Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #590892 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-26 21:25 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-29 12:04 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 97 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 21:25 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:49 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-27 13:42 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:26 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 09:29 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-27 15:08 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:37 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 12:04 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-27 20:48 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 05:04 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 07:12 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom B Gates <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-07-28 19:43 -0400
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-28 14:16 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 09:35 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 09:43 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-28 18:02 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:27 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:28 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-29 05:20 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 06:30 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-29 15:18 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 08:23 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 10:49 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-29 18:12 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:08 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-30 05:52 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 05:07 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-30 17:12 -0400
Processes that _consume_ energy. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 11:57 -0700
Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 12:19 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-05 19:51 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 13:01 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:36 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:28 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 18:36 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-06 01:18 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 20:45 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-06 13:49 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 07:05 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 11:38 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 11:51 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 11:59 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-06 22:31 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 16:09 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-07 00:01 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 17:10 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-07 05:15 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 05:38 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 06:23 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-07 22:44 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 16:58 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-08 01:48 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 19:03 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-08 03:58 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 00:57 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 07:54 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-08 15:24 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-08 15:15 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 10:29 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 14:47 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 17:13 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 19:13 -0400
waves-ies noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 13:24 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-07 13:24 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 06:32 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 06:45 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 09:01 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:05 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:30 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:32 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 10:19 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-07 22:24 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:00 -0400
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 15:07 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-06 23:10 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-06 01:00 +0000
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 15:16 -0500
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-05 16:12 -0400
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 13:32 -0700
Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-05 19:23 -0400
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:48 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 12:54 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 13:21 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-31 23:01 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 06:26 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 08:54 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-01 14:32 +0000
waves alfvenic, slow, fast, nedium noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 15:47 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:06 -0500
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-27 19:05 +0000
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:22 -0500
dictions of pre-that-and-this noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 17:22 -0700
Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 07:04 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom B Gates <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-07-28 19:39 -0400
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 19:12 -0700
Re: Predictions of Galaxy Model for the Atom Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-29 12:04 -0700
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 11:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <a45336f6-84e1-4f3d-a37d-f4b1041707ef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592072 |
The double-layered spherical halo of old globular stars, moving in different directions, is caused by precession of the spinning disc. Every second time the disc comes through, the edge is going the opposite way, since the precession is twice the rotation, and these globular clusters are coming off the ends of the arms. (See Benzene: http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/BenzeneE.GIF )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 11:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <f98775d6-d467-4ec9-b531-6d15ece91bfe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592095 |
Galactic rotation curves are different on opposite sides of the disc. The curve used is always an average of the two. Why do the stars appear to be going different speeds on different sides of the disc? Because one side is coming towards you, and the other is receding; the disc is precessing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 11:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <62a02eda-008f-4026-8a4c-772acdaf617c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592100 |
Something like 85% of spiral galaxies that can be seen well-enough have opposite warping on the edge of their disc- like a sombrero with one edge bent up and the opposite bent down. Cause? Precession.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 22:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <no5ofm$n5h$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592101 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Something like 85% of spiral galaxies >that can be seen well-enough have >opposite warping on the edge of >their disc- like a sombrero with one edge >bent up and the opposite bent down. >Cause? Precession. You really really need to talk to a doctor about this precession OCD or whatever it really is. Seriously. I mean it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 16:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <c469cb8c-2b6f-49e5-8ce1-0ff4b591381a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592133 |
Michael Moroney - show quoted text - You really really need to talk to a doctor about this precession OCD or whatever it really is. Seriously. I mean it. ----------- John has obviously been prescribing his own medications.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 00:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <no5tp8$jbr$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592135 |
HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> writes: >Michael Moroney >- show quoted text - >You really really need to talk to a doctor about this precession OCD >or whatever it really is. >Seriously. I mean it. >----------- >John has obviously been prescribing his own medications. Little Pharma!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-06 17:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <dd4b2113-e623-41fc-b5c4-07301e7ef936@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592148 |
