Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #571393 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-18 16:05 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-04-22 16:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 175 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 16:05 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-18 21:21 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-18 22:32 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-18 15:57 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 21:07 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-19 13:05 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:28 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 15:59 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-04-19 06:53 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:34 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 07:01 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 13:43 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:49 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 23:10 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-04-20 03:15 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:05 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 06:15 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:27 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:44 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:40 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:47 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:57 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:08 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:41 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 10:14 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:52 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 14:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 22:16 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 08:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-21 12:14 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 10:11 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 15:40 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 10:07 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-20 13:25 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 02:40 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-21 11:44 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 04:59 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 11:32 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:35 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 12:56 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:41 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-21 20:30 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:47 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:20 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:25 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:18 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:26 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:35 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:33 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 13:47 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 11:26 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:57 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 12:02 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 14:18 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-19 19:39 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 14:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:30 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 08:47 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:43 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 13:54 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 23:21 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:08 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-19 22:21 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 15:31 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 07:57 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-19 07:36 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 11:07 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-21 20:32 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 04:34 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:09 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 06:28 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:32 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:33 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:30 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:28 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 06:41 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:50 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:09 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:15 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 12:36 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 14:43 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:20 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:42 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 07:47 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:25 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:27 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:39 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 17:00 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:12 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 17:22 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:32 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:54 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:57 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:27 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:41 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 15:00 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:05 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:51 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:40 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:46 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 21:13 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:08 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-24 23:55 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 21:27 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-25 01:56 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:58 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:50 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 04:58 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 07:02 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 05:12 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 05:39 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 14:46 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:48 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 23:39 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 14:11 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 16:58 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 06:39 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 04:44 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 07:01 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 11:52 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 21:37 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 14:53 -0400
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 13:52 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-25 08:56 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 16:51 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-25 20:24 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-26 14:41 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:09 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 07:29 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 09:43 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 20:50 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:05 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-30 06:31 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 08:42 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:38 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-04 05:26 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:55 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-28 19:39 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 10:35 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-29 08:58 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-30 06:37 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 08:43 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:38 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-30 06:40 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 08:44 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:02 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:15 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-03 14:32 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 05:35 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-04 05:30 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 12:24 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 11:27 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 13:31 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:12 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 07:48 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 15:25 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:28 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 19:44 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-27 07:21 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-27 14:41 +0000
