Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591737 > unrolled thread

how to handle robots in sci.physics/ took only 2 minutes today to get rid of front page hog McGinn

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  how to handle robots in sci.physics/ took only 2 minutes today to get rid of front page hog McGinn Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 22:39 -0700
    Re: how to handle robots in sci.physics/ took only 2 minutes today to get rid of front page hog McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-03 10:35 -0500
      Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 14:55 -0700
        Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-04 01:03 +0000
          Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-04 21:09 +0200
            Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-04 20:35 +0000
              Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 15:58 -0700
                Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-04 23:42 +0000
                  Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-05 12:35 -0700
                    Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 12:52 -0700
                      Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-05 14:31 -0700
                        Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-05 18:44 -0500
                          Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-07 14:02 -0700
                            Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election?? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-08 22:58 -0500
                    What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-08-06 16:11 -0700
                      Re: What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-08-06 19:13 -0400
                        Re: NetCopping. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-08-06 19:40 -0400
                        Re: What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-08-08 00:56 +0000
                        Re: What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-14 09:34 +0200
                    Re: Little Man Syndrome. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-07 14:04 -0700
                      I posted a (PlainText) link, not a binary file. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-08-07 19:42 -0700
                        Re: I posted a (PlainText) link, not a binary file. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 22:16 -0700
                          Re: I posted a (PlainText) link, not a binary file. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 22:19 -0700
                          Re: I posted a (PlainText) link, not a binary file. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-07 23:23 -0700
                        Re: I posted a (PlainText) link, not a binary file. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:48 -0400

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#591737 — how to handle robots in sci.physics/ took only 2 minutes today to get rid of front page hog McGinn

Now there are at least two robots in sci.physics. A robot is some computer program with man-handlers of the robot. You can easily recognize a robot post of empty headed posts, airy in content, and mangled language. I am about 51 to 49 in favor of closing their account. They sometimes provide attention getting, but most times are distractions. I suppose with 2 or 3 robots in sci.physics, as Sam Wormley use to say-- plenty of bandwidth, to let them be. But I can see the day when robots number more than 3 and the place goes to the dogs. Too much of anything is too much. The worst of robots, is that they do not really push physics forward, but are a parasite of the newsgroup wanting to do physics. Robots with manhandlers are really about finding out how they perform as robots-- not on whether they do physics. At the moment I am reporting the robots as abuse, but expect nothing to be done about them.

I have no mixed emotions about McGinn and other front page hogs, as that is abusive posting-- knocking others off the front page because the hog is around.

I would like Google engineers to find a program that throws a poster on the fifth page if more than 2 posts of his are in the first 20 posts. Software that eliminates the bad behavior of front page hogging.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#591752

On 8/3/2016 12:39 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>
> I would like Google engineers to find a program that throws a poster
> on the fifth page if more than 2 posts of his are in the first 20
> posts. Software that eliminates the bad behavior of front page
> hogging.
>
> AP
>

cant do it.   a message gets posted on one server, then it probagates to 
the other news servers, what about 500 or more ?  (the news servers 
update from each other)

and google cannot take off a message on someone else's server(s)

what you can do is go over to another newsreader, like thunderbird, and 
sign up to several non google news servers, and block who you want to.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591778 — Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 10:36:11 AM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/3/2016 12:39 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 
> >
> > I would like Google engineers to find a program that throws a poster
> > on the fifth page if more than 2 posts of his are in the first 20
> > posts. Software that eliminates the bad behavior of front page
> > hogging.
> >
> > AP
> >
> 
> cant do it.   a message gets posted on one server, then it probagates to 
> the other news servers, what about 500 or more ?  (the news servers 
> update from each other)
> 
> and google cannot take off a message on someone else's server(s)
> 
> what you can do is go over to another newsreader, like thunderbird, and 
> sign up to several non google news servers, and block who you want to.

From an antiscience person like Sergio, this is choice, because a person who cannot accept the science of Global Warming, how likely is such an idiot with his opinion able to say Google cannot engineer something.

No wonder Sergio hides behind a fake name and hides behind a aioe address.

What Sergio and Republican Party have in common is both are Antiscience, anti truth.

The News media BBC, PBS, DW and all others, what they are missing in reporting in this election year cycle is the fact that the Republican Party is in a spiral-death-throes of a party going extinct. And in such a climax of extinction, a party will rear an ugly head of a deformed leadership, not normal people for president. And so we have Trump.

