Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 278 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-09 13:53 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-11 01:25 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:36 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:38 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-13 09:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-03-13 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-15 07:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 20:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 18:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-03-26 13:50 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 16:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 23:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 07:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-05 17:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-05 15:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-08 13:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-09 15:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-12 14:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:54 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 19:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-06 14:46 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 23:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:33 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 11:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 20:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 18:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 23:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> - 2016-03-15 10:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:19 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:46 -0500
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <be5nfb1tvpe2pf4up99s7gs31g2n3v0abq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566526 |
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>> >>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>> >>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>majority. >>> >>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >> >>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. > >Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. > The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my time? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566610 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>> >>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>> >>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>majority. >>>> >>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>> >>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >> >>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >time? Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned to hell for it. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <charlie-gordon1492-9E05AF.09502530032016@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> |
| In reply to | #566672 |
In article <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com>, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned > to hell for it. I think NDSAP was anti-abortion. At least nice German babies. Were they Christians? Atheists? What? -- Any one who has common sense will remember that the bewilderments of the eye are of two kinds, and arise from two causes, either from coming out of the light or from going into the light, which is true of the mind's eye, quite as much as of the bodily eye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lr4qfb5bk2us59kurt8jb2399jc50446lb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566679 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:50:25 -0700, je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> wrote: >In article <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com>, > duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote: > >> Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >> to hell for it. > >I think NDSAP was anti-abortion. At least nice German babies. Were they >Christians? Atheists? What? It's all depends on what NDSAP is. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oflpfbti0384tmbb581guvkgut15ipa6gm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566672 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>> >>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>majority. >>>>> >>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>>> >>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>> >>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. > >>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>time? > >Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >to hell for it. > Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nv4qfblnb6f9tnf2rfmc60ch8a4h28dh22@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566868 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to your way >>>>>>>>>of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>> >>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>majority. >>>>>> >>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying to learn. >>>>> >>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>> >>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >> >>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>time? >> >>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be condemned >>to hell for it. >> > >Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God for your support of murdering the human unborn. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndjmk9$641$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566898 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to >>>>>>>>>>your way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying >>>>>>>to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>> >>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>> >>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>time? >>> >>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be >>>condemned to hell for it. >>> >>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. > > You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be > judged by God That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > for your support of murdering The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. > the human unborn. They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? > ***** > "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndjmjb$640$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566898 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to >>>>>>>>>>your way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying >>>>>>>to learn. >>>>>> >>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>> >>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>> >>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>time? >>> >>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be >>>condemned to hell for it. >>> >>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. > > You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be > judged by God That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > for your support of murdering The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. > the human unborn. They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? > ***** > "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5j1rfbp9oo0ta3pt6pv5c93m77lvnrb6vs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566985 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id <oevnfb5amfh6757jhcaeo8nci2npuvn1kl@4ax.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 05:02:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:22:01 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><ndllfbd54qk3dpcv966sa3m5lm30so41aj@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:52:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:21:52 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><728jfblaecafrc6fvt1sjhghusc85pfj4m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Actually you are the one trying to convert everyone else to >>>>>>>>>>>your way of thinking. I am trying to prevent this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Stupid people turn a blind eye to God in creation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>According you your superstition, which is meaningless to the vast >>>>>>>>>majority. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You're a waste of time. Quit poisoning the minds of people trying >>>>>>>>to learn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But I am pointing out not everything is worth learning. >>>>>> >>>>>>Name something. And advise why it isn't just your specialty. >>>> >>>>>The details of superstitions, and the reason is obvious. Why waste my >>>>>time? >>>> >>>>Your superstition is that you can murder the human unborn and not be >>>>condemned to hell for it. >>>> >>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >> >> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >> judged by God > >That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're moving forward. >> for your support of murdering >The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >> the human unborn. >They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? You really eat shit? