Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #583662 > unrolled thread

Gravitational Waves

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2016-06-07 15:45 -0500
Last post2016-06-15 14:20 -0700
Articles 6 on this page of 26 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:45 -0500
    Re: Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 15:47 -0500
      Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 12:51 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 14:55 -0500
        Re: Gravitational Waves benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-06-08 16:50 -0400
          Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 11:38 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 12:52 -0700
    Re: Gravitational Waves "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 01:11 -0700
      Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 01:29 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 02:45 -0700
          Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 06:51 -0700
        Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-13 15:15 +0000
          Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 11:26 -0700
            Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-13 19:44 +0000
              Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:36 -0700
                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 02:45 +0000
                  Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 02:26 -0700
                    Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 12:20 +0000
                      Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 07:06 -0700
                        Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-14 15:54 +0000
                          Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 11:21 -0700
                            Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-15 14:33 +0000
                              Re: Gravitational Waves john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:35 -0700
                                Re: Gravitational Waves moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-16 01:39 +0000
        Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 13:02 -0700
          Re: Gravitational Waves "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 14:20 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#584892

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-14 11:21 -0700
Message-ID<f6153367-80a7-4565-bd6a-06594edbf809@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#584876
Michael
I. Have. Never. Heard   You. Put. 
Forward. Anything. 


Run along, now

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584997

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-06-15 14:33 +0000
Message-ID<njrp06$u75$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#584892
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>I. Have. Never. Heard   You. Put. 
>Forward. Anything. 

You mean, post kook theories here?  Why would I do that, and make myself
another kook?

If I had access to the cutting edge physics research such as CERN or LIGO,
perhaps I could create new research theories. But I would create a paper
and submit it through the review chain of fellow physicists, and hopefully
pass muster and get published, like my brother does.  Throwing it to the
peanut gallery here wouldn't accomplish anything useful.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585064

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-15 16:35 -0700
Message-ID<f64eff5d-a8f2-405a-845c-572ec8750705@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#584997
Michael
So- you're here because....
you have no questions,
and you're sure everything's
been answered,
but you want others to realize
that to question is futile?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585083

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-06-16 01:39 +0000
Message-ID<njsvvo$evu$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#585064
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael
>So- you're here because....
>you have no questions,
>and you're sure everything's
>been answered,
>but you want others to realize
>that to question is futile?

Nope. I came here long ago to find out all kinds of cool stuff about 
science and physics (and long ago there were real scientists here; no 
longer).

I stay because it turns out I am fascinated by kooks and kookery.  Kooks 
are so interesting some times!  It is interested how twisted minds work!
Not all kooks are interesting; the water vapor/tornado guy is a bore.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#584758

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-13 13:02 -0700
Message-ID<902d9f2e-50aa-422c-8c82-a4322bc99153@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#584453
On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 1:29:45 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> I actually have to agree with Bert, here.
> Big money for completely wrong
> Science that
> fakes the signal and then
> MONTHS LATER
> after papers were written
> says "just testing".
> 
> God's "just testing" THEM right
> now, to see how big they make
> their LIE.
> 
> Look at all the homeless!!
> THAT'S how good your "science" is.
> Look at all the sick!!
> THAT'S how good your "science" is.
> Look at all the DEVASTATION!!!
> THAT IS HOW GOOD YOUR SCIENCE IS!!!
> 
> Your "science" is a reeking, shameful,
> sack of lies.
> 
> Point particles!!  Ridiculous on its face.
> Infinite gravitation!!  Ridiculous on its face.
> Random electron movement!!  Ridiculous
> on its fucken face.
> Suck gravity!! Ridiculous on its face.
> No underlying structure to subatomic
> particles!!  Ridiculous on its face.
> Universal expansion!!! Ridiculous
> on its face.
> 
> You should be ashamed

john biggest lie in science.Reality is they prove gravity waves that were created 1.3 billion LYs away from us.They don't tell the public how weak that force becomes so far from us.o ya .We all know the law that fits,other than the $450,000,000 that slit up this cash. LIGO is money all the way to Cern banks.  TreBert I should ge a prize for proving what LIGO has not done.Einstein said this.Never will gravity waves ever be found.He is right again. TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#585039

From"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-15 14:20 -0700
Message-ID<0c2b9824-3773-4fdf-9a03-e08c57d70bbc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#584758
On Monday, June 13, 2016 at 1:03:02 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 1:29:45 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> > I actually have to agree with Bert, here.
> > Big money for completely wrong
> > Science that
> > fakes the signal and then
> > MONTHS LATER
> > after papers were written
> > says "just testing".
> > 
> > God's "just testing" THEM right
> > now, to see how big they make
> > their LIE.
> > 
> > Look at all the homeless!!
> > THAT'S how good your "science" is.
> > Look at all the sick!!
> > THAT'S how good your "science" is.
> > Look at all the DEVASTATION!!!
> > THAT IS HOW GOOD YOUR SCIENCE IS!!!
> > 
> > Your "science" is a reeking, shameful,
> > sack of lies.
> > 
> > Point particles!!  Ridiculous on its face.
> > Infinite gravitation!!  Ridiculous on its face.
> > Random electron movement!!  Ridiculous
> > on its fucken face.
> > Suck gravity!! Ridiculous on its face.
> > No underlying structure to subatomic
> > particles!!  Ridiculous on its face.
> > Universal expansion!!! Ridiculous
> > on its face.
> > 
> > You should be ashamed
> 
> john biggest lie in science.Reality is they prove gravity waves that were created 1.3 billion LYs away from us.They don't tell the public how weak that force becomes so far from us.o ya .We all know the law that fits,other than the $450,000,000 that slit up this cash. LIGO is money all the way to Cern banks.  TreBert I should ge a prize for proving what LIGO has not done.Einstein said this.Never will gravity waves ever be found.He is right again. TreBert

Is it possible cutting up $450,000,000 by 1,000 people made LIGO reality? O ya TreBert

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web