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:29 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-27 10:41 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:22 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-22 07:34 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:42 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:14 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:50 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:06 -0700
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:16 -0500
Re: The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 16:51 +0000
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 16:05 -0500 |
| Subject | The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again |
| Message-ID | <geednSsmUNCJ0YjKnZ2dnUU7-T0AAAAA@giganews.com> |
The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again > http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/the-search-for-hidden-dimensions-comes-up-empty-again/ > Now, one of the most sensitive experiments yet has reported another > null result. But it's a very cool experiment nonetheless. > > Why do quantum mechanics and gravity always argue, Mom? > > Here is the sort of conflict facing physicists: quantum mechanics > takes place on the fixed stage of space and time; in gravity, space > and time are actors. In quantum mechanics, the actors are not always > continuous, often making sharp jumps. Unfortunately, gravity requires > that space and time be smooth and continuous. These conflicting > requirements are, so far, unresolved. > > One approach to resolving this problem is for space and time to have > more than four dimensions. I can't pretend to have a great > understanding of this subject, but my impression is that all the > jumpiness of space time will get absorbed into the dimensions that we > don't observe. Why don't we observe these dimensions? Because they > are curled up into tiny volumes. > > Yet particles should still feel them. Imagine that you are a > particle. You have some mass, and therefore, you bend space and time > such that nearby objects feel a force attracting them to you—even > better, it is a mutual attraction, the best sort of attraction. > -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qnvfuc-9ba.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #571393 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again Yawn. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 22:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf3n9g02uj1@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #571393 |
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:05:24 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote: > The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again >> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/t > Fuck that goddamned arse-technica shit. This is actually a very fascinating area of experimental physics which tests the inverse square law at extremely (relatively speaking) small distances. One can appreciate the difficulties that must be overcome to arrive at valid results. Only the original article can do this subject justice: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.131101 Well, it's only the summary. The article itself is behind a fucking paywall. Why doesn't Sammy use his resources to obtain the original article and post it here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2f8206e9-2d65-47f3-8e1b-4116ded3af3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571393 |
On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 2:05:28 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: > The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again > > http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/the-search-for-hidden-dimensions-comes-up-empty-again/ > > > > Now, one of the most sensitive experiments yet has reported another > > null result. But it's a very cool experiment nonetheless. > > > > Why do quantum mechanics and gravity always argue, Mom? > > > > Here is the sort of conflict facing physicists: quantum mechanics > > takes place on the fixed stage of space and time; in gravity, space > > and time are actors. In quantum mechanics, the actors are not always > > continuous, often making sharp jumps. Unfortunately, gravity requires > > that space and time be smooth and continuous. These conflicting > > requirements are, so far, unresolved. > > > > One approach to resolving this problem is for space and time to have > > more than four dimensions. I can't pretend to have a great > > understanding of this subject, but my impression is that all the > > jumpiness of space time will get absorbed into the dimensions that we > > don't observe. Why don't we observe these dimensions? Because they > > are curled up into tiny volumes. > > > > Yet particles should still feel them. Imagine that you are a > > particle. You have some mass, and therefore, you bend space and time > > such that nearby objects feel a force attracting them to you--even > > better, it is a mutual attraction, the best sort of attraction. > > Wasn't Mike Varney involved in such tomfoolery a while back? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-18 21:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <X8CdnVmB-vxxD4jKnZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #571425 |
On 4/18/16 5:57 PM, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 2:05:28 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: >> The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again >>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/the-search-for-hidden-dimensions-comes-up-empty-again/ >> >> >>> Now, one of the most sensitive experiments yet has reported another >>> null result. But it's a very cool experiment nonetheless. >>> >>> Why do quantum mechanics and gravity always argue, Mom? >>> >>> Here is the sort of conflict facing physicists: quantum mechanics >>> takes place on the fixed stage of space and time; in gravity, space >>> and time are actors. In quantum mechanics, the actors are not always >>> continuous, often making sharp jumps. Unfortunately, gravity requires >>> that space and time be smooth and continuous. These conflicting >>> requirements are, so far, unresolved. >>> >>> One approach to resolving this problem is for space and time to have >>> more than four dimensions. I can't pretend to have a great >>> understanding of this subject, but my impression is that all the >>> jumpiness of space time will get absorbed into the dimensions that we >>> don't observe. Why don't we observe these dimensions? Because they >>> are curled up into tiny volumes. >>> >>> Yet particles should still feel them. Imagine that you are a >>> particle. You have some mass, and therefore, you bend space and time >>> such that nearby objects feel a force attracting them to you--even >>> better, it is a mutual attraction, the best sort of attraction. >>> > > > Wasn't Mike Varney involved in such tomfoolery a while back? > > Double-A > If you want to contact Mike, I can email you his email address. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 13:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <deb26d1f-dde5-476b-8b38-8bc3ea684e83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571474 |
On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 7:07:43 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 4/18/16 5:57 PM, Double-A wrote: > > On Monday, April 18, 2016 at 2:05:28 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again > >>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/the-search-for-hidden-dimensions-comes-up-empty-again/ > >> > >> > >>> Now, one of the most sensitive experiments yet has reported another > >>> null result. But it's a very cool experiment nonetheless. > >>> > >>> Why do quantum mechanics and gravity always argue, Mom? > >>> > >>> Here is the sort of conflict facing physicists: quantum mechanics > >>> takes place on the fixed stage of space and time; in gravity, space > >>> and time are actors. In quantum mechanics, the actors are not always > >>> continuous, often making sharp jumps. Unfortunately, gravity requires > >>> that space and time be smooth and continuous. These conflicting > >>> requirements are, so far, unresolved. > >>> > >>> One approach to resolving this problem is for space and time to have > >>> more than four dimensions. I can't pretend to have a great > >>> understanding of this subject, but my impression is that all the > >>> jumpiness of space time will get absorbed into the dimensions that we > >>> don't observe. Why don't we observe these dimensions? Because they > >>> are curled up into tiny volumes. > >>> > >>> Yet particles should still feel them. Imagine that you are a > >>> particle. You have some mass, and therefore, you bend space and time > >>> such that nearby objects feel a force attracting them to you--even > >>> better, it is a mutual attraction, the best sort of attraction. > >>> > > > > > > Wasn't Mike Varney involved in such tomfoolery a while back? > > > > Double-A > > > > If you want to contact Mike, I can email you his email address. > That's OK. I'm sure he reads this group, and if he wants to respond to any of my remarks, I'm sure he'll fine a way. He has before. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 13:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a510579-93a3-47d4-a0e0-86b5128d7383@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571654 |
