Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #566498 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-31 14:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 154 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why You Should Care About Nukes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 12:37 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 12:59 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 11:25 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 05:08 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 12:33 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-02 15:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-02 20:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 06:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 16:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 12:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 18:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 21:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 05:45 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:30 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 20:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:23 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 17:52 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 13:10 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 18:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:29 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 19:59 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 17:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 07:14 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 18:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 14:46 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 15:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:46 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-08 03:35 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:51 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 00:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 15:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 20:57 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 06:51 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:09 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:42 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:56 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:29 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:23 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 21:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 11:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:12 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:09 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 15:00 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 06:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 15:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:52 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:20 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 11:00 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 01:20 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 01:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 15:27 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 20:58 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:53 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 11:14 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:59 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:31 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 12:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:53 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:09 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 16:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 16:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-08 03:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:11 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:20 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:15 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:18 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:43 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:28 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-04-02 23:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-29 18:07 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-30 14:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-30 15:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 03:02 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 07:59 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 15:36 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:41 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:31 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 20:11 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 16:04 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-31 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 19:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:44 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:54 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 12:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:31 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 19:13 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:25 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes vishnushelat@gmail.com - 2016-03-31 12:28 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-31 14:13 -0700
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500 |
| Subject | Why You Should Care About Nukes |
| Message-ID | <vY6dnQCAQOwlIWfLnZ2dnUU7-f0AAAAA@giganews.com> |
Why You Should Care About Nukes > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnU0bqsyq0 -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 12:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vY6dnQOAQOzOIGfLnZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #566498 |
On 3/29/16 12:34 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Why You Should Care About Nukes > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnU0bqsyq0 > > BTW--This video is about the continued dangers of nuclear weapons and the nuclear arms race in the post-cold war world, particularly nuclear winter but also modernizations by the US and Russian governments, EMPs (electromagnetic pulses), fallout, explosions, terrorism, other accidents, etc. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 12:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ndefqd$1tp7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #566499 |
On 3/29/2016 12:37 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 3/29/16 12:34 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Why You Should Care About Nukes >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnU0bqsyq0 >> >> > > BTW--This video is about the continued dangers of nuclear weapons and > the nuclear arms race in the post-cold war world, particularly > nuclear winter but also modernizations by the US and Russian > governments, EMPs (electromagnetic pulses), fallout, explosions, > terrorism, other accidents, etc. > > > video is just another leftist ad. problem is the old nukes are degrading materially, and have to be replaced with new stuff (not the nuke material, but the metals and materials the bomb is composed of, most were made in the 60, 70s, ) the stockpiles have been diminishing for quite a while, USA has less than 4,000 usable and unusable. Same w Russia 4k max, both had over 30,000 each in the 1960 to 1995 timframe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 11:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eaee1452-cccc-4884-aa90-e7a6ddbbefe8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #566499 |
Sam Wormley On 3/29/16 12:34 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Why You Should Care About Nukes > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnU0bqsyq0 > > BTW--This video is about the continued dangers of nuclear weapons and the nuclear arms race in the post-cold war world, particularly nuclear winter but also modernizations by the US and Russian governments, EMPs (electromagnetic pulses), fallout, explosions, terrorism, other accidents, etc. ------------- Nuclear weapons have ushered in a very long period with no worldwide wars. Rethink your position
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 05:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4b397fc-4ce1-4e77-9332-ab8c60265ec9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #566517 |
Another good thing about nukes... Now *everyone* is in the game. Back in the day, the president and Congress had secret bunkers deep underground that were impervious from anything but a direct hit from a nuke. With today's guidance systems, a direct hit is assured. Even Cheyenne mountain is not safe. This means even THEY are at risk. So if you're gonna go nuclear, be prepared to risk your own ass as well as mine. I sleep better at night with nukes protecting me using fear. I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 12:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QvSLy.21872$Xr2.13599@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #567413 |
On 04/02/2016 08:08 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Another good thing about nukes... Now *everyone* is in the game. Back in the day, the president and Congress had secret bunkers deep underground that were impervious from anything but a direct hit from a nuke. With today's guidance systems, a direct hit is assured.
>
> Even Cheyenne mountain is not safe.
>
> This means even THEY are at risk. So if you're gonna go nuclear, be prepared to risk your own ass as well as mine.
>
> I sleep better at night with nukes protecting me using fear.
