Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #590575 > unrolled thread
| Started by | osbornfg@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-24 07:19 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-01 15:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 276 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 07:19 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-24 12:37 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 14:36 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:20 -0700
amazin noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:29 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 21:36 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 17:26 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 17:38 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 23:48 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 08:17 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 09:15 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 08:51 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-08-06 12:34 -0400
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 10:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 22:14 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 13:46 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 13:43 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 17:03 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:21 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:33 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:56 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-07 09:09 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 09:24 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 09:39 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 09:48 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 10:08 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 14:11 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 20:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 07:45 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 20:50 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-17 15:31 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-07 12:40 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 11:47 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 20:59 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 16:54 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 10:06 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-30 21:14 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 14:51 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-24 19:25 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:42 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints jmcginn@womply.com - 2016-07-28 11:34 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:16 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 16:16 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-28 18:14 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints B Gates <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-07-28 19:23 -0400
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 05:52 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 19:48 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 05:58 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 08:08 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 18:18 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 21:52 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-25 08:04 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-25 16:59 -0500
hence, dUh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:08 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 21:56 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 21:58 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 10:17 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 12:03 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-28 16:27 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints B Gates <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-07-28 21:38 -0400
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 11:28 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-14 13:52 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 12:40 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-08-15 12:58 +0000
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 12:12 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 21:25 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 09:55 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 16:25 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 11:36 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 04:30 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 15:31 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 19:19 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 20:21 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 23:09 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 22:33 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 22:32 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 22:48 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 05:19 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 10:45 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 05:28 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:50 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 06:54 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 08:04 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-20 12:13 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 11:30 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-13 13:53 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 18:30 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 19:07 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 22:52 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 22:47 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:18 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-28 16:43 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-28 17:11 -0700
bOOk, like, written with adverbs & so on noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 19:02 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:04 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:32 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:36 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 22:55 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 08:47 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 11:54 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 13:03 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-30 17:37 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 15:47 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-30 17:03 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-30 22:22 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 10:33 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 13:31 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 00:37 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 08:18 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 08:30 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 10:30 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 10:39 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-07-31 11:11 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-31 13:33 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 01:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 08:20 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 11:02 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 10:06 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 20:02 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 22:49 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 21:25 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 07:37 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-02 