Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521903 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-18 17:45 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-18 22:57 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Near-Perfect Computer Security May Be Surprisingly Close Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:45 -0500
Re: Near-Perfect Computer Security May Be Surprisingly Close jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 22:57 +0000
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:45 -0500 |
| Subject | Near-Perfect Computer Security May Be Surprisingly Close |
| Message-ID | <ON-dnbri3fZyDmHInZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Near-Perfect Computer Security May Be Surprisingly Close > http://www.wired.com/2015/09/new-design-cryptographys-black-box/ > In July 2013 a pair of studies set the cryptography world on fire. > They were posted within days of one another to an online archive > where researchers share their work, and together they described a > powerful new method for hiding the secrets inside software programs. > > Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an > editorially independent division of the Simons Foundation whose > mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering > research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and > life sciences > The method was called “indistinguishability obfuscation,” or IO. The > authors touted it as a “central hub” for all of cryptography—a > unified basis upon which to reconstruct familiar cryptographic tools > like public keys and selectively secure signatures. The papers also > took a first stab at demonstrating what IO might look like > mathematically. > > The research produced a flurry of interest at the time, but in the > two years since the announcement, computer science researchers have > encountered a number of practical challenges that stand in the way of > using IO. For one thing, IO is extraordinarily slow. Obfuscating a > program adds delays that would be measured not in minutes or hours, > but in lifetimes. In addition, the method is not nearly as > mathematically secure as it needs to be. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 22:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nghucc-6oa.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521903 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Near-Perfect Computer Security May Be Surprisingly Close Which might be nice if it actually happened but has nothing to do with physics, shit head. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web