Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #590783 > unrolled thread

Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it

Started bymapou001@gmail.com
First post2016-07-25 21:47 -0700
Last post2016-07-27 11:25 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 45 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 21:47 -0700
    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 23:18 -0700
      Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-25 23:42 -0700
        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-26 16:58 +0000
        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:26 -0500
    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 12:30 -0500
      Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 10:38 -0700
        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 13:09 -0500
          Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 11:22 -0700
            Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 12:26 -0700
              Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 14:47 -0500
                Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 12:54 -0700
                  Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 16:12 -0500
                    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 14:28 -0700
                      Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 16:31 -0500
                        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 14:45 -0700
                          Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 19:09 -0500
                            Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 17:26 -0700
                              Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 22:14 -0500
                                Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 20:21 -0700
                                  Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-26 22:35 -0500
                                    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 20:57 -0700
                                  Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:45 -0500
                                    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 09:24 -0700
                                      Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 13:00 -0500
                                        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:21 -0700
                                          Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:22 -0500
                              Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:26 -0500
    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 12:40 -0700
      Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 15:09 -0500
        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 13:26 -0700
          Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:17 -0500
            Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 09:22 -0700
              Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-27 12:08 -0500
                Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 10:13 -0700
                  Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-27 12:19 -0500
                    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 10:44 -0700
                      Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:27 -0500
                        Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 12:39 -0700
                          Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-29 10:13 -0500
                          Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 13:22 -0500
                  Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:07 -0500
              Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 12:58 -0500
    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:18 -0500
    Re: Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:25 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →


#590783 — Steve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-25 21:47 -0700
SubjectSteve Carlip is a crackpot and a con artist and he knows it
Message-ID<894d8311-b69e-4c3b-b107-34d410ce8a7e@googlegroups.com>
I thought that this deserved its own thread.

To Steve Carlip:

Re: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html 

Carlip, you are either a crackpot or a fraud or both. You claim (see link above) that a moving body, by some unknown and unfalsifiable magic, broadcasts information about its position and velocity out into space. This information travels at c. Somehow, by some other unfalsifiable, pseudoscientific magic, a receiving body can use the information to calculate the actual position of the source regardless of how far apart the two are. This way, relativity can agree with the Newtonian result even though Newton assumed instantaneous gravity. 

This is one of the stinkiest pile of crap I have ever seen from Big Brother physics. No moving body can know its velocity or position relative to anything else so as to broadcast that information at the speed of light. This crap contradicts the very theory (GR) that you are trying so hard to defend. Your crap is thus falsified by simple logic. 

You, Carlip, are not a physicist. You are a pseudoscientist, a mental midget, a jackass, a crackpot and a gutless criminal. You should be in jail. Fuck you. LOL 

You assholes in the physics community who are preaching these lies ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are a bunch of con artists and you should be in jail. It's not nice to fool the whole world to the tune of billions of dollars. It is not nice to use Big Brother government to force the world to pay you in order to preach your lies. Fuck all of you, and the mules you sleep with. Your time is coming sooner than you think. 

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 

PS. To physicists who knowingly lie to the people and steal their hard earned money to practice crappy physics. It's sackcloth and ashes time for you assholes. It's almost at the door. Repent from your shit now. You've been warned. ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#590789

Frompnalsing@gmail.com
Date2016-07-25 23:18 -0700
Message-ID<8fea979d-605b-4991-9d82-5a41a0e84d7f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590783
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 9:47:46 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
> I thought that this deserved its own thread.
> 
> To Steve Carlip:
> 
> Re: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html 
> 
> Carlip, you are either a crackpot or a fraud or both. You claim (see link above) that a moving body, by some unknown and unfalsifiable magic, broadcasts information about its position and velocity out into space. This information travels at c. Somehow, by some other unfalsifiable, pseudoscientific magic, a receiving body can use the information to calculate the actual position of the source regardless of how far apart the two are. This way, relativity can agree with the Newtonian result even though Newton assumed instantaneous gravity. 
> 
> This is one of the stinkiest pile of crap I have ever seen from Big Brother physics. No moving body can know its velocity or position relative to anything else so as to broadcast that information at the speed of light. This crap contradicts the very theory (GR) that you are trying so hard to defend. Your crap is thus falsified by simple logic. 
> 
> You, Carlip, are not a physicist. You are a pseudoscientist, a mental midget, a jackass, a crackpot and a gutless criminal. You should be in jail. Fuck you. LOL 
> 
> You assholes in the physics community who are preaching these lies ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are a bunch of con artists and you should be in jail. It's not nice to fool the whole world to the tune of billions of dollars. It is not nice to use Big Brother government to force the world to pay you in order to preach your lies. Fuck all of you, and the mules you sleep with. Your time is coming sooner than you think. 
> 
> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> 
> PS. To physicists who knowingly lie to the people and steal their hard earned money to practice crappy physics. It's sackcloth and ashes time for you assholes. It's almost at the door. Repent from your shit now. You've been warned. ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

Steve Carlip has forgotten more physics than you will ever know, you dumbfuck crackpot...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590790

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-25 23:42 -0700
Message-ID<5112e978-7f66-4cbf-9346-29c3cebe28b0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590789
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 11:18:18 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 9:47:46 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I thought that this deserved its own thread.
> > 
> > To Steve Carlip:
> > 
> > Re: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html 
> > 
> > Carlip, you are either a crackpot or a fraud or both. You claim (see link above) that a moving body, by some unknown and unfalsifiable magic, broadcasts information about its position and velocity out into space. This information travels at c. Somehow, by some other unfalsifiable, pseudoscientific magic, a receiving body can use the information to calculate the actual position of the source regardless of how far apart the two are. This way, relativity can agree with the Newtonian result even though Newton assumed instantaneous gravity. 
> > 
> > This is one of the stinkiest pile of crap I have ever seen from Big Brother physics. No moving body can know its velocity or position relative to anything else so as to broadcast that information at the speed of light. This crap contradicts the very theory (GR) that you are trying so hard to defend. Your crap is thus falsified by simple logic. 
> > 
> > You, Carlip, are not a physicist. You are a pseudoscientist, a mental midget, a jackass, a crackpot and a gutless criminal. You should be in jail. Fuck you. LOL 
> > 
> > You assholes in the physics community who are preaching these lies ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are a bunch of con artists and you should be in jail. It's not nice to fool the whole world to the tune of billions of dollars. It is not nice to use Big Brother government to force the world to pay you in order to preach your lies. Fuck all of you, and the mules you sleep with. Your time is coming sooner than you think. 
> > 
> > > Steve Carlip 

Re: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html 

Carlip, you are either a crackpot or a fraud or both. You claim (see link above) that a moving body, by some unknown and unfalsifiable magic, broadcasts information about its position and velocity out into space. This information travels at c. Somehow, by some other unfalsifiable, pseudoscientific magic, a receiving body can calculate the actual position of the source regardless of how far apart the two are. This way, relativity can agree with the Newtonian result even though Newton assumed instantaneous gravity. 

