Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #572904 > unrolled thread

Re: H bonds get stronger when asymmetry is restored

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: H bonds get stronger when asymmetry is restored Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 11:32 -0500

#572904 — Re: H bonds get stronger when asymmetry is restored

On 3/28/2016 4:06 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 3/28/2016 3:54 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>
>> Whether you choose to educate yourself is not my concern, as it changes
>> nothing. Whether you continue to call anything absurd or speculative
>> that you've not educated yourself about is also not my concern. Whether
>> you think that freshman level physics as already explained to you is
>> complicated and therefore phoney is ALSO not my concern. Facts are
>> facts, whether you choose to acknowledge them or not. You might as well
>> be denying the existence of Australia.

>> All that matters to me is letting you know that you are oblivious to
>> simple facts, which you could test yourself but decline to do so.
>>
>
> I'll just add, Jim, that putting out a DEMONSTRABLY ridiculous idea and
> then jumping into an online community to flood the community with your
> idea, and then coupling it with the challenge "I dare you to try to
> prove me wrong! I'm quite certain that I will never be forced to admit
> it!" is the hallmark of an infantile attention-whore with profound
> social anxieties and incompetencies. Because this is also fairly common
> (Henry Wilson, Robert Winn, Ken Seto, the list goes on), you are not
> even interesting as a specimen. You're what's called a Crank of the
> Pedestrian Sort.
>
>

James McGinn, who hates science, is simply trying to spread his 
"insane-ness" around.

it is obvious in his videos on you tube, his brain is fried.

to assume he can reason and understand, is probably a bad assumption.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web