Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #564123 > unrolled thread

New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 09:36 -0500
    Re: New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-21 17:32 +0000
    Re: New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:34 -0700
      Re: New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 15:37 -0500
      Re: New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 05:21 -0400
    Re: New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-21 14:23 -0500

#564123 — New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free

New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free
> http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.8169


> The headline for a 13 March New York Times Sunday Review article took
> the form of an open question: “Should all research papers be free?”
> The Times classified it as a “news analysis.” But in fact the almost
> impassioned opinion piece urges universal open access to scientific
> publications.
>
> Author Kate Murphy, a Houston journalist who writes frequently for
> the Times, opens by praising graduate student Alexandra Elbakyan from
> Kazakhstan. Elbakyan “is believed to be hiding out in Russia after
> illegally leaking millions of documents,” thereby—as Murphy puts
> it—taking “a stand for the public’s right to know by providing free
> online access to just about every scientific paper ever published.”
>
> The RT network, which calls itself “three global news channels
> broadcasting in English, Arabic and Spanish,” calls Elbakyan the
> “Robin Hood neuroscientist” behind the “Sci-Hub research-pirate
> site,” which in turn calls itself first “in the world to provide mass
> & public access to research papers.”
>

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#564200

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free

And since newspapers are a compilation of current event research, newspapers
should be free.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564221

On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 7:36:42 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free
> > http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.8169
> 
> 
> > The headline for a 13 March New York Times Sunday Review article took
> > the form of an open question: "Should all research papers be free?"
> > The Times classified it as a "news analysis." But in fact the almost
> > impassioned opinion piece urges universal open access to scientific
> > publications.
> >
> > Author Kate Murphy, a Houston journalist who writes frequently for
> > the Times, opens by praising graduate student Alexandra Elbakyan from
> > Kazakhstan. Elbakyan "is believed to be hiding out in Russia after
> > illegally leaking millions of documents," thereby--as Murphy puts
> > it--taking "a stand for the public's right to know by providing free
> > online access to just about every scientific paper ever published."
> >
> > The RT network, which calls itself "three global news channels
> > broadcasting in English, Arabic and Spanish," calls Elbakyan the
> > "Robin Hood neuroscientist" behind the "Sci-Hub research-pirate
> > site," which in turn calls itself first "in the world to provide mass
> > & public access to research papers."

Keeping their phoney research hidden behind pay walls is a major strategy of the global warming industrial complex.  I'm surprised you are supporting this, Sam. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564263

On 3/21/16 1:34 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 7:36:42 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free
>>> http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.8169
>>
>>
>>> The headline for a 13 March New York Times Sunday Review article took
>>> the form of an open question: "Should all research papers be free?"
>>> The Times classified it as a "news analysis." But in fact the almost
>>> impassioned opinion piece urges universal open access to scientific
>>> publications.
>>>
>>> Author Kate Murphy, a Houston journalist who writes frequently for
>>> the Times, opens by praising graduate student Alexandra Elbakyan from
>>> Kazakhstan. Elbakyan "is believed to be hiding out in Russia after
>>> illegally leaking millions of documents," thereby--as Murphy puts
>>> it--taking "a stand for the public's right to know by providing free
>>> online access to just about every scientific paper ever published."
>>>
>>> The RT network, which calls itself "three global news channels
>>> broadcasting in English, Arabic and Spanish," calls Elbakyan the
>>> "Robin Hood neuroscientist" behind the "Sci-Hub research-pirate
>>> site," which in turn calls itself first "in the world to provide mass
>>> & public access to research papers."
>
> Keeping their phoney research hidden behind pay walls is a major strategy of the global warming industrial complex.  I'm surprised you are supporting this, Sam.
>

   I am not surprised that you are surprised, James. Goes with the
   territory.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564415

On 03/21/2016 02:34 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 7:36:42 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free
>>> http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.8169
>>
>>
>>> The headline for a 13 March New York Times Sunday Review article took
>>> the form of an open question: "Should all research papers be free?"
>>> The Times classified it as a "news analysis." But in fact the almost
>>> impassioned opinion piece urges universal open access to scientific
>>> publications.
>>>
>>> Author Kate Murphy, a Houston journalist who writes frequently for
>>> the Times, opens by praising graduate student Alexandra Elbakyan from
>>> Kazakhstan. Elbakyan "is believed to be hiding out in Russia after
>>> illegally leaking millions of documents," thereby--as Murphy puts
>>> it--taking "a stand for the public's right to know by providing free
>>> online access to just about every scientific paper ever published."
>>>
>>> The RT network, which calls itself "three global news channels
>>> broadcasting in English, Arabic and Spanish," calls Elbakyan the
>>> "Robin Hood neuroscientist" behind the "Sci-Hub research-pirate
>>> site," which in turn calls itself first "in the world to provide mass
>>> & public access to research papers."
>
> Keeping their phoney research hidden behind pay walls is a major strategy of the global warming industrial complex.  I'm surprised you are supporting this, Sam.
>
Doesn't surprise anyone here!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#564253

On 3/21/2016 9:36 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> New York Times commentary argues that all research papers should be free


the NYT should be free, especially to all pet owners.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web