Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #590634 > unrolled thread

Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 17:33 -0700
    Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-25 09:23 +0200
      Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-25 08:17 -0500
        Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-25 16:57 -0500
    Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 11:22 -0700
      Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:21 -0700
        Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-22 17:29 -0500
          Re: Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 10:30 -0700

#590634 — Five Questions Meteorologists Won't Acknowledge

Five Questions That All Meteorologists Refuse to Answer 

1) Why should we believe that moist air contains gaseous H2O if such 
has never been detected? 

2) Why should we believe moist air is lighter than dry air if such 
has never been measured? 

3) How does the undetected gaseous H2O somehow release 1,000 times 
the latent heat than has ever been measured in a laboratory upon 
condensing from a gaseous H2O that has never been detected? 

4) How does this undetected latent heat push the atmosphere and, 
somehow, cause the emergence of distinct bands of flow--jetstreams-- 
along the tropopause? 

5) How does this explain the highly structured entities, tornadoes, 
that have been observed descending down from above (and not emerging 
from below as convection theory predicts)? 

Our atmosphere is a big sponge for energy: 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/cldqCr_vk6s/NsoPvTIvCAAJ 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#590663

On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:33:46 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn
<jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:

>Five Questions That All Meteorologists Refuse to Answer 
>
>1) Why should we believe that moist air contains gaseous H2O if such 
>has never been detected? 
>
What do you think makes air "moist"?


Idiot.

w.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#590674

On 7/25/2016 2:23 AM, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:33:46 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn
> <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Five Questions That All Meteorologists Refuse to Answer
>>
>> 1) Why should we believe that moist air contains gaseous H2O if such
>> has never been detected?
>>
> What do you think makes air "moist"?
>
>
> Idiot.
>
> w.
>
>
>

James drinks beer (containing high percentage of water vapor in a liquid 
form), to keep his brain "moist".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#590740

On 7/25/2016 8:17 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 2:23 AM, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:33:46 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn
>> <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Five Questions That All Meteorologists Refuse to Answer
>>>
>>> 1) Why should we believe that moist air contains gaseous H2O if such
>>> has never been detected?
>>>
>> What do you think makes air "moist"?
>>
>>
>> Idiot.
>>
>> w.
>>
>>
>>
>
> James drinks beer (containing high percentage of water vapor in a liquid
> form), to keep his brain "moist".


Real Water vapor generated by human
    for James McGinn, Cladius Dink, et al

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ_lMzVBl_c

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597562

On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 5:33:49 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> Five Questions That All Meteorologists Refuse to Answer 
> 
> 1) Why should we believe that moist air contains gaseous H2O if such 
> has never been detected? 
> 
> 2) Why should we believe moist air is lighter than dry air if such 
> has never been measured? 
> 
> 3) How does the undetected gaseous H2O somehow release 1,000 times 
> the latent heat than has ever been measured in a laboratory upon 
> condensing from a gaseous H2O that has never been detected? 
> 
> 4) How does this undetected latent heat push the atmosphere and, 
> somehow, cause the emergence of distinct bands of flow--jetstreams-- 
> along the tropopause? 
> 
> 5) How does this explain the highly structured entities, tornadoes, 
> that have been observed descending down from above (and not emerging 
> from below as convection theory predicts)? 
> 
> Our atmosphere is a big sponge for energy: 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/cldqCr_vk6s/NsoPvTIvCAAJ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597958

what was taht guy on y00t00b, breathing?...
one can see, though, the effect of supersaturation
of vapor of combustion (HOH

> > 4) How does this undetected latent heat push the atmosphere and, 
> > somehow, cause the emergence of distinct bands of flow--jetstreams-- 
> > along the tropopause? 
> > 
> > 5) How does this explain the highly structured entities, tornadoes, 
> > that have been observed descending down from above (and not emerging 
> > from below as convection theory predicts)? 
> > 
> > Our atmosphere is a big sponge for energy: 
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/cldqCr_vk6s/NsoPvTIvCAAJ

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#597965

On 9/22/2016 3:21 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> what was taht guy on y00t00b, breathing?...
> one can see, though, the effect of supersaturation
> of vapor of combustion (HOH
>
>>> 4) How does this undetected latent heat push the atmosphere and,
>>> somehow, cause the emergence of distinct bands of flow--jetstreams--
>>> along the tropopause?

wrong James, you state "...undetected...pushing... causes.. jetstreams 
and the tropo-sauce ?


>>>
>>> 5) How does this explain the highly structured entities, tornadoes,
>>> that have been observed descending down from above (and not emerging
>>> from below as convection theory predicts)?

wrong James,  google "DENSITY" and think about air density, and how 
moist air... is how moist ?

>>>
>>> Our atmosphere is a big sponge for energy:
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.porn/clddqCr_vk6s/NsodPvTIvCAAJ

sometimes a persons head is a big sponge for static electricity, and 
moistness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598488

sldo, teh jetstream may not have existed,
fefore the era of jets, or props ...
or pteradactyls?

> sometimes a persons head is a big sponge for static electricity, and 
> moistness.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web