Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #587682 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-02 13:59 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-10 13:14 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 76 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-02 13:59 -0700
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 05:05 -0700
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 06:42 -0700
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:57 -0700
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 15:56 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-05 01:50 +0000
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 06:12 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-05 13:49 +0000
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 08:52 -0500
DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-07-03 09:05 -0700
DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:48 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-03 14:07 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 14:36 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 20:16 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 16:51 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-07 12:47 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 17:29 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 20:13 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 04:12 +0000
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 06:59 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 09:50 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 14:50 +0000
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 10:02 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 10:35 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 13:13 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 11:57 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 14:28 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 20:27 +0000
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 15:33 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 15:42 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 16:27 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 08:17 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 07:22 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 10:35 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 16:49 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 16:52 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 04:41 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 04:55 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 12:22 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 12:39 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 08:30 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 07:02 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 09:17 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 07:44 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 10:03 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 10:25 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 12:31 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 10:56 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 11:40 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 13:48 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 13:55 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 16:36 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 17:12 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-10 17:58 +0000
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 08:24 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:09 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:48 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 11:00 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:12 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 11:29 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 11:21 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 13:51 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 10:16 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 20:39 +0000
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 03:42 +0000
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 17:50 +0000
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:05 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 13:35 -0500
Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 06:48 -0700
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-07 20:23 -0500
Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-03 14:06 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 16:27 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-08 21:41 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-07-09 12:52 -0700
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-09 21:19 +0000
Re: Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-10 13:14 -0500
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-02 13:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire! |
| Message-ID | <9b2105fe-4446-4413-8b9c-12f6f2eef6e8@googlegroups.com> |
http://www.space.com/33331-juno-probe-jupiter-radiation-environment.html Arriving at Jupiter on the 4th, it will begin year long observations of the planet. Double-A
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 05:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0b142ec9-a1e3-4a03-9eb7-4bf96360e79d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587682 |
Jupiter eats spacecraft
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 06:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c78ee79c-45d4-465e-81a4-845aaedc1f0e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587793 |
Jupiters gravity will surprise them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-04 11:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dad79bb1-ec15-4a12-85fe-ccf29e01cfbc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587804 |
john Jupiters gravity will surprise them. ---------- Gravity can be calculated exactly. There will be no surprises
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-04 15:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a9073388-1eba-477b-b36c-0fd069b51209@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587966 |
Jupiter eats spacecraft
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 01:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nlf3pu$3at$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #587991 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Jupiter eats spacecraft No, it doesn't. So far, we are 1 for 1 with dedicated Jupiter missions (pre-Juno) and about 7 successful flybys. On the other hand, Mars eats spacecraft.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 06:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0f1a7747-354c-4f1f-909e-9cca370b3e0b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587999 |
Well, so far, so good. They figure on 50 orbits. That's 0 out of 50, so far
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 13:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nlgdu5$v8r$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #588019 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Well, so far, so good. >They figure on 50 orbits. >That's 0 out of 50, so far So tell us again how we have Jupiter's gravity all wrong and we couldn't even get Juno into orbit. And how Jupiter eats spacecraft (0 for 2 so far). Oh wait, Jupiter did eat Galileo. But it was deliberate, done at the end of the extended mission.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 08:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nlge26$cc3$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #588025 |
