Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #561102 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-10 06:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-10 14:38 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:32 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-10 17:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:33 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 07:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 10:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:10 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-12 12:00 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-12 19:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:21 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-21 17:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-22 04:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:38 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 11:21 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-12 17:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-13 11:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-13 14:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-14 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-15 12:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-16 14:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-16 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-17 12:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-17 16:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 04:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-19 08:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-19 18:29 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-19 20:09 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 19:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-20 20:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-21 17:03 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-22 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 21:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-22 15:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-22 22:58 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-23 07:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-23 17:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 08:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-24 18:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-24 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-25 14:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 04:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-26 06:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-29 22:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-30 18:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:13 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-26 12:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-26 19:28 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 15:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-24 20:52 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-25 09:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-25 19:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-26 09:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-19 17:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 09:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-20 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-20 15:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-18 15:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 04:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-11 11:34 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-11 18:14 -0500
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-25 19:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd423a$1m2c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #565246 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>> >>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>> being, >>> >>>>Nope. A born person. >>> >>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>> the cord. >> >>And the legal status. > > It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's > personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal > fires. Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. Did you miss this fact, moron? > ***** > "Empty threats are the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-25 14:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0l5bfbteug6uu7om631th89bliqm8o4b6n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565552 |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>> >>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>> being, >>>> >>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>> >>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>> the cord. >>> >>>And the legal status. >> >> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >> fires. > >Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. > >>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. > >Did you miss this fact, moron? Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective fact that everybody else acknowledges.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 04:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd53tr$19ol$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #565564 |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>> being, >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>> >>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>>> the cord. >>>> >>>>And the legal status. >>> >>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>> fires. >> >>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >> >>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >> >>Did you miss this fact, moron? > > Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just > believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective fact > that everybody else acknowledges. What he imagines and what is the truth are two entirely different things. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 06:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <huqcfb559eu9u0kol48nh424i0vo6dmbl3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565669 |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 04:41:32 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>>> being, >>>>>> >>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>>>> the cord. >>>>> >>>>>And the legal status. >>>> >>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>>> fires. >>> >>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>> >>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>His brainwashing ha >>>Did you miss this fact, moron? >> >> Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just >> believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective fact >> that everybody else acknowledges. > >What he imagines and what is the truth are two entirely different things. And because of the mind-control his religion exerts over him, he doesn't even realise this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 12:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tsgdfbde8kbvo391l9revp7sahcv4au1lv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565564 |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>> being, >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>> >>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>>> the cord. >>>> >>>>And the legal status. >>> >>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>> fires. >> >>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >> >>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >> >>Did you miss this fact, moron? > >Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just >believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective >fact that everybody else acknowledges. I'm not extreme. I've being very honest about your massive error in the making. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 19:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd6nkv$1vcc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #565771 |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee > <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: > >>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>><snip> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>>> being, >>>>>> >>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>> >>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after >>>>>> is the cord. >>>>> >>>>>And the legal status. >>>> >>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>>> fires. >>> >>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>> >>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>> >>>Did you miss this fact, moron? Well? >>Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just >>believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective fact >>that everybody else acknowledges. > > I'm not extreme. You're extremely stupid. > I've being very honest about your massive error in the > making. What error would that be, moron? Surely not as erroneous as believing in something without the slightest scrap of evidence, as you do. > ***** > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-28 16:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6c8jfblhhjr7gkt79k9160894duip9h64l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565786 |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:24:15 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>><snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>>>> being, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after >>>>>>> is the cord. >>>>>> >>>>>>And the legal status. >>>>> >>>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>>>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>>>> fires. >>>> >>>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>>> >>>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>> >>>>Did you miss this fact, moron? > >Well? > >>>Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just >>>believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective fact >>>that everybody else acknowledges. >> >> I'm not extreme. > >You're extremely stupid. I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is a rat. >> I've being very honest about your massive error in the >> making. >What error would that be, moron? >Surely not as erroneous as believing in something without the slightest >scrap of evidence, as you do. That's exactly what I'm trying to say about you. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 22:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndev32$qtn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566310 |
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:24:15 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>>>>> being, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after >>>>>>>> is the cord. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And the legal status. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>>>>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>>>>> fires. >>>>> >>>>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>>>> >>>>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>>> >>>>>Did you miss this fact, moron? >> >>Well? Still no answer, I see. >>>>Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just >>>>believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective >>>>fact that everybody else acknowledges. >>> >>> I'm not extreme. >> >>You're extremely stupid. > > I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is a > rat. It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. On second thoughts, a rat is much more intelligent than you. At least rats don't believe in a supposed god for which they have no evidence. >>> I've being very honest about your massive error in the making. > >>What error would that be, moron? >>Surely not as erroneous as believing in something without the slightest >>scrap of evidence, as you do. > > That's exactly what I'm trying to say about you. Trying, but not succeeding. > ***** > "Rats are the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 11:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fkvnfb5lmsvgchr9ut8ipi4eljrlbuc0pb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566546 |
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:24:15 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>>>>>> being, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after >>>>>>>>> is the cord. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And the legal status. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>>>>>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>>>>>> fires. >>>>>> >>>>>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>>>> >>>>>>Did you miss this fact, moron? >>> >>>Well? > >Still no answer, I see. > >>>>>Fatso the Beached Whale is an extreme Catholic, so he doesn't just >>>>>believe in ensoulment at conception, he imagines it is an objective >>>>>fact that everybody else acknowledges. >>>> >>>> I'm not extreme. >>> >>>You're extremely stupid. >> >> I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is a >> rat. >It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. I did. And all of you think you were rats before you were born as you all agree you weren't human beings. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndh478$9n6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566674 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:24:15 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born >>>>>>>>>>>>>person. >>>>>>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a >>>>>>>>>>>> human being, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day >>>>>>>>>> after is the cord. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>And the legal status. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - >>>>>>>> one's personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the >>>>>>>> eternal fires. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Did you miss this fact, moron? >>>> >>>>Well? >> >>Still no answer, I see. Earl runs away. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 18:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndh487$a9l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566674 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:24:15 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:15:37 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:53:03 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>>> <c.lee@fairpoint.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler >>>>>>>>>>>> <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born >>>>>>>>>>>>>person. >>>>>>>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a >>>>>>>>>>>> human being, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day >>>>>>>>>> after is the cord. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>And the legal status. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - >>>>>>>> one's personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the >>>>>>>> eternal fires. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Did you miss this fact, moron? >>>> >>>>Well? >> >>Still no answer, I see. Earl runs away. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-30 18:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndh4hb$apc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566674 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: <snip> >>> I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is a >>> rat. > >>It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. >>On second thoughts, a rat is much more intelligent than you. At least >>rats don't believe in a supposed god for which they have no evidence. > > I did. And all of you think you were rats That would be your delusion, not ours. > before you were born as you all agree you weren't human beings. We were human, but not human beings > ***** > "Seeing things which are not there is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 07:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <865qfbdcj00qbokui48e5f000m2hom3qp6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566700 |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: > ><snip> > >>>> I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is a >>>> rat. >> >>>It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. >>>On second thoughts, a rat is much more intelligent than you. At least >>>rats don't believe in a supposed god for which they have no evidence. >> >> I did. And all of you think you were rats > >That would be your delusion, not ours. YOU.....said you were not human. I suggested rat. What do you think? >> before you were born as you all agree you weren't human beings. >We were human, but not human beings Haahaahaa. So if you murder it, you can find safety in seeing it as a rat? the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 17:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndjm08$4uf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566900 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:16:21 -0500, duke wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: >> >><snip> >> >>>>> I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is >>>>> a rat. >>> >>>>It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. >>>>On second