This is one of the stinkiest pile of crap I have ever seen from Big Brother physics. No moving body can know its velocity or position relative to anything else so as to broadcast that information at the speed of light. This alone falsifies your crap. 

You, Carlip, are not a physicist. You are a pseudoscientist, a mental midget, a jackass, a crackpot and a gutless criminal. You should be in jail. Fuck you. LOL 

You assholes in the physics community who are preaching these lies ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are a bunch of con artists and you should be in jail. It's not nice to fool the whole world to the tune of billions of dollars. It is not nice to use Big Brother government to force the world to pay you in order to preach your lies. Fuck all of you, and the mules you sleep with. Your time is coming sooner than you think. 

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 

> > 
> > PS. To physicists who knowingly lie to the people and steal their hard earned money to practice crappy physics. It's sackcloth and ashes time for you assholes. It's almost at the door. Repent from your shit now. You've been warned. ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> 
> Steve Carlip has forgotten more physics than you will ever know, you dumbfuck crackpot...

LOL. Go pound sand, asshole. I wasn't talking to you.

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590819

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-07-26 16:58 +0000
Message-ID<nn84sb$pjn$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#590790
Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.
                -- Euripides

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#591061

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-07-28 14:26 -0500
Message-ID<nndm9e$1231$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590790
On 7/26/2016 1:42 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 11:18:18 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:


>> Steve Carlip has forgotten more physics than you will ever know, you dumbfuck crackpot...
>
> LOL. Go pound sand, asshole. I wasn't talking to you.

Yes, you were. You post here, you're talking to EVERYONE here.
If you want to talk to Carlip alone, you do it in email.
If you want to talk to Carlip one-on-one, and you want an audience, then 
you're a worthless attention whore that is only here to hear yourself 
talk. And everyone here knows it.



-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590820

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 12:30 -0500
Message-ID<nn86n2$12o4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590783
On 7/25/2016 11:47 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> I thought that this deserved its own thread.
>
> To Steve Carlip:
>
> Re:
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
>

>
> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>

[you should go see a dentist]



Some of Steve Carlips Honors and Awards;

     Fellow, American Physical Society
     Fellow, Institute of Physics (UK)
     Editorial Board member, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A
     Divisional Associate Editor, Physical Review Letters
     Kramers Professor, Utrecht University, 2007
     Member, Nominating Committee, International Society on General
Relativity and Gravitation, 2004-
     Member, Executive Committee, American Physical Society Topical Group
in Gravitation, 1998-2001
     Editorial Board member, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 1995-2004
     National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award (NYI), 1993
     Department of Energy Outstanding Junior Investigator Award, 1991
     Elected to Phi Beta Kappa, 1974
     Referee for about 35 different physics journals
     Grant reviewer for national science agencies of nine countries
     Invited speaker at 4-5 conferences a year

Memberships

     American Physical Society
     International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation
     Institute of Physics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590822

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 10:38 -0700
Message-ID<95279bc1-46ff-410d-b2fc-3813a77f5196@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590820
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 10:30:15 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 11:47 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > I thought that this deserved its own thread.
> >
> > To Steve Carlip:
> >
> > Re:
> > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
> >
> 
> >
> > ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> >
> > ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> >
> 
> [you should go see a dentist]
> 
> 
> 
> Some of Steve Carlips Honors and Awards;
> 
>      Fellow, American Physical Society
>      Fellow, Institute of Physics (UK)
>      Editorial Board member, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A
>      Divisional Associate Editor, Physical Review Letters
>      Kramers Professor, Utrecht University, 2007
>      Member, Nominating Committee, International Society on General
> Relativity and Gravitation, 2004-
>      Member, Executive Committee, American Physical Society Topical Group
> in Gravitation, 1998-2001
>      Editorial Board member, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 1995-2004
>      National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award (NYI), 1993
>      Department of Energy Outstanding Junior Investigator Award, 1991
>      Elected to Phi Beta Kappa, 1974
>      Referee for about 35 different physics journals
>      Grant reviewer for national science agencies of nine countries
>      Invited speaker at 4-5 conferences a year
> 
> Memberships
> 
>      American Physical Society
>      International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation
>      Institute of Physics

What does Carlip's ass smell like today, Sergio?

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590829

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 13:09 -0500
Message-ID<nn890g$16d4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590822
On 7/26/2016 12:38 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 10:30:15 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 7/25/2016 11:47 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I thought that this deserved its own thread.
>>>
>>> To Steve Carlip:
>>>
>>> Re:
>>> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
>>>
>>

>>> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>>
>>> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>>

>> [you should go see a dentist]
>>
>>
>>
>> Some of Steve Carlips Honors and Awards;
>>
>>      Fellow, American Physical Society
>>      Fellow, Institute of Physics (UK)
>>      Editorial Board member, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A
>>      Divisional Associate Editor, Physical Review Letters
>>      Kramers Professor, Utrecht University, 2007
>>      Member, Nominating Committee, International Society on General
>> Relativity and Gravitation, 2004-
>>      Member, Executive Committee, American Physical Society Topical Group
>> in Gravitation, 1998-2001
>>      Editorial Board member, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 1995-2004
>>      National Science Foundation Young Investigator Award (NYI), 1993
>>      Department of Energy Outstanding Junior Investigator Award, 1991
>>      Elected to Phi Beta Kappa, 1974
>>      Referee for about 35 different physics journals
>>      Grant reviewer for national science agencies of nine countries
>>      Invited speaker at 4-5 conferences a year
>>
>> Memberships
>>
>>      American Physical Society
>>      International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation
>>      Institute of Physics
>
> What does Carlip's ass smell like today, Sergio?

> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...



More from STEVE CARLIP for you, mapou001, fall down and worship him, now!;

My Research

     "Quantum gravity is notoriously a subject
     where problems vastly outnumber results."
     -Sidney Coleman

One of the deepest problems of modern physics is that of reconciling our 
well-established theories of fundamental processes at very small scales, 
as described by quantum field theory, with those at very large scales, 
as described by general relativity. Efforts to formulate a consistent 
quantum theory of gravity date back to at least 1930 -- here is a nice 
history -- but despite eighty years of work, we still seem far from an 
answer. While such a unification is probably unimportant at laboratory 
scales, it is vital for understanding the physics of strong 
gravitational fields: in the cosmology of the very early Universe, for 
example, and in the formation and evaporation of black holes.

But the study of quantum gravity is difficult, and the main thing we 
have learned in these years of research is that the obvious approaches 
don't work. The difficulties are partly technical -- general relativity 
is a complicated, nonlinear theory -- but we face deep conceptual 
problems as well. According to general relativity, gravity is a 
consequence of the geometry of spacetime. That means that when we talk 
about quantizing gravity, we really mean "quantizing space and time 
themselves." We don't know what a completed quantum theory of gravity 
will look like, but we will surely end up with a picture of the Universe 
quite unlike anything we now imagine.

In the past few years, two promising new approaches to these problems 
have emerged. The first is string theory, a model in which elementary 
particles are not treated as pointlike objects, but instead as extended 
one-dimensional "strings." (Here is a nice nontechnical introduction.) 
The second is a reformulation of general relativity in terms of new 
variables -- "self-dual connections" or "Ashtekar variables" -- that 
behave more like those of conventional quantum field theories. This 
approach is now often called "quantum geometry." More recently, a new 
method, "causal dynamical triangulations," has also shown promise. Gary 
Au has written a nice nontechnical paper based on interviews with 
physicists working on string theory and quantum geometry, and I have 
written a more technical review of a variety of approaches to the problem.

An alternative general strategy for research is to explore simpler 
models that share the underlying conceptual features of quantum gravity 
while avoiding the technical difficulties. For example, general 
relativity in 2+1 dimensions -- two spatial dimensions plus time -- has 
the same basic structure as the full (3+1)-dimensional theory, but it is 
technically much simpler, and the implications of quantum gravity can be 
examined in detail. Similarly, quantum black holes may be simple enough 
to allow us to learn concrete lessons about the full theory.

For the past few years, I have concentrated on four areas of research:

     Looking at (2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity as a sort of testing 
ground for approaches to the full quantum theory;
     Trying to understand the quantum gravitational basis of black hole 
thermodynamics;
     Investigating other "windows" into quantum gravity, such as causal 
dynamical triangulations -- relatively simple settings, models, and 
approximations that may offer insight into quantum gravity without 
requiring a complete theory; and
     Exploring a variety of other issues involving quantum gravity and 
"low dimensional physics," including string theory.

I have also run a seminar on career prospects and options for physics 
graduates.

(2+1)-Dimensional Quantum Gravity
General relativity in 2+1 dimensions -- that is, two spatial dimensions 
plus time -- has proven to be a very useful model for exploring the 
conceptual foundations of quantum gravity. In three spacetime 
dimensions, general relativity has finitely many physical degrees of 
freedom, and there are no freely propagating gravitational waves. As a 
result, quantum gravity reduces to a special instance of ordinary 
quantum mechanics, and problems such as nonrenormalizability that are 
associated with quantum field theory disappear. But the model is still a 
coordinate-invariant theory of spacetime geometry, and most of the 
conceptual issues of the full theory remain.

In all, roughly 15 different approaches to quantizing (2+1)-dimensional 
gravity have been developed. Most of these are discussed in a book I 
wrote in 1998 for Cambridge University Press. The model has offered 
insight into such issues as the nature of time in quantum gravity, the 
source of black hole entropy, and the question of whether the topology 
of space can change. Here is a paper I wrote with Jeanette Nelson 
comparing two interesting approaches.

A recent review article I wrote on general relativity in 2+1 dimensions 
for the on-line journal Living Reviews in Relativity can be found here. 
Another review is here, this one discussing what we know about the 
microscopic "statistical mechanics" that presumably underlies 
(2+1)-dimensional black hole entropy. An older and more general review I 
wrote on (2+1)-dimensional black holes is here. For some research papers 
on the statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole, look 
here and here.

In some ways, ordinary (2+1)-dimensional gravity may be too simple. 
Recently, a number of physicists have become interested in a slightly 
more complicated version, topologically massive gravity, which has a new 
propagating "graviton." I have been involved in this work; two papers 
are here and here.
Black Hole Thermodynamics
Thanks to the work of Hawking and Bekenstein, we have known for 25 years 
that black holes are thermal objects, with characteristic temperatures, 
entropies, and radiation spectra. But we still do not really understand 
why black holes behave this way -- we don't know what microscopic 
quantum states are responsible for the "statistical mechanics" that 
leads to these thermodynamic properties. This problem serves as a key 
test for any attempt to quantize gravity: a model that cannot reproduce 
the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for a black hole in terms of microscopic 
quantum gravitational states is unlikely to be right.

An important focus of my recent work here has been an attempt to 
understand how much of the statistical mechanics of black holes can be 
determined purely from general symmetries, independent of the details of 
quantum gravity. I have shown that a symmetry mechanism is at least 
plausible. (Here and here are some papers, and here is a review.) This 
idea would help explain one of the mysteries of this field, sometimes 
called the problem of universality: the fact that very different 
approaches to quantum gravity, with different starting points and 
different underlying degrees of freedom, all seem to give the same 
answer. This overview won the 2007 Gravity Research Foundation essay 
prize; here is a less technical summary.

