Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #563335 > unrolled thread

Fairy Circles

Started byHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-18 06:13 -0700
Last post2016-03-18 12:09 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 66 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Fairy Circles HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 06:13 -0700
    Fairy Circles HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 06:14 -0700
      Fairy Circles john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 06:51 -0700
        Fairy Circles HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:08 -0700
          Fairy Circles john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 08:29 -0700
            Fairy Circles HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:00 -0700
              Re: Fairy Circles benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 13:17 -0400
              Re: Fairy Circles benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 13:20 -0400
            Re: Fairy Circles benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:14 -0400
            shrOOms noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:57 -0700
              shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:22 -0700
                shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:34 -0700
                  shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:38 -0700
                    shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 08:40 -0700
                      shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 09:16 -0700
                        shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 09:32 -0700
                          shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 11:07 -0700
                            shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 16:06 -0700
                              shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 16:19 -0700
                                shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:04 -0700
                                  shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:06 -0700
                                    shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:35 -0700
                                      shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:44 -0700
                                        Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 09:49 -0500
                                          Re: shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 07:59 -0700
                                            Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:12 -0700
                                              Re: shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:22 -0700
                                                Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 09:00 -0700
                                                  Re: shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 12:04 -0700
                                                    Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:19 -0700
                                                      Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:00 -0500
                                                        Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 14:02 -0700
                                                        Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 23:51 -0400
                                                          Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 08:08 -0500
                                                            Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 06:44 -0700
                                                              Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 09:54 -0500
                                                                Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 08:38 -0700
                                                                  Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:00 -0500
                                                                    Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 10:18 -0700
                                                                      Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 10:21 -0700
                                                                        Re: shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 10:26 -0700
                                                                          Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 14:13 -0400
                                                                        Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 12:38 -0500
                                                                          Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 10:45 -0700
                                                                            Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 10:52 -0700
                                                                              Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 14:23 -0500
                                                                                f our halves noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 17:20 -0700
                                                                                  Re: f our halves noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 09:16 -0700
                                                                            Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 13:27 -0500
                                                                              Re: shrOOms moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-22 19:15 +0000
                                                                                Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 14:33 -0500
                                                                                Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 14:34 -0500
                                                                                  Re: shrOOms Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 14:44 -0500
                                                                                    Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 16:03 -0700
                                                      Re: shrOOms HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 14:45 -0700
                                                        Re: shrOOms john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 15:22 -0700
                                                        Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 23:52 -0400
                                                    Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 23:46 -0400
                                                Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 14:59 -0400
                                            Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 14:56 -0400
                                  Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 02:31 -0400
                              Re: shrOOms benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 02:26 -0400
                          Re: shrOOms noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:52 -0700
      Re: Fairy Circles benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:10 -0400
    Re: Fairy Circles Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-18 08:57 -0500
    Re: Fairy Circles benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:09 -0400

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →


#564547 — Re: shrOOms

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 10:26 -0700
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<e0cbfa75-7ef6-4740-8136-fc7d613b4091@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564545
john
^ "9/11 Truth movement" is the collective name of individuals and organizations that are questioning the veracity of the results of the investigations by United States government agencies into the September 11 attacks.
----------

Did Bush/Cheney also mastermind the attack today in Belgium? How about Paris?

Is your insanity consistent?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564575 — Re: shrOOms

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 14:13 -0400
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<WWfIy.38869$111.31323@fx31.iad>
In reply to#564547
On 03/22/2016 01:26 PM, HVAC wrote:
> john
> ^ "9/11 Truth movement" is the collective name of individuals and organizations that are questioning the veracity of the results of the investigations by United States government agencies into the September 11 attacks.
> ----------
>
> Did Bush/Cheney also mastermind the attack today in Belgium? How about Paris?
>
> Is your insanity consistent?
>
Bushites are behind ALL trouble. Hillary told me so.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564553 — Re: shrOOms

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 12:38 -0500
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncrvui$ir6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#564545
On 3/22/2016 12:21 PM, john wrote:
> ^ "9/11 Truth movement" is the collective name of individuals and organizations that are questioning the
> veracity of the results of the investigations by United States government agencies into the September 11
> attacks.

OK, and am I to take it that there presented is scientific proof, agreed 
upon by scientists, that buildings cannot fall down into their own 
footprint unless there is an engineered implosion by explosives?


