Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #570006 > unrolled thread

Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:59 +0000
    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:38 -0500
      Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 21:35 +0000
        Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-17 09:27 -0500
          Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:17 +0000
            Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-20 03:47 -0500
              Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 14:32 +0000
                Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:39 -0500
                  Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 18:58 +0000
                    Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:19 -0500

#570006 — Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:nejifq$ir2$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>And your explanation for the very small seismic readings for when WTC7
>>>appeared to crash to the ground is what?
>>
>> And your explanation for the very small (that is, ZERO) seismic readings
>> for the distinctive nuclear explosive signatures when the buildings
>> crashed to the ground is what?

>BULLSHIT.  Even the background seismic activity is higher than ZERO you 
>idiot.  And an the detonation of an MRR nuked could hide in the background 
>seismic activity.  DUH.

The distinctive nuclear explosion signature would be about 5 on the 
Richter Scale.  WAY above the background noise, which you kookclaim was
less than what a jackhammer produces, even though the difference between
force and energy confuses you.

>> And your answer to why there was still 1.5 million tons of debris to be
>> hauled out even after the buildings were supposedly "vaporized" is what?

>And your explaination for why that much weight could not crush the 
>"Surviving Corners" is what?  Your failure to provide a valid explanation 
>for that and from NIST proves you are full of shit just like NIST.

Quit avoiding the question.  Why was there 1.5 million tons (or 1.492
million tons if you want to nitpick) of debris removed, when the WTC
weighed about 1.5 million tons in the first place?

>Once again what you or NIST can't explain and what you can not deal with so 
>you keep deleting it from your replies.  ROTFLMAO

Why should I embarrass you further by reposting a link that proves you
wrong by showing all that debris?

You should at least post the original without all the kookscribblings
all over it.

>> You already told us that.  200 truckloads of DE to absorb leaking toxic
>> liquids.  Compared to 108,342 truckloads hauled out.  So a difference of
>> 108,142 truckloads of WTC debris.  Those 200 truckloads reduce the 1.5
>> million tons by how much? Less than 40 tons max per truckload, or under
>> 8,000 tons of DE was brought in.  So, 1,500,000 tons minus 8,000 tons is
>> how much? I know you flunked math so I'll do it for you.  1,492,000 tons
>> of actual WTC debris.

>If your number were true then why couldn't that much weight crush the 
>"Surviving Corners?"

Asked and answered.

>  It is because someone is lying and I doubt if it is 
>the photo of the "Surviving Corners."  ROTFLMAO

We already know who is lying, it is all those kookvids you keep watching.
You already proved they are all lies, why believe them since you know they
are lies!?!?!

>>>And why don't you compare the seismic signature of an American made nuke
>>>with an MRR nuke.   ROTFLMAO
>>
>> Nukes don't care where they were made.  So the answer is the same seismic
>> signature!  Obviously!!

>America doesn't make MRR nukes so American nukes were not used to vaporize 
>most of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.

I thought you claimed "MRR" stood for "minimal residual radiation", not
"Magical R____ R____".  "Minimal residual radiation" has nothing to do
with a magically reduced nuclear signature.  But perhaps the magic you
apparently believe in does this?  Could you explain this magic to us and
how this magic makes the nuclear detonation signature less than what a
jackhammer produces?  Is it black magic?  Is it created by casting spells?  
Do witches cast this spell? Does Hogwarts teach this spell?  Could you
also explain what the two R's mean in the phrase "Magical R____ R____
Nuke"?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#570265

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:nejr3p$2hm$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:nejifq$ir2$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>And your explanation for the very small seismic readings for when WTC7
>>>>appeared to crash to the ground is what?
>>>
>>> And your explanation for the very small (that is, ZERO) seismic readings
>>> for the distinctive nuclear explosive signatures when the buildings
>>> crashed to the ground is what?
>
>>BULLSHIT.  Even the background seismic activity is higher than ZERO you
>>idiot.  And an the detonation of an MRR nuked could hide in the background
>>seismic activity.  DUH.
>
> The distinctive nuclear explosion signature would be about 5 on the
> Richter Scale.

Funny that you are not considering the fact that MRR nukes were used you 
asshole.