Now why Trump, well, better it be Trump so that he loses not only the election but loses some of his wealth, whereas the other candidates have not that much to lose. Subconsciously the people of USA know the Republican Party is in decline and extinction and so, the last vestiges of money of candidates is wanting a Trump to lose his money along with the election. The largest money candidate was Trump out of the 16. 

And let Trump say anything he wants to say, because we all know he is unfit and going to lose.

But the question really is, now, not how bad he will lose, but the question is, whether Trump cannot handle loss, and so, will he commit suicide. Will Trump take a overdose of opoids rather than face a world where he lost. A world where he dragged the Republican Party into a extinction. A party that is antiscience and stands for only a few items-- being white, being rich and buying guns.

A party, the Republican Party that no longer looks after, looks out for all Americans and is so, very much antiscience.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591804 — Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 10:36:11 AM UTC-5, Sergio wrote:
>> On 8/3/2016 12:39 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I would like Google engineers to find a program that throws a poster
>> > on the fifth page if more than 2 posts of his are in the first 20
>> > posts. Software that eliminates the bad behavior of front page
>> > hogging.
>> >
>> > AP
>> >
>>
>> cant do it.   a message gets posted on one server, then it probagates to
>> the other news servers, what about 500 or more ?  (the news servers
>> update from each other)
>>
>> and google cannot take off a message on someone else's server(s)
>>
>> what you can do is go over to another newsreader, like thunderbird, and
>> sign up to several non google news servers, and block who you want to.

>From an antiscience person like Sergio, this is choice, because a person
>who cannot accept the science of Global Warming, how likely is such an 
>idiot with his opinion able to say Google cannot engineer something.

I won't get into crap like global warming or the foolishness of the
Republicans, but Sergio's definitely right about Usenet. While Google has
produced some truly awesome products and some awesome code, Google Groups
is definitely not among them.  Google Groups has been broken for years and
they've _never_ even tried to fix it. I once commented that instead of
firing any incompetent programmers they may accidentally hire, they send
them to a dungeon deep below their main building, where they work on
making Google Groups worse.

Google doesn't control Usenet, they never have. Usenet was around long
before Google was. You should know that, you were posting on Usenet then!  
Instead of whining about Sergio or McGinn, you should get a proper
newsreader with a killfile, and plonk! you never hear from them again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591890 — Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

Michael Moroney wrote:

> I won't get into crap like global warming or the foolishness of the
> Republicans, but Sergio's definitely right about Usenet. While Google has
> produced some truly awesome products and some awesome code, Google Groups
> is definitely not among them.  Google Groups has been broken for years and
> they've _never_ even tried to fix it. I once commented that instead of
> firing any incompetent programmers they may accidentally hire, they send
> them to a dungeon deep below their main building, where they work on
> making Google Groups worse.

[x] YMMD
[x] sigged
[x] I want to read more of this.  Please fix your “From”.


PointedEars
-- 
”[…] instead of firing any incompetent programmers they may accidentally
 hire, they send them to a dungeon deep below their main building, where
 they work on making Google Groups worse.”
   –Michael Moroney in <news:nnu48k$c7o$1@pcls7.std.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591910 — Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:

>[x] YMMD
>[x] sigged
>[x] I want to read more of this.  Please fix your "From".

Thanks. I don't come up with stuff like that too often so there really
isn't much "more".
Removing the ".spaamtrap" spambuster makes the From: address emailable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591920 — Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 1:36:40 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> 
> >[x] YMMD
> >[x] sigged
> >[x] I want to read more of this.  Please fix your "From".
> 
> Thanks. I don't come up with stuff like that too often so there really
> isn't much "more".
> Removing the ".spaamtrap" spambuster makes the From: address emailable.

Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down by 10%,and knows the republicans are about to fire him. His only chance is the Godfather will start shooting.  TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591925 — Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:

> Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down by 10%,and
> knows the republicans are about to fire him.

If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 40.6% of the
vote from his high of 45.7% for Trump vs. Clinton.

If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 36.9% of the
vote from his high of 40.2% for Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein.

Trump holds no postion that the Republicans can fire him from.

Senile babbling fool.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591988 — Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 4:46:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down by 10%,and
> > knows the republicans are about to fire him.
> 
> If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 40.6% of the
> vote from his high of 45.7% for Trump vs. Clinton.
> 
> If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 36.9% of the
> vote from his high of 40.2% for Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein.
> 
> Trump holds no postion that the Republicans can fire him from.
> 
> Senile babbling fool.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino


Word is that "Rule 9" of the RNC is being discussed!