Another interesting issue is whether "quasinormal modes" -- the damped 
oscillations of a disturbed black hole -- can tell us anything about 
black hole quantum mechanics. I've written two papers on this subject, 
one on (2+1)-dimensional black holes and another on the 
higher-dimensional black holes that are understood in string theory.
"Windows"
When faced with a question that seems too hard to answer, a physicist's 
first reaction is likely to be, "Let's find a simpler question." In the 
absence of a full-fledged quantum theory of gravity -- a complete, 
self-consistent theory that agrees with observations -- a natural 
strategy is to look into simpler "windows" into quantum gravity that 
might give us useful clues without requiring a complete answer. Black 
hole thermodynamics, for instance, offers a simple setting in which to 
probe complex problems; (2+1)-dimensional gravity provides another 
simple model.

Lattice quantum gravity may be another such window. The basic idea of 
putting a continuous theory on a lattice, approximating it by a simpler 
discrete theory, has had considerable success in quantum chromodynamics 
(QCD). The gravitational version is similar, but unlike QCD, where 
fields live on a fixed lattice, gravity is the lattice: just as the flat 
triangles in a a geodesic dome approximate a sphere, varying edge 
lengths or patterns of connectivity in higher dimensions can approximate 
varying curved spacetimes.

In particular, several of my students and I have begun to work on a 
promising lattice approach known as causal dynamical triangulations, in 
which a causal structure -- a "direction of time" -- is put in from the 
start. We have found the first independent confirmation of the 
pioneering results of Ambjorn, Jurkiewicz, and Loll, who showed that the 
method gives a sensible semiclassical limit that really looks like a 
four-dimensional spacetime. With the code now running stably, we are 
starting to look at new questions, such as the renormalization group 
flow of the cosmological constant and the predicted patterns of quantum 
fluctuations in the early Universe.

One intriguing prediction of the causal dynamical triangulations method 
is that while spacetime appears four-dimensional at large scales, it 
undergoes a "dimensional reduction" to two dimensions at very small 
scales. If this is a general feature of quantum gravity, and not just a 
peculiarity of this particular approximation, it could be telling us 
something very important. A lecture of mine on this topic may be found here.
Other Research
I also work on a variety of other issues involving quantum gravity and 
"low dimensional physics," and on other areas in which geometry and 
topology are important to physics. Some of the questions I have studied 
include:

     Can quantum fluctuations in spacetime solve the "cosmological 
constant problem"? See here and here for two papers, and here for a 
write-up in the American Institute of Physics newsletter, Physics News 
Update.
     Can quantum fluctuations cause the topology of space to change in 
time? Here is a paper written with a graduate student, Russell Cosgrove, 
that gives some answers in (2+1)-dimensional spacetime.
     What does the "wave function of the Universe" really mean? In this 
paper I address some issues involved in interpreting the "no boundary" 
proposal of Hartle and Hawking. Here I work with a bunch of 
mathematicians to try to understand whether quantum fluctuations in the 
topology of the early Universe can affect that wave function. (The 
answer seems to be "yes" -- they might even help explain how inflation 
got started.)
     Can string theory be related to three-dimensional topological field 
theories? This paper with Ian Kogan discusses some of the problems in 
making such a connection.

A few less technical areas I've worked in are the following:

     Debunking "creationist" cosmology: in this paper, Ryan Scranton and 
I demolish an article by Robert Gentry, a well-known "young Earth 
creationist," that is, a person who believes on religious grounds that 
the Universe is only about 10,000 years old, and who attempts to 
shoehorn science into that picture. (For more on the struggle to keep 
"creation science" out of the science classroom and to defend the 
teaching of evolution, see the National Center for Science Education Web 
pages. I am proud to be one of the early Steves in Project Steve.)
     Weighing kinetic energy: in this paper I discuss the experimental 
and theoretical foundation for the statement that "a hot brick weighs 
more than a cold one."
     Investigating the "speed of gravity": in Newton's theory, gravity 
propagates instantaneously. This is testable: if one puts a finite 
propagation speed into Newtonian gravity, the forces between two 
orbiting bodies no longer point toward their center of mass, and this 
"aberration" would lead to observable orbital instabilities. In general 
relativity, on the other hand, gravity (like everything else) cannot 
propagate faster than light. In this paper I show how this light-speed 
propagation can be reconciled with the observed lack of aberration, and 
correct some errors in the literature. Here I weigh in on the question 
of whether a recent observation of deflection of quasar light by Jupiter 
gives us observational information about the speed of gravity.
     Looking at "varying constants": there is an old idea, dating back 
to Dirac, that fundamental "constants" such as the fine structure 
constant may actually vary in time. Here and here are two papers in 
which I look at the question of whether black holes can tell us anything 
about the allowed variations. (Probably not much, unfortunately...)
     Answering Frequently Asked Questions: I have written portions of 
the Usenet Physics FAQs and Astronomy FAQs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590831

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 11:22 -0700
Message-ID<3f5549ee-099c-4019-b173-6626824e353b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590829
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 11:09:26 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>[Pile of crap deleted]
Sergio, fuck you and the mule you sleep with. I don't care about your fucking credentials. And, goddammit, stop highjacking this thread for your own self-aggrandizement. Jackass.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590839

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 12:26 -0700
Message-ID<604af342-23a1-4f32-b658-9ed0ccf879e4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590831
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 11:22:55 AM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 11:09:26 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> >[Pile of crap deleted]
> Sergio, fuck you and the mule you sleep with. I don't care about your fucking credentials. And, goddammit, stop highjacking this thread for your own self-aggrandizement. Jackass.