10:55 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-02 13:44 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 16:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 22:19 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 22:28 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 06:16 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-04 09:25 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 22:06 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 19:34 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 08:08 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 13:08 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-04 09:26 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 08:11 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 08:49 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-04 11:02 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 10:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 11:40 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-04 15:37 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-04 08:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 20:33 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 19:01 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 21:42 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-29 13:09 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 12:59 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 15:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:24 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:31 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-07 15:22 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 09:13 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-08 12:06 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 11:36 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-08 16:32 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 19:24 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 19:30 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-08 22:05 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 11:51 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 20:59 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 19:54 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 19:55 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:37 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-29 21:43 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 12:08 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 20:25 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:39 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-11 21:50 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:05 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 21:51 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-08 21:56 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 13:02 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-13 23:39 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Gamma <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 11:49 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-18 09:07 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:04 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 11:05 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-09 16:29 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 14:48 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 14:49 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 16:59 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 17:36 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 20:40 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-13 23:54 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Hanna <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 16:09 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 19:05 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:16 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 19:28 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-25 11:29 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:34 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 06:02 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 16:39 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 17:19 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 17:39 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:13 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-29 21:18 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:30 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-29 21:42 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-08-29 21:01 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-29 20:39 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 00:27 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 17:51 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 19:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 20:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 20:58 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 21:15 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 21:26 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 05:53 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-27 12:47 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-29 11:26 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:49 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 18:02 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 20:59 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-11 21:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 20:03 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-09-12 20:15 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 05:03 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-12 22:12 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergoi <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-13 08:36 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 22:26 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-17 10:00 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 16:17 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-17 23:59 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 06:05 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 20:55 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 05:54 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-31 12:44 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 20:49 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 21:40 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:13 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 08:52 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints frank osborn <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 09:59 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 11:38 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 13:53 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 08:24 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 20:52 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 07:40 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 20:46 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 21:48 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-30 13:42 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-31 11:50 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 12:37 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 21:27 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 13:21 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 09:47 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:11 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 13:15 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 08:25 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 21:00 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 19:08 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 21:18 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-13 23:43 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 13:13 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 14:16 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-13 23:40 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:06 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 08:09 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-15 14:07 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 22:50 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 17:01 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints osbornfg@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 01:10 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 09:57 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:34 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-01 20:04 -0500
