Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #564265 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-21 13:58 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-03-22 07:40 -0500 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: MIT Researchers Plan a World Without Traffic Signals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:58 -0700
Re: MIT Researchers Plan a World Without Traffic Signals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:31 -0500
Re: MIT Researchers Plan a World Without Traffic Signals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 17:40 -0700
Re: MIT Researchers Plan a World Without Traffic Signals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 07:40 -0500
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 13:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: MIT Researchers Plan a World Without Traffic Signals |
| Message-ID | <d2e8bcff-2aa7-4777-9bc2-150f074913fa@googlegroups.com> |
I hear your angst. Odd doesn't like my saying "head in ass", but that's what these "scientists " are doing. They believe what they're told, and have no problem with Building 7 just "falling down", and many other obviously-wrong prepositions. There ARE no scientists any more. There are directed drones.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 16:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ncpp6p$17d8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #564265 |
On 3/21/2016 3:58 PM, john wrote: > There ARE no scientists any more. > There are directed drones. John, I seriously doubt that you're in a position to state that science is dead and there are no scientists. I'm pretty sure active scientists would laugh and walk away from you. Now, it's possible that scientists don't live up to YOUR expectation of them. But since you have a very foggy understanding of how science works in the first place, your expectations are a little off. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 17:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e23ff507-80ec-4cf0-aa39-725aaa3bf20d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #564275 |
Pons and Fleishmann were savaged by savages just like you who don't have the foggiest idea how backwards their thinking is. But- you have said- and you never lie- that you are NOT and NEVER HAVE BEEN a scientist! You have just done a lot of (very selective) reading. You want 20 names? Here's another- John Lear
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 07:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ncregn$1if3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #564311 |
On 3/21/2016 7:40 PM, john wrote: > Pons and Fleishmann were > savaged by savages just like > you who don't have the > foggiest idea how backwards > their thinking is. They were savaged by their peers. > But- you have said- and you never > lie- that you are NOT and > NEVER HAVE BEEN a scientist! Indeed. > > You have just done a lot > of (very selective) reading. Well, I don't think it's selective. I've viewed the YouTube videos you've pointed to, for example. You on the other hand haven't read any mainstream materials. Wonder why. > > You want 20 names? > Here's another- John Lear > So what are we up to now? Three? Four? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web