Double-A

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#591992 — Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 2:35:04 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 4:46:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down by 10%,and
> > > knows the republicans are about to fire him.
> > 
> > If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 40.6% of the
> > vote from his high of 45.7% for Trump vs. Clinton.
> > 
> > If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 36.9% of the
> > vote from his high of 40.2% for Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein.
> > 
> > Trump holds no postion that the Republicans can fire him from.
> > 
> > Senile babbling fool.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> 
> Word is that "Rule 9" of the RNC is being discussed!
> 
> Double-A

Question: Is Trump bald, so bald that he is so vain in wanting to not appear as bald. Would he be the first president to be "so vain as to cover up his baldness" whereas all the other bald presidents were not vain and were proud of being bald as president-- Eisenhower, etc.

In other words, Trump is antiscience which makes him disqualified to be president, for if any president cannot accept the truths of science-- global warming, they are unfit to lead this nation. But as for being bald and not able to appear in public as bald is a vanity issue that suggests Trump's mind is a childish mind, not a grown-up mature mind.

So, what is it? Is Trump bald and covering it up with a toupee or wig? And if not bald, why have a overcomb of long hair? Why not just be yourself, not a childish teenager mind about your hair, indicates Trump is not fit to be president. There was a funny website that sang the song "We shall overcome" with the words for Trump "We shall overcomb" which again shows how much Trump is a misfit as a politician, for the job of USA President is about people, not about Trump and his goofy teenager hair style.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592015 — Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 2:35:04 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 4:46:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > > reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down by 10%,and
> > > > knows the republicans are about to fire him.
> > > 
> > > If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 40.6% of the
> > > vote from his high of 45.7% for Trump vs. Clinton.
> > > 
> > > If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to 36.9% of the
> > > vote from his high of 40.2% for Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein.
> > > 
> > > Trump holds no postion that the Republicans can fire him from.
> > > 
> > > Senile babbling fool.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Jim Pennino
> > 
> > 
> > Word is that "Rule 9" of the RNC is being discussed!
> > 
> > Double-A
> 
> Question: Is Trump bald, so bald that he is so vain in wanting to not appear as bald. Would he be the first president to be "so vain as to cover up his baldness" whereas all the other bald presidents were not vain and were proud of being bald as president-- Eisenhower, etc.
> 
> In other words, Trump is antiscience which makes him disqualified to be president, for if any president cannot accept the truths of science-- global warming, they are unfit to lead this nation. But as for being bald and not able to appear in public as bald is a vanity issue that suggests Trump's mind is a childish mind, not a grown-up mature mind.
> 
> So, what is it? Is Trump bald and covering it up with a toupee or wig? And if not bald, why have a overcomb of long hair? Why not just be yourself, not a childish teenager mind about your hair, indicates Trump is not fit to be president. There was a funny website that sang the song "We shall overcome" with the words for Trump "We shall overcomb" which again shows how much Trump is a misfit as a politician, for the job of USA President is about people, not about Trump and his goofy teenager hair style.
> 
> AP


Trump vain?  What about Joe "Plugs" Biden?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592032 — Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On 8/5/2016 4:31 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium
> wrote:
>> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 2:35:04 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 4:46:05 PM UTC-7,
>>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down
>>>>> by 10%,and knows the republicans are about to fire him.

>>>> If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to
>>>> 40.6% of the vote from his high of 45.7% for Trump vs.
>>>> Clinton.
>>>>
>>>> If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to
>>>> 36.9% of the vote from his high of 40.2% for Trump vs. Clinton
>>>> vs. Johnson vs. Stein.
>>>>
>>>> Trump holds no postion that the Republicans can fire him from.
>>>>
>>>> Senile babbling fool.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Jim Pennino
>>>
>>>
>>> Word is that "Rule 9" of the RNC is being discussed!
>>>
>>> Double-A
>>
>> Question: Is Trump bald, so bald that he is so vain in wanting to
>> not appear as bald. Would he be the first president to be "so vain
>> as to cover up his baldness" whereas all the other bald presidents
>> were not vain and were proud of being bald as president--
>> Eisenhower, etc.