On 7/5/2016 8:49 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > >> Well, so far, so good. >> They figure on 50 orbits. >> That's 0 out of 50, so far > > So tell us again how we have Jupiter's gravity all wrong and we > couldn't even get Juno into orbit. And how Jupiter eats spacecraft > (0 for 2 so far). > > Oh wait, Jupiter did eat Galileo. But it was deliberate, done > at the end of the extended mission. > Facts should never get in the way of what you believe. -- John Sefton -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 09:05 -0700 |
| Subject | DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <LIaez.1031$yW.330@fx27.iad> |
| In reply to | #587682 |
On 7/2/2016 1:59 PM, Double-A wrote: > http://www.space.com/33331-juno-probe-jupiter-radiation-environment.html > > Arriving at Jupiter on the 4th, it will begin year long observations of the planet. > > Double-AssHole > Nutin' like reportin' the fuskin' news. LOLK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 13:48 -0700 |
| Subject | DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <e0f45fc1-ffcb-465b-adf5-eb3f1a36acca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587813 |
Because Jupiter is composed of EXACTLY THE SAME STUFF as Earth and the other planets, but its size is masking much of its actual mass, that spacecraft is going to encounter LOTS of problems. I predict a total loss. Too bad they turned off the camera- oh well, we still have dash cam crash footage coming in every day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 14:07 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <e60495a9-31f5-4852-8f20-70ff283806d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587849 |
On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 1:48:21 PM UTC-7, john wrote: > Because Jupiter is composed of > EXACTLY THE SAME STUFF > as Earth and the other planets, > but its size is masking much of its > actual mass, that spacecraft is going > to encounter LOTS of problems. > I predict a total loss. > Too bad they turned off the > camera- oh well, we still have dash cam > crash footage coming in every day. Jupiter's gravity is well know from its orbit and the obits of its moons. The main problem will be surviving the intense radiation. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 14:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <31fe4a15-fc26-43df-b52e-f5b257845dea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587854 |
Well known out far. LeSage gravity gets different in close
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-03 20:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <f2b99aae-2cab-4e17-a98d-9793e9f5c75c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587858 |
Prediction: crash- no footage; they turned the camera off. I hope not, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-06 16:51 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <nljuh3$1hh0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #587914 |
On 7/3/2016 10:16 PM, john wrote: > Prediction: crash- no footage; they turned > the camera off. > I hope not, though. > Well, John, it's now safely in orbit, something you thought could not happen because NASA had vastly underestimated Jupiter's gravity. So when you predict a disaster and it doesn't happen, what do you do with that information? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-07 12:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <aff9ffc9-6a00-45c4-9fa0-b7c6afbfb8c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #588202 |
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/3/2016 10:16 PM, john wrote: > > Prediction: crash- no footage; they turned > > the camera off. > > I hope not, though. > > > > Well, John, it's now safely in orbit, something you thought could not > happen because NASA had vastly underestimated Jupiter's gravity. > > So when you predict a disaster and it doesn't happen, what do you do > with that information? > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables A major setback for LeSagian gravity? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-07 17:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <7f9bc6de-c422-48b8-bfa6-af89a77f5b00@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #588285 |
On Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:48:02 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 7/3/2016 10:16 PM, john wrote: > > > Prediction: crash- no footage; they turned > > > the camera off. > > > I hope not, though. > > > > > > > Well, John, it's now safely in orbit, something you thought could not > > happen because NASA had vastly underestimated Jupiter's gravity. > > > > So when you predict a disaster and it doesn't happen, what do you do > > with that information? > > > > -- > > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > A major setback for LeSagian gravity? > > Double-A The space ship should stay in orbit.Its a shame for it to crash into Jupiter so fast.Lets get some play out of it. It must of cost a few 100 million. Trebert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-07 20:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <99a5fb42-8647-4fb1-ab78-2cdaf5b17b3e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #588285 |
AA said "A major setback for LeSagian gravity? " If gravity is LeSagian, it will be skewed somehow with larger bodies. Doesn't mean it won't be captured, but it might behave unexpectedly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 04:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <nln96k$vne$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #588318 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >AA said >"A major setback for LeSagian gravity? " >If gravity is LeSagian, it will >be skewed somehow with larger >bodies. >Doesn't mean it won't be >captured, but it might behave >unexpectedly So let me get this straight. NASA rocket scientists got nervous because they knew they had to get the mechanics and gravity just right. No second chance for Juno. Along comes John who kooks that we have gravity all wrong and he predicts disaster for Juno. Juno successfully gets into orbit and everyone celebrates. Everyone except for John. Does John sit down and think "Wow, they really did fly that thing through the eye of a needle", and consider that if they got gravity so right, perhaps the kook gravity theory John believes in (and which predicts different behavior) just may be wrong? No, John just has some sour grapes "It's 0 for 50 orbits so far." Now he has some more sour grapes "it might behave unexpectedly". He doesn't think how just a couple days before, LeSagian gravity, if real, would have made Juno "behave unexpectedly" to such an extent it never would have gotten into orbit at all, would have been a total failure, and we never would have seen whether it would "behave unexpectedly" in orbit. John hates science. John must wish the worse for Juno, just so he can kook about LeSagian gravity. John hates science. That's why he hangs around a physics group, just like how atheists attend church every Sunday so they can whine to the parishioners that there is no God.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 06:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: DOUBLE ASSHOLE TALKS ABOUT "Juno Spacecraft Faces Baptism by Fire" |
| Message-ID | <9b491764-8da3-4589-8a41-8382307705c2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #588319 |
With the world crumbling around his ears, poisoned species giving up the ghost on all sides, and DISABLED a "special" word, Michael says, "It's all good! Science rules!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web