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 22:00 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:51 -0700
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 23:06 -0700
after bad noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:45 -0700
Page 13 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 Next page →
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 13:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c621989b-b486-4151-a8ae-2f9d50c356a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593118 |
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:59:44 AM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas phase and creates drops. Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase doesn't start until it acheives boiling, which is much higher than is available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is a gas phase at ambient temps before you go asking McGinn to explain why he assumes there is not one. Your imagination isn't evidence. You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you believe and what you know.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 08:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nosfpj$4ql$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593154 |
On 8/14/2016 3:53 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:59:44 AM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > >> Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas >> phase and creates drops. > > Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. > > McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase > doesn't start until it acheives boiling, that is where McGinn is obviously wrong to anyone who knows science, and it brands him as a kook and a liar > which is much higher than is > available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is > a gas phase at ambient temps no you do not. McGinn has to prove it. McGinn is posting as Denk. > before you go asking McGinn to explain > why he assumes there is not one. wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because he cannot do it. > > Your imagination isn't evidence. it is McGinns imagination. > > You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you > believe and what you know. which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 20:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7ec9a3ba-295d-4c9b-891e-9f4561d7b3bb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593208 |
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 8/14/2016 3:53 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:59:44 AM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > > > >> Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas > >> phase and creates drops. > > > > Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. > > > > McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase > > doesn't start until it acheives boiling, > > that is where McGinn is obviously wrong to anyone who knows science, and > it brands him as a kook and a liar LOL. So, if truth is obvious why do we need scientific methods? > > > > which is much higher than is > > available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is > > a gas phase at ambient temps > > no you do not. McGinn has to prove it. McGinn is posting as Denk. > > > > before you go asking McGinn to explain > > why he assumes there is not one. > > wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because > he cannot do it. McGinn submitted the steam tables. You have nothing that contradicts steam tables. So . . . > > > > > Your imagination isn't evidence. > > it is McGinns imagination. So, are you saying McGinn just imagined the steam tables? > > > > > You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you > > believe and what you know. > > > which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk. Sergio, tell us why you think the people that made the steam tables were lying?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 07:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nov1ku$1lgi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593339 |
On 8/15/2016 10:52 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: >> On 8/14/2016 3:53 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: >>> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:59:44 AM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: >>> >>>> Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas >>>> phase and creates drops. >>> >>> Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. >>> >>> McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase >>> doesn't start until it acheives boiling, >> >> that is where McGinn is obviously wrong to anyone who knows science, and >> it brands him as a kook and a liar > > LOL. So, if truth is obvious why do we need scientific methods? non-responsive. > > >> >> >>> which is much higher than is >>> available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is >>> a gas phase at ambient temps >> >> no you do not. McGinn has to prove it. McGinn is posting as Denk. >> >> >>> before you go asking McGinn to explain >>> why he assumes there is not one. >> >> wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because >> he cannot do it. > > McGinn submitted the steam tables. You have nothing that contradicts steam tables. So . . . liar, you are McGinn and you dont know what a steam table is, except at a Cafateria. > >> >>> >>> Your imagination isn't evidence. >> >> it is McGinns imagination. > > So, are you saying McGinn just imagined the steam tables? that is what you and McGinn, are saying, that you imagine steam tables. > >> >>> >>> You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you >>> believe and what you know. >> >> >> which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk. > > Sergio, tell us why you think the people that made the steam tables were lying? why do you say they are lying ? Oh, you McGinn, lie all the time. Why do you think your troll book got 2 bad reviews, and only one person bought it, which was you ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 20:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9f4531ab-ca6a-4d64-b9b7-7160420f65dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593208 |
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-7, Gamma wrote: > On 8/14/2016 3:53 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:59:44 AM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > > > >> Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas > >> phase and creates drops. > > > > Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. > > > > McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase > > doesn't start until it acheives boiling, > > that is where McGinn is obviously wrong to anyone who knows science, and > it brands him as a kook and a liar > > > > which is much higher than is > > available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is > > a gas phase at ambient temps > > no you do not. McGinn has to prove it. The boiling temperature of H2O is firmly established. There is zero evidence of gaseous H2O below its boiling temperature. There is nothing to prove because it has already been proven. There is nothing to debate on this issue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-29 21:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9067675b-0f57-411e-9a38-79f1cd272a78@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593208 |
