Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #581603 > unrolled thread

Is antimatter anti-gravity?

Started byjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
First post2016-05-29 17:59 -0700
Last post2016-05-31 09:27 -0500
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 17:59 -0700
    Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 18:16 -0700
      Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 18:27 -0700
        Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-30 02:29 +0000
          Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-29 19:48 -0700
            Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-30 15:16 +0000
      Re: Is antimatter anti-gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 09:27 -0500

#581603 — Is antimatter anti-gravity?

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-29 17:59 -0700
SubjectIs antimatter anti-gravity?
Message-ID<2f218439-7f14-4829-98b7-f3a403f60dac@googlegroups.com>
Thomas 'pointed ears' said:
"Not even wrong."
Which means- a different story,
Your story IS wrong.
IMHO

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#581607

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-29 18:16 -0700
Message-ID<85e82476-b0ce-42b3-899d-eae6d98456ee@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#581603
What is a real eye opener, is that
a 'down' electron in matter is identical
to an 'up' electron in antimatter, according 
to the Galaxy Model.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#581609

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-29 18:27 -0700
Message-ID<5236a7ec-07ae-4580-9a63-790bd969d0de@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#581607
In other words, EVERYTHING is
half matter and half antimatter!!
The antimatter in the matter is
simply upside down, as is the
matter in the antimatter!
Cool, hey?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#581620

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-05-30 02:29 +0000
Message-ID<nig8ip$5jb$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#581609
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>In other words, EVERYTHING is
>half matter and half antimatter!!
>The antimatter in the matter is
>simply upside down, as is the
>matter in the antimatter!
>Cool, hey?

Wow! I see Little Pharma has been very, very good to you today!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#581632

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-29 19:48 -0700
Message-ID<dcc8bb5c-2920-4d98-9d96-1a4df7c66076@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#581620
Michael, a cool idea is a cool idea.
Gotta love it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#581708

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-05-30 15:16 +0000
Message-ID<nihlgr$6ch$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#581632
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Michael, a cool idea is a cool idea.
>Gotta love it.

So, you think just because an idea is really "cool" it should be included
as part of physics?

What if I think invisible pink fairies pushing planets around is a really
cool explanation for gravity?  Should invisible pink fairies be taught in
high school?

p.s. Learn to quote.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#581843

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-05-31 09:27 -0500
Message-ID<nik6vl$m9j$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#581607
On 5/29/2016 8:16 PM, john wrote:
> What is a real eye opener, is that
> a 'down' electron in matter is identical
> to an 'up' electron in antimatter, according
> to the Galaxy Model.
>

It might help to look up what physicists say is the difference between a 
particle and an antiparticle. Do you need help looking that up?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web