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And how does NIST "Global Collapse" theory explain why one side of the Twin 
Towers stood strong and the other side is completely gone?
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#570279

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:nejr3p$2hm$2@pcls7.std.com...

>>>BULLSHIT.  Even the background seismic activity is higher than ZERO you
>>>idiot.  And an the detonation of an MRR nuked could hide in the background
>>>seismic activity.  DUH.
>>
>> The distinctive nuclear explosion signature would be about 5 on the
>> Richter Scale.

>Funny that you are not considering the fact that MRR nukes were used you 
>asshole.

You still haven't explained what "MRR Nukes" are, and what the MRR stands
for.  Obviously not the "minimal residual radiation" nukes since that
has nothing to do with the nuclear seismic signature.  Fill in the blanks
for me?  "Magical R______ R______ Nukes"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571172

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:neme3s$3no$1@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:nejr3p$2hm$2@pcls7.std.com...
>
>>>>BULLSHIT.  Even the background seismic activity is higher than ZERO you
>>>>idiot.  And an the detonation of an MRR nuked could hide in the 
>>>>background
>>>>seismic activity.  DUH.
>>>
>>> The distinctive nuclear explosion signature would be about 5 on the
>>> Richter Scale.
>
>>Funny that you are not considering the fact that MRR nukes were used you
>>asshole.
>
> You still haven't explained what "MRR Nukes" are, and what the MRR stands
> for.  Obviously not the "minimal residual radiation" nukes since that
> has nothing to do with the nuclear seismic signature.  Fill in the blanks
> for me?  "Magical R______ R______ Nukes"

ROTFLMAO because you and NIST have not explained why only one side of both 
the twin towers ended up at ground level while the other side went higher 
and higher depending on how far it was from a deep underground MRR nuke.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

BTW the far side of WTC2 was much much higher before WTC1 was MRR nuked as 
proven by a photo of WTC3 before it was MRR nuked and after WTC2 was MRR 
nuked by a MRR nuke under WTC4.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571259

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>> You still haven't explained what "MRR Nukes" are, and what the MRR stands
>> for.  Obviously not the "minimal residual radiation" nukes since that
>> has nothing to do with the nuclear seismic signature.  Fill in the blanks
>> for me?  "Magical R______ R______ Nukes"

>ROTFLMAO because 

Here comes a doozy of a lie!!!

<snip doozy of a lie>

So, you haven't explained what a "MRR Nuke" is, even if we already figured
out the M stands for Magical.  Or what Magical Powers these nukes have.
All we know is that they weren't made in the USA. But what does that
matter, since everything, including American Flags, is made in China. But
I didn't know China could access magic.

You haven't provided any seismic evidence that the WTC tower collapses
are too small, much less the distinctive nuclear explosion signature they
would have to have.  You haven't provided WTC 7 seismic readings or that
of a jackhammer for us to compare it to.

And of course, you *still* haven't provided the mass spectrometry data
with the two substances in approximately equal amounts that can only be
produced by nuclear detonations.

All you can do is...RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Over and over and over again!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571777

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:nf1jkk$dug$4@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>> You still haven't explained what "MRR Nukes" are, and what the MRR 
>>> stands
>>> for.  Obviously not the "minimal residual radiation" nukes since that
>>> has nothing to do with the nuclear seismic signature.  Fill in the 
>>> blanks
>>> for me?  "Magical R______ R______ Nukes"
>
>>ROTFLMAO because
>
> Here comes a doozy of a lie!!!
>
> <snip doozy of a lie>
>
> So, you haven't explained what a "MRR Nuke" is, even if we already figured
> out the M stands for Magical.  Or what Magical Powers these nukes have.
> All we know is that they weren't made in the USA. But what does that
> matter, since everything, including American Flags, is made in China. But
> I didn't know China could access magic.
>
> You haven't provided any seismic evidence that the WTC tower collapses
> are too small, much less the distinctive nuclear explosion signature they
> would have to have.  You haven't provided WTC 7 seismic readings or that
> of a jackhammer for us to compare it to.
>
> And of course, you *still* haven't provided the mass spectrometry data
> with the two substances in approximately equal amounts that can only be
> produced by nuclear detonations.
>
> All you can do is...RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Over and over and over again!