I just now realized your were still kissing Carlip's ass and not your own ass. My bad. But fuck you anyway.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590845

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 14:47 -0500
Message-ID<nn8eo4$1fnd$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590839
On 7/26/2016 2:26 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 11:22:55 AM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 11:09:26 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>>> [Pile of crap deleted]
>> Sergio, fuck you and the mule you sleep with. I don't care about
>> your fucking credentials. And, goddammit, stop highjacking this
>> thread for your own self-aggrandizement. Jackass.
>
>
> I just now realized your were still kissing Carlip's ass and not your
> own ass. My bad. But fuck you anyway.
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>


so where are your pubs missy mapo ?     no got-um ?    figures



           Curricula Vitae Steve Carlips


PUBLICATIONS AND MANUSCRIPTS:
Pressman, R.M. & Imber, S.C. (2011) Relationship of Children’s Day Time
Behavior Problems with Bedtime Routines/Practices: a Family Context and
the Consideration of Faux – ADHD. The American Journal of Family Therapy.
Imber, S.C. Southeast Magazine (SOCO), Guest Columnist on Parenting,
Kids Don’t Come with a
Manual! January through July, 2010.
Imber, S.C. Overview of the Massachusetts Regulations on Independent
Educational Evaluations. Federation for Children with Special Needs
NEWSLINE, Boston, MA, December 16,2009.
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations: Parents Plights and
Rights, Rhode Island Family
Magazine, October, 2009.
Imber, S.C. Tuning into Your Child‘s World at School: Parents Plights
and Rights, Rhode Island
Family Magazine, September, 2009.
Imber, S.C. Assemble Roster of Evaluation Specialists, LRP Special
Education Connection, March
17, 2009. Based upon an interview with an LRP editor.
Imber, S.C. & Cortiella, C. Independent Educational Evaluations,
Exceptional Parent, December, 2008.
Imber, S.C. Contributor to the Purple Haze, an article on Indigos,
Street Level: A publication of New
York University, Gabriela Magda, Fall 2008.
Imber, S.C. Grant right to IEE regardless of parents' notification
efforts, LRP Special
Education Connection, October 4, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations, LRP Special Education
Connection,
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 3 of 10
Smart Starts -- SmartStart: Evaluations -- Independent Educational
Evaluations (IEEs), September 30, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations, LRP Special Education
Connection, Live Back- to
School chat on IEEs, LRP on-line LRP Chat Room Conference, September 30,
2004.
Imber, S.C. Evaluators who serve as district consultants aren't truly
'independent', LRP Special Education Connections, September 23, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Minimize financial burdens by avoiding costly IEE mistakes,
LRP Special Education Connection, September 17, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Back-to-School Chat: Get expert advice on IEEs today, LRP
Special Education Connection, September 13, 2004.
Imber, S.C. & Radcliff, D. Independent Educational Evaluations under
IDEA-97: It’s a Testy Matter!)
Exceptional Children, fall, 2003.
Imber, S.C. The Miranda Warning: Readability and the Rights of Children
with Disabilities. Submitted for
review. Virginia Law Review, March, 2003.
Imber, S.C. The Miranda Warning: Readability and the Rights of Children
with Disabilities. It’s a TestyMatter, The Electronic Journal of
Forensic Psychonomics, http://users.sgi.net/~lastone/, 2001.
Imber, S.C. - Independent Educational Evaluations: It‘s a Testy Matter!
Paper presented at an
IDEA-97 seminar. The Biltmore Hotel, Providence, RI. Lorman Education
Services. April 11, 2001
Imber, S.C. - The Miranda Warning: Readability and the Rights of
Children with Disabilities; Paper presented at an IDEA-97 seminar. The
Biltmore Hotel, Providence, RI. Lorman Education Services.
April 11, 2001.
Pine, J. & Imber, S. - Issues on School Violence, "School Talk". A
Channel 36 Videotape Production,
Moderated by Nardja Varney, October, 1996. (Originally videotaped with
the Attorney General in
June, 1993.)
Imber, S.C. (Ed.) Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A book of
Readings, Second Edition. Longman Publishing Group, New York, ISBN
0-89568-294-X. (Out of Print).
Imber, S. "Relationship of trust to academic performance," Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology
(28:1) 1973, pp 145-150.
GRANTS:
Federal Application for Graduate Traineeship: Section pertaining to
Emotional Disturbance, Special Education, approved 1986, 1983, and 1980
Faculty Research Grant: The Relationship of Trust, Emotional Adjustment
and Academic Achievement.
Rhode Island College, May 1977.
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 4 of 10
Co-Author of the Rhode Island College Department of Special Education
Application for Personnel
Preparation Guide for Traineeships (Behavioral Disorders).
PRESENTATIONS: REGIONAL AND NATIONAL:
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations under IDEA 2004: It’s a
Testy Business! The Childhood Apraxia of Speech Association of North
America’s National Conference, Coco Beach Hotel, July 14, 2012 Danvers, MA.
Imber, S.C. The ABCs of IEPs. A Power Point presentation for parents and
educators. Somerset Parent Special Education Advisory Committee, the Old
Town Hall, Somerset, MA January 19, 2010
EDITORIAL CONSULTANT:
Guest Consultant, The SpecialEd Connection, LRP, -Carry out thorough
personal evaluations to stave
off IEE demands, on line article, October 29, 2007
Editorial Consultant: to Today's School Psychologist, Responding to
Parent's Request for
Psychoeducational Evaluation, Volume 1, Issue 1, August, 1997.
Editorial Consultant to the Special Educator, Dealing with Student
Evaluations, Internal and External, Volume 13, Issue 3, August 15, 1997.
MEDIA PRESENTATIONS AND OTHER RECENT ACTIVITIES:
Participant in the 5th National Satellite Broadcast from Harvard
University on Violence Prevention. Racial Bias. Rhode Island Hospital,
Providence, Rhode Island April 14, 2000.
Coordinated several training workshops on PowerPoint and Excel for
students in various special education courses during the (re: technology
applications to lesson planning, lesson adaptations and presentations),
Gaige Hall Computer Laboratory, Rhode Island College, Providence Rhode
Island, Summer and Fall Semesters, 1998- present.
COURT RELATED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Consultant and Expert on a matter of school placement, Seattle Family
Court Arbitration, August ‘13
Consultant and Expert Witness on a Matter for due process hearing, July
2012 re
Appropriate placement.
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter for due process hearing re
Free Appropriate Public
Education November 2012 through January, Rhode Island (case settled).
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter for due process hearing re
independent educational
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 5 of 10
evaluations, December 2012 (testimony given on December 19, 2012), Rhode
Island.
Independent Educational Evaluator and Expert on a 504 matter re a
student with ADHD, federal
court, New Jersey 2011-12.
Expert Employed by law firm on matter pertaining to the degree to which
a child with severe
disabilities suffered loss of functioning due to an accident, Superior
Court, Philadelphia, 2011-12.
Consultant and Independent Program Evaluator, on a matter of Due Process
(Lowell Juvenile Court
And Malden, MA) for a child with blindness and other severe disabilities
(through Public Counsel)
November 2011 through January 2012.`.
Review of records, consultation and expert opinion within a written
report, re a Due Process Hearing, Massachusetts, November, 2011
Evaluation and expert consultation on a 504 Discrimination federal law
suit for an adult, New Jersey, October, 2011.
Review of records, consultation and expert testimony on a matter
pertaining to special education, Hawaii, October, 2011.
Review of records and the development of a written report on a 504
Discrimination Law Suit re College (TASA), Pennsylvania, May, 2011
Retained on a criminal matter, regarding an individual with disabilities
Barnstable, MA, November,
2009 – March 2010.
Retained on a matter f or Due Process Hearing re a child with Learning
Disabilities, Southeast MA, September 2008-October 2009.
Retained by an Arizona law firm as a consultant and expert on a matter
of negligence of an adolescent child with autism, February 2009.
Consultant for parents on a matter of fee reimbursement for an IEE,
Program Quality Assurance (PQA, Department of Education) and mediation,
Massachusetts, January - March 2009.
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter of Due Process, South County,
RI on a matter of independent educational evaluations, January 2009.
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter of child custody, Stoughton
District Court, November 2008-February 2009.
Consultant for a Functional Behavioral Analysis and Behavior
Intervention Plan re a Mediation Agreement for a child with Down‘s
syndrome Attleboro, MA December 2008-March 2009.
Special Education advisor for an adolescent with learning disabilities,
for a due process hearing Connecticut, August- December 2008.
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 6 of 10
Consultant, Independent Educational Evaluator, and Expert Witness on a
matter of Due Process
(Lowell Juvenile Court and Malden, MA) for a child with blindness and
other severe disabilities, 2008.
Consultant, Independent Educational Evaluator and Expert Witness on a
Family Court matter re private vs. public education for an adolescent
with disabilities. Kent County, Warwick RI, 2007-08
Consultant to Attorney Thomas Zraik, on a matter pertaining to
independent educational evaluations based upon a case in the Northern
Ohio District Court for appeal to the Sixth Circuit, April 2007.
Consultant, Independent Educational Evaluator and expert witness on a
matter pertaining to a student with learning disabilities, August 2006.
(Rhode Island Due Process Hearing).
Consultant and expert witness: Pre-trial and trial testimony pertaining
to the Massachusetts Miranda
Warning. Massachusetts Superior Court. June 1987.
Intellectual and Academic Evaluation (adult), Rhode Island Superior
Court. Evaluation report and consultation. June 1987.
Child evaluation pertaining to a case of medical malpractice.
Providence, Rhode Island; 1987. April 27-29, 1995.
Consultation pertaining to funding of a vocational student (fall, 1986).
Expert witness/consultant. Evaluation of a behaviorally disordered
student. Rhode Island Legal
Services, Newport, Rhode Island. Federal Court; December 1986.
Evaluation review of a learning disabled adolescent. Rhode Island State
Department of Education, Hearing Review; October 1986.
Consultant/expert witness: Pre-trial and trial testimony pertaining to
Rhode Island Miranda Warning. Rhode Island Superior Court. October 1987.
Independent evaluator in Rhode Island and Massachusetts for various
public school systems and parents. Evaluations have been utilized in
special education hearings since 1980.
Consultant/expert witness: Class action suit against the State of Rhode
Island. Area of testimony: Programs for emotionally
disturbed/behaviorally disordered children and adolescents. Federal
Court, fall, 1975.
PROFESSIONAL HONORS:
Rhode Island College, 30 years of service as a professor of Special
Education (December 4, 2003) Inducted into the W.C. Mepham High School
(Bellmore, New York) Who’s Who for service in the field of Special
Education, April 7, 2002, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York.
Professional Advisory Board for the Rhode Island Association for
Children and Adults with

