Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #597688 > unrolled thread

Telepathy drug

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 07:25 -0700
    Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-20 10:33 -0500
      Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 09:39 -0700
        Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-20 19:31 +0000
          Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 16:51 -0700
            Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-21 00:35 +0000
              Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 17:44 -0700
                Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-20 21:36 -0500
                Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-21 05:48 +0000
                  Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 08:32 -0700
                    Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 09:29 -0500
                      Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 07:45 -0700
                        Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 10:35 -0500
                        Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-22 15:35 +0000
                          Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 11:02 -0700
                            Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:23 -0500
                            Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:25 -0500
                            Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-22 19:27 +0000
                              Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:13 -0700
                                Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 15:48 -0500
                                Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-22 20:48 +0000
                                  Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 16:57 -0700
                                    Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 18:48 -0700
                                      Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 19:09 -0700
                                        Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-23 03:13 +0000
                                          Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 21:56 -0700
                                            Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-23 13:15 +0000
                                          Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-23 08:42 -0500
                                            Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 06:54 -0700
                                              Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:19 -0700
                                                Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:57 -0700
                                                  Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-23 10:22 -0500
                                                  Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-23 17:12 +0000
                                                    Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 10:57 -0700
                                                      Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-23 13:18 -0500
                                                Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 09:57 -0500
                                            Re: Telepathy drug pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-09-23 20:37 -0700
                                              Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-24 14:43 +0000
                                                Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 08:16 -0700
                                                  Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-24 12:16 -0500
                                                  Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-24 19:13 +0000
                                                    Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 13:39 -0700
                                        Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:10 -0500
                                      Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:08 -0500
                                    Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-23 03:05 +0000
                                    Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:06 -0500
                    Re: Telepathy drug moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-22 15:32 +0000
    Re: Telepathy drug "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 12:26 -0700
      Re: Telepathy drug "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-20 12:33 -0700
    Re: Telepathy drug Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-23 22:14 +1000
      Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 06:16 -0700
        Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 08:20 -0500
          Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 06:34 -0700
            Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 06:39 -0700
              Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 09:51 -0500
                Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 08:02 -0700
                  Re: Telepathy drug john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 08:26 -0700
                    Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 11:05 -0500
                  Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 11:04 -0500
                    Re: Telepathy drug Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-23 13:22 -0500
            Re: Telepathy drug Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 08:39 -0500

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#597688 — Telepathy drug

A new drug will come out enabling
people to
recover their capacity for telepathy.
Oh oh.
Then you find out who
gives a shit, and who's in it for #1.

Why do I think this?
90% of our brain is never used.
We're like a cell phone in an
old person's hands

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#597696

On 9/20/2016 9:25 AM, john wrote:
> A new drug will come out enabling
> people to
> recover their capacity for telepathy.
> Oh oh.
> Then you find out who
> gives a shit, and who's in it for #1.
>
> Why do I think this?
> 90% of our brain is never used.
> We're like a cell phone in an
> old person's hands
>

the voices you are hearing in your head,
if one of them is the operator,
  you got an old land line.

what if dogs have telepathy ?
all these strange dogs would be popping into your head telling you to do 
stuff. What if they just barked telepathy wise ?

90% of brain not used ? no problem, you going to get really old anyway 
and only use 10% then anyway.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597700

Sergio said
"
90% of brain not used ? no problem, you going to get really old anyway 
and only use 10% then anyway. "

Unless as you get old you figure
out what is taking you down, and
how to cure it- don't listen
to doctors; they get paid when you
are sick

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597726

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Sergio said
>"
>90% of brain not used ? no problem, you going to get really old anyway 
>and only use 10% then anyway. "

>Unless as you get old you figure
>out what is taking you down, and
>how to cure it- don't listen
>to doctors; they get paid when you
>are sick

So have you figured out what is taking you down, John?  Little Pharma, or
something more insidious?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597780

Michael
"
So have you figured out what is taking you down, John?  Little Pharma, or 
something more insidious? "

Shingled my cabin roof this summer.
Hammer and nails.
Fun.
Exposed my entire septic system right
down to the holding tank. Fixed the
levels. Covered it back up.
Shovel.
Easy.
Walk dogs every day. Temporarily lost
my keys today because I was running
too fast.
Figured out where they bounced out.
Perception.

Haven't paid a dime to
Big Pharma for 16 years.
No one has to.
Just quit eating members of our
own Kingdom.

What was your question Michelle?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597786

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>"
>So have you figured out what is taking you down, John?  Little Pharma, or 
>something more insidious? "

<snip list of healthy body but no healthy mind>

>What was your question Michelle?

I was responding to your reply to Sergio, where he wrote of the brain
(not the rest of the body):

>90% of brain not used ? no problem, you going to get really old anyway
>and only use 10% then anyway. "

So I'll ask again, and I'll be more specific this time:

So have you figured out what is taking your mind/brain down, John?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597787

Michelle
I assume you're trying to
get info on the
Alzheimer's that you're getting.
I told you- go vegan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597793

On 9/20/2016 7:44 PM, john wrote:
> Michelle
> I assume you're trying to
> get info on the
> Alzheimer's that you're getting.
> I told you- go vegan
>

too late for HILLARY !!  => Steak and Gin Tonics every night

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597806

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michelle
>I assume you're trying to
>get info on the
>Alzheimer's that you're getting.
>I told you- go vegan

No, John.  Either you are playing stupid or you are stupid.

