Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #565723 > unrolled thread

Re: manufacturing black holes

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: manufacturing black holes Bojana Kudryavtseva <bojkud@rtyn56h67i.org> - 2016-03-26 10:47 +0000
    Re: manufacturing black holes Andrzej Przemysław <andrzejp@hotmailforyou.org> - 2016-03-27 16:33 +0000
      Re: manufacturing black holes "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-27 20:58 +0200
      Re: manufacturing black holes Ewan <iq49j@noemail.edu> - 2016-03-28 13:19 +0000
        Re: manufacturing black holes Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-01 21:04 +0000
          Re: manufacturing black holes Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 10:40 +0000
            Re: manufacturing black holes Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-03 11:41 +0000
              Re: manufacturing black holes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 09:02 -0700

#565723 — Re: manufacturing black holes

JanPB wrote:

>> [blah, blah, blah of a poor, brainwashed idiot]
>> Yeah, I have no doubts your Shit has told you you're seeing a black
>> hole.
>> So, your black holes are as strongly confirmed, as my dragons. Well,
>> except that dragon's concept isn't self denying.
> 
> Reread what I wrote.

There is an old saying that "A liar needs a good memory". Nowhere is this
more true than in the Apollo program. NASA tell lies to cover up previous
lies, and other discrepancies uncovered by people investigating the Moon
landings. Altering previous data, removing photographs, and retracting
statements made, only re-enforces the evidence that NASA are on the run,
and being forced into a corner to which they cannot escape. The actions of
those under investigation makes the investigator more aware they are
bluffing. The longer that person, or persons, who make the extravagant
claims continue, the more lies they have to tell in order to counteract
it, until it reaches the point where it becomes ridiculous. That point was
passed in July 1999,
when NASA officials were questioned about the Moon landings on television.
They dodged the all important questions like a drifter dodges the heat.
Many Apollo astronauts have long since died, as to have many of the
original NASA officials involved in the scam, consequently current
officials, who know that Apollo was a fake, have not quite got it right
when talking openly in public. Perhaps the biggest slip of the tongue was
made by NASA Chief Dan Goldin when interviewed by UK TV journalist Sheena
McDonald in 1994. He said that mankind cannot venture beyond Earth orbit,
250 miles into space, until they can find a way to overcome the dangers of
cosmic radiation. He must have forgot that they supposedly sent 27
astronauts 250,000 miles outside Earth orbit 36 years earlier.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#565934

JanPB wrote:

>> > Reread what I wrote.
>> 
>> There is an old saying that "A liar needs a good memory". Nowhere is
>> this more true than in the Apollo program. NASA tell lies to cover up
>> previous lies, and other discrepancies uncovered by people investigating
>> the Moon landings.
> 
> Total nonsense. Idiocy beyond belief.

Agree. Because they admittedly also lost the blueprints for those rockets, 
they were paid to defend. Together with the original films and everything 
else. Just remember how those take-offs were filmed to make those rockets 
appear larger than they really were. The crude facts are that those 
rockets were pretty small to reach anything. (they need two oversized 
tubes to put that shuttle into the orbit).

They said they lost everything, so morons like us cannot debate and 
reject. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#565957

On 27.03.2016 18:33, Andrzej Przemysław wrote:
 > []

It doesn't help to change your name,
the trolling idiot is recognized anyway.

One can but wonder what kind of mental disturbance make
a person constantly change his name and write nonsense only.

plonk

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566135

JanPB wrote:

>> >> Agree. Because they admittedly also lost the blueprints for those
>> >> rockets,
>> > 
>> > Blah blah, cherrypicking nonsense. Why don't you tell us about your
>> > UFO abduction or something. It would be more entertaining.
>> 
>> Hard nut to crack, you mean this picture is fake? Because if not, then
>> you can't circumspect it without smiling. Correct?
>> https://www.metabunk.org/data/
MetaMirrorCache/5337dcd6b6f022f7f6d6d485bdfe985a.jpg
> 
> I was talking about the Apollo Moon landings: it's nonsense to claim they
> didn't happen. -- Jan

Me too. You are a slow learner. They are not fake, shuttle or not
http://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/Rockwell-Space-Shuttle/0421834/L/

Btw, shouldn't this moon lander be on Moon right now, with Gold radiation 
protection and stuff?? What is it doing in a museum or whatever like that? 
There is no dangerous radiation inthere, right?

Ron Howard Says The 1969 Apollo 11 Moon Landing Was Faked In A Studio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjNLcVbTXjk

Do the math, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17 -> a total of minimum SEVEN gold plated 
moon landers on moon right now as wee speak.