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590846

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 12:54 -0700
Message-ID<78ecf778-faa2-48b3-8d99-f76f2da5bf6d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590845
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 12:47:21 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>[ass kissing crap deleted]

Address the argument instead of attacking the messenger, asshole.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590857

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 16:12 -0500
Message-ID<nn8jnp$1n1n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590846
On 7/26/2016 2:54 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 12:47:21 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> [ass kissing crap deleted]
>



> Address the argument instead of attacking the messenger, asshole.
>

you deliver messages too ?


you should have read it,

it wasnt *Steve Car Lips* elgranda vitimums, sucker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590858

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 14:28 -0700
Message-ID<cc22c34c-e752-4d20-a467-37890aad2650@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590857
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:12:30 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>[ass kissing crap deleted]

What does Carlip's ass smell like today, Sergio?

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590859

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 16:31 -0500
Message-ID<nn8kri$1ojv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590858
On 7/26/2016 4:28 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:12:30 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> [ass kissing crap deleted]
>

>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>

you should apply to Carlips to get a real job, he can teach you.


so where are your pubs missy mapo ?     no got-um ?    figures



           Curricula Vitae Steve Carlips


PUBLICATIONS AND MANUSCRIPTS:
Pressman, R.M. & Imber, S.C. (2011) Relationship of Children’s Day Time
Behavior Problems with Bedtime Routines/Practices: a Family Context and
the Consideration of Faux – ADHD. The American Journal of Family Therapy.
Imber, S.C. Southeast Magazine (SOCO), Guest Columnist on Parenting,
Kids Don’t Come with a
Manual! January through July, 2010.
Imber, S.C. Overview of the Massachusetts Regulations on Independent
Educational Evaluations. Federation for Children with Special Needs
NEWSLINE, Boston, MA, December 16,2009.
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations: Parents Plights and
Rights, Rhode Island Family
Magazine, October, 2009.
Imber, S.C. Tuning into Your Child‘s World at School: Parents Plights
and Rights, Rhode Island
Family Magazine, September, 2009.
Imber, S.C. Assemble Roster of Evaluation Specialists, LRP Special
Education Connection, March
17, 2009. Based upon an interview with an LRP editor.
Imber, S.C. & Cortiella, C. Independent Educational Evaluations,
Exceptional Parent, December, 2008.
Imber, S.C. Contributor to the Purple Haze, an article on Indigos,
Street Level: A publication of New
York University, Gabriela Magda, Fall 2008.
Imber, S.C. Grant right to IEE regardless of parents' notification
efforts, LRP Special
Education Connection, October 4, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations, LRP Special Education
Connection,
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 3 of 10
Smart Starts -- SmartStart: Evaluations -- Independent Educational
Evaluations (IEEs), September 30, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations, LRP Special Education
Connection, Live Back- to
School chat on IEEs, LRP on-line LRP Chat Room Conference, September 30,
2004.
Imber, S.C. Evaluators who serve as district consultants aren't truly
'independent', LRP Special Education Connections, September 23, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Minimize financial burdens by avoiding costly IEE mistakes,
LRP Special Education Connection, September 17, 2004.
Imber, S.C. Back-to-School Chat: Get expert advice on IEEs today, LRP
Special Education Connection, September 13, 2004.
Imber, S.C. & Radcliff, D. Independent Educational Evaluations under
IDEA-97: It’s a Testy Matter!)
Exceptional Children, fall, 2003.
Imber, S.C. The Miranda Warning: Readability and the Rights of Children
with Disabilities. Submitted for
review. Virginia Law Review, March, 2003.
Imber, S.C. The Miranda Warning: Readability and the Rights of Children
with Disabilities. It’s a TestyMatter, The Electronic Journal of
Forensic Psychonomics, http://users.sgi.net/~lastone/, 2001.
Imber, S.C. - Independent Educational Evaluations: It‘s a Testy Matter!
Paper presented at an
IDEA-97 seminar. The Biltmore Hotel, Providence, RI. Lorman Education
Services. April 11, 2001
Imber, S.C. - The Miranda Warning: Readability and the Rights of
Children with Disabilities; Paper presented at an IDEA-97 seminar. The
Biltmore Hotel, Providence, RI. Lorman Education Services.
April 11, 2001.
Pine, J. & Imber, S. - Issues on School Violence, "School Talk". A
Channel 36 Videotape Production,
Moderated by Nardja Varney, October, 1996. (Originally videotaped with
the Attorney General in
June, 1993.)
Imber, S.C. (Ed.) Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A book of
Readings, Second Edition. Longman Publishing Group, New York, ISBN
0-89568-294-X. (Out of Print).
Imber, S. "Relationship of trust to academic performance," Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology
(28:1) 1973, pp 145-150.
GRANTS:
Federal Application for Graduate Traineeship: Section pertaining to
Emotional Disturbance, Special Education, approved 1986, 1983, and 1980
Faculty Research Grant: The Relationship of Trust, Emotional Adjustment
and Academic Achievement.
Rhode Island College, May 1977.
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 4 of 10
Co-Author of the Rhode Island College Department of Special Education
Application for Personnel
Preparation Guide for Traineeships (Behavioral Disorders).
PRESENTATIONS: REGIONAL AND NATIONAL:
Imber, S.C. Independent Educational Evaluations under IDEA 2004: It’s a
Testy Business! The Childhood Apraxia of Speech Association of North
America’s National Conference, Coco Beach Hotel, July 14, 2012 Danvers, MA.
Imber, S.C. The ABCs of IEPs. A Power Point presentation for parents and