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564555 — Re: shrOOms

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 10:45 -0700
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<0e222f1a-c206-4dca-9171-410b0a0d6e5d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564553
You can take it from hundreds of
engineers that your country is
run by a cabal
that has destroyed Iraq,
causing hundreds of thousands of
deaths.
Good job

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564559 — Re: shrOOms

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 10:52 -0700
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<b3700c51-b5d6-410e-a234-086daeb97acb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564555
2,000 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS
CALL FOR NEW INVESTIGATION OF
DESTRUCTION OF THE 3 WORLD TRADE
CENTER SKYSCRAPERS ON 9/11/01 _________________________________________________________________
The AE911Truth Petition
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Please take notice that:
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story to justify re-opening the 9/11 investigation. The new investigation must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
High-Rise Architects and Fellows of the AIA
Daniel B. Barnum, FAIA BArch, Rice University, Lic: TX3741
Houston TX, USA
David Paul Helpern, FAIA Lic: NY 03 010070
New York, NY,USA,
Kevin A. Kelly, FAIA Lic: TX7724
Austin, TX, USA
Paul Stevenson Oles, FAIA MArch, Architecture, Yale Santa Fe, NM,USA
Lic: MA 2754
Eason Cross, FAIA
BA Harvard, MArch. HGSD Lic: Virginia and Maryland Alexandria, VA, USA
Harry G. Robinson III, FAIA Washington DC, USA
Lic: Architect 2667, Washington, DC
B Arch and MCP Harvard U. / MCPUD Harvard
Paul Asaro, Architect
B.A. Architecture, Lic: c22769 Fair Oaks CA, USA
Michael E. Balay, Architect Lic: IN #AR00880149 Fishers, IN, USA
Stephen B. Barasch, AIA, APA, NCARB
B Arch (U of Ariz), M Arch (Rice Univ.), Lic: CA. C-9505, AR. 19599, TX. 5514, NCARB
San Luis Obispo CA, USA
Paul Murray Barnard, Architect B. Arch., M. Arch.. (UD)
Lic: C12102 --California Laguna Beach CA, USA
Dan Bartlett, AIA
B. Arch, Lic: New Hampshire Architect's license 2919 Keene NH, USA
Visit AE911Truth.org for the complete list of more than 2,000 AEs and 17,500 General Public signers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564600 — Re: shrOOms

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 14:23 -0500
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncs62j$u0u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#564559
On 3/22/2016 12:52 PM, john wrote:
> 2,000 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS
> CALL FOR NEW INVESTIGATION OF
> DESTRUCTION OF THE 3 WORLD TRADE
> CENTER SKYSCRAPERS ON 9/11/01 _________________________________________________________________
> The AE911Truth Petition
> TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
> Please take notice that:
> On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects & Engineers for
> 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with
> subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically
> the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt
> about the official story to justify re-opening the 9/11 investigation. The new investigation must
> include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause
> of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
> Sincerely,
> The Undersigned
> High-Rise Architects and Fellows of the AIA
> Daniel B. Barnum, FAIA BArch, Rice University, Lic: TX3741
> Houston TX, USA
> David Paul Helpern, FAIA Lic: NY 03 010070
> New York, NY,USA,
> Kevin A. Kelly, FAIA Lic: TX7724
> Austin, TX, USA
> Paul Stevenson Oles, FAIA MArch, Architecture, Yale Santa Fe, NM,USA
> Lic: MA 2754
> Eason Cross, FAIA
> BA Harvard, MArch. HGSD Lic: Virginia and Maryland Alexandria, VA, USA
> Harry G. Robinson III, FAIA Washington DC, USA
> Lic: Architect 2667, Washington, DC
> B Arch and MCP Harvard U. / MCPUD Harvard
> Paul Asaro, Architect
> B.A. Architecture, Lic: c22769 Fair Oaks CA, USA
> Michael E. Balay, Architect Lic: IN #AR00880149 Fishers, IN, USA
> Stephen B. Barasch, AIA, APA, NCARB
> B Arch (U of Ariz), M Arch (Rice Univ.), Lic: CA. C-9505, AR. 19599, TX. 5514, NCARB
> San Luis Obispo CA, USA
> Paul Murray Barnard, Architect B. Arch., M. Arch.. (UD)
> Lic: C12102 --California Laguna Beach CA, USA
> Dan Bartlett, AIA
> B. Arch, Lic: New Hampshire Architect's license 2919 Keene NH, USA
> Visit AE911Truth.org for the complete list of more than 2,000 AEs and 17,500 General Public signers
>