Odd and Mikey Play with math all you want- it will never be reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 15:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf6680$3dm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #571667 |
On 4/19/2016 3:28 PM, john wrote: > Odd and Mikey > Play with math all you want- > it will never be reality. > John, definitions are definitions. As I've told you, how a dimension is defined was determined by physicists and mathematicians. If you want to claim that their definition of dimension is not real and that you have a more realistic and grounded definition of dimension than they do, then you can certainly carry that cardboard sign around with you at protest demonstrations and rallies if you want to. Just me, but it seems silly to stick to your guns and claim that because YOUR COMMON SENSE tells you that 2D objects are flat, then "curved 2D surfaces" is a contradiction in terms. That's a special kind of ignorance: arrogant ignorance. "The experts may not agree with me, but I like my concept better, so they're full of it." -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 06:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <if3chbp3un8q4bp8af35it7j1gh1ln94tb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #571393 |
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:05:24 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >The search for hidden dimensions comes up empty again How can a dimension itself have a size? -- Boris --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 06:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ac93b422-c574-460c-9f75-43530c8961c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571532 |
There are THREE dimensions. Just like with logarithmic paper, reality can be constructed at different scales. And is
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 07:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f1966745-421e-42e3-b593-e8bb18476011@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571538 |
john There are THREE dimensions. Just like with logarithmic paper, reality can be constructed at different scales. And is ------------- John, just use the example of a kitchen chair. It exits. It exists in width, in breadth, in height, AND in time. Time is as real as any other dimension. Obviously. Until you actually THINK this way, knowing that time is an equal partner in our four dimensional space/time, you will always struggle with physical concepts. Right right? Fist bump bro?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 13:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <57166e3c$0$53745$c3e8da3$3304c218@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #571545 |
On 04/19/2016 10:01 AM, HVAC wrote: > john > There are THREE dimensions. > > Just like with logarithmic paper, > reality can be constructed at different > scales. > And is > ------------- > > John, just use the example of a kitchen chair. It exits. It exists in width, in breadth, in height, AND in time. > > Time is as real as any other dimension. Obviously. > > Until you actually THINK this way, knowing that time is an equal partner in our four dimensional space/time, you will always struggle with physical concepts. > > Right right? > > Fist bump bro? > Time is not a dimension, Professor Wormley to the contrary not withstanding. You really have no understanding of math and science do you? When was the last time you saw x or y constantly and inexorably moving from smaller to larger values? Idiot. Loser.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 13:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf5ujc$1m96$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #571593 |
On 4/19/2016 12:43 PM, benj wrote: > Time is not a dimension, Professor Wormley to the contrary not > withstanding. You really have no understanding of math and science do > you? When was the last time you saw x or y constantly and inexorably > moving from smaller to larger values? Idiot. Loser. I'm sorry, I'm not following. Is it your claim that by definition (whose?) a dimension is something that a body can move freely along in either direction? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-19 23:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5716f31f$0$62719$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #571608 |
On 04/19/2016 02:49 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/19/2016 12:43 PM, benj wrote: >> Time is not a dimension, Professor Wormley to the contrary not >> withstanding. You really have no understanding of math and science do >> you? When was the last time you saw x or y constantly and inexorably >> moving from smaller to larger values? Idiot. Loser. > > I'm sorry, I'm not following. Is it your claim that by definition > (whose?) a dimension is something that a body can move freely along in > either direction? Of course you are not following. But I'm not here to educate you in mathematical fantasy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 03:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nf6s84$v2o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #571719 |
benj <loser@gmail> wrote: > On 04/19/2016 02:49 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/19/2016 12:43 PM, benj wrote: >>> Time is not a dimension, Professor Wormley to the contrary not >>> withstanding. You really have no understanding of math and science do >>> you? When was the last time you saw x or y constantly and inexorably >>> moving from smaller to larger values? Idiot. Loser. "moving"? Descartes befores deshorse. >> I'm sorry, I'm not following. Is it your claim that by definition >> (whose?) a dimension is something that a body can move freely along in >> either direction? > Of course you are not following. But I'm not here to educate you in > mathematical fantasy. It's just sommin you do by accident? -- Dimension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension In physics and mathematics, the dimension of a mathematical space (or object ) is informally defined as the minimum number of coordinates needed to specify any point within it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 08:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nf7uqq$ld2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #571719 |
On 4/19/2016 10:10 PM, benj wrote: > On 04/19/2016 02:49 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/19/2016 12:43 PM, benj wrote: >>> Time is not a dimension, Professor Wormley to the contrary not >>> withstanding. You really have no understanding of math and science do >>> you? When was the last time you saw x or y constantly and inexorably >>> moving from smaller to larger values? Idiot. Loser. >> >> I'm sorry, I'm not following. Is it your claim that by definition >> (whose?) a dimension is something that a body can move freely along in >> either direction? > > Of course you are not following. But I'm not here to educate you in > mathematical fantasy. Oh, I see. So let's recap. You have a concept of dimension that appeals to your common sense, even though it might well be very different than the definition that is used by physicists and mathematicians. But then again, it's a mathematical term according to you, and therefore doesn't correspond to anything in reality and is only fantasy anyway. So you are free to make statements about time not being a fantastical dimension that has no bearing on reality, because of what your common sense tells you about this fantastical, nonreal notion. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 06:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f683226a-9c77-46d6-a5f9-124937297c1c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571719 |
BJ quacked Of course you are not following. But I'm not here to educate you in mathematical fantasy ----------- BJ is here to educate people in his non fantasy topics. Including ghosts, ESP, and the 9/11 nuke theory. You mad BJ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 07:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <73b98007-c452-4d28-bc46-84301c064ec7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571807 |
No such thing as SMALLEST Because smaller is SMALLER The trouble is, their radiation is also smaller, so we can't see them. But they're there. They gravitate. They're DM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 07:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <018dd7d6-cbcf-4aa7-8406-26fa642a14c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #571818 |
No
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobodyxx@gmail> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 13:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5717bf00$0$28811$c3e8da3$88b277c5@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #571839 |
On 04/20/2016 10:44 AM, HVAC wrote: > No Wormley's "no" is bigger and 90 degrees out of phase.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web