educators. Somerset Parent Special Education Advisory Committee, the Old
Town Hall, Somerset, MA January 19, 2010
EDITORIAL CONSULTANT:
Guest Consultant, The SpecialEd Connection, LRP, -Carry out thorough
personal evaluations to stave
off IEE demands, on line article, October 29, 2007
Editorial Consultant: to Today's School Psychologist, Responding to
Parent's Request for
Psychoeducational Evaluation, Volume 1, Issue 1, August, 1997.
Editorial Consultant to the Special Educator, Dealing with Student
Evaluations, Internal and External, Volume 13, Issue 3, August 15, 1997.
MEDIA PRESENTATIONS AND OTHER RECENT ACTIVITIES:
Participant in the 5th National Satellite Broadcast from Harvard
University on Violence Prevention. Racial Bias. Rhode Island Hospital,
Providence, Rhode Island April 14, 2000.
Coordinated several training workshops on PowerPoint and Excel for
students in various special education courses during the (re: technology
applications to lesson planning, lesson adaptations and presentations),
Gaige Hall Computer Laboratory, Rhode Island College, Providence Rhode
Island, Summer and Fall Semesters, 1998- present.
COURT RELATED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Consultant and Expert on a matter of school placement, Seattle Family
Court Arbitration, August ‘13
Consultant and Expert Witness on a Matter for due process hearing, July
2012 re
Appropriate placement.
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter for due process hearing re
Free Appropriate Public
Education November 2012 through January, Rhode Island (case settled).
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter for due process hearing re
independent educational
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 5 of 10
evaluations, December 2012 (testimony given on December 19, 2012), Rhode
Island.
Independent Educational Evaluator and Expert on a 504 matter re a
student with ADHD, federal
court, New Jersey 2011-12.
Expert Employed by law firm on matter pertaining to the degree to which
a child with severe
disabilities suffered loss of functioning due to an accident, Superior
Court, Philadelphia, 2011-12.
Consultant and Independent Program Evaluator, on a matter of Due Process
(Lowell Juvenile Court
And Malden, MA) for a child with blindness and other severe disabilities
(through Public Counsel)
November 2011 through January 2012.`.
Review of records, consultation and expert opinion within a written
report, re a Due Process Hearing, Massachusetts, November, 2011
Evaluation and expert consultation on a 504 Discrimination federal law
suit for an adult, New Jersey, October, 2011.
Review of records, consultation and expert testimony on a matter
pertaining to special education, Hawaii, October, 2011.
Review of records and the development of a written report on a 504
Discrimination Law Suit re College (TASA), Pennsylvania, May, 2011
Retained on a criminal matter, regarding an individual with disabilities
Barnstable, MA, November,
2009 – March 2010.
Retained on a matter f or Due Process Hearing re a child with Learning
Disabilities, Southeast MA, September 2008-October 2009.
Retained by an Arizona law firm as a consultant and expert on a matter
of negligence of an adolescent child with autism, February 2009.
Consultant for parents on a matter of fee reimbursement for an IEE,
Program Quality Assurance (PQA, Department of Education) and mediation,
Massachusetts, January - March 2009.
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter of Due Process, South County,
RI on a matter of independent educational evaluations, January 2009.
Consultant and Expert Witness on a matter of child custody, Stoughton
District Court, November 2008-February 2009.
Consultant for a Functional Behavioral Analysis and Behavior
Intervention Plan re a Mediation Agreement for a child with Down‘s
syndrome Attleboro, MA December 2008-March 2009.
Special Education advisor for an adolescent with learning disabilities,
for a due process hearing Connecticut, August- December 2008.
CURRICULUM VITAE: STEVE C. IMBER, PH.D. (last revised September 23,2014
Page 6 of 10
Consultant, Independent Educational Evaluator, and Expert Witness on a
matter of Due Process
(Lowell Juvenile Court and Malden, MA) for a child with blindness and
other severe disabilities, 2008.
Consultant, Independent Educational Evaluator and Expert Witness on a
Family Court matter re private vs. public education for an adolescent
with disabilities. Kent County, Warwick RI, 2007-08
Consultant to Attorney Thomas Zraik, on a matter pertaining to
independent educational evaluations based upon a case in the Northern
Ohio District Court for appeal to the Sixth Circuit, April 2007.
Consultant, Independent Educational Evaluator and expert witness on a
matter pertaining to a student with learning disabilities, August 2006.
(Rhode Island Due Process Hearing).
Consultant and expert witness: Pre-trial and trial testimony pertaining
to the Massachusetts Miranda
Warning. Massachusetts Superior Court. June 1987.
Intellectual and Academic Evaluation (adult), Rhode Island Superior
Court. Evaluation report and consultation. June 1987.
Child evaluation pertaining to a case of medical malpractice.
Providence, Rhode Island; 1987. April 27-29, 1995.
Consultation pertaining to funding of a vocational student (fall, 1986).
Expert witness/consultant. Evaluation of a behaviorally disordered
student. Rhode Island Legal
Services, Newport, Rhode Island. Federal Court; December 1986.
Evaluation review of a learning disabled adolescent. Rhode Island State
Department of Education, Hearing Review; October 1986.
Consultant/expert witness: Pre-trial and trial testimony pertaining to
Rhode Island Miranda Warning. Rhode Island Superior Court. October 1987.
Independent evaluator in Rhode Island and Massachusetts for various
public school systems and parents. Evaluations have been utilized in
special education hearings since 1980.
Consultant/expert witness: Class action suit against the State of Rhode
Island. Area of testimony: Programs for emotionally
disturbed/behaviorally disordered children and adolescents. Federal
Court, fall, 1975.
PROFESSIONAL HONORS:
Rhode Island College, 30 years of service as a professor of Special
Education (December 4, 2003) Inducted into the W.C. Mepham High School
(Bellmore, New York) Who’s Who for service in the field of Special
Education, April 7, 2002, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York.
Professional Advisory Board for the Rhode Island Association