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > On 8/14/2016 3:53 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:59:44 AM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > > > >> Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas > >> phase and creates drops. > > > > Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. > > > > McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase > > doesn't start until it acheives boiling, > > that is where McGinn is obviously wrong to anyone who knows science, and > it brands him as a kook and a liar > > > > which is much higher than is > > available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is > > a gas phase at ambient temps > > no you do not. McGinn has to prove it. McGinn submitted steam tables as proof. You have no dispute. Right? Looks like you lost . . . again. McGinn is posting as Denk. > > > > before you go asking McGinn to explain > > why he assumes there is not one. > > wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because > he cannot do it. > > > > > Your imagination isn't evidence. > > it is McGinns imagination. Steam tables seem fairly decisive to me. Your turn. > > > > > You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you > > believe and what you know. > > > which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-30 13:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a6a4dde0-116d-44e4-ac66-6c39b80ed17d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #595204 |
if there are no f00tnotes to the steamtables, then they are probably for use by boilerr00m operators, but not telemarketeering, such as you wish to have for your supposed b00k ... I'll bet it has letters in it, though > McGinn submitted steam tables as proof. You have no dispute. Right? > > Looks like you lost . . . again. > > > > > McGinn is posting as Denk. > > > > > > > before you go asking McGinn to explain > > > why he assumes there is not one. > > > > wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because > > he cannot do it. > > > > > > > > Your imagination isn't evidence. > > > > it is McGinns imagination. > > > Steam tables seem fairly decisive to me. Your turn. > > > > > > > > > You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you > > > believe and what you know. > > > > > > which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-31 11:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nq71so$fbs$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #595275 |
On 8/30/2016 3:42 PM, noTthaTguY wrote: > if there are no f00tnotes to the steamtables, then > they are probably for use by boilerr00m operators, but > not telemarketeering, such as you wish to have > for your supposed b00k ... I'll bet it has letters in it, though STEMtables for science class. Steamed Tabloids Seam Toriods Solient Tormadios Solvient Tormadose > >> McGinn submitted steam tables as proof. You have no dispute. Right? >> >> Looks like you lost . . . again. >> >> >> >> >> McGinn is posting as Denk. >>> >>> >>>> before you go asking McGinn to explain >>>> why he assumes there is not one. >>> >>> wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because >>> he cannot do it. >>> >>>> >>>> Your imagination isn't evidence. >>> >>> it is McGinns imagination. >> >> Steam tables seem fairly decisive to me. Your turn. >> >>> >>>> >>>> You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you >>>> believe and what you know. >>> >>> >>> which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 12:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nosull$rnh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593118 |
On 8/14/2016 11:59 AM, frank osborn wrote: > James McGinn wrote: > > > Frank wrote> What about Sergio's math ?; >>> >>>> Sergio >> what is the ratio of surface area (SA= 4*pi*r^2), to >>>> volume of a sphere >>> (V= 4/3*pi*r^3) ? ratio of surface to volume = >>> (4*pi*r^2)/(4/3*pi*r^3) = 3/r >>>> which *decreases* with smaller drop size.. > > > James McGinn wrote:> Please state in plain english why you think this > is significant with respect to my hypothesis. (note: James McGinn does not understand simple high school algebra.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-16 21:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a148e32b-4495-4881-bc02-bd19dcee2853@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593236 |
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 10:38:03 AM UTC-7, Gamma wrote: > On 8/14/2016 11:59 AM, frank osborn wrote: > > James McGinn wrote: > > > > > > Frank wrote> What about Sergio's math ?; > >>> > >>>> Sergio >> what is the ratio of surface area (SA= 4*pi*r^2), to > >>>> volume of a sphere > >>> (V= 4/3*pi*r^3) ? ratio of surface to volume = > >>> (4*pi*r^2)/(4/3*pi*r^3) = 3/r > >>>> which *decreases* with smaller drop size.. > > > > > > James McGinn wrote:> Please state in plain english why you think this > > is significant with respect to my hypothesis. > > (note: James McGinn does not understand simple high school algebra.) I knew you couldn't do it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 13:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f53e948e-3daa-4414-b6df-6f13f34c74d3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593097 |
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:40:55 PM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > > You looked at a picture and determine that the surface tension is decreasing? I looked at the same picture and determined that the relative surface tension is increasing. I'm not convinced that the slumping isn't simply the result of the fact that in smaller droplets the top of the droplet is closer to the surface. > > > > Did you read the paper yet? Frank, what was the point of the paper. And how is it relevant to James' hypothesis? You were asked this. Sergio was asked this. Nobody gave an answer. Why do you think it is you can't explain its relevance? You said your thoughts were just conjecture. > > > What about Sergio's math ?; > > >Sergio >> > >what is the ratio of surface area (SA= 4*pi*r^2), to volume of a sphere > (V= 4/3*pi*r^3) ? > ratio of surface to volume = (4*pi*r^2)/(4/3*pi*r^3) = 3/r > >which *decreases* with smaller drop size.. > > > James: > What the fuck are you talking about? You determined all of this from looking at pictures of microdroplets? > > > > Did you read the paper yet? It would be easier to discuss it if we both have read it. Go ahead, discuss it. What are you waiting for? > > > Frank; > > and therefore humid air is, as basic science predicts, lighter than dry air. > > > > James ; > Bull shit. You have nothing but your imagination to back this up. Show us the definitive evidence. > > > > How about the periodic table of elements? And "not" ignoring liquid to gas, H2O gas will displace heaver gas per volume and be lighter? > > > Frank;>> So H2O gas must add to the Hot/cold convection of air masses. > > > James;>> Absurd speculation. Prove it. > > Lighter gases are buoyant? Hot air rises and cold air sinks? This is one fact. There are other factors at play here, such as electrostatic forces. Right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 09:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <noskmm$c0k$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593148 |