thoughts, a rat is much more intelligent than you. At least >>>>rats don't believe in a supposed god for which they have no evidence. >>> >>> I did. And all of you think you were rats >> >>That would be your delusion, not ours. > > YOU.....said you were not human. I suggested rat. What do you think? I think you're nuts. >>> before you were born as you all agree you weren't human beings. >>We were human, but not human beings > > Haahaahaa. So if you murder it, you can find safety in seeing it as a > rat? The law is about the murder of a person. A foetus isn't a person, so it cannot be murdered. Come back when that fact has wormed its way into your tiny brain. > ***** > "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 15:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6q1rfbtcfp688pdhkv2gktmsr32ckdfgsr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #566972 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:15:52 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:16:21 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>> I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus is >>>>>> a rat. >>>> >>>>>It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. >>>>>On second thoughts, a rat is much more intelligent than you. At least >>>>>rats don't believe in a supposed god for which they have no evidence. >>>> >>>> I did. And all of you think you were rats >>> >>>That would be your delusion, not ours. >> >> YOU.....said you were not human. I suggested rat. What do you think? > >I think you're nuts. Not me. You implied you were a rat first. >>>> before you were born as you all agree you weren't human beings. >>>We were human, but not human beings >> >> Haahaahaa. So if you murder it, you can find safety in seeing it as a >> rat? >The law is about the murder of a person. God's law takes the lead regardless of what civil law allows. That's where the burning fires come in. >A foetus isn't a person, so it >cannot be murdered. Come back when that fact has wormed its way into your >tiny brain. > >> ***** >> "Idiocy is the most perfect form of Prayer." >> Pope Paul VI ***** the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-01 20:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ndmkp7$nsl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #567029 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:24:58 -0500, duke wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:15:52 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:16:21 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:29:24 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:27:45 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>> I'm not stupid at all compared to you who declares a human fetus >>>>>>> is a rat. >>>>> >>>>>>It was you who did that. I didn't mention rats at all, rat brain. >>>>>>On second thoughts, a rat is much more intelligent than you. At >>>>>>least rats don't believe in a supposed god for which they have no >>>>>>evidence. >>>>> >>>>> I did. And all of you think you were rats >>>> >>>>That would be your delusion, not ours. >>> >>> YOU.....said you were not human. I suggested rat. What do you think? >> >>I think you're nuts. > > Not me. You implied you were a rat first. > >>>>> before you were born as you all agree you weren't human beings. >>>>We were human, but not human beings >>> >>> Haahaahaa. So if you murder it, you can find safety in seeing it as a >>> rat? > >>The law is about the murder of a person. > > God's That would be the god for which you have no evidence. > law takes the lead regardless of what civil law allows. Only according to your delusions. > That's where the burning fires come in. I'm not afraid of your delusional empty threats, Earl. >>A foetus isn't a person, so it cannot be murdered. Come back when that >>fact has wormed its way into your tiny brain. > ***** > "Delusions are the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 12:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <iqgdfbh19s4bi05mv08slkse8l7b8fe3qr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565552 |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>> wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>> >>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>> being, >>>> >>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>> >>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>> the cord. >>> >>>And the legal status. >> >> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >> fires. > >Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. You'll learn the ramifications of your mistake when you stand before God at the moment you die. >>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >Did you miss this fact, moron? God disagrees, and he gets the only vote sending you to the flames. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-26 19:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd6nti$1vcc$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #565770 |
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:14:51 -0500, duke wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 19:04:10 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > >>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:59:04 -0500, duke wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:07:54 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. >>>>>>>>There is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human >>>>>>> being, >>>>> >>>>>>Nope. A born person. >>>>> >>>>> The only thing different between one day before and one day after is >>>>> the cord. >>>> >>>>And the legal status. >>> >>> It's a human being murdered for the most selfish of reasons - one's >>> personal comfort and convenience. And for it, you get the eternal >>> fires. >> >>Your empty meaningless threats still have no effect on me. > > You'll learn the ramifications of your mistake when you stand before God > at the moment you die. That would be the supposed god for which you have no evidence. >>>>An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. >>Did you miss this fact, moron? > > God disagrees, The voices in your head. > and he gets the only vote sending you to the flames. Your empty meaningless threats _still_ have no effect on me. > ***** > "Pretence is the most perfect form of Prayer." > Pope Paul VI ***** -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 15:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-1B55BF.15542924032016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #565200 |
In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > <snip> > > >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There > >>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. > > > >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, > > > >>Nope. A born person. > > > > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the > > cord. > > And the legal status. > An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor dukie is being incredibly stupid again. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-24 20:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g469fb1a4v0if2de24lem9v9joegrv811r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #565278 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:54:29 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: >In article <nd1adq$1dkv$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 08:19:43 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:51:40 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> wrote: >> > >> >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:03:42 -0500, duke wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> <snip> >> >> >>>>LIE. To have murdered, the victim must have been a born person. There >> >>>>is NO law against abortion in your country or in mine. >> > >> >>> Nope, if you killed or supported with intend to murder a human being, >> > >> >>Nope. A born person. >> > >> > The only thing different between one day before and one day after is the >> > cord. >> >> And the legal status. >> An unborn foetus is not a person and cannot be murdered. > > >Since nobody has an abortion a day before a fetus is born, poor poor >dukie is being incredibly stupid again. Like the rest of the anti-abortion lobby, he refuses to admit that late term abortions are for reasons of serious medical emergency - which is why third trimester abortions are illegal in most jurisdictions with that limited exception. And that if he has ever known a pregnant woman, he would know that they're not going to go through 8 1/2 months of ever-increasing discomfort jut to have a late abortion. They are incapable of honesty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web