ROTFLMAO because you and NIST can not explain why only certain walls stood 
strong when the alleged "Global Collapse" shouldn't have left any of them 
standing.  DUH
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#571821

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>> You haven't provided any seismic evidence that the WTC tower collapses
>> are too small, much less the distinctive nuclear explosion signature they
>> would have to have.  You haven't provided WTC 7 seismic readings or that
>> of a jackhammer for us to compare it to.
>>
>> And of course, you *still* haven't provided the mass spectrometry data
>> with the two substances in approximately equal amounts that can only be
>> produced by nuclear detonations.
>>
>> All you can do is...RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> Over and over and over again!

>ROTFLMAO because

<snip Roger running away, faster than ever>

Run away!!!! Run away!!!!!!  Run away!!!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572138

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:nf83td$sbo$5@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>> You haven't provided any seismic evidence that the WTC tower collapses
>>> are too small, much less the distinctive nuclear explosion signature 
>>> they
>>> would have to have.  You haven't provided WTC 7 seismic readings or that
>>> of a jackhammer for us to compare it to.
>>>
>>> And of course, you *still* haven't provided the mass spectrometry data
>>> with the two substances in approximately equal amounts that can only be
>>> produced by nuclear detonations.
>>>
>>> All you can do is...RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>> Over and over and over again!
>
>>ROTFLMAO because

On and you are SNIP AWAY.  ROTFLMAO
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

You know damn well that your gazillion pounds of debris do not explain the 
"Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers but nukes do.   ROTFLMAO

And don't forget since the seismic reading for when WTC7 crashed to the 
ground is so fcuking small other seismic readings could be flat out wrong 
too.  ROTFLMAO.

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572170

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:nf83td$sbo$5@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>> You haven't provided any seismic evidence that the WTC tower collapses
>>>> are too small, much less the distinctive nuclear explosion signature 
>>>> they
>>>> would have to have.  You haven't provided WTC 7 seismic readings or that
>>>> of a jackhammer for us to compare it to.
>>>>
>>>> And of course, you *still* haven't provided the mass spectrometry data
>>>> with the two substances in approximately equal amounts that can only be
>>>> produced by nuclear detonations.
>>>>
>>>> All you can do is...RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>> Over and over and over again!
>>
>>>ROTFLMAO because

>On and you are SNIP AWAY.  ROTFLMAO

As Roger runs away further and faster than ever!

So, Roger, why do you refuse to answer the questions?

Where is the seismic evidence of the three nuclear explosions and their
distinctive seismic signatures?

Where is the seismic evidence that the collapses are all too small for 
buildings of their size?

WHERE IS THE MASS SPECTROMETER RESULTS OF THE DUST SAMPLES????????????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#572174

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:nfb7sh$92t$2@pcls7.std.com...
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>
>>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>news:nf83td$sbo$5@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>> You haven't provided any seismic evidence that the WTC tower collapses
>>>>> are too small, much less the distinctive nuclear explosion signature
>>>>> they
>>>>> would have to have.  You haven't provided WTC 7 seismic readings or 
>>>>> that
>>>>> of a jackhammer for us to compare it to.
>>>>>
>>>>> And of course, you *still* haven't provided the mass spectrometry data
>>>>> with the two substances in approximately equal amounts that can only 
>>>>> be
>>>>> produced by nuclear detonations.
>>>>>
>>>>> All you can do is...RUN AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>> Over and over and over again!
>>>
>>>>ROTFLMAO because
>
>>On and you are SNIP AWAY.  ROTFLMAO
>
> As Roger runs away further and faster than ever!

And you are Mr. SNIP AWAY because you can't deal with the fact CGIs were 
used on 9/11:
 http://www.911closeup.com/nico/CGI/CGI_aprilfools.html

And you can not deal with the fact that "Global Collapses" do not leave 
Surviving Corners the exact same way a deep underground MRR nuke do.
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

You have to go back to the drawing board because you and NIST have failed to 
prove how a gazillion pounds of debris could not crush the side of the Twin 
Towers furthest from where deep underground MRR nukes were planted.

And you can't deal with the fact the "Seismic readings" could have been 
tainted or flat out wrong because the force or energy that a 47 story 
building hit the ground should have been much much much stronger than a 
jackhammer.  ROTFLMAO

Rocky
 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web