Yes, I'm aware of this report. It's quite detailed. Nowhere in it is a 
statement that it is physically impossible for a building to collapse on 
its own footprint without being deliberately imploded with demo charges. 
So why are you citing it in support of your contention?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564658 — f our halves

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 17:20 -0700
Subjectf our halves
Message-ID<33dc6a74-07c8-4771-90c5-163117cbb704@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564600
half a zillion engineers could explain,
why flying bombs were inadequate ... or, two zillion

> Yes, I'm aware of this report. It's quite detailed. Nowhere in it is a 
> statement that it is physically impossible for a building to collapse on 
> its own footprint without being deliberately imploded with demo charges. 
> So why are you citing it in support of your contention?
> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564834 — Re: f our halves

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-23 09:16 -0700
SubjectRe: f our halves
Message-ID<9da4149a-9d43-4fea-af6d-dc76bf11df9b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564658
you, foo;
they were huge bombs,
filled with fuel for a transcontinental ride;
wt7 was especial to the site

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564581 — Re: shrOOms

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 13:27 -0500
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncs2qu$og3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#564555
On 3/22/2016 12:45 PM, john wrote:
> You can take it from hundreds of
> engineers that your country is
> run by a cabal
> that has destroyed Iraq,
> causing hundreds of thousands of
> deaths.
> Good job
>

I don't see anything in those reports where engineers are saying that.
Nor do I see anything in the reports that say that the collapse of a 
building into its own footprint is physically impossible unless it is 
caused by an engineered implosion by detonation.

So, John, you seem to be doing either a lot of loose interpretation of 
what's actually written, or you're layering on stuff that isn't actually 
there. Which is it?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564598 — Re: shrOOms

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-03-22 19:15 +0000
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncs5kq$uaj$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#564581
WTC 7 "collapsing into its own footprint" is a bit of a stretch anyway.
Its collapse damaged Fiterman Hall beyond repair and damaged the
Verizon building as well.  Plus much fell to the south which didn't matter 
since everything there was already destroyed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564607 — Re: shrOOms

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 14:33 -0500
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncs6lv$u0u$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#564598
On 3/22/2016 2:15 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> WTC 7 "collapsing into its own footprint" is a bit of a stretch anyway.
> Its collapse damaged Fiterman Hall beyond repair and damaged the
> Verizon building as well.  Plus much fell to the south which didn't matter
> since everything there was already destroyed.
>

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-wtc-towers-fell-in-their-own-footprints.t1226/

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564609 — Re: shrOOms

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 14:34 -0500
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncs6ob$u0u$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#564598
On 3/22/2016 2:15 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> WTC 7 "collapsing into its own footprint" is a bit of a stretch anyway.
> Its collapse damaged Fiterman Hall beyond repair and damaged the
> Verizon building as well.  Plus much fell to the south which didn't matter
> since everything there was already destroyed.
>

Falling into its own footprint. LOL
https://mrrational88.wordpress.com/2010/10/24/911-theories-fell-into-its-own-footprint/

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564613 — Re: shrOOms

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 14:44 -0500
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ncs7ar$vob$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#564609
On 3/22/2016 2:34 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 3/22/2016 2:15 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> WTC 7 "collapsing into its own footprint" is a bit of a stretch anyway.
>> Its collapse damaged Fiterman Hall beyond repair and damaged the
>> Verizon building as well.  Plus much fell to the south which didn't
>> matter
>> since everything there was already destroyed.
>>
>
> Falling into its own footprint. LOL
> https://mrrational88.wordpress.com/2010/10/24/911-theories-fell-into-its-own-footprint/
>
>

And notice that a 34-story building in Belem, Brazil, fell completely 
into its own footprint without explosives.

IMPOSSIBLE! John says.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564654 — Re: shrOOms

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-22 16:03 -0700
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<152fde2b-a42c-4309-8651-6bf615343ca2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564613
2000 engineers, Odd.

But you probably read an engineering book,
so you know better, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564278 — Re: shrOOms

FromHVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-21 14:45 -0700
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<5f0d1667-d8ff-4798-ab61-7f46d2fd4cdf@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564258
john
HVAC 
You're living in a fantasy. 
Building 7 just "fell down"? 