While it's great that your body is physically in great shape, the same
thing can't be said for your mind.

The most obvious is the raging, untreated OCD.  You also can't seem to 
follow ordinary logic at all.  Your behavior, at least what can be seen
in this newsgroup, is all screwed up.  Illogical.

Why?

Perhaps too many "Little Pharma" products?

Or is it the veganism?

Or perhaps some underlying condition?
Maybe even one that "Big Pharma" has an excellent treatment for? (OCD for
instance)  Naah, forget that. You won't give Big Pharma a dime.  You'd
rather suffer in silence, or entertain yourself with "Little Pharma".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597822

Poor Michelle
Trying on his high-heeled shoes,
he seeks refuge in Logic.
Point particles are LOGICAL,
he says.
That way you can have an
infinite number on your
point like thingy.
Wow!!
And Nothing is also logical.
Why, Universal Expansion has to
be going SOMEWHERE, right?
Why not NOWHERE?
You're SO logical, Michelle.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597916

On 9/21/2016 10:32 AM, john wrote:
> Poor Michelle
> Trying on his high-heeled shoes,
> he seeks refuge in Logic.
> Point particles are LOGICAL,
> he says.
> That way you can have an
> infinite number on your
> point like thingy.

What infinite number do you think is associated with point particles, John?

> Wow!!
> And Nothing is also logical.
> Why, Universal Expansion has to
> be going SOMEWHERE, right?
> Why not NOWHERE?
> You're SO logical, Michelle.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597919

Odd said
"

What infinite number do you think is associated with point particles, John? 
"
Let's see, Odd.
If a point has NO SIZE, then ANY
volume should be capable of containing
an infinite number,

What NOTHING do you think the
Universe is "expanding universally" into?
tard-duo Michelle and Off

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597927

On 9/22/2016 9:45 AM, john wrote:
> Odd said
> "
>
> What infinite number do you think is associated with point particles, John?
> "
> Let's see, Odd.
> If a point has NO SIZE, then ANY
> volume should be capable of containing
> an infinite number,

No.

Because electrons are fermions. Look up Paul Exclusion Principle.

So that one being ruled out, what infinite number do you think is 
associated with point particles, John.

>
> What NOTHING do you think the
> Universe is "expanding universally" into?
> tard-duo Michelle and Off
>

What does this have to do with point particles, John?

By the way, and getting back on topic, you know that this myth about 
only using 10% of your brain is utter horseshit, don't you?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-people-only-use-10-percent-of-their-brains/




-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597928

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Odd said
>"

>What infinite number do you think is associated with point particles, John? 
>"
>Let's see, Odd.
>If a point has NO SIZE, then ANY
>volume should be capable of containing
>an infinite number,

Nope. Electrons are fermions, so you could have no more than the possible 
number of (non-spacial) quantum states at any one place.
Not to mention the electric charge repulsion all of them would have with
each other.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597932

Oh, so they DO have dimensions
of a repulsive sort, do they?
What are the dimensions
of this "quantum state"?
Can you draw it?
Why not?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597933

On 9/22/2016 1:02 PM, john wrote:
> Oh, so they DO have dimensions
> of a repulsive sort, do they?

No, they don't have "dimensions of a repulsive sort". Fermions obey the 
Pauli exclusion principle. This does not happen because of a volume.

> What are the dimensions
> of this "quantum state"?
> Can you draw it?
> Why not?
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597934

On 9/22/2016 1:02 PM, john wrote:
> Can you draw it?
> Why not?

John, draw potential energy. Can you? Why not?
Does this tell you that potential energy is mumbo-jumbo because it can't 
be drawn?
How about momentum? Can it be drawn?
How about temperature? Is that a real property? Draw it. If you can't, 
why not?

Are you getting a grip on why "Can you draw it?" is an inane question?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597946

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Oh, so they DO have dimensions
>of a repulsive sort, do they?

Where did you get "dimension" from?  Electric charge is a (quantized) 
scalar, meaning just a number.  Electric charge doesn't have dimensions.

>What are the dimensions
>of this "quantum state"?

Quantum states are also just numbers (integers).

In an atom, there are four quantum numbers for its electrons, n, l, m, s.
These are integers (except spin s which is half-integer).  They also don't
have dimensions.

Electrons are fermions, meaning they can't be in the same state as 
any other.  All electrons in an atom must have a different value for at 
least one of these numbers than any other electron in the atom.

>Can you draw it?
>Why not?

WTF?  These are a set of rules, not a drawing of a dog or something.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597955

You.
Don't.
Have.
A.
Model.

You have measurements.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597960

On 9/22/2016 3:13 PM, john wrote:
> You.
> Don't.
> Have.
> A.
> Model.
>
> You have measurements.
>

Have both, actually. It's just that what physicists recognize as a 
model, you don't. That's because you're expecting a museum exhibit with 
moving parts moving and meshing, and you can't recognize a physics model 
when it raises its hand.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web