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndmmme$req$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #567028 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>> wrote: <snip> >>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>> >>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>> judged by God >> >>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. > > Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're moving > forward. That's merely another of your delusions. >>> for your support of murdering >>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. > > Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. Life started a few billion years ago. >>> the human unborn. > >>They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? > > You really eat shit? Nope, but you believe in it and talk it. > ***** > "Talking shit is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2pntfbp20hhkhmrgt2hvgjmrpf4ih0nkcs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567296 |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>> wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>> >>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>> judged by God >>> >>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're moving >> forward. > >That's merely another of your delusions. > >>>> for your support of murdering >>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >> >> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. > >Life started a few billion years ago. The stupids have been brainwashed that everything from conception to birth is a baby - even though it doesn't actually become one until a few weeks before birth. >>>> the human unborn. >> >>>They're called foetuses. Do you call your food 'undigested shit'? Good one. >> You really eat shit? Being a Christian, he had to pretend he didn't get the point. >Nope, but you believe in it and talk it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l3qtfbde4oe0lp0t558lovbdedrpi1ve8l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567301 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:55:33 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>> wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>> >>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>>> judged by God >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> >>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're moving >>> forward. >> >>That's merely another of your delusions. >> >>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>> >>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >> >>Life started a few billion years ago. > >The stupids have been brainwashed that everything from conception to >birth is a baby - even though it doesn't actually become one until a >few weeks before birth. Haahaahaa. Now he shows his butt. Your idiot buddies mandate that it's not until the cord is cut. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8vptfb9k97e7o0p42njs0m19kr3b3c3esa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567296 |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>> wrote: > ><snip> > >>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>> >>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>> judged by God >>> >>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >> >> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're moving >> forward. > >That's merely another of your delusions. When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>> for your support of murdering >>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >Life started a few billion years ago. Could be. You would have been a monkey then. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndmvj3$18q3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #567315 |
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>> wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>> >>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>>> judged by God >>>> >>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>> >>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>> moving forward. >> >>That's merely another of your delusions. > > When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? What help would I need if I were black? >>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>Life started a few billion years ago. > > Could be. You would have been a monkey then. You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. > ***** > "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <77fvfb1r1i37tg1a8lej29vsj58k2e1rsf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567331 |
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>> >>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>>>> judged by God >>>>> >>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>> >>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>> moving forward. >>> >>>That's merely another of your delusions. >> >> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. > >Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >What help would I need if I were black? Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>Life started a few billion years ago. >> >> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. > >You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. You're still a monkey. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndp6o2$i01$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #567420 |
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>>>>> judged by God >>>>>> >>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>> >>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>> moving forward. >>>> >>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>> >>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >> >>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>What help would I need if I were black? > > Either way, it's going to burn off. What's going to burn off and how? >>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>> >>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >> >>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. > > You're still a monkey. Do you imagine that is an insult? > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4072gbt7hs3ftpvq7lepjd3uoscl6atnd8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567540 |
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be >>>>>>>> judged by God >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>> moving forward. >>>>> >>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>> >>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>> >>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>What help would I need if I were black? >> >> Either way, it's going to burn off. > >What's going to burn off and how? Well, I've never been there to report back, but satan says his ways are lock solid punishment. >>>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>>> >>>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >>> >>>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. >> >> You're still a monkey. > >Do you imagine that is an insult? Not any more than you said I was a protocell. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndriku$j3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #567670 |
On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>><snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't >>>>>>>>> be judged by God >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>> >>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>> >>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>> >>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>> >>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >> >>What's going to burn off and how? > > Well, I've never been there to report back, Then how can you know? > but satan says Thanks for again admitting your Satanism. > his ways are lock solid punishment. A hippy destroying your aura would be as much punishment. >>>>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>>>> >>>>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >>>> >>>>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. >>> >>> You're still a monkey. >> >>Do you imagine that is an insult? > > Not any more than you said I was a protocell. A few billion years ago, we all would have been protocells, moron. > ***** > "The Satanic Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q8c5gbt4mjco6c2qsv96sgm7k3k40giu1l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #567705 |
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't >>>>>>>>>> be judged by God >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>> >>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>> >>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>> >>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>> >>>What's going to burn off and how? >> >> Well, I've never been there to report back, > >Then how can you know? God told us. >> but satan says >Thanks for again admitting your Satanism. >> his ways are lock solid punishment. >A hippy destroying your aura would be as much punishment. A hippy can't pain you more than the way you're going. > >>>>>>>>>> for your support of murdering >>>>>>>>>The 'unborn' cannot be murdered. >>>>>>>> Life starts at conception, not then the cord is cut. >>>>>>>Life started a few billion years ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could be. You would have been a monkey then. >>>>> >>>>>You would have been a protocell. You haven't changed much. >>>> >>>> You're still a monkey. >>> >>>Do you imagine that is an insult? >> >> Not any more than you said I was a protocell. > >A few billion years ago, we all would have been protocells, moron. > >> ***** >> "The Satanic Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndv1si$1hj6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #567880 |
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:13 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:37:28 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 19:32:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:13 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:17:55 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:30:19 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:46:06 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:22:15 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:12:59 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:47:44 -0400, Attila >>>>>>>>>>> <<prochoice@here.now> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Such speculations are a part of your cult. I have no cult. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You actually have the most damning of them all - that you >>>>>>>>>>> won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet you understand you are now damned for your position. You're >>>>>>>>> moving forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>That's merely another of your delusions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When your skin turns black, don't say I didn't try to help you. >>>>>> >>>>>>Aren't you supposed to be a Christian, racist Earl? >>>>>>What help would I need if I were black? >>>>> >>>>> Either way, it's going to burn off. >>>> >>>>What's going to burn off and how? >>> >>> Well, I've never been there to report back, >> >>Then how can you know? > > God told us. Then you must have evidence for this supposed god character, where is it? Beliefs, opinions and 'holy' books are NOT evidence. >>> but satan says >>Thanks for again admitting your Satanism. >>> his ways are lock solid punishment. >>A hippy destroying your aura would be as much punishment. > > A hippy can't pain you more than the way you're going. You know this how, Satanist boi? Did the supposed Satan tell you? > ***** > "The Satanic Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web