And the motor, the fuel tank and the pedals are missing!! Come on, you 
can't have a moon lander without pedals, various motors and a tank for the 
fuel. Come on, let's stay cool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjNLcVbTXjk&t=48s

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567304

JanPB wrote:

>> This person is a post-only engine and/or a "professional" ball buster.
>> Why don't you take your own advice?  Clearly you are not making a dent
>> in the unobtainium shell...
>> 
>> David A. Smith
> 
> Haha, that's not my goal. I've been around here for a loooong time.
> I post for my own entertainment and to probe the diseases of the human
> mind. I find it interesting (up to a point).

You both are idiots. Lots of proofs. Where to start ...zZzzz

VAXXED DIRECTOR ANDREW WAKEFIELD BREAKS SILENCE ON VACCINE VIOLENCE 
AGAINST CHILDREN AND CDC COVERUP 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=titN2bZYlUU

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567405

JanPB wrote:

> On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 2:04:27 PM UTC-7, Bimpy wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>> 
>> >> This person is a post-only engine and/or a "professional" ball
>> >> buster.
>> >> Why don't you take your own advice?  Clearly you are not making a
>> >> dent in the unobtainium shell...
>> >> 
>> >> David A. Smith
>> > 
>> > Haha, that's not my goal. I've been around here for a loooong time.
>> > I post for my own entertainment and to probe the diseases of the
>> > human mind. I find it interesting (up to a point).
>> 
>> You both are idiots. Lots of proofs. Where to start ...zZzzz
>> 
>> VAXXED DIRECTOR ANDREW WAKEFIELD BREAKS SILENCE ON VACCINE VIOLENCE
>> AGAINST CHILDREN AND CDC COVERUP
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=titN2bZYlUU
> 
> Anti-vaccine "movement" is pure baloney by people susceptible to any
> dumb propaganda.

You see any movement, beetch? I see no any movement, I'm not talking about 
movements, but real stuff, empirical, with data, correlation, and 
errorbars. Beetch!! aHhahaaha, you are dismissing the Evolution. The 
nature worked on a human body for six thousands years, and now they put 
toxic crap in it. Look at the birds, my friend Gary, why are they not 
vaccinate themself, you don't know huh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567663

JanPB wrote:

> On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 3:40:54 AM UTC-7, Bimpy wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>> 
>> > On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 2:04:27 PM UTC-7, Bimpy wrote:
>> >> JanPB wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >> This person is a post-only engine and/or a "professional" ball
>> >> >> buster.
>> >> >> Why don't you take your own advice?  Clearly you are not making a
>> >> >> dent in the unobtainium shell...
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> David A. Smith
>> >> > 
>> >> > Haha, that's not my goal. I've been around here for a loooong
>> >> > time.
>> >> > I post for my own entertainment and to probe the diseases of the
>> >> > human mind. I find it interesting (up to a point).
>> >> 
>> >> You both are idiots. Lots of proofs. Where to start ...zZzzz
>> >> 
>> >> VAXXED DIRECTOR ANDREW WAKEFIELD BREAKS SILENCE ON VACCINE VIOLENCE
>> >> AGAINST CHILDREN AND CDC COVERUP
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=titN2bZYlUU
>> > 
>> > Anti-vaccine "movement" is pure baloney by people susceptible to any
>> > dumb propaganda.
>> 
>> You see any movement, beetch? I see no any movement, I'm not talking
>> about movements, but real stuff, empirical, with data, correlation, and
>> errorbars.
> 
> There is none of that. All of the "support" for this is amateur
> gobbledygook by know-nothings who simply derive pleasure from
> manufacturing issues where none exist because it gives them a feeling of
> superiority.
> 
>> Beetch!! aHhahaaha, you are dismissing the Evolution.
> 
> Get a life.

You are so stupid like an idiot. Not only stupid, but you refuse to look 
at the empirical data, beetch, as demanded by the scientific method. Learn 
this, my beetch, science is all about data, correlation graphs and 
errorbar. I always look at the data. You can't possibly dismiss the data, 
beetch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCA5haGU6sI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8nrdybZZzA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_nWp6ZHA2Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwuyxyBUmwY

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#567691

Bumpy says
You are so stupid like an idiot. Not only stupid, but you refuse to look 
at the empirical data, beetch, as demanded by the scientific method. Learn 
this, my beetch, science is all about data, correlation graphs and 
errorbar. I always look at the data. You can't possibly dismiss the data, 
beetch. 
--------------

As Mr Bodkin had stated many times, true science is all about predictions.

And not the type of phychic *predictions* espoused by BJ and John. 

Real testable, repeatable predictions.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web