Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #592439 > unrolled thread

Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-08 16:56 -0700
    Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 07:14 -0500
    Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 11:37 -0700
      Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 21:29 -0700
        Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 17:34 -0700
          Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 19:46 -0500
          Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 07:07 -0500
      Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 21:02 -0500
      Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 07:11 -0700
        Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 11:20 -0700
          Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-17 14:52 -0500
        Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:54 -0700

#592439 — Re: How does heavier H2O get to the top of the troposphere

On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:

> Trust me, I’m a physicist...

Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#592479

On 8/8/2016 6:56 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>
>> Trust me, I’m a physicist...
>
> Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
>

Jim McGinn has some serious mental problems.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592532

On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
> > Trust me, I’m a physicist...
> 
> Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!

LOL.  McGinn wins again.  

Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?

What do you think this indicates?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592633

On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > 
> > > Trust me, I’m a physicist...
> > 
> > Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
> 
> LOL.  McGinn wins again.  
> 
> Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?
> 
> What do you think this indicates?

You tell em, Claude.

Go claude.  Go claude.  Go claude.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593309

On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 9:29:35 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
> > On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Trust me, I’m a physicist...
> > > 
> > > Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
> > 
> > LOL.  McGinn wins again.  
> > 
> > Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?
> > 
> > What do you think this indicates?
> 
> You tell em, Claude.
> 
> Go claude.  Go claude.  Go claude.

Jim, you dumbfuck, you probably aren't even aware that you are talking to yourself!

Are going to deny that these a$$holes are the same guys?

https://disqus.com/by/claudiusdenk/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcg8R1ALfDP7sGkeIEBjkMQ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593310

On 8/15/2016 7:34 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 9:29:35 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Trust me, I’m a physicist...
>>>>
>>>> Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
>>>
>>> LOL.  McGinn wins again.
>>>
>>> Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to asshole McGinn?
>>>
>>> What do you think this indicates?
>>
>> You tell em, asshole Claude.
>>
>> Go asshole claude.  Go asshole claude.  Go asshole claude.
>
> Jim, you dumbfuck, you probably aren't even aware that you are talking to yourself!
>
> Are going to deny that these a$$holes are the same guys?
>
> https://disqus.com/by/claudiusdenk/

note his followers: "retired attorney", and "Business lady"
Ha!

>
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcg8R1ALfDP7sGkeIEBjkMQ
>

here is more of His Dinkness, just an argumentive old airhead;

Discussion on Raw Story 399 comments
Astrophysicist deGrasse Tyson schools former GM exec Lutz on climate change
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Budzilla 4 years ago

His reasoning was worthless.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk 4 years ago

I thought that was surreal how Maher tried to say that Cap and Trade was 
republican.  It was never republican.  I don't even know where he gets 
this.  He's so out of touch.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk oddsrhuge 4 years ago

Well stated.  The only sensible thing Neil stated was to contradict 
Maher that science is (or should be) a consensus of experiment.  But he 
obviously hasn't applied this to global warming because if he had he'd 
have long ago realized that the experimental evidence for CO2 caused 
global warming is nonexistent.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Steve Lane 4 years ago

The global warming industrial complex intentionally conceals the 
distinction between temperature and heat.  The "evidence" you speak of 
is anecdotal nonsense.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Ryan Simon 4 years ago

Actually, there is zero peer-reveiwed and/or experimental evidence that 
CO2 has any kind of thermal effect on the atmosphere.  Global warming is 
cult phenomenon based science-based speculation.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Jordan Barker 4 years ago

Neil deGrasse-Tyson came across as perfectly ignorant about climatology.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk PithHelmut 4 years ago

The hole in the ozone notion was based on unverified speculation.  There 
is zero evidence that any "movement" had any effect on this phenomenon.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Ryan Simon 4 years ago

Mann cherrypicked data and concealed this from the public for over 15 
years.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Ryan Simon 4 years ago

They did not claim Mann was/is correct.  They simply stated, wrongly 
IMO, that they did not see convincing evidence of illegal activity.
View in discussion
Claudius Denk
Claudius Denk Susan Salisbury 4 years ago

Good advice.  What is surprising to me here is how completely 
nonscientific is the attitude of Mr. deGrasse Tyson.  From Maher it's 
expected.  He's obviously not a scientists.  But deGrasse seems to have 
swallowed AGW propaganda hook, line and sinker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593539

On 8/15/2016 7:34 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 9:29:35 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Trust me, I’m a physicist...
>>>>
>>>> Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
>>>
>>> LOL.  McGinn wins again.
>>>
>>> Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?
>>>
>>> What do you think this indicates?
>>
>> You tell em, Claude.
>>
>> Go claude.  Go claude.  Go claude.
>
> Jim, you dumbfuck, you probably aren't even aware that you are talking to yourself!
>
> Are going to deny that these a$$holes are the same guys?
>
> https://disqus.com/by/claudiusdenk/
>
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcg8R1ALfDP7sGkeIEBjkMQ
>

You know, of course, that you're talking with a barely functional mental 
basket case?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593322

On 8/9/2016 1:37 PM, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>
>>> Trust me, I’m a physicist...
>>
>> Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
>
> LOL.  McGinn sucks again.
>
> Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn's non argument?
>
> What do you think this indicates, McGinn is a Troll.
>
- show quoted text -

I regrettably concluded that he's a complete troll.  Irrational
attacks, non-sequitur posts, virtually content-free.  It's weird, like
he's sometimes responding to some hidden content that we can't see.
I'm stuck using Google for the time being or I'd remove the temptation
by plonking him.

So I suppose what I am saying is, there's no point in asking him for a
response.  Whatever you get will likely not be appropriate and will
only be annoying.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593540

On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > 
> > > Trust me, I’m a physicist...
> > 
> > Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
> 
> LOL.  McGinn wins again.  
> 
> Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?
> 
> What do you think this indicates?

It indicates they are brain-dead believers.  They can't think, they can't reason.  They just believe.  

These bozos can't explain anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593562

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 7:11:09 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
> > On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Trust me, I’m a physicist...
> > > 
> > > Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
> > 
> > LOL.  McGinn wins again.  
> > 
> > Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?
> > 
> > What do you think this indicates?
> 
> It indicates they are brain-dead believers.  They can't think, they can't reason.  They just believe.  
> 
> These bozos can't explain anything.

... with you being the biggest bozo of all, having never explained a single thing...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593577

On 8/17/2016 1:20 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 7:11:09 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 11:37:34 AM UTC-7, Claudius Denk wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 8, 2016 at 4:56:57 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Saturday, June 11, 2016 at 1:27:40 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Trust me, I’m a physicist...

>>>> Biggest lie of the year! You are no physicist, and you are an even worse pretender!
>>>
>>> LOL.  McGinn wins again.
>>>
>>> Ever note how you guys never have a counterargument to McGinn?
>>>
>>> What do you think this indicates?
>>
>> It indicates they are brain-dead believers.  They can't think, they can't reason.  They just believe.
>>
>> These bozos can't explain anything.
>
> ... with you being the biggest bozo of all, having never explained a single thing...
>

I have McGinn *plonked*, sounds like he is over in the corner mumbling 
again. I dont think he has ever been the member of a team, but a loaner.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#596849

mason jars go very well with hygrometers,
AFAiK

> These bozos can't explain anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web