Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #592093 > unrolled thread

Re: where some poles

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: where some poles Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 11:23 -0700
    Re: where some poles Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 13:41 -0500
      Re: where some poles noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 10:45 -0700
        Re: where some poles Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-24 13:19 -0500

#592093 — Re: where some poles

On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 3:41:18 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote:
> hold onto teh antithesis & its thesis ... well,
> I se nothing that might void the use of hygrometer(s --
> if you have a hygrometer some where
> 
> >Firstly, there must be electronegativity differences between its covalently bonded atoms.4 (These are, sometimes, referred to as “polar” bonds. In my opinion this designation is the source of a lot of confusion. Herein polarity is considered an attribute of a molecule in its entirety, not just its bonds.) The H2O molecule has electronegativity differences of 1.34 between its oxygen atom and any one of its two hydrogen atoms.4 Electronegativity differences between the atoms of any molecule do not change regardless of circumstances. Therefore, any purported variability of H2O polarity cannot be solely a consequence of electronegativity differences between its atoms.

I tried to warn you about McGinn.  You wouldn't listen.

Now see what is happening.

The only solution for McGinn is to ignore him.  Everything else just makes him stronger.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#592097

On 8/6/2016 1:23 PM, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 3:41:18 PM UTC-7, noTthaTguY wrote:
>> hold onto teh antithesis & its thesis ... well, I se nothing that
>> might void the use of hygrometer(s -- if you have a hygrometer some
>> where
>>
>>> Firstly, <snip crap> its atoms.
>
> I tried to warn you about McGinn.  You wouldn't listen.
>
> Now see what is happening.

yep, nothing.

>
> The only solution for McGinn is to ignore him.  Everything else just
> makes him stronger.
>

he is so mentally weak, *anything else* will make him stronger.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594511

yep, and, l00k,
he quoted himself, again, belowsville ...
taht is g00d for at least three zees

> yep, nothing.
> 
> >
> > The only solution for McGinn is to ignore him.  Everything else just
> > makes him stronger.
> >
> 
> he is so mentally weak, *anything else* will make him stronger.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#594516

On 8/24/2016 12:45 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> yep, and, l00k,
> he quoted himself, again, belowsville ...
> taht is g00d for at least three zees
>
>> yep, nothing.
>>
>>>
>>> The only solution for McGinn is to ignore him.  Everything else just
>>> makes him stronger.
>>>
>>
>> he is so mentally weak, *anything else* will make him stronger.
>

Of course, it was previously identified in this very forum probably by 
qualified scientists that,

  "he is so mentally weak, *anything else* will make him stronger" IBID,

even just one Tums would make him stronger. What if he took a whole roll ?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web