On 8/14/2016 3:21 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:40:55 PM UTC-7, frank osborn > wrote: >> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-5, James McGinn >> wrote: > > This is one fact. There are other factors at play here, such as > electrostatic forces. Right? wrong, that is your imagination. the electrostatic forces are between your ears, and sum to Zero.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ca2c654-e715-4974-8009-444a1a5442ff@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593097 |
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:40:55 PM UTC-7, Paco wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > > You looked at a picture and determine that the surface tension is decreasing? I looked at the same picture and determined that the relative surface tension is increasing. I'm not convinced that the slumping isn't simply the result of the fact that in smaller droplets the top of the droplet is closer to the surface. > > > > Did you read the paper yet? Do you have a point? You said your thoughts were just conjecture. > > > What about Sergio's math ? What about it? ; > > >Sergio >> > >what is the ratio of surface area (SA= 4*pi*r^2), to volume of a sphere > (V= 4/3*pi*r^3) ? > ratio of surface to volume = (4*pi*r^2)/(4/3*pi*r^3) = 3/r > >which *decreases* with smaller drop size.. > > > James: > What the fuck are you talking about? You determined all of this from looking at pictures of microdroplets? > > > > Did you read the paper yet? It would be easier to discuss it if we both have read it. > > > Frank; > > and therefore humid air is, as basic science predicts, lighter than dry air. > > > > James ; > Bull shit. You have nothing but your imagination to back this up. Show us the definitive evidence. > > > > How about the periodic table of elements? And "not" ignoring liquid to gas, H2O gas will displace heaver gas per volume and be lighter? > > > Frank;>> So H2O gas must add to the Hot/cold convection of air masses. > > > James;>> Absurd speculation. Prove it. > > Lighter gases are buoyant? Hot air rises and cold air sinks? Yeah, so?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb646883-1117-4b66-8816-0e9c45091548@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593076 |
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 5:36:06 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 4:59:36 PM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 3:00:48 PM UTC-5, Claudius Denk wrote: > > > I can't figure out what your point is. > > > > http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01875.x/full#f4 > > > > My point being, I can see the reduction of volume of the droplet and the slumping of the remaining volume as the surface tension reduces. > > You looked at a picture and determine that the surface tension is decreasing? I looked at the same picture and determined that the relative surface tension is increasing. I'm not convinced that the slumping isn't simply the result of the fact that in smaller droplets the top of the droplet is closer to the surface. > > > > > > So I can't see an alternate process that can get around evaporation, to create droplets especially in defiance of the conservation of energy. > > OMG, what do you think CoE has to do with it? Honestly. Be explicit. James, I predict Frank will never answer this question because he doesn't even know what he meant when he stated this. Sheep do as sheep do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 08:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nosfsr$4ro$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593146 |
On 8/14/2016 3:15 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 5:36:06 PM UTC-7, James McGinn > wrote: >> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 4:59:36 PM UTC-7, frank osborn >> wrote: >>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 3:00:48 PM UTC-5, Claudius Denk >>> wrote: >>>> I can't figure out what your point is. >>> > > > James, > > I predict Frank will never answer this question because he doesn't > even know what he meant when he stated this. > > Sheep do as sheep do. > Frank = Denk = McGinn. why ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 21:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nots4e$5ef$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593146 |
On 8/14/2016 3:15 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 5:36:06 PM UTC-7, James McGinn > wrote: > - show quoted text - I regrettably concluded that he's a complete troll. Irrational attacks, non-sequitur posts, virtually content-free. It's weird, like he's sometimes responding to some hidden content that we can't see. I'm stuck using Google for the time being or I'd remove the temptation by plonking him. So I suppose what I am saying is, there's no point in asking him for a response. Whatever you get will likely not be appropriate and will only be annoying.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paco <osbornfg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 19:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d3fa936f-e503-44ac-a9da-d7b165f40fb3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593321 |
o dam...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-15 21:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nott66$6uq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593324 |
On 8/15/2016 9:08 PM, Paco wrote: > o dam... > ha, I did a c+p from a old post in 2010 from a C the Denk thread. for at least the last 6 years he's trolled, James McGinn Claud the Dink is like dried wheat chaff in a dead field. Nothing there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-13 23:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <noostv$182n$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #593074 |
On 8/13/2016 6:59 PM, frank osborn wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 3:00:48 PM UTC-5, Claudius Denk > wrote: >> I can't figure out what your point is. > > http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01875.x/full#f4 > > > My point being, I can see the reduction of volume of the droplet and > the slumping of the remaining volume as the surface tension reduces. > > So I can't see an alternate process that can get around evaporation, > to create droplets especially in defiance of the conservation of > energy. Its clear enough for me, evaporation (liquid to gas) is a > valid process, and therefore humid air is, as basic science predicts, > lighter than dry air. So H2O gas must add to the Hot/cold convection > of air masses. > > it is far easier than that, just weigh the molecules, go to the wiki and look up the weights of O2, N2, H2O, and any others. H2O is the lightest. yes it is that simple, something Pointless McDinkey always misses.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-14 13:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dc890ba9-ceaa-4fe3-a6d0-9aa955062672@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #593074 |
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 4:59:36 PM UTC-7, frank osborn wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 3:00:48 PM UTC-5, Claudius Denk wrote: > > I can't figure out what your point is. > > http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01875.x/full#f4 > > My point being, I can see the reduction of volume of the droplet and the slumping of the remaining volume as the surface tension reduces. > > So I can't see an alternate process that can get around evaporation, to create droplets especially in defiance of the conservation of energy. > Its clear enough for me, evaporation (liquid to gas) is a valid process, What does this, "it's clear to me," even mean. Are you saying it is clear to you because you have evidence that this happens? Or are you saying it is clear because you can imagine it? Answer these questions. You prove that McGinn is right. Other than your imagination you have no evidence that H2O turns to gas during evaporation. Right? So, Frank, can you explain how something for which you have no positive evidence is "clear?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web