Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #571393 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-18 16:05 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-04-22 16:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 175 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 16:05 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-18 21:21 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-18 22:32 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-18 15:57 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 21:07 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-19 13:05 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:28 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 15:59 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-04-19 06:53 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:34 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 07:01 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 13:43 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:49 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 23:10 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-04-20 03:15 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:05 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 06:15 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:27 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:44 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:40 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:47 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:57 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:08 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:41 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 10:14 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:52 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 14:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 22:16 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 08:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-21 12:14 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 10:11 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 15:40 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 10:07 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:25 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 02:40 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-21 11:44 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 04:59 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 11:32 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:35 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 12:56 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:41 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-21 20:30 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:47 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:20 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:25 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:18 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:26 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:35 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:33 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 13:47 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 11:26 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:57 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 12:02 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 14:18 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-19 19:39 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 14:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:30 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 08:47 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:43 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:54 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 23:21 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:08 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-19 22:21 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 15:31 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:57 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-19 07:36 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 11:07 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-21 20:32 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 04:34 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:09 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 06:28 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:32 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:33 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:30 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:28 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 06:41 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:50 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:09 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:15 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 12:36 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 14:43 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:20 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:42 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:47 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:25 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:27 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:39 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 17:00 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:12 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 17:22 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:32 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:54 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:57 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:27 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:41 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 15:00 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:05 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:51 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:40 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:46 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 21:13 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:08 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-24 23:55 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 21:27 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-25 01:56 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:58 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:50 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 04:58 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 07:02 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 05:12 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 05:39 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 14:46 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:48 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 23:39 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:11 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 16:58 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:39 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 04:44 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 07:01 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 11:52 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 21:37 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 14:53 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:52 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-25 08:56 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 16:51 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-25 20:24 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-26 14:41 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:09 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 07:29 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:43 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 20:50 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:05 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-30 06:31 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 08:42 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:38 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-04 05:26 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-28 19:39 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 10:35 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 08:58 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-30 06:37 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 08:43 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:38 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-30 06:40 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 08:44 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:02 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:15 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-03 14:32 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 05:35 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-04 05:30 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 12:24 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 11:27 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 13:31 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:12 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 07:48 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 15:25 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:28 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 19:44 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 07:21 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 14:41 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:29 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-27 10:41 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:34 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:42 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:14 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:50 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:06 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:16 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 16:51 +0000
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 10:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <U6-dnZ3E45AXr7_KnZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #573864 |
On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: > I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-28 19:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f9b72394-26c9-48bc-99ba-a988bef9669d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573967 |
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: > > I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. > > > I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. Idiot.....I didn't say that. I said that every object is in a state of motion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 10:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <w8ydnS7myMnf4r7KnZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #574075 |
On 4/28/16 9:39 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. >> >> >> I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. > > Idiot.....I didn't say that. I said that every object is in a state of motion. > Every object in motion ==> all motion is relative. It's that simple, Seto. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 08:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ng005r$6mt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #574172 |
