.sds.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>,
> nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz says...
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > ----snip----
> >
> > > Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People".
> >
> > It's a racist statement: if it's true that Einstein said it,
> > then he was a racist.
> 
> Making disparaging remarks about your own ethnicity is generally not
> considered to be "racist".


Let me make something clear to everyone once and for all...

Albert Einstein 'did not' make disparaging remarks about his own ethnicity  here because

Albert Winstein is not White, he's Jewish!

Albert Einstein belongs to the Jewish Race, not the White Race.

for further information:


In May 1987 the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision that
Jews are a "race" for purposes of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

Shaare Tefila Congregation v. Cobb, 481 U.S. 615, 617-18 (1987)


and here is a conversation plus the video:


Here's a transcript from 60 minutes where you can read Mike Wallace saying he's Jewish, not White:

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

MIKE WALLACE, CBS`s "60 MINUTES": Black History Month, you find...

MORGAN FREEMAN, ACTOR: Ridiculous.

WALLACE: Why?

FREEMAN: You`re going to relegate my history to a month?

WALLACE: Come on.

FREEMAN: What do you do with yours? Which month is White History Month? Come on, tell me.

WALLACE: I`m Jewish.

FREEMAN: OK. Which month is Jewish History Month?

WALLACE: There isn`t one.

FREEMAN: Why not? Do you want one?

WALLACE: No, no.

FREEMAN: I don`t either. I don`t want a Black History Month. Black history is American history.

WALLACE: How are we going to get rid of racism until...?

FREEMAN: Stop talking about it. I`m going to stop calling you a white man. And I`m going to ask you to stop calling me a black man.
 I know you as Mike Wallace. You know me as Morgan Freeman. You`re not going to say, "I know this white guy named Mike Wallace." Hear what I`m saying? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRnTovm26I4





So, when Albert Einstein Called Racism "A Disease of White People"...he was talking about White people, not himself cause he knows that
he is not White, he is Jewish, of the Jewish race..not of the White or Black race.


I hope that helps.



The Starmaker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web