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590861

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 14:45 -0700
Message-ID<8f0d288f-9c8a-486a-80b9-61a1cd43496d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590859
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:31:35 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> [crap deleted]

Ass, ass, ass. Kiss, kiss, kiss.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590877

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 19:09 -0500
Message-ID<nn8u47$5ih$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590861
On 7/26/2016 4:45 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:31:35 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> [crap deleted]
>

you high from sniffing your own ass.

Fuck you. Address the argument or pack your opinion up your ass.

Repent, asshole, and be forgiven for your sins. Retract the lies and all 
will be well with you and the world. There is still time before you croak.

Fuck all of you, and the mules you sleep with. Your time is coming 
sooner than you think.

Pack it up your ass, moron.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590879

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 17:26 -0700
Message-ID<b29de8b9-5de2-44cd-b359-13ca6ce06c05@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590877
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 5:09:49 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:

LOL. I got on your nerves didn't I, Mr. ass kisser? You can't stand it. You're twisting like a worm.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590885

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-26 22:14 -0500
Message-ID<nn98vf$hel$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#590879
On 7/26/2016 7:26 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 5:09:49 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>
> LOL. I got on your nerves didn't I, Mr. ass kisser? You can't stand it. You're twisting like a worm.
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>

  an you a dance like monkey boy,

      dance monkey, dance

      "..dinka dinky..."


You didnt read it again,  all those statements are yours from other 
posts, you got dirty potty mouth.


Try again (you wrote these, (you anal retentive type, packed upto 
eyeballs w poop)) here you go;

"you high from sniffing your own ass. Fuck you. Address the argument or 
pack your opinion up your ass. Repent, asshole, and be forgiven for your 
sins. Retract the lies and all will be well with you and the world. 
There is still time before you croak. Fuck all of you, and the mules you 
sleep with. Your time is coming sooner than you think.  Pack it up your 
ass, moron."  you Buckwheat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#590886

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-26 20:21 -0700
Message-ID<4604d755-c202-47a5-9553-f1da331bdd69@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#590885
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 8:14:59 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/26/2016 7:26 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 5:09:49 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> >
> > LOL. I got on your nerves didn't I, Mr. ass kisser? You can't stand it. You're twisting like a worm.
> >
> > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> >
> 
>   an you a dance like monkey boy,
> 
>       dance monkey, dance
> 
>       "..dinka dinky..."
> 
> 
> You didnt read it again,  all those statements are yours from other 
> posts, you got dirty potty mouth.
> 
> 
> Try again (you wrote these, (you anal retentive type, packed upto 
> eyeballs w poop)) here you go;
> 
> "you high from sniffing your own ass. Fuck you. Address the argument or 
> pack your opinion up your ass. Repent, asshole, and be forgiven for your 
> sins. Retract the lies and all will be well with you and the world. 
> There is still time before you croak. Fuck all of you, and the mules you 
> sleep with. Your time is coming sooner than you think.  Pack it up your 
> ass, moron."  you Buckwheat.

LOL. It just shows how much I respect your stupid opinion. If I lay a pile of shit on Carlip, what makes you think you're better, asshole? Now go pound sand up your ass and leave me alone, moron.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web