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/28/16 9:39 PM, kenseto wrote: >> On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: >>> On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>> I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a >>>> state of motion. >>> >>> >>> I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , >>> Seto. >> >> Idiot.....I didn't say that. I said that every object is in a state of >> motion. >> > > Every object in motion ==> all motion is relative. It's that simple, > Seto. > Sam, bad pedagogic, your 1-liner. It's not that simple. If it were he would get it. If he sits on a bench and looks at a building: Neither moves. Even for astronomers there were the non-moving "Fixed Stars". Give it another Try, Sam, if you wanna be the teacher.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 06:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <85e9de0c-8153-4d97-b74c-ddf686594f5a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #574172 |
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 11:35:33 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 4/28/16 9:39 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. > >> > >> > >> I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. > > > > Idiot.....I didn't say that. I said that every object is in a state of motion. > > > > Every object in motion ==> all motion is relative. It's that simple, > Seto. Idiot....in order to have relative motion you need to have individual motion. IOW relative motion is born from individual motions. Gee you are stupid.....now go and copy and paste some papers to support your absurd argument.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 08:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <KqadnfkoUqMJK7nKnZ2dnUU7-Q0AAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #574359 |
On 4/30/16 8:37 AM, kenseto wrote: > Idiot....in order to have relative motion you need to have individual motion. Whether you are in motion or not, Seto, depends *strictly* on the perspective of the observer. All motion is relative. Even Galileo new this. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 12:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ng83bb$j4r$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #574359 |
On 4/30/2016 8:37 AM, kenseto wrote: > Idiot....in order to have relative motion you need to have individual motion. Not true. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 06:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <69eab2f5-c0f0-45f2-b58a-7b057944d65d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573967 |
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: > > I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. > > > I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. I don't need any other object to know that I am in motion when I am running.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 08:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <KqadnfgoUqNQK7nKnZ2dnUU7-Q2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #574360 |
On 4/30/16 8:40 AM, kenseto wrote: > I don't need any other object to know that I am in motion when I am running Try running in intergalactic space, Seto. Whether you are in motion or not, Seto, depends *strictly* on the perspective of the observer. All motion is relative. Even Galileo new this. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 07:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <150e9b2a-e036-4091-9449-ff7a2b00fba6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #574364 |
On Saturday, April 30, 2016 at 9:44:48 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 4/30/16 8:40 AM, kenseto wrote: > > I don't need any other object to know that I am in motion when I am running > > Try running in intergalactic space, Seto. Ken is already running in inter and or outer galactic space. Period. > Whether you are in motion or not, Seto, depends *strictly* on the > perspective of the observer. All motion is relative. Even Galileo > new this. Basically your observers are some anonymous stalkers out of nowhere. Galileo told me Sam Worm Whole Liar is an Idiot. Then we two drank wine. Red. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: If only Sam Worm Whole Liar had a brain.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 12:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ng83cd$j4r$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #574360 |
On 4/30/2016 8:40 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. >> >> >> I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. > > I don't need any other object to know that I am in motion when I am running. > Yes, you do. How do you know the surface you're running on isn't moving in the opposite direction? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-02 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aca257d9-1187-43cd-80b9-b617f19283bf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #574879 |
Flat Earthers, relativity deniers, and people like Odd, who believe in point particles, and zero-volume entities. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-03 14:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ngacpb$kjn$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #574943 |
Flat Earthers, relativity deniers, scientific creationists, spinny thing worshipers, fractal nuts. Kooks, every one of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 05:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0c0d3b42-5839-4031-a0de-0f9d5261e5cd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #575164 |
Oh, Michael Are you a point particles zero volume guy?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 05:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b05a8b39-35cd-407e-8d10-a91ba381bfa7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #574879 |
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 1:39:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/30/2016 8:40 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. > >> > >> > >> I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. > > > > I don't need any other object to know that I am in motion when I am running. > > > > Yes, you do. How do you know the surface you're running on isn't moving > in the opposite direction? > I don't care what the surface is doing. When I run means I am in motion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 12:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ngdb88$129k$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #575414 |
On 5/4/2016 7:30 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 1:39:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/30/2016 8:40 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 11:55:58 AM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote: >>>> On 4/27/16 10:50 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> I am not motionless.....in fact every object in the universe is in a state of motion. >>>> >>>> >>>> I am glad you finally recognize that *all motion is relative* , Seto. >>> >>> I don't need any other object to know that I am in motion when I am running. >>> >> >> Yes, you do. How do you know the surface you're running on isn't moving >> in the opposite direction? >> > > I don't care what the surface is doing. When I run means I am in motion. > I'm going to let this sit right here and speak volumes about your 3rd grade notions of motion. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <61a4c988-c8ec-47e6-887f-d14ad6fbf908@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #575489 |
Off- All my atoms are in motion compared to your atoms- unless you still claim that electrons and protons don't move
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-04 13:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ngdf59$19or$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #575519 |
On 5/4/2016 1:27 PM, john wrote: > Off- > All my atoms are in motion And why exactly do you think that's a plus? > compared > to your atoms- unless you still claim that electrons > and protons don't move > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 12:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qMSdnUWZ692Kbr3KnZ2dnUU7-SUAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #573697 |
On 4/27/16 9:29 AM, kenseto wrote: > If I run toward you at constant speed, I certainly can tell that I am the one who is doing the moving. If you were in intergalactic space "running" toward me (both of us in spacesuits), it would be stooopid to say that one of us was moving and the other stationary. What make *way more sense* is to say that we have relative velocity to each other. Period. Saying more is a waste of time. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 07:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <965d6de8-c3a4-4dd0-8523-f92ece5cf879@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573387 |
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 10:42:27 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: > > >On Monday, April 25, 2016 at 12:51:56 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: > > >> >Idiot....2.2 us on a moving fast moving muon clock is corresponded to gamma > >> >*2.2 us on the earth clock.....that's why the fast moving muon is able to > >> >reach the earth surface with 2.2 us on its clock. > >> > >> From the earth reference frame, that is true. However, from the muon's > >> reference frame, the earth is seen as a thin pancake and it has to travel > >> only a short distance to reach the ground from the upper atmosphere, so it > >> can do so in only 2.2 uS. > > >No....from the muon's point of view the earth looks the same round ball > >and the muon itself is rushing very fast toward it. The 2.2 us on the > >muon clock is able to reach the earth's surface before it decays. > > SR predicts length contraction for anything moving relative to it. No, you need to learn what SR says. SR says that the projected length of a moving meter stick is fore-shortened to a factor of 1/gamma. This is not material contraction as you implied. >So, as > far as the muon is concerned, the earth is approaching it at nearly c. Clearly this is an absurd assertion. There are zillions of muons surrounding the earth the earth cannot rush I different directions to meet each one of these muons. The correct description is that the muons surrounding the earth are rushing toward to meet it....the 2.2us of time for the muon clock became gamma*2.2us on the earth clock and that's why the muon is able to reach the ground before decaying. It > sees the earth as highly flattened in the direction of motion as the > length contraction is only in this direction. This is an absurd assertion.....clearly the earth cannot be flattened in different directions. The muon is able to reach the ground because 2.2 us on the muon clock is corresponded to gamma 2.2 us on the earth clock. This is how the muon can > reach the ground in only 2.2 uS, which at c is only about 660 meters. To > the muon, the distance between the upper atmosphere and the ground really > is only 660 meters or so, that is how much the earth is compressed in its > frame. In the uncompressed reference we on earth see, this distance is > many kilometers. > > You really need to learn about SR someday, rather than making the same > mistakes over and over again. I don't know why you refuse to learn SR. > > > There is no rest frame for any object in our universe. > > That statement is false, by definition.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web