Truthfully, in your soul, which you reject 
and therefore you might have the last 
word on that, you must know that 
steel buildings don't "just fall down". 
"They put a transit on it and it was 
leaning". Have you seen Iraq? 
-------------

John, calm down. You're all over the place

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564284 — Re: shrOOms

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-21 15:22 -0700
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<e35c697f-c8d4-4708-91ae-570fa09cee9c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#564278
I'm in one place.
That place is "you guys deny so many things
that you must have your heads up your asses".

I'll get you a crop circle calendar for
your birthday- you couldn't accurately 
replicate ONE of those designs by hand
no matter HOW many instruments you used-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564349 — Re: shrOOms

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-21 23:52 -0400
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ok3Iy.15497$pE.11146@fx40.iad>
In reply to#564278
On 03/21/2016 05:45 PM, HVAC wrote:
> john
> HVAC
> You're living in a fantasy.
> Building 7 just "fell down"?
>
> Truthfully, in your soul, which you reject
> and therefore you might have the last
> word on that, you must know that
> steel buildings don't "just fall down".
> "They put a transit on it and it was
> leaning". Have you seen Iraq?
> -------------
>
> John, calm down. You're all over the place
>
John, HVAC is sorry he went too far. Please calm down! Don't hurt 
yourself and don't shoot any muslims that HVAC tells you to shoot.

Just trust in Trump and Satan and all will be well.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564346 — Re: shrOOms

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-21 23:46 -0400
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<ae3Iy.72779$Ou7.46000@fx21.iad>
In reply to#564249
On 03/21/2016 03:04 PM, HVAC wrote:
> john
> HVAC
> Your whole paradyme is changing.
> Die or open one eye
> --------------
>
> John, serious question. Is there ANY amount of evidence that would cause you to give up your beliefs?
>
> Like the fat guy... Even BJ finally admitted that fat fuck was lying and his 'alien' pictures were just a toy. What would it take for you to renounce your belief like BJ did?
>
"finally admitted"?  Hey, let's get this conversation down to your 
level: Who in Hollywood is pregnant now? Who is getting a divorce?
This is your kind of science, right?

I said the guy was being fed a bunch of crap from the start. Just like 
you try to feed everybody here a bunch of crap. I'm sure there are also 
a few fat fucks here dumb enough to actually believe things you say.

Yeah that's it, after you pointed out to me how that alien was a toy I 
had no choice but to "admit" the guy was lying. Why don't you "admit" 
you lie about everything. Start by telling the truth that you have no 
science education whatsoever.

I got it. Your degree is in LAW, right? Only a lawyer or politician 
could lie at the advanced level you do.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564244 — Re: shrOOms

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-21 14:59 -0400
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<fwXHy.64223$X_.53148@fx04.iad>
In reply to#564150
On 03/21/2016 11:22 AM, HVAC wrote:
> John, it's time to fold your tent and give up these kooky beliefs.
>
> You will be on the road to illumination once you do.
>
> Good luck
>
It's time you grow a brain and get an education, HVAC.

Do you intend to die stupid as a box of hammers?

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#564238 — Re: shrOOms

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-21 14:56 -0400
SubjectRe: shrOOms
Message-ID<etXHy.64220$X_.26618@fx04.iad>
In reply to#564133
On 03/21/2016 10:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Odd Bodkin - show quoted text - Let's probe your use of "many" here.
> Let's just arbitrarily draw a line at twenty. More than 20 is many,
> less than 20 is not many.
>
> So let's come up with a list of names, ex-military, ex-CIA,
> ex-astronauts, and count them up.
>
> You start. -------------
>
> It's truly amazing to watch Kooks like BJ and John do their mental
> gymnastics. When presented with facts that go against their kook
> beliefs, they typically change the subject. It's almost as if they
> KNOW, at least on some level, that these ideas are bogus. But if they
> let even one tiny crack appear in their thin veneer of a belief
> system, and the whole rotten house of kook cards will fall apart.

At least Odd has a LITTLE bit of liberal arts education and at least 
understands science to the level found in college textbooks!

HVAC only understands wrestling, has no education and is just one more 
blowhard like Trump. PS. HVAC is voting for TRUMP!



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web