>
> I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
>
Yeee Haaaa!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 15:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lJGdnWxJapzuu53KnZ2dnUU7-TfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #566517 |
"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote in message news:eaee1452-cccc-4884-aa90-e7a6ddbbefe8@googlegroups.com... > Sam Wormley > On 3/29/16 12:34 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: >> Why You Should Care About Nukes >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRnU0bqsyq0 >> >> > > BTW--This video is about the continued dangers of nuclear weapons and > the nuclear arms race in the post-cold war world, particularly > nuclear winter but also modernizations by the US and Russian > governments, EMPs (electromagnetic pulses), fallout, explosions, > terrorism, other accidents, etc. > ------------- > > Nuclear weapons have ushered in a very long period with no worldwide wars. > > Rethink your position No "worldwide wars" but certainly wars and a hell of a lot of TSA for nothing. Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event and that only nukes can vaporize 110 story buildings the way two 110 story buildings in Nuke York City were vaporized. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg BTW name one thing that our government has ever been honest about? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-02 20:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567543 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when every one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 06:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9cadneM2mp8WZJ3KnZ2dnUU7-bnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #567548 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event > > Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when every > one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? > > Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. > > > -- > Jim Pennino ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made nukes. DUH Besides nobody here or anywhere else for that matter has been able to explain why so little was left of the Twin Towers but a lot of holes in the area without using nukes or more precisely MRR nukes. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 16:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567660 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >> >> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when every >> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >> >> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made nukes. Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the planet, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 12:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3rCdnRjh2tCPyZzKnZ2dnUU7-W3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #567699 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>> >>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when >>> every >>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>> >>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jim Pennino >> >> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made >> nukes. > > Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the > planet, > kook. ROTFLMAO because I also stated: "Besides nobody here or anywhere else for that matter has been able to explain why so little was left of the Twin Towers but a lot of holes in the area without using nukes or more precisely MRR nukes." AND ONCE AGAIN YOU PROVED THAT FOR ME!!! See, it would help if you knew about MRR nukes instead of thinking they are like American made nukes. DUH Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 18:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <il28tc-0vl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567709 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>>> >>>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when >>>> every >>>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>>> >>>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jim Pennino >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made >>> nukes. >> >> Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the >> planet, >> kook. > > ROTFLMAO because I also stated: Nobody cares about your kook delusions such as your lack of understanding why the rubble pile of a demolished building isn't as tall as the original building. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-03 21:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7bmdnZE4rcT9TJzKnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #567714 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:il28tc-0vl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>>>> >>>>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when >>>>> every >>>>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>>>> >>>>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jim Pennino >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made >>>> nukes. >>> >>> Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the >>> planet, >>> kook. >> >> ROTFLMAO because I also stated: > > Nobody cares about your kook delusions such as your lack of understanding > why the rubble pile of a demolished building isn't as tall as the > original building. You are spinning again because nobody but you has ever said anything about a demolished building being as tall as the original. The fact remains there should have been a few floors of rubble but since they were nuked most of the Twin Towers floated away. DUH. http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Since you have a habit of posting bullshit don't expect a reply to your constant bullshit. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 05:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <klb9tc-rup.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567763 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:il28tc-0vl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>>>>> >>>>>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when >>>>>> every >>>>>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jim Pennino >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made >>>>> nukes. >>>> >>>> Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the >>>> planet, >>>> kook. >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because I also stated: >> >> Nobody cares about your kook delusions such as your lack of understanding >> why the rubble pile of a demolished building isn't as tall as the >> original building. > > The fact remains there should have been a few floors of rubble but since > they were nuked most of the Twin Towers floated away. Nope, it fell into the basement as you have been told many times. Like I said, delusional. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 09:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ouCdna8Ug-Z15p_KnZ2dnUU7-enNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #567832 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:klb9tc-rup.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:il28tc-0vl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when >>>>>>> every >>>>>>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jim Pennino >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made >>>>>> nukes. >>>>> >>>>> Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the >>>>> planet, >>>>> kook. >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because I also stated: >>> >>> Nobody cares about your kook delusions such as your lack of >>> understanding >>> why the rubble pile of a demolished building isn't as tall as the >>> original building. >> >> The fact remains there should have been a few floors of rubble but since >> they were nuked most of the Twin Towers floated away. > > Nope, it fell into the basement as you have been told many times. > > Like I said, delusional. > > > -- > Jim Pennino YOU ARE FULL OF IT AND IN CASE YOU DIDN'T NOTICE THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF OF THAT EITHER. Plus if the Twin Towers had fallen into their basements the seismic readings would have been a lot bigger than they were you idiot but the thuds that nobody heard or felt were comparable to the fall of a 20 story building and a 26 story buildings and people felt the ground shake a lot more when the nukes were detonated than when the buildings floated away before they could crash to the ground. DUH. And in Controlled Demolitions the basement have to be blown out first to make room for the debris above so if the building did end up in the basement who blew the basement up to make room first??? <G> Again, take a close look at the following and you will see holes where you claim the building ended up. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg And once again, you have completely failed to explain why nothing crushed the surviving outside walls if there was supposed to be 100+ floors above them. <VERY BIG GRIN> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 18:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <epnatc-pc1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567844 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:klb9tc-rup.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:il28tc-0vl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event when >>>>>>>> every >>>>>>>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the towers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jim Pennino >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American made >>>>>>> nukes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on the >>>>>> planet, >>>>>> kook. >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because I also stated: >>>> >>>> Nobody cares about your kook delusions such as your lack of >>>> understanding >>>> why the rubble pile of a demolished building isn't as tall as the >>>> original building. >>> >>> The fact remains there should have been a few floors of rubble but since >>> they were nuked most of the Twin Towers floated away. >> >> Nope, it fell into the basement as you have been told many times. >> >> Like I said, delusional. >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Plus if the Twin Towers had fallen into their basements the seismic readings > would have been a lot bigger It is interesting that there were seismic readings for the building collapse but none for an explosion of any kind, particularly nuclear. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 14:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3dudnd5prLdqXZ_KnZ2dnUU7-UHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #567882 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:epnatc-pc1.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:klb9tc-rup.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:il28tc-0vl.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:aft7tc-sel.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:rcm5tc-6ae.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just don't ever forget that 9/11 was a nuclear event >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then why did no seismograph on the planet record such an event >>>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>>> every >>>>>>>>> one of them would have if there had been a nuclear event? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Note that nearby seismographs DID record the collapse of the >>>>>>>>> towers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Jim Pennino >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because MRR nukes do not work the same way as American >>>>>>>> made >>>>>>>> nukes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anybodies nuke can be detected by just about every seismograph on >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> planet, >>>>>>> kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because I also stated: >>>>> >>>>> Nobody cares about your kook delusions such as your lack of >>>>> understanding >>>>> why the rubble pile of a demolished building isn't as tall as the >>>>> original building. >>>> >>>> The fact remains there should have been a few floors of rubble but >>>> since >>>> they were nuked most of the Twin Towers floated away. >>> >>> Nope, it fell into the basement as you have been told many times. >>> >>> Like I said, delusional. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jim Pennino >> >> Plus if the Twin Towers had fallen into their basements the seismic >> readings >> would have been a lot bigger > > It is interesting that there were seismic readings for the building > collapse > but none for an explosion of any kind, particularly nuclear. Too things idiot,. 1. The seismec readings were way too small for 110 story buildings so what happened to over 80 floors of debris? <G> 2. There was a movie taken of the South Tower shaking like a tunning fork when it was nuked and yet there was no seismec reading for that? Something is strange there. And don't ever forget, if the debris really went down why didn't it crush the "Surviving Corners" in the following photo? <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 20:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <iauatc-s12.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #567905 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > 1. The seismec readings were way too small for 110 story buildings so what > happened to over 80 floors of debris? The seismic readings were appropriate for the collapse of a building, but there were no readings appropriate for any nuclear explosions or even conventional explosions and the deris wound up mostly in the basement levels, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 06:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Y_6dnV4mCsLUaZnKnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #567919 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:iauatc-s12.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> 1. The seismec readings were way too small for 110 story buildings so >> what >> happened to over 80 floors of debris? > > The seismic readings were appropriate for the collapse of a building, As I stated before the seismic reading were consistent with a collapse of a 20 story building and a 26 story building so what happened to the debris from the other 80 floors? <G> The fact is most of the Twin Towers were vaporized before they had a chance to hit the ground and Michael claims everything was accounted for but he fails to state heavy machinery was not needed to haul away most of the Twin Towers because they floated away after being MRR nuked. See for yourself. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 10:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MZ8Ny.7406$ZI.6290@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #568225 |
On 04/06/2016 07:34 AM, Rocky wrote:
> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:iauatc-s12.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. The seismec readings were way too small for 110 story buildings so
>>> what
>>> happened to over 80 floors of debris?
>>
>> The seismic readings were appropriate for the collapse of a building,
>
> As I stated before the seismic reading were consistent with a collapse of a
> 20 story building and a 26 story building so what happened to the debris
> from the other 80 floors? <G>
>
> The fact is most of the Twin Towers were vaporized before they had a chance
> to hit the ground and Michael claims everything was accounted for but he
> fails to state heavy machinery was not needed to haul away most of the Twin
> Towers because they floated away after being MRR nuked. See for yourself.
> <G>
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Rocky
Come on "Rocky", you are really just one of HVAC's online
"personalities", right? You know like Glazier, Odd and the other kooks
he pretends to be. For all you know *I* could be one of HVAC's
"personalities"!
PS HVAC got fired for having gay sex at work.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 8 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web