Mickey Yep. Spherical double- layered halo. With different flows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 05:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <no6g5h$kjd$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592149 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Mickey >Yep. Spherical double- layered halo. >With different flows. Nope, the orbital planes of the clusters are essentially at random, other than near the plane of the galaxy disk itself, because of its influence. But go ahead and believe your spinny thing fantasy, as your OCD rages out of control.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 05:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <b0aed04a-243c-4a21-a266-4cec2ba63aa4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592179 |
Hey, Mickey, you're so fine http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/astronomers-discover-dizzying-spin-of-the-milky-way-galaxy-s-halo "Astronomers at the University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA) discovered for the first time that the hot gas in the halo of the Milky Way galaxy is spinning in the same direction and at comparable speed as the galaxy's disk, which contains our stars, planets, gas, and dust"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 06:23 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <5722457d-4534-421c-84fb-b1c0370ad7e9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592183 |
Hey, Mickey, you're so fine You're so fine you blow my mind. No, Michael. I've said it before. The whole galaxy is like a whirlpool- everything is carried along.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 22:44 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <no8dkh$se6$5@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592186 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Hey, Mickey, you're so fine >You're so fine you blow my mind. >No, Michael. >I've said it before. >The whole galaxy is like a whirlpool- >everything is carried along. Which is wrong, of course. The stars move into and out of the arms as they orbit the center. It resembles a standing wave more than anything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 16:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <477fbbd5-51b0-4cd8-9434-dce944d21b8d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592259 |
Mickey They said everything moves the same way at the same rate. Yes, stars move around in there. Bees move around in a beehive, too, but it can certainly be given spin. You guys are in SUCH denial
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 01:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <no8oda$bfe$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592262 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Mickey >They Who? > said everything moves the same >way at the same rate. Yes galactic rotation curves typically have stars all moving at the same speed regardless of their distance, beyond a certain distance. That does NOT mean it rotates as a solid unit since a star twice as far from the center as a second star moves at the same speed as the second star, but takes twice as long to go around, since it travels twice the distance. >Yes, stars move around in there. >Bees move around in a beehive, too, >but it can certainly be given spin. Yeah, so what? >You guys are in SUCH denial Denial of what? YOU are in denial of your own OCD.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-07 19:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <2ab06c07-02a2-4a4f-bbdc-28a0bf3b2b44@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592282 |
Mickey said "Who?" Mickey can't remember things. Here, Mickey- I c+p ed this from just up above: "Astronomers at the University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA) discovered for the first time that the hot gas in the halo of the Milky Way galaxy is spinning in the same direction and at comparable speed as the galaxy's disk, which contains our stars, planets, gas, and dust" That's who
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 03:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <no900e$fit$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592284 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Mickey said >"Who?" >Mickey can't remember things. You never quote what you are responding to. I just see these zero context quotes from you. >Here, Mickey- I c+p ed this from >just up above: Just up above what? I don't use the same newsreader you do so "just up above" has zero meaning. It's like Archie Pu's "front page hog" rants. I don't use Giggle Groups so I don't have any such thing as a "front page hog" as I don't have a front page to hog. Anyway, the globular clusters don't orbit in counter-rotating shells like you claimed, before you moved the goalposts to the gas rotating in one single direction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 00:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <5371b131-a6e3-4103-9166-dcab5bf044c9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592291 |
Michael said "Anyway, the globular clusters don't orbit in counter-rotating shells like you claimed, before you moved the goalposts to the gas rotating in one single direction. " There is more than one population of globular clusters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 07:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <4770799e-6275-43a5-9857-deeab47c9b28@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #592307 |
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/astronomers-discover-dizzying-spin-of-the-milky-way-galaxy-s-halo "Astronomers at the University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA) discovered for the first time that the hot gas in the halo of the Milky Way galaxy is spinning in the same direction and at comparable speed as the galaxy's disk, which contains our stars, planets, gas, and dust" Proving that a galaxy turns AS A UNIT. Proving that those who have been saying otherwise are FOS. Proving that DM is nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 15:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <noa86h$ud0$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592325 |
Because of the conservation of angular momentum, and assuming the Milky Way formed from this cloud in the first place, I would _expect_ the gas to have similar rotation to the Milky Way. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> tarded: >Proving that a galaxy turns AS A UNIT. Nope, it does not say that, they give different speeds. >Proving that those who have >been saying otherwise are FOS. Does not follow. >Proving that DM is nonsense. Did you notice that the article gives support for dark matter?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 15:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <noa7nf$ud0$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #592307 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Michael said >"Anyway, the globular clusters don't orbit in counter-rotating shells >like you claimed, before you moved the goalposts to the gas rotating in >one single direction. " >There is more than one population of >globular clusters. Sorry, no. That refers to all the globular clusters of the Milky Way that we can see from Earth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 10:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Processes that _consume_ energy. |
| Message-ID | <noa8h7$p5g$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #592284 |
On 8/7/2016 9:03 PM, john wrote: > Mickey said > "Who?" > Mickey can't remember things. > Here, Mickey- I c+p ed this from > just up above: > > "Astronomers at the University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science, and the > Arts (LSA) discovered for the first time that the hot gas in the halo of the Milky Way > galaxy is spinning in the same direction and at comparable speed as the galaxy's disk, > which contains our stars, planets, gas, and dust" > > That's who > So you can't read. I'll explain what this sentence means. At the position of the Sun, which is about 2/3 of the way out, the time for one complete revolution of the stars at that radius is 240 million years. But nearer the center, where the bar is (the Milky Way is a barred spiral galaxy), the time for one complete revolution is 110 million years. Further out to the edges, the time for one complete revolution is 360 million years. So CLEARLY the galaxy is not rotating as a unit. What the sentence in the article you quoted is saying is that the region of the halo that has about the same radius as the bar of the Milky Way also takes 110 million years to revolve. The region of the halo that is at distances about that of the sun is revolving once every 240 million years. So the halo is in synch with the Milky Way, though the whole Milky Way does not revolve as a unit. You keep telling people to pull their heads out of their asses, but John, what you are spouting off is due to the fact that you do not read much and you can't understand even the short things you do read. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web