Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #573362 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-26 04:54 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-30 14:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 139 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 04:54 -0700
Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 05:04 -0700
Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 05:16 -0700
Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 05:31 -0700
Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 06:05 -0700
Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 06:11 -0700
Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 07:36 -0700
Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 07:52 -0700
Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 07:38 -0700
Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:00 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:07 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:13 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:21 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:28 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:40 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-26 12:48 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 11:54 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:06 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-26 14:39 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 12:08 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 14:17 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:08 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-26 19:42 +0000
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 13:50 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-26 21:31 +0000
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:12 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:16 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 13:53 +0000
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 07:16 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:22 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 14:55 +0000
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:17 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:19 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:23 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:33 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 11:08 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 13:35 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:48 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:47 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 16:03 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:36 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 18:36 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:43 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:38 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 19:37 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 23:16 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 09:32 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 16:06 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 15:59 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 17:06 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:48 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-27 23:05 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 06:00 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 06:18 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 07:42 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-28 22:43 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 06:00 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-29 09:55 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 07:55 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 13:14 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 14:44 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 16:20 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 00:27 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 00:27 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 21:40 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 02:24 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 04:37 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 12:21 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 09:57 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 10:28 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? "Pom Trotter" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-04-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 13:32 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-02 17:14 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 15:49 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-04 03:59 -0500
Re: A rancher hates "townies" for being too hip, too worldly. ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-04 04:51 -0500
Re: A rancher hates "townies" for being too hip, too worldly. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-04 08:24 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-04 08:25 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 12:51 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-05-04 19:25 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-04 21:37 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 05:53 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 06:08 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 06:43 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 06:57 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 12:47 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 10:08 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 13:35 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 12:43 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-29 23:47 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 10:32 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 08:56 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 13:38 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 00:24 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-29 23:53 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 21:03 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 01:59 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 02:04 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 02:04 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 00:14 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:01 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-28 15:17 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 15:46 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-28 23:26 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 02:11 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-29 09:44 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 07:07 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 00:47 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 04:32 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 09:48 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 10:31 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-30 14:01 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 09:19 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-03 14:26 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 14:13 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 17:30 +0000
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-26 12:39 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 06:10 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-29 09:58 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 08:23 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-29 23:50 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:33 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:34 -0500
Re: Lawyer kooks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:26 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-26 11:40 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 08:48 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-26 12:40 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:29 -0700
Re: Lawyer kooks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-26 21:19 -0400
Re: Lawyer kooks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 14:49 -0700
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 14:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nfoerm$1m9f$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #573489 |
On 4/26/2016 1:39 PM, benj wrote: > Only when he's debating when actual word meanings no longer matter. You mean, like "surface" and "boundary", which you claim don't exist? Is that what "actual word meanings" say? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 12:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <05e96c15-bca4-42e7-8a68-5a776c85f32f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573450 |
Anyone notice how fast HVAC changed the subject from Chemtrails?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 16:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9ad9c2cb-da24-414e-ae8b-a8f9af6cca24@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573498 |
john Anyone notice how fast HVAC changed the subject from Chemtrails? --------------- Meh. It's a talent