>> In other words, Trump is antiscience which makes him disqualified
>> to be president, for if any president cannot accept the truths of
>> science-- global warming, they are unfit to lead this nation. But
>> as for being bald and not able to appear in public as bald is a
>> vanity issue that suggests Trump's mind is a childish mind, not a
>> grown-up mature mind.
>>
>> So, what is it? Is Trump bald and covering it up with a toupee or
>> wig? And if not bald, why have a overcomb of long hair? Why not
>> just be yourself, not a childish teenager mind about your hair,
>> indicates Trump is not fit to be president. There was a funny
>> website that sang the song "We shall overcome" with the words for
>> Trump "We shall overcomb" which again shows how much Trump is a
>> misfit as a politician, for the job of USA President is about
>> people, not about Trump and his goofy teenager hair style.
>>
>> AP
>
>
> Trump vain?  What about Joe "Plugs" Biden?
>
> Double-A
>

Obama could let it grow out and use Jheri Curl.
but then he couldn't pass that hair drug test.

and Hillary is bald, shes got a wig on.
that is why she does not do news conferences,
	1. they will see she has a wig on
	2. they will know she has Alzheimer when they ask her a question.
	3. they will smell the liquor on her breath.
	4. Hillary is channeling Bill

look close at grannie Hillary next time, you will see the wig, and her 
lipstick is off.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592244 — Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 4:44:21 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 4:31 PM, Double-A wrote:
> > On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium
> > wrote:
> >> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 2:35:04 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 4:46:05 PM UTC-7,
> >>> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >>>> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Looking at Trump on TV he is a man losing his cool.He is down
> >>>>> by 10%,and knows the republicans are about to fire him.
> 
> >>>> If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to
> >>>> 40.6% of the vote from his high of 45.7% for Trump vs.
> >>>> Clinton.
> >>>>
> >>>> If one looks at the average of all polls, Trump is down to
> >>>> 36.9% of the vote from his high of 40.2% for Trump vs. Clinton
> >>>> vs. Johnson vs. Stein.
> >>>>
> >>>> Trump holds no postion that the Republicans can fire him from.
> >>>>
> >>>> Senile babbling fool.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Jim Pennino
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Word is that "Rule 9" of the RNC is being discussed!
> >>>
> >>> Double-A
> >>
> >> Question: Is Trump bald, so bald that he is so vain in wanting to
> >> not appear as bald. Would he be the first president to be "so vain
> >> as to cover up his baldness" whereas all the other bald presidents
> >> were not vain and were proud of being bald as president--
> >> Eisenhower, etc.
> 
> >> In other words, Trump is antiscience which makes him disqualified
> >> to be president, for if any president cannot accept the truths of
> >> science-- global warming, they are unfit to lead this nation. But
> >> as for being bald and not able to appear in public as bald is a
> >> vanity issue that suggests Trump's mind is a childish mind, not a
> >> grown-up mature mind.
> >>
> >> So, what is it? Is Trump bald and covering it up with a toupee or
> >> wig? And if not bald, why have a overcomb of long hair? Why not
> >> just be yourself, not a childish teenager mind about your hair,
> >> indicates Trump is not fit to be president. There was a funny
> >> website that sang the song "We shall overcome" with the words for
> >> Trump "We shall overcomb" which again shows how much Trump is a
> >> misfit as a politician, for the job of USA President is about
> >> people, not about Trump and his goofy teenager hair style.
> >>
> >> AP
> >
> >
> > Trump vain?  What about Joe "Plugs" Biden?
> >
> > Double-A
> >
> 
> Obama could let it grow out and use Jheri Curl.
> but then he couldn't pass that hair drug test.
> 
> and Hillary is bald, shes got a wig on.
> that is why she does not do news conferences,
> 	1. they will see she has a wig on
> 	2. they will know she has Alzheimer when they ask her a question.
> 	3. they will smell the liquor on her breath.
> 	4. Hillary is channeling Bill
> 
> look close at grannie Hillary next time, you will see the wig, and her 
> lipstick is off.


What ever happened to her channeling Eleanor Roosevelt?

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592462 — Re: Trump -- antiscience, and childish mentality of his hair combing Re: Will Trump commit suicide when he loses this election??

On 8/7/2016 4:02 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 4:44:21 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 8/5/2016 4:31 PM, Double-A wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 12:52:11 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium
>


>>>> So, what is it? Is Trump bald and covering it up with a toupee or
>>>> wig? And if not bald, why have a overcomb of long hair? Why not
>>>> just be yourself, not a childish teenager mind about your hair,
>>>> indicates Trump is not fit to be president. There was a funny
>>>> website that sang the song "We shall overcome" with the words for
>>>> Trump "We shall overcomb" which again shows how much Trump is a
>>>> misfit as a politician, for the job of USA President is about
>>>> people, not about Trump and his goofy teenager hair style.
>>>>
>>>> AP
>>>
>>>
>>> Trump vain?  What about Joe "Plugs" Biden?
>>>
>>> Double-A
>>>