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 19:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfogba$363$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #573449 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: >Your cynicism notwithstanding, I think we can own up to acts of war we >have committed. After all, our military is telling us we are at war, >which means somewhere along the way a declaration of war has been made. I don't think the US has made a declaration of war against anyone since World War II. Every thing since then has been a "police action" or "military intervention" or "they needed killin'", never an official war. Not even 9/11, where an attack against a military target (the Pentagon) and an attempted attack against the seat of government (Flight 93 supposedly targeting the White House or Capitol) would certainly justify such.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 13:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <902fa98d-8e60-412e-958c-fe012701fd16@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573515 |
93 was heading for WTC7 The pilot who shot it down is still in military prison
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 21:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfomn6$nff$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #573526 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >93 was heading for WTC7 >The pilot who shot it >down is still in military prison Why do you believe such things? Why would terrorists (or "they", whoever "they" are, you tell me) want to crash a jet into the WTC complex a third time? The path of Flight 93 was toward DC, not New York. I do believe Khalid Sheikh Muhammad admitted 93's target was the US Capitol Building, but am not sure. I find 9/11 k00kery quite fascinating for some reason.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 16:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ad3f2a45-21e1-4811-9116-c62401039ff7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573532 |
Because 7 was wired too. "Pull it." (Asbestos-filled white elephants)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 16:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7ff1badb-e349-424c-9c10-021f9fdaea85@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573555 |
john Because 7 was wired too. "Pull it. ------------- Pull this
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 16:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e532d8d6-2f7f-4ae7-aea0-20507faa1f6a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573558 |
Silverstein said it, not me. And George said he saw the first plane hit the first building while he was waiting to go into the school. And when he met the principal at the front door- and I'm sure many people will be able to verify the time- she says he told her a plane had hit a building. Figure. It. Out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-26 16:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <27803e7b-67ab-45c0-816c-bc381add5353@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573559 |
john Silverstein said it, not me. And George said he saw the first plane hit the first building while he was waiting to go into the school. And when he met the principal at the front door- and I'm sure many people will be able to verify the time- she says he told her a plane had hit a building. Figure. It. Out. ------------- John. Look. Just give it up. You're grasping at straws. The reality is horrible enough without these 9/11 kooks like Rocko and BJ searching for any crack in the true story so they can insult the government and the people of the United States. So renounce them and their crazy beliefs and join with the normal people of the world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 13:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqg7t$bmm$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #573555 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Because 7 was wired too. >"Pull it." >(Asbestos-filled white elephants) So you're going to misquote Silverstein, too? Towers 1 and 2 had asbestos. (Asbestos was banned partly through their construction. Some think the less effective asbestos replacement on the fire floors contributed to their failures). Building 7 was quite a bit newer (construction started 1983), and didn't have asbestos, it was already banned by then. It used Monokote fireproofing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 07:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4a91c6ce-00a3-4b29-b196-b2a2400c9ee2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573687 |
Michael You are a Physicist and you think several floors on fire and significant impact is enough to cause global collapse right through that many huge steel columns? Oh, right, you're not an engineer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 09:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nfqhvm$qu6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #573690 |
On 4/27/2016 9:16 AM, john wrote: > Michael > You are a Physicist and you think several > floors on fire and significant impact > is enough to cause global collapse right through > that many huge steel columns? > > Oh, right, you're not an engineer. > Um, John, are you an engineer? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 14:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqjtd$grr$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #573690 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Michael >You are a Physicist and you think several >floors on fire and significant impact >is enough to cause global collapse right through >that many huge steel columns? Once one floor's columns fails, you have the mass of the entire building above it essentially falling onto the floor below. Although the way the towers failed, there was no need to "collapse right through huge steel columns". The outer columns (exterior walls) largely peeled away like a banana peel and the cores remained standing for several seconds after the floors around them were already gone. Try this simple experiment: Gently place a large concrete block onto your foot. You'll feel the weight and it might be a little uncomfortable but you will be fine. Now drop that same concrete block onto your foot from about 10' high. Feel the difference?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <016f5a41-d351-47c2-9914-6723f9c1f0b3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573702 |
Ah!! So that's why SO MANY steel buildings come down like that!! What is it? 0% except for those three?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 12:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nfqsbe$3g8$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #573734 |
On 4/27/2016 12:17 PM, john wrote: > Ah!! > So that's why SO MANY steel buildings > come down like that!! > What is it? > 0% except for those three? > How many buildings have been hit by commercial airliners? Let's see.... 2. And you know that buildings won't fall down if hit by a commercial airliner how exactly? You're an engineer? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 10:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3f64e3bf-79ce-427a-97a9-898c53d516c4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573735 |
7 wasn't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 12:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nfqt4h$652$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #573737 |
On 4/27/2016 12:23 PM, john wrote: > 7 wasn't > Nope, and it's not the first building to fall down as a result of NOT being hit by a plane, either. It's also not the first building to fall down as a result of NOT being blown up with explosives. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 11:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd3d4d82-c2d5-4068-b9b5-5fa7284973d5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #573743 |
If there weren't 65 other things wrong with the official story, that would STILL be far-fetched. Check the time Bush told the school principal there was a plane/building accident. He knew before he exited his limo. He saw it happen. HE SAID SO. What more proof do your retarded little brains need?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-27 13:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nfr0on$fhj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #573753 |
On 4/27/2016 1:08 PM, john wrote: > If there weren't 65 other things > wrong with the official > story, that would STILL be far-fetched. According to who? Are you an engineer, that you know that it is far fetched for a building to fall down even if it's not been blown up with explosives or not been hit by a commercial airliner? Really. I'm just trying to get at your basis of determining what's far-fetched or not. Your gut? Tell me. > Check the time Bush told the > school principal there was a > plane/building accident. > He knew before he exited his limo. > He saw it happen. > HE SAID SO. > What more proof do your retarded > little brains need? > Yes, he knew the first plane had crashed into the WTC before he entered the classroom. In the classroom, his aide leaned down to tell him of the second crash, and that this confirmed that they were under attack. I'm not sure what your point is. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web