>> Obama could let it grow out and use Jheri Curl.
>> but then he couldn't pass that hair drug test.
>>
>> and Hillary is bald, shes got a wig on.
>> that is why she does not do news conferences,
>> 	1. they will see she has a wig on
>> 	2. they will know she has Alzheimer when they ask her a question.
>> 	3. they will smell the liquor on her breath.
>> 	4. Hillary is channeling Bill
>>
>> look close at grannie Hillary next time, you will see the wig, and her
>> lipstick is off.
>
>
> What ever happened to her channeling Eleanor Roosevelt?
>
> Double-A
>

HA! that is a good one,

that stuffy+dusty feeling

Perhaps Trump will ask her in the debate who she is channeling...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592136 — What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.

You ( Mr. DFS ) don't see what "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.

John Gohde ( nhp_bus ) is referring to:

  https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/zyQhQX618Ig/6lfXoFWBBAAJ

John, HTML is allowed in emails and posts ( Usenet ).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592140 — Re: What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:11:07 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>You ( Mr. DFS ) don't see what "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.
>
>John Gohde ( nhp_bus ) is referring to:
>
>  https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/zyQhQX618Ig/6lfXoFWBBAAJ
>
>John, HTML is allowed in emails and posts ( Usenet ).


Surprise surprise! I had heard that you had kicked the bucket.

-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592146 — Re: NetCopping.

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:29:24 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/rDC92wlEiQ0/ekIxgWl-BAAJ 
>  MPG.320faeb63166a1609896a3@news.eternal-september.org 


GG says:

"The post you requested could not be found so we have redirected you to the discussion topic"

:-(


Perhaps the Rube X No-Archives his netKKKopping?


-- 

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.

"It is my learned opinion that a man
should not mince words just to spare
the sensibilities of the thin-skinned
or the ignorant."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592276 — Re: What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:13:49 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:11:07 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> 
>>You ( Mr. DFS ) don't see what "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.
>>
>>John Gohde ( nhp_bus ) is referring to:
>>
>>  https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/
zyQhQX618Ig/6lfXoFWBBAAJ
>>
>>John, HTML is allowed in emails and posts ( Usenet ).
> 
> 
> Surprise surprise! I had heard that you had kicked the bucket.

Excellent to hear that he's still alive. Perhaps he'll liven up the kook 
awards with a Technicolor Yawn or two.

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#593109 — Re: What "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.

Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:

> On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 16:11:07 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>You ( Mr. DFS ) don't see what "Eternal-September.ORG" drops.
>>
>>John Gohde ( nhp_bus ) is referring to:
>>
>>  
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/zyQhQX618Ig/6lfXoFWBBAAJ
>>
>>John, HTML is allowed in emails and posts ( Usenet ).

Allowed, yes.  Wanted, no (especially not in text-only newsgroups.)

Address header fields whose value do not contain an e-mail address, that is, 
the address of a mailbox (which by definition receives mail), and Newsgroups 
header fields whose value contains more than three newsgroup names 
(including both newsgroups in the Big 8 and alt.ALL) could be interpreted as 
allowed, too.  (See RFC 5536 and referred RFCs.)

But they are not wanted, as they go against the purpose of the medium.  
Depending on the rules on the server you are using, this could even get your 
account suspended or cancelled.

As a result, “Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.” (is that the real name? If no, that is 
also allowed but not wanted) will enter my killfile, too; that is, I am not 
reading their postings anymore, except perhaps in quotations, until they 
post appropriately (this is done automatically).

You must decide if you want your postings to be read, and if yes, by whom.
Your postings are not going to be read by people who do not want articles 
with attributes considered unwanted (such as the one I mentioned above) in 
Usenet, or in newsgroups in general.  And you should know that most of the 
time those are the people who know what they are talking about, while you 
receive mostly noise like that from “Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.” from the rest.

HTH

Crosspost (X-Post) limited to three newsgroups (for technical and social 
reasons); Followup-To (F'up2) news.software,readers (for social reasons 
only).

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#592245 — Re: Little Man Syndrome.

On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 7:16:17 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> Come the debates, Hilliary will look like the enabler,
> compared to Trump.  Hollywood loves Hillary for that but...
> like North Korea, they're all bark and no bite.
> 
> Little Man Syndrome.  _Actions_ are louder than words.


Oh